Vote au Parlement européen
RAPPORT sur le rapport annuel relatif aux activités du Médiateur européen en 2024
Date: 12.03.2026Référence: A10-0015/2026Résultat global
Rejeté- 233 Pour
- 250 Contre
- 76 Abstention
- 159 N'a pas voté
Comment nous comptons
- Les votes Pour, Contre et Abstention proviennent du procès-verbal de vote nominal du Parlement européen.
- « N'a pas voté » est déduit : députés avec un mandat le jour du vote pour lesquels aucun vote n'est enregistré. Les abstentions ne comptent pas pour cela.
- Les corrections de vote ultérieures sont affichées mais ne modifient pas le résultat officiel.
- Chaque vote (vote global, amendement, vote partiel) compte séparément. C'est pourquoi les totaux peuvent différer des pages qui comptent différemment.
Statut et procédure
Résultat tel qu'enregistré par le Parlement européen.
- Vote du
- Dernière étape documentée
- Plénière · (il y a 269 jours)
- Prochaine étape prévue
- Aucune autre étape n'est prévue dans la source.
Déroulement de la procédure
2025/2138(INI) · INI
Activités documentées de la procédure. Elles ne prouvent pas qu’une loi est entrée en vigueur.
- Documenté: Renvoi
- Documenté: Examen en commission
- Dernier documenté: Plénière
Activités documentées (17)
- Renvoi en commission
- Dépôt du rapport en commission
- Dépôt d’amendements en commission
- Dépôt d’amendements en commission
- Adoption du rapport en commission
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Débat en séance plénière
- Vote en séance plénière
- Résultats du vote en séance plénière
Activités prévues (réalisation non confirmée)
- Débat en séance plénière
- Vote en séance plénière
Fiche de procédure (OEIL) · Données du Parlement européen
Consulté le:
Sources
Données : EP Open Data API
De quoi s’agit-il ?
- Approbation du rapport annuel 2024 du Médiateur européen.
- Accent sur la transparence et les droits fondamentaux dans les décisions de l'UE.
- Critique des retards dans l' accès aux documents .
Historique des amendements (14)
Texte tel que publié par le PE, en anglais.
- Amendement 15Rejeté
Paragraph 12
Déposé par Cristina Guarda · Verts/ALE
Supprimé: 12. Calls on the Ombudsman to examine the Commission’s practice of financing environmental non-governmental organisations that subsequently lobby Parliament and the Commission to further green policies; stresses that such practices risk creating conflicts of interest, distort the democratic process and undermine the legitimacy of EU decision-making;Ajouté: deleted - Amendement 17Rejeté
Paragraph 16
Déposé par Cristina Guarda · Verts/ALE
16. Stresses that Frontex must operate
Supprimé: within the provisions enshrined in its regulation5 , including theAjouté: in line with its obligations related to fundamentalSupprimé: rights andAjouté: and human rights and in compliance with relevant internationalSupprimé: law; takes note of the reform of the Frontex mandate announced by the President of the Commission for 2026; expects that reinforcing the mandate, resources and budget of Frontex will ensure that the agency can perform its work under the best possible conditions in order to better support the Member States,Ajouté: law, including in search and rescue operations;Supprimé: 5 Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2019 on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1052/2013 and (EU) 2016/1624 (OJ L 295, 14.11.2019, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1896/oj). - Amendement 18Rejeté
Paragraph 17
Déposé par Cristina Guarda · Verts/ALE
17. Stresses that Frontex’s primary mission must be the
Supprimé: protection of the EU’s external borders, the control of human traffickers and coyotes, and the fight against illegal immigration; underlines that a lack of border control is what leads to more deaths at sea;Ajouté: prevention of deaths at sea, fully and consistently complying with relevant international human rights law; stresses that under the applicable EU and international legal framework, Member States are obliged to render assistance to any vessel or person in distress at sea, regardless of the nationality or status of the person or the circumstances in which that person is found; - Amendement 22Rejeté
Recital B
Déposé par Marcin Sypniewski, Christine Anderson · ESN
… Ombudsman from 2013 until the end of her term in early 2025; Ajouté: whereas from 2013 to 2024 her efforts in the areas of transparency and accountability – including inquiries concerning access to information on COVID-19 vaccine negotiations, recommendations linked to the prevention of maladministration in the EU institutions and findings following the ‘Qatargate’ scandal – were instrumental in highlighting the need to improve administration in the EU institutions;
- Amendement 24Rejeté
Paragraph 14
Déposé par Marcin Sypniewski, Christine Anderson · ESN
… text messages and instant messages are considered ‘documents’ under Regulation (EC) No
