Vote au Parlement européen
Anciens défis et nouvelles pratiques commerciales dans le marché intérieur
Résultat global
Adopté- 306 Pour
- 80 Contre
- 57 Abstention
- 276 N'a pas voté
Comment nous comptons
- Les votes Pour, Contre et Abstention proviennent du procès-verbal de vote nominal du Parlement européen.
- « N'a pas voté » est déduit : députés avec un mandat le jour du vote pour lesquels aucun vote n'est enregistré. Les abstentions ne comptent pas pour cela.
- Les corrections de vote ultérieures sont affichées mais ne modifient pas le résultat