Vote in the European Parliament

2025 Commission report on Türkiye

Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 39 – Am 29
Date: 17.06.2026·Reference: A10-0106/2026
Rapporteur: Nacho Sánchez Amor

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 193 For
  • 431 Against
  • 28 Abstention
  • 67 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 29 · Tabled by ECRView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Geadis Geadi, Diego Solier, Nora Junco García, Stephen Nikola Bartulica, Emmanouil Fragkos, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Marion Maréchal

… the resumption of negotiations and not to miss this window of opportunity; Added: expresses, however, its regret and dissatisfaction regarding the repeated statements made by Tufan Erhürman in favour of the continued presence of Turkish troops and guarantees, and his promotion of partitionist rhetoric, recalling that he is the leader of an occupation regime;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE783.323

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (206 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2256(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral50 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage74 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary206 days since this step began
Recorded activities (18)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee report adopted
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Plenary debate
  17. Plenary vote
  18. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Criticism of rule-of-law deficiencies and authoritarian trends in Turkey.
  • Demand for implementation of ECtHR rulings and release of political prisoners.
  • Emphasis on strategic EU-Turkey relations despite stalled accession process.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
FranceEPP
For
FrancePfE
For
DenmarkPfE
For
ItalyECR
For
SlovakiaESN
For
SpainNI
For
CzechiaNI
For
GermanyESN
For
BulgariaESN
For
CzechiaPfE
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en