Mise en œuvre de la clause de sauvegarde bilatérale de l’accord de partenariat UE-Mercosur et de l’accord commercial intérimaire UE-Mercosur pour les produits agricoles

Texte tel que publié par le PE, en anglais.

1. Amendement 18Rejeté

   Recital 2

   Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

   (2) The EMPA and the ITA Supprimé: aim to protect Union producers of Ajouté: will undermine Union producers who manufacture sensitive commodities in the Supprimé: agriculture sector by limiting preferences to tariff rate quotas. Ajouté: agricultural sector . The safeguards are reactive in nature, being designed to trigger only after a collapse in prices has already taken place, thereby failing to provide genuine protection to EU farmers and rural communities;

2. Amendement 19Rejeté

   Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point ii a (new)

   Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

   Ajouté: (ii a) clear indications of a deterioration in the economic situation of the industry, across the Union or at Member State level, including an increase in volume of more than 5 % year-on-year compared to the three-year average of the imports under preferential terms of a given product or sustained decreases in domestic prices, may be sufficient to demonstrate serious injury to the sector and to warrant a safeguard;

3. Amendement 20Rejeté

   Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point iii a (new)

   Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

   Ajouté: (iii a) trade unions representing workers producing the same or a directly competitive product in the importing party;

4. Amendement 21Adopté

   Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5

   Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

   … means a significant overall impairment to the position of the Union industry; Ajouté: an increase in volume of more than 5 % year-on-year compared to the three-year average of the imports under preferential terms of a given product, or a decrease of more than 5 % year-on-year in the average import price of a given product, shall be considered as prima facie evidence of serious injury;

5. Amendement 22Rejeté

   Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10

   Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

   Supprimé: 10. ‘transition period’ means: (i) 12 years from the date of entry into force of the Agreement; or (ii) for goods for which the Tariff Elimination Schedule of the Union provides for tariff elimination in 10 years or more, 18 years from the date of entry into force of the Agreement; Ajouté: deleted

6. Amendement 23Rejeté

   Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

   Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

   … in accordance with this Regulation where a product originating in a country Supprimé: concerned Ajouté: concerned, which complies with EU environmental, animal welfare, food-safety and labour requirements, is imported into the Union:

7. Amendement 24Rejeté

   Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c

   Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

   Supprimé: (c) the increase of imports is the result of the effect of obligations incurred under the Agreement, including of the reduction or the elimination of the customs duties on that product. Ajouté: deleted

8. Amendement 25Rejeté

   Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)

   Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

   Ajouté: 1 a. For point (b), “under such conditions” shall be understood as conditions under which the production in the exporting country takes place are at least equivalent to those in the EU in terms of the protection of human, animal, plant life or health, and the protection of exhaustible natural resources. For greater certainty, the use of chemical substances banned in the EU may be a reason to impose a safeguard measure.

9. Amendement 26Rejeté

   Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

   Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

   Ajouté: (c a) a suspension of imports of the product concerned.

10. Amendement 27Rejeté

    Article 3 a (new)

    Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

    Ajouté: Article3a A safeguard measure may be imposed: (a) if the EMPA or ITA is used to challenge the EU precautionary principle; or (b) in case of persistent substantial differences in the standards pertaining to the protection of human, animal, plant life or health, and the protection of exhaustible natural resources; or (c) if there are factual and reasonable indications that the product is related to illegal deforestation.

