Vote in the European Parliament

2025 Commission report on Türkiye

Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 43 – Am 48
Date: 17.06.2026·Reference: A10-0106/2026
Rapporteur: Nacho Sánchez Amor

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 186 For
  • 403 Against
  • 69 Abstention
  • 61 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 48 · Tabled by The LeftView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Giorgos Georgiou, Rima Hassan

Added: 43a. Rejects the use of Article 122 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as the legal basis for the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) initiative, emphasising that this provision, intended for exceptional financial assistance in the event of serious difficulties, is not appropriate for a common security and defence instrument; underlines that participation of non-EU countries with which the EU has established a security and defence partnership within the framework of SAFE must be based on unanimity among Member States and contingent upon the strict fulfilment of conditions safeguarding the security and defence interests of all its Member States without discrimination;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE783.323

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (206 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2256(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral50 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage74 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary206 days since this step began
Recorded activities (18)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee report adopted
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Plenary debate
  17. Plenary vote
  18. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Criticism of rule-of-law deficiencies and authoritarian trends in Turkey.
  • Demand for implementation of ECtHR rulings and release of political prisoners.
  • Emphasis on strategic EU-Turkey relations despite stalled accession process.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
FranceGUE/NGL
For
PortugalGUE/NGL
For
PolandECR
For
ItalyGUE/NGL
For
FrancePfE
For
RomaniaECR
For
PolandECR
For
LuxembourgNI
For
CyprusGUE/NGL
For
FrancePfE
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en