Vote in the European Parliament

2025 Commission report on Türkiye

Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 1 – Am 8
Date: 17.06.2026·Reference: A10-0106/2026
Rapporteur: Nacho Sánchez Amor

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 123 For
  • 512 Against
  • 21 Abstention
  • 63 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 8 · Tabled by ESNView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell

1. Removed: Reaffirms its appreciation for the long-standing aspirations of the majority of the Turkish people regarding accession to Added: Recommends that EU accession negotiations with Türkiye should be officially closed, in the interest of both the EU and Removed: maintaining Türkiye’s candidate status, despite the persistent lack of progress and political will; acknowledges the fatigue that, as a consequence, continues to grow among stakeholders on both sides of the process; underscores, however, that any development in the accession process requires tangible progress in upholding the rule of law and democratic processes and believes that, in the absence of such progress, Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed; Added: Türkiye; considers Türkiye to be an important strategic partner of the EU and invites the European Council to request that the Commission develop a strategic partnership between the EU and Türkiye as an alternative path to membership;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE783.323

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (206 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2256(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral50 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage74 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary206 days since this step began
Recorded activities (18)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee report adopted
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Plenary debate
  17. Plenary vote
  18. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Criticism of rule-of-law deficiencies and authoritarian trends in Turkey.
  • Demand for implementation of ECtHR rulings and release of political prisoners.
  • Emphasis on strategic EU-Turkey relations despite stalled accession process.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
GermanyESN
For
GermanyESN
For
FrancePfE
For
FrancePfE
For
FranceECR
For
HungaryESN
For
LithuaniaECR
For
PortugalPfE
For
FranceECR
For
FrancePfE
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en