11. Amendement 28Rejeté

    Article 5 – paragraph 1

    Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

    … the request of a Member State, of any natural or legal person Supprimé: that is Ajouté: acting on behalf of the Union industry, of any association not having legal personality acting on behalf of the Union industry, or of Supprimé: any association not having legal personality that is acting on behalf Ajouté: a trade union representing workers of the Union industry, where there is sufficient prima facie evidence of …

12. Amendement 29Rejeté

    Article 5 – paragraph 1

    Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

    … be initiated by the Commission at the request of a Member State, Ajouté: the European Parliament, of any natural or legal person that is acting on behalf of …

13. Amendement 30Rejeté

    Article 6 – paragraph 2

    Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

    … there is a surge of imports or a decrease in domestic prices Ajouté: or a fall in market share, in relation to the Union industry concentrated in one or several Member States, or where there is a surge of imports or a decrease in the price of a product Ajouté: or a fall in market share, in relation to the Union industry, and the Union producers of like or directly competitive products are predominantly …

14. Amendement 33Rejeté

    Article 7 – paragraph 5

    Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

    … and losses, and employment. This list is not exhaustive, and the Commission Supprimé: may Ajouté: shall also take other relevant factors into consideration for its determination of the existence … serious injury or threat of serious injury, such as stocks, prices, return Supprimé: of Ajouté: on capital employed, cash flow, the level of market shares, Ajouté: environmental or public health impacts, including risks arising from the use of antibiotics as growth promoters in exporting countries, the use of chemical substances banned in the Union, compliance of Mercosur economic operators with Union due diligence and deforestation legislation, and other factors which are causing or may have caused serious injury, …

15. Amendement 35Rejeté

    Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c

    Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

    Supprimé: (c) the increase of imports is the result of the reduction or the elimination of the customs duties on that product. Ajouté: deleted

16. Amendement 37Rejeté

    Article 11 – paragraph 3

    Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

    Supprimé: 3. The Commission shall not apply, extend or maintain in force a bilateral safeguard measure beyond the expiration of the transition period. Ajouté: deleted

17. Amendement 38Rejeté

    Article 12 a (new)

    Déposé par Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan +4 · The Left

    Ajouté: Article12a Reciprocity of Standards Clause and Health and SPS Clause 1. The Commission shall initiate an investigation and adopt safeguard measures under this Regulation where there is credible evidence that imports benefiting from tariff preferences do not meet equivalent environmental, climate, animal welfare, health, food and feed safety, or labour protection requirements applicable to Union producers. 2. In the event of a documented risk to human, animal, or plant health, including the use of production methods prohibited in the Union or failure to comply with sanitary and phytosanitary requirements, the Commission shall immediately suspend imports of the product benefiting from tariff preferences, in accordance with Article 9. 3. Measures adopted under this Article shall be necessary and proportionate and shall be subject to review in accordance with Article 12.

18. Amendement 39Rejeté

    Recital 4

    Déposé par Christophe Bay, Thierry Mariani, Isabella Tovaglieri +2 · PfE

    … market access is constrained by the limits contained in tariff rate quotas. Ajouté: Nevertheless, while the bilateral safeguard may address quantitative imbalances arising from the Agreement, there is no safeguard ensuring that imports from Mercosur countries comply with the Union production rules, notably on food safety, animal welfare, social and environmental standards. Notes that the absence of genuine mirror clauses may negatively affect the competitiveness of Union farmers and the health of Union citizens.

19. Amendement 42Rejeté

    Article 4 – paragraph 3 b (new)

    Déposé par Enikő Győri, Christophe Bay, Thierry Mariani +3 · PfE

    Ajouté: 3 b. Where an increase in imports causes or threatens to cause serious injury or the risk thereof to a sector in one or more Member States, the Commission may initiate the application of a safeguard measure on the products concerned, even if the 5 % increase threshold is not met at Union level, provided that clear evidence demonstrates significant adverse effects at Member State or regional market level.

20. Amendement 45Rejeté

    Article 9 a (new)

    Déposé par Isabella Tovaglieri, Christophe Bay, Thierry Mariani +2 · PfE

    Ajouté: Article9a Automatic safeguard measure 1. The Commission shall suspend, without undue delay, the tariff preferences provided for by the Agreement if one of the following conditions applies: (a) imports of a product from a Mercosur country exceed 5 % of the reference value for that product, calculated on the basis of the average imports from that country in the three years preceding the application of the Agreement; or (b) imports under the quota for a given product from a Mercosur country exceed 50 % of the annual quota established by the Agrement. 2. This automatic safeguard shall be adopted no later than 21 days after the verification of one of the conditions set out in paragraph 1.

