Vote in the European Parliament

2025 Commission report on Türkiye

Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 5 – Am 34
Date: 17.06.2026·Reference: A10-0106/2026
Rapporteur: Nacho Sánchez Amor

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 173 For
  • 448 Against
  • 20 Abstention
  • 78 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 34 · Tabled by PfEView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Mieke Andriese, Jordan Bardella, António Tânger Corrêa, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Hermann Tertsch, Matthieu Valet, Julie Rechagneux, Afroditi Latinopoulou

Added: 5a. Stresses that, given that Türkiye’s accession negotiations have remained at a standstill, Türkiye should no longer receive financial assistance under the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA III); insists that any remaining EU funding to Türkiye must remain fully transparent, strictly conditional and subject to rigorous parliamentary scrutiny;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE783.323

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (206 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2256(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral50 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage74 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary206 days since this step began
Recorded activities (18)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee report adopted
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Plenary debate
  17. Plenary vote
  18. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Criticism of rule-of-law deficiencies and authoritarian trends in Turkey.
  • Demand for implementation of ECtHR rulings and release of political prisoners.
  • Emphasis on strategic EU-Turkey relations despite stalled accession process.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
ItalyECR
For
ItalyECR
For
NetherlandsECR
For
SwedenECR
For
SpainECR
For
ItalyECR
For
PortugalPfE
For
BelgiumPfE
For
FrancePfE
For
FrancePfE
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en