Vote au Parlement européen

RAPPORT sur le rapport annuel relatif aux activités du Médiateur européen en 2024

Date: 12.03.2026·Référence: A10-0015/2026
Rapporteur: Bogdan Rzońca

Résultat global

Rejeté
  • 233 Pour
  • 250 Contre
  • 76 Abstention
  • 159 N'a pas voté
Statut et procédure

Résultat tel qu'enregistré par le Parlement européen.

Vote du
Dernière étape documentée
Plénière · (il y a 269 jours)
Prochaine étape prévue
Aucune autre étape n'est prévue dans la source.

Déroulement de la procédure

2025/2138(INI) · INI

Activités documentées de la procédure. Elles ne prouvent pas qu’une loi est entrée en vigueur.

  1. Documenté: Renvoi60 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  2. Documenté: Examen en commission162 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  3. Dernier documenté: Plénière269 jours depuis le début de cette étape
Activités documentées (17)
  1. Renvoi en commission
  2. Dépôt du rapport en commission
  3. Dépôt d’amendements en commission
  4. Dépôt d’amendements en commission
  5. Adoption du rapport en commission
  6. Dépôt en séance plénière
  7. Dépôt en séance plénière
  8. Dépôt en séance plénière
  9. Dépôt en séance plénière
  10. Dépôt en séance plénière
  11. Dépôt en séance plénière
  12. Dépôt en séance plénière
  13. Dépôt en séance plénière
  14. Dépôt en séance plénière
  15. Débat en séance plénière
  16. Vote en séance plénière
  17. Résultats du vote en séance plénière
Activités prévues (réalisation non confirmée)
  1. Débat en séance plénière
  2. Vote en séance plénière

Fiche de procédure (OEIL) · Données du Parlement européen
Consulté le:

Sources

Données : EP Open Data API

De quoi s’agit-il ?

  • Approbation du rapport annuel 2024 du Médiateur européen.
  • Accent sur la transparence et les droits fondamentaux dans les décisions de l'UE.
  • Critique des retards dans l' accès aux documents .
Source : Résumé généré par IA avec Mistral

Historique des amendements (14)

Texte tel que publié par le PE, en anglais.

  1. Amendement 15Rejeté

    Paragraph 12

    Déposé par Cristina Guarda · Verts/ALE

    Supprimé: 12. Calls on the Ombudsman to examine the Commission’s practice of financing environmental non-governmental organisations that subsequently lobby Parliament and the Commission to further green policies; stresses that such practices risk creating conflicts of interest, distort the democratic process and undermine the legitimacy of EU decision-making; Ajouté: deleted

  2. Amendement 17Rejeté

    Paragraph 16

    Déposé par Cristina Guarda · Verts/ALE

    16. Stresses that Frontex must operate Supprimé: within the provisions enshrined in its regulation5 , including the Ajouté: in line with its obligations related to fundamental Supprimé: rights and Ajouté: and human rights and in compliance with relevant international Supprimé: law; takes note of the reform of the Frontex mandate announced by the President of the Commission for 2026; expects that reinforcing the mandate, resources and budget of Frontex will ensure that the agency can perform its work under the best possible conditions in order to better support the Member States, Ajouté: law, including in search and rescue operations; Supprimé: 5 Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2019 on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1052/2013 and (EU) 2016/1624 (OJ L 295, 14.11.2019, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1896/oj).

  3. Amendement 18Rejeté

    Paragraph 17

    Déposé par Cristina Guarda · Verts/ALE

    17. Stresses that Frontex’s primary mission must be the Supprimé: protection of the EU’s external borders, the control of human traffickers and coyotes, and the fight against illegal immigration; underlines that a lack of border control is what leads to more deaths at sea; Ajouté: prevention of deaths at sea, fully and consistently complying with relevant international human rights law; stresses that under the applicable EU and international legal framework, Member States are obliged to render assistance to any vessel or person in distress at sea, regardless of the nationality or status of the person or the circumstances in which that person is found;

  4. Amendement 22Rejeté

    Recital B

    Déposé par Marcin Sypniewski, Christine Anderson · ESN

    … Ombudsman from 2013 until the end of her term in early 2025; Ajouté: whereas from 2013 to 2024 her efforts in the areas of transparency and accountability – including inquiries concerning access to information on COVID-19 vaccine negotiations, recommendations linked to the prevention of maladministration in the EU institutions and findings following the ‘Qatargate’ scandal – were instrumental in highlighting the need to improve administration in the EU institutions;

  5. Amendement 24Rejeté

    Paragraph 14

    Déposé par Marcin Sypniewski, Christine Anderson · ESN

    … text messages and instant messages are considered ‘documents’ under Regulation (EC) No Supprimé: 1049/20014 ; Ajouté: 1049/20014; stresses that genuine transparency must include full and timely access to documents of major public interest, including those relating to large-scale public procurement procedures and negotiations conducted during crisis situations; considers that delays or refusals in granting access to such documents seriously undermine public trust in the EU’s institutions and calls on the Ombudsman to continue prioritising inquiries in this regard; 4 Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the …

  6. Amendement 26Rejeté

    Paragraph 17

    Déposé par Gheorghe Falcă · PPE

    17. Stresses that Frontex’s Supprimé: primary mission must be Ajouté: role in the protection of the Supprimé: EU’s external borders, the control of human traffickers and coyotes, and Ajouté: Union’s external borders and in the fight against Supprimé: illegal immigration; underlines that a lack of border control is what leads to more deaths Ajouté: smuggling and human trafficking networks contributes to discouraging dangerous crossings and preventing loss of life at sea;

  7. Amendement 27Rejeté

    Recital AC

    Déposé par Pál Szekeres, Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal, Sebastian Kruis +1 · PfE

    AC. whereas the Ombudsman conducted an inquiry Supprimé: following deaths in Ajouté: in the context of the increase in illegal migration flows crossing the Mediterranean Sea and Supprimé: suggested the establishment of an EU accountability mechanism that could independently investigate the respective roles of national authorities, Frontex and the Commission; Ajouté: the disproportionate burden placed on the most affected EU regions; whereas the absence of effective border control and insufficient action against smuggling networks contribute to illegal migration flows and create a pull effect towards the EU’s borders;

  8. Amendement 31Rejeté

    Paragraph 13

    Déposé par Pál Szekeres, Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal, Sebastian Kruis · PfE

    … Commissioners, with a view to safeguarding the integrity of the decision-making process; Ajouté: stresses that this is particularly relevant in light of the case concerning Commission Vice-President Teresa Ribera, including the controversy linked to her husband’s position in Spain’s financial regulatory authority and her past involvement in the approval of environmental projects such as the Castor gas storage facility; highlights, in this context, the Ombudsman’s contribution towards enhancing the ethics and …

  9. Amendement 37Rejeté

    Paragraph 16

    Déposé par Nikos Pappas, Valentina Palmisano · The Left

    16. Supprimé: Stresses that Frontex must operate within the provisions enshrined in its regulation5, including the obligations related to fundamental rights Ajouté: Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding the fundamental and human rights of migrants, including in the EU’s border management activities, by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this regard; stresses that several inquiries were opened in 2024 concerning the European Union Agency for Asylum and Frontex, which highlighted systemic challenges in ensuring accountability and compliance with Supprimé: relevant international law; takes note of the reform of the Frontex mandate announced by the President of the Commission for 2026; expects that reinforcing the mandate, resources and budget of Frontex will ensure that the agency can perform its work under the best possible conditions in order to better support the Member States, including in search and rescue operations; 5 Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2019 on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1052/2013 and (EU) 2016/1624 (OJ L 295, 14.11.2019, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1896/oj). Ajouté: EU fundamental rights obligations; calls on the Commission and the agencies concerned to report to Parliament on the action taken in response to the Ombudsman’s findings in these cases;

  10. Amendement 38Rejeté

    Paragraph 17

    Déposé par Nikos Pappas · The Left

    17. Supprimé: Stresses that Frontex’s primary mission must be the protection of the EU’s external borders, the control of human traffickers and coyotes, and the fight against illegal immigration; underlines that a lack of border control is what leads to more deaths at sea; Ajouté: Expresses concern about the deployment of extensive surveillance and monitoring systems in Greece’s reception and identification centres; calls on the Commission to ensure that EU funding for such systems does not result in violations of fundamental rights of asylum seekers; insists that the Commission fully implement the Ombudsman’s recommendations concerning the transparency of relevant documents;

  11. Amendement 39Rejeté

    Paragraph 17 a (new)

    Déposé par Nikos Pappas · The Left

    Ajouté: 17a. Calls on the Commission to fully implement the Ombudsman’s recommendations regarding the monitoring of EU funds allocated to Greece for border management; underlines that the protection of fundamental rights must be a non-negotiable condition for the financing of projects linked to returns, detention centres and border operations;

  12. Amendement 40Adopté

    Paragraph 19

    Déposé par Nikos Pappas, Valentina Palmisano · The Left

    19. Supprimé: Regrets Ajouté: Criticises the Commission’s refusal to follow the Ombudsman’s recommendation to grant greater public … documents related to the drafting of proposed legislation to combat child sexual Supprimé: abuse; recalls that citizens should be able to scrutinise the Commission’s work on legislative proposals; underlines that transparency is of particular importance in this context, as the proposal directly touches on Ajouté: abuse, as it has thus failed to ensure that citizens can verify that it has acted independently and exclusively in the public interest; underlines that the protection of Supprimé: children, citizens’ fundamental rights and private life; Ajouté: children from sexual abuse must be the EU’s foremost priority; stresses that this fight must go hand in hand with the protection of fundamental rights, including the right to privacy and data protection; calls on the Commission to ensure full transparency in the preparation of the legislative proposal and to actively involve civil society organisations, experts and non-governmental organisations in the field of child protection in the process; further calls on the Ombudsman to closely monitor the action taken on this legislative file to ensure that EU measures are both effective in protecting children and fully compliant with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;

  13. Amendement 40Rejeté

    Paragraph 19

    Déposé par Nikos Pappas, Valentina Palmisano · The Left

    19. Supprimé: Regrets Ajouté: Criticises the Commission’s refusal to follow the Ombudsman’s recommendation to grant greater public … documents related to the drafting of proposed legislation to combat child sexual Supprimé: abuse; recalls that citizens should be able to scrutinise the Commission’s work on legislative proposals; underlines that transparency is of particular importance in this context, as the proposal directly touches on Ajouté: abuse, as it has thus failed to ensure that citizens can verify that it has acted independently and exclusively in the public interest; underlines that the protection of Supprimé: children, citizens’ fundamental rights and private life; Ajouté: children from sexual abuse must be the EU’s foremost priority; stresses that this fight must go hand in hand with the protection of fundamental rights, including the right to privacy and data protection; calls on the Commission to ensure full transparency in the preparation of the legislative proposal and to actively involve civil society organisations, experts and non-governmental organisations in the field of child protection in the process; further calls on the Ombudsman to closely monitor the action taken on this legislative file to ensure that EU measures are both effective in protecting children and fully compliant with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;

  14. Amendement 41Rejeté

    Paragraph 21 a (new)

    Déposé par Nikos Pappas, Valentina Palmisano, Manon Aubry · The Left

    Ajouté: 21a. Notes that the Ombudsman has opened several inquiries concerning transparency in the EU-Mercosur negotiations and has expressed concern to the Commission regarding its refusal to disclose key documents, considering this approach inconsistent with the Commission’s commitment to open policymaking; recalls the Ombudsman’s previous finding of maladministration in relation to the Commission’s failure to finalise the sustainability impact assessment before concluding the negotiations with the Mercosur countries; further notes that concerns persist regarding the lack of transparency, including in the context of the decision to provisionally apply the agreement prior to obtaining Parliament’s consent, thereby limiting democratic scrutiny and parliamentary oversight; calls on the Ombudsman to examine, without delay, whether the handling of the agreement’s provisional application complies with the principles of transparency, democratic accountability, institutional balance and respect for Parliament’s prerogatives;

Vote par groupe politique

Comment les groupes politiques ont voté

Les membres

Montrer 10 de 718

Position de vote
NomPaysGroupePosition de vote
PologneEPP
Pour
PologneEPP
Pour
ItalieEPP
Pour
Pays-BasPfE
Pour
TchéquieEPP
Pour
HongriePfE
Pour
AllemagneEPP
Pour
PortugalPfE
Pour
FrancePfE
Pour
SuèdeEPP
Pour
Afficher plus
Suivez-nous sur Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en