21. Amendement 50Rejeté

    Article 12 – paragraph 7

    Déposé par Christophe Bay, Thierry Mariani, Isabella Tovaglieri +3 · PfE

    Supprimé: 7. The total duration of a safeguard measure shall not exceed four years, including the period of application of any provisional safeguard measure, the initial period of application and any extension thereof. Ajouté: deleted

22. Amendement 51Rejeté

    Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new)

    Déposé par Christophe Bay, Thierry Mariani, Isabella Tovaglieri +2 · PfE

    Ajouté: 3 a. If the report demonstrates that the provisional and definitive safeguard measures have been triggered more than once for the same product, thereby confirming repeated threats posed by Mercosur imports to Union farmers, the Commission should engage with the Mercosur countries with a view to permanently excluding the product concerned from the trade liberalisation commitments offered under the ITA and EMPA.

23. Amendement 52Rejeté

    Recital 2

    Déposé par Saskia Bricmont · Verts/ALE

    (2) The EMPA and the ITA Supprimé: aim to Ajouté: fail to adequately protect Union producers of sensitive commodities in the agriculture sector Supprimé: by limiting preferences to tariff rate quotas. Ajouté: despite the use of tariff rate quotas and they should therefore be renegotiated.

24. Amendement 57Rejeté

    Article 4 – paragraph 1

    Déposé par Saskia Bricmont · Verts/ALE

    1. The Commission shall Supprimé: regularly Ajouté: constantly and proactively monitor the Union market of sensitive products, in particular as regards import and export trends, production and price Supprimé: developments. Ajouté: developments as well as compliance with applicable Union sanitary and phytosanitary requirements, with the support of the Union market observatories established by Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. For that purpose, the Commission shall cooperate and exchange data with Member Supprimé: States Ajouté: States, the European Parliament and the Union industry on a regular basis. Ajouté: In its monitoring the Commission shall look at the cumulative effect of its preferential trade agreements in force.

25. Amendement 58Rejeté

    Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)

    Déposé par Saskia Bricmont · Verts/ALE

    Ajouté: 2 a. As set out in the SPS Chapter of the Agreement, the Commission will carry out verifications, including audits, of the official control system of Mercosur States. The Commission will adapt the nature and frequency of verifications, including audits, to the inherent characteristics of the product concerned, the track record of past import checks and other available information. The inspections referred to in paragraph 1 shall include checks on: (a) the use of substances, treatments or production methods that are prohibited or strictly limited in the Union, including pesticides, antibiotics and growth hormones; (b) the compliance with relevant due diligence legislation; (c) the functioning of traceability mechanisms for products intended for export to the Union, including the verification of critical points in the supply chain where gaps or irregularities may occur. The Commission shall ensure that inspections allow for the full traceability of agri-food products exported to the Union, from production to the point of export, and shall take the necessary measures to remedy any traceability deficiencies identified during the checks. The Commission shall ensure that adequate and sufficient testing capacity is available to carry out the checks conducted by national customs authorities and the inspections referred to in this paragraph.

26. Amendement 60Rejeté

    Article 6 – paragraph 3

    Déposé par Saskia Bricmont · Verts/ALE

    … the absence of contrary indications, an increase in volume of more than Supprimé: 10% year-on-year, Ajouté: 5 % compared to the three-year average, as a rule, of the imports under preferential terms of a given … evidence of serious injury or the threat of serious injury to Union Supprimé: industry, if, at the same time, the average import price for those imports from a country concerned is at least 10%, as a rule, below the relevant average domestic price of like or directly competitive products during the same period, based on available data. Ajouté: industry.

