Vote in the European Parliament

2025 Commission report on Türkiye

Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 1 – Am 33
Date: 17.06.2026·Reference: A10-0106/2026
Rapporteur: Nacho Sánchez Amor

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 179 For
  • 445 Against
  • 27 Abstention
  • 68 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 33 · Tabled by PfEView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Mieke Andriese, Jordan Bardella, António Tânger Corrêa, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Hermann Tertsch, Matthieu Valet, Julie Rechagneux, Afroditi Latinopoulou

1. Removed: Reaffirms its appreciation for the long-standing aspirations of the majority of the Turkish people regarding accession to the EU and maintaining Türkiye’s candidate status, despite the persistent lack of progress and political will; acknowledges the fatigue that, as a consequence, continues to grow among stakeholders on both sides of the process; underscores, however, that any development in the accession process requires tangible progress in upholding the rule of law and democratic processes and believes that, in the absence of such progress, Türkiye’s EU Added: Notes that accession negotiations have remained at a standstill since 2018 and that no meaningful progress has been achieved in fulfilling the Copenhagen criteria; considers therefore that, given these circumstances, the accession process cannot be Removed: resumed; Added: revived and calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure that any future strategic partnership with Türkiye can only be pursued upon full compliance with its obligations towards all EU Member States as a realistic alternative to accession;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE783.323

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (206 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2256(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral50 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage74 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary206 days since this step began
Recorded activities (18)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee report adopted
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Plenary debate
  17. Plenary vote
  18. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Criticism of rule-of-law deficiencies and authoritarian trends in Turkey.
  • Demand for implementation of ECtHR rulings and release of political prisoners.
  • Emphasis on strategic EU-Turkey relations despite stalled accession process.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
LatviaECR
For
GermanyESN
For
SwedenEPP
For
ItalyECR
For
CroatiaECR
For
GermanyESN
For
EstoniaECR
For
CzechiaPfE
For
FrancePfE
For
FrancePfE
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en