Supprimé: 1049/20014 ;Ajouté: 1049/20014; stresses that genuine transparency must include full and timely access to documents of major public interest, including those relating to large-scale public procurement procedures and negotiations conducted during crisis situations; considers that delays or refusals in granting access to such documents seriously undermine public trust in the EU’s institutions and calls on the Ombudsman to continue prioritising inquiries in this regard; 4 Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the … - Amendement 26Rejeté
Paragraph 17
Déposé par Gheorghe Falcă · PPE
17. Stresses that Frontex’s
Supprimé: primary mission must beAjouté: role in the protection of theSupprimé: EU’s external borders, the control of human traffickers and coyotes, andAjouté: Union’s external borders and in the fight againstSupprimé: illegal immigration; underlines that a lack of border control is what leads to more deathsAjouté: smuggling and human trafficking networks contributes to discouraging dangerous crossings and preventing loss of life at sea; - Amendement 27Rejeté
Recital AC
Déposé par Pál Szekeres, Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal, Sebastian Kruis +1 · PfE
AC. whereas the Ombudsman conducted an inquiry
Supprimé: following deaths inAjouté: in the context of the increase in illegal migration flows crossing the Mediterranean Sea andSupprimé: suggested the establishment of an EU accountability mechanism that could independently investigate the respective roles of national authorities, Frontex and the Commission;Ajouté: the disproportionate burden placed on the most affected EU regions; whereas the absence of effective border control and insufficient action against smuggling networks contribute to illegal migration flows and create a pull effect towards the EU’s borders; - Amendement 31Rejeté
Paragraph 13
Déposé par Pál Szekeres, Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal, Sebastian Kruis · PfE
… Commissioners, with a view to safeguarding the integrity of the decision-making process; Ajouté: stresses that this is particularly relevant in light of the case concerning Commission Vice-President Teresa Ribera, including the controversy linked to her husband’s position in Spain’s financial regulatory authority and her past involvement in the approval of environmental projects such as the Castor gas storage facility; highlights, in this context, the Ombudsman’s contribution towards enhancing the ethics and …
- Amendement 37Rejeté
Paragraph 16
Déposé par Nikos Pappas, Valentina Palmisano · The Left
16.
Supprimé: Stresses that Frontex must operate within the provisions enshrined in its regulation5, including the obligations related to fundamental rightsAjouté: Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding the fundamental and human rights of migrants, including in the EU’s border management activities, by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this regard; stresses that several inquiries were opened in 2024 concerning the European Union Agency for Asylum and Frontex, which highlighted systemic challenges in ensuring accountability and compliance withSupprimé: relevant international law; takes note of the reform of the Frontex mandate announced by the President of the Commission for 2026; expects that reinforcing the mandate, resources and budget of Frontex will ensure that the agency can perform its work under the best possible conditions in order to better support the Member States, including in search and rescue operations; 5 Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2019 on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1052/2013 and (EU) 2016/1624 (OJ L 295, 14.11.2019, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1896/oj).Ajouté: EU fundamental rights obligations; calls on the Commission and the agencies concerned to report to Parliament on the action taken in response to the Ombudsman’s findings in these cases; - Amendement 38Rejeté
Paragraph 17
Déposé par Nikos Pappas · The Left
17.
Supprimé: Stresses that Frontex’s primary mission must be the protection of the EU’s external borders, the control of human traffickers and coyotes, and the fight against illegal immigration; underlines that a lack of border control is what leads to more deaths at sea;Ajouté: Expresses concern about the deployment of extensive surveillance and monitoring systems in Greece’s reception and identification centres; calls on the Commission to ensure that EU funding for such systems does not result in violations of fundamental rights of asylum seekers; insists that the Commission fully implement the Ombudsman’s recommendations concerning the transparency of relevant documents; - Amendement 39Rejeté
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Déposé par Nikos Pappas · The Left
Ajouté: 17a. Calls on the Commission to fully implement the Ombudsman’s recommendations regarding the monitoring of EU funds allocated to Greece for border management; underlines that the protection of fundamental rights must be a non-negotiable condition for the financing of projects linked to returns, detention centres and border operations;
- Amendement 40Adopté
Paragraph 19
Déposé par Nikos Pappas, Valentina Palmisano · The Left
19.
Supprimé: RegretsAjouté: Criticises the Commission’s refusal to follow the Ombudsman’s recommendation to grant greater public … documents related to the drafting of proposed legislation to combat child sexualSupprimé: abuse; recalls that citizens should be able to scrutinise the Commission’s work on legislative proposals; underlines that transparency is of particular importance in this context, as the proposal directly touches onAjouté: abuse, as it has thus failed to ensure that citizens can verify that it has acted independently and exclusively in the public interest; underlines that the protection ofSupprimé: children, citizens’ fundamental rights and private life;Ajouté: children from sexual abuse must be the EU’s foremost priority; stresses that this fight must go hand in hand with the protection of fundamental rights, including the right to privacy and data protection; calls on the Commission to ensure full transparency in the preparation of the legislative proposal and to actively involve civil society organisations, experts and non-governmental organisations in the field of child protection in the process; further calls on the Ombudsman to closely monitor the action taken on this legislative file to ensure that EU measures are both effective in protecting children and fully compliant with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; - Amendement 40Rejeté
Paragraph 19
Déposé par Nikos Pappas, Valentina Palmisano · The Left
19.
Supprimé: RegretsAjouté: Criticises the Commission’s refusal to follow the Ombudsman’s recommendation to grant greater public … documents related to the drafting of proposed legislation to combat child sexualSupprimé: abuse; recalls that citizens should be able to scrutinise the Commission’s work on legislative proposals; underlines that transparency is of particular importance in this context, as the proposal directly touches onAjouté: abuse, as it has thus failed to ensure that citizens can verify that it has acted independently and exclusively in the public interest; underlines that the protection ofSupprimé: children, citizens’ fundamental rights and private life;Ajouté: children from sexual abuse must be the EU’s foremost priority; stresses that this fight must go hand in hand with the protection of fundamental rights, including the right to privacy and data protection; calls on the Commission to ensure full transparency in the preparation of the legislative proposal and to actively involve civil society organisations, experts and non-governmental organisations in the field of child protection in the process; further calls on the Ombudsman to closely monitor the action taken on this legislative file to ensure that EU measures are both effective in protecting children and fully compliant with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; - Amendement 41Rejeté
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Déposé par Nikos Pappas, Valentina Palmisano, Manon Aubry · The Left
Ajouté: 21a. Notes that the Ombudsman has opened several inquiries concerning transparency in the EU-Mercosur negotiations and has expressed concern to the Commission regarding its refusal to disclose key documents, considering this approach inconsistent with the Commission’s commitment to open policymaking; recalls the Ombudsman’s previous finding of maladministration in relation to the Commission’s failure to finalise the sustainability impact assessment before concluding the negotiations with the Mercosur countries; further notes that concerns persist regarding the lack of transparency, including in the context of the decision to provisionally apply the agreement prior to obtaining Parliament’s consent, thereby limiting democratic scrutiny and parliamentary oversight; calls on the Ombudsman to examine, without delay, whether the handling of the agreement’s provisional application complies with the principles of transparency, democratic accountability, institutional balance and respect for Parliament’s prerogatives;
Vote par groupe politique
Comment les groupes politiques ont voté
- 11Pour
- 5Contre
- 7Abstention
- 8N'a pas voté
- 136Pour
- 1Contre
- 4Abstention
- 43N'a pas voté
- 60Pour
- 0Contre
- 0Abstention
- 24N'a pas voté
- 17Pour
- 42Contre
- 2Abstention
- 15N'a pas voté
- 4Pour
- 105Contre
- 0Abstention
- 26N'a pas voté
- 4Pour
- 18Contre
- 39Abstention
- 20N'a pas voté
- 1Pour
- 1Contre
- 21Abstention
- 5N'a pas voté
- 0Pour
- 35Contre
- 1Abstention
- 10N'a pas voté
- 0Pour
- 43Contre
- 2Abstention
- 8N'a pas voté
Les membres
Montrer 10 de 718
| Nom | Pays | Groupe | Position de vote |
|---|---|---|---|
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour |