Vote in the European Parliament

2025 Commission report on Türkiye

Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 35 – Am 42
Date: 17.06.2026·Reference: A10-0106/2026
Rapporteur: Nacho Sánchez Amor

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 135 For
  • 502 Against
  • 13 Abstention
  • 69 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 42 · Tabled by The LeftView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Giorgos Georgiou, Rima Hassan

Added: 35a. Remains deeply concerned about Türkiye being considered by the EU as a ‘safe country of origin’ in the light of widespread evidence of persecution and serious harm against its citizens; highlights that this constitutes a breach of Article 61(1) of the Asylum Procedure Regulation1a, which states that a third country may only be designated as a safe country of origin where, on the basis of the legal situation, the application of the law within a democratic system and the general political circumstances, it can be shown that there is no persecution as defined in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1347 and no real risk of serious harm as defined in Article 15 of that Regulation; __________________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 establishing a common procedure for international protection in the Union and repealing Directive 2013/32/EU (OJ L, 2024/1348, 22.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1348/oj).

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE783.323

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (206 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2256(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral50 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage74 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary206 days since this step began
Recorded activities (18)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee report adopted
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Plenary debate
  17. Plenary vote
  18. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Criticism of rule-of-law deficiencies and authoritarian trends in Turkey.
  • Demand for implementation of ECtHR rulings and release of political prisoners.
  • Emphasis on strategic EU-Turkey relations despite stalled accession process.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
FranceGUE/NGL
For
FranceS&D
For
FranceGUE/NGL
For
PortugalGUE/NGL
For
SwedenGreens/EFA
For
NetherlandsGreens/EFA
For
FranceGUE/NGL
For
ItalyS&D
For
GermanyGUE/NGL
For
ItalyGreens/EFA
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en