27. Amendement 61Rejeté

    Article 6 – paragraph 4

    Déposé par Saskia Bricmont · Verts/ALE

    … treat, in the absence of contrary indications, a decrease of more than Supprimé: 10% year-on-year, Ajouté: 5% compared to the three-year average, as a rule, in the average import price of a given product … evidence of serious injury or the threat of serious injury to Union Supprimé: industry, if at the same time the average import price for that product from a country concerned is at least 10%, as a rule, below the relevant average domestic price of like or directly competitive products during the same period, based on available data. Ajouté: industry.

28. Amendement 62Rejeté

    Article 7 – paragraph 5

    Déposé par Saskia Bricmont · Verts/ALE

    … prices, return of capital employed, cash flow, the level of market shares, Ajouté: environmental or public health impacts including risks arising from the use of antibiotics as growth promoters in exporting countries, potential public-health threats linked to antimicrobial-resistant bacteria entering the Union via animal-derived products, and resulting structural competitive disadvantages for Union producers, the use of chemical substances banned in the Union, compliance of Mercosur economic operators with Union due diligence and deforestation legislations and other factors which are causing or may have caused serious injury, …

29. Amendement 64Adopté

    Article 12 a (new)

    Déposé par Saskia Bricmont · Verts/ALE

    Ajouté: Article12a Environment, Health and SPS clause 1. The Commission shall initiate an investigation and adopt safeguard measures under this Regulation where there is credible evidence that imports benefiting from tariff preferences do not meet equivalent environmental, animal welfare, health, food safety, or labor protection requirements applicable to Union producers. 2. In the event of a documented risk to human, animal, or plant health, including the use of production methods prohibited in the Union or failure to comply with sanitary and phytosanitary requirements, the Commission may immediately suspend imports of the product benefiting from tariff preferences, in accordance with Article 9(3). Measures adopted under this Article shall be necessary and proportionate and shall be subject to review in accordance with Article 12.

30. Amendement 66Rejeté

    Article 14 – paragraph 3

    Déposé par Saskia Bricmont · Verts/ALE

    … of trade with each country for which the safeguard measure is in Supprimé: place. Ajouté: place and shall include a summary of the cumulative impact of preferential trade agreements on sensitive products.

31. Amendement 67Rejeté

    Article 14 – paragraph 5 a (new)

    Déposé par Saskia Bricmont · Verts/ALE

    Ajouté: 5 a. No later than two years after the date of entry into force of the Agreement and regularly thereafter, the Commission shall assess, after consulting the Union industry, the opportunity to develop differentiated thresholds tailored to the specific characteristics of the product markets.

32. Amendement 69Rejeté

    Recital 2 a (new)

    Déposé par Sarah Knafo · ESN

    Ajouté: (2 a) Union farmers are subject to particularly strict requirements in terms of traceability, food safety, animal welfare, and environmental sustainability, while agricultural products imported from Mercosur are produced to standards that are often lower. This regulatory asymmetry creates unfair competition that could seriously undermine Union argiculture.

33. Amendement 70Rejeté

    Article 3 – paragraph 1

    Déposé par Sarah Knafo · ESN

    … increased quantities, in absolute terms or relative to Union production or consumption; Supprimé: and Ajouté: or (b) under such conditions, as to cause or threaten to cause serious injury to the Union industry; Supprimé: and Ajouté: or (c) the increase of imports is the result of the effect of … of the reduction or the elimination of the customs duties on that Supprimé: product. Ajouté: product ; or (d) does not comply with requirements equivalent to those imposed by Union legislation on public health, environmental protection, traceability, or animal welfare, resulting in distortion of competition or downward pressure on European agricultural prices. (c a) does not comply with requirements equivalent to those imposed by Union legislation on public health, environmental protection, traceability, or animal welfare, resulting in distortion of competition or downward pressure on European agricultural prices.

34. Amendement 71Rejeté

    Article 19 a (new)

    Déposé par Sarah Knafo · ESN

    Ajouté: Article19a This Regulation shall not prevent a Member State from maintaining or adopting national measures to protect its agricultural or industrial sectors when they face foreign competition that does not comply with equivalent production, health, or environmental standards.

35. Amendement 74Rejeté

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new)

    Déposé par Francesco Torselli, Waldemar Buda · ECR

    Ajouté: Temporary suspension of tariff preferences for agricultural products 1. The application of tariff preferences and any liberalisation measures provided for in the Agreement shall be temporarily suspended until 30 June 2026 with regard to all agricultural products covered by this Regulation. 2. During the period of suspension, the Commission shall carry out additional, in-depth on-site audits in the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, conducted by the competent Union inspection services, in particular concerning food safety, the use of pesticides, active substances and antibiotics, animal welfare, and sanitary, phytosanitary and veterinary standards. 3. The audits referred to in paragraph 2 shall include an assessment of the compliance of production, control and supervisory practices in the countries listed in paragraph 2 with the objectives of the Union’s Farm to Fork policy, as well as with the following Union legal acts: (a) in relation to the use of pesticides and active substances, including compliance with: Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, Regulation (EU) 2019/1381 on the transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain, the lists of substances withdrawn, prohibited or not renewed pursuant to implementing acts adopted under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and the maximum residue levels (MRLs) applicable in the Union pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005; (b) in relation to the use of veterinary medicinal products and the prevention of antimicrobial resistance, including compliance with: Regulation (EU) 2019/6 on veterinary medicinal products and Regulation (EU) 2019/4 on medicated feed, the rules limiting the prophylactic, mass and routine use of antibiotics in animal husbandry; (c) in relation to animal welfare, including compliance with: Directive 98/58/EC concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes, sector-specific directives (broiler chickens, pigs, calves), Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 on the protection of animals during transport, including temperature and travel-time standards and Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing; (d) in relation to sanitary, phytosanitary and veterinary standards, including compliance with: Regulation (EU) 2017/625 on official controls, the food hygiene package and Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, 852/2004 and 853/2004, on requirements concerning refrigeration systems, frozen-goods transport, traceability and the supply chain; (e) in relation to environmental and climate requirements, in particular concerning the use of chemical substances in accordance with: Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP), on prohibitions concerning substances of particular concern for health or the environment. The audits shall also assess whether public-control mechanisms and certification systems are in place and capable of ensuring that agricultural products exported to the Union do not contain substances whose use is prohibited or restricted under Union law. 4. The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the results of the audits referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 no later than 30 June 2026. 5. Where the Commission fails to submit the report referred to in paragraph 4 by the deadline set in that paragraph, or where that report demonstrates evidence of non-compliance or a risk of non-compliance with Union standards, the suspension of tariff preferences shall be automatically extended for an additional period of six months. Such extension shall continue to apply, in successive six-month periods, until the Commission has established, on the basis of verified and conclusive evidence, full compliance of the production, control and supervisory systems of the countries concerned with all applicable Union standards.

36. Amendement 75Rejeté

    Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point i

    Déposé par Francesco Torselli, Waldemar Buda · ECR

    (i) Supprimé: 12 Ajouté: 15 years from the date of entry into force of the Agreement; or

37. Amendement 76Rejeté

    Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

    Déposé par Francesco Torselli · ECR

    Ajouté: (c a) the suspension of the preferential tariff treatment and the application of a prohibitive tariff rate equivalent to the most-favoured-nation bound rate where, on the basis of verifications conducted pursuant to this Regulation, the Commission establishes that a statistically significant number of consignments benefiting from preferential access fail to comply with on-farm production, animal-welfare or environmental standards required to Union producers;

38. Amendement 77Rejeté

    Article 9 a (new)

    Déposé par Francesco Torselli · ECR

    Ajouté: Article 9a Automatic safeguard measures 1. Without prejudice to Article 3(2), when imports of a product referred to in Article 2(7) from one single MERCOSUR Country exceed 5% of the reference value for that product, calculated based on the average imports from that Country in the three years before the application of the Agreement, the tariff preferences provided for in the Agreement shall be temporarily suspended. 2. Those automatic safeguard measures shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 18(4) without delay and in any event within a maximum of 21 days from the verification of the conditions set out in paragraph 1 of this article. 3. Without prejudice to Article 3(2) and paragraph 1 of this Article, if during the first three month of the calendar year imports under quotas of a given product referred to in Article 2(7) from one single MERCOSUR Country exceed 50 % of the annual quota set by the Agreement, the tariff preferences provided for in the Agreement shall be temporarily suspended. 4. The duration of the suspension shall be decided in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 18(4). The suspension shall be limited to the time needed to stabilize the market. 5. Automatic safeguard measures shall apply to every product which is put into free circulation after the date of entry into force of those measures.

39. Amendement 80Rejeté

    Article 9 – paragraph 7 a (new)

    Déposé par Georgiana Teodorescu, Patryk Jaki, Adrian-George Axinia +42 · Members

    Ajouté: 7 a. Any supplementation of the support fund for farmers affected by tariff reductions shall not come at the expense of the welcome doubling of the CAP's crisis reserve communicated by the Commission in the National and Regional Partnerships Plans.

40. Amendement 81Adopté

    Recital 2

    Déposé par Raphaël Glucksmann, Jean-Marc Germain, Eric Sargiacomo +42 · Members

    (2) The Supprimé: EMPA and the ITA aim to protect Union producers of Ajouté: Partnership Agreement and the Interim Trade Agreement will reduce the protections enjoyed by Union producers who manufacture sensitive commodities in the Supprimé: agriculture sector by limiting preferences to tariff rate quotas. Ajouté: agricultural sector. Bilateral safeguard clauses should therefore be put in place to limit the scope of preferential tariff quotas in the event of injury or threat of injury.

41. Amendement 83Adopté

    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

    Déposé par Raphaël Glucksmann, Jean-Marc Germain, Eric Sargiacomo +37 · Members

    Ajouté: Clear indications of a deterioration in the economic situation of the industry, across the Union or at Member State level, including an increase in volume of more than 5 % year-on-year compared to the three-year average of the imports under preferential terms of a given product or sustained decreases in domestic prices, may be sufficient to demonstrate serious injury to the sector and to warrant a safeguard.

42. Amendement 84Rejeté

    Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new)

    Déposé par Raphaël Glucksmann, Jean-Marc Germain, Eric Sargiacomo +30 · Members

    Ajouté: 4 a. The Commission shall treat an increase in volume of the imports under preferential terms of a given product from a country concerned as prima facie evidence of serious injury or the threat of serious injury to Union industry, if, at the same time, the average import price of those imports is below 120 % of the reference thresholds laid down in Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.

43. Amendement 85Rejeté

    Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point -a

    Déposé par Raphaël Glucksmann, Jean-Marc Germain, Eric Sargiacomo +28 · Members

    Ajouté: (-a) at a price below 120 % of the reference thresholds laid down in Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013; or

44. Amendement 86Adopté

    Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

    Déposé par Raphaël Glucksmann, Jean-Marc Germain, Eric Sargiacomo +37 · The Left Members

    Ajouté: Clear indications of a deterioration in the economic situation of the industry, across the Union or at Member State level, including an increase in volume of more than 5 % year-on-year compared to the three-year average of the imports under preferential terms of a given product or sustained decreases in domestic prices, may be sufficient to demonstrate serious injury to the sector and to warrant a safeguard.

45. Amendement 87Adopté

    Article 11 – paragraph 1

    Déposé par Raphaël Glucksmann, Jean-Marc Germain, Eric Sargiacomo +38 · The Left Members

    … that the conditions set out in Article 3(1) are met, the Commission Supprimé: may Ajouté: shall adopt definitive safeguard measures in accordance with the examination procedure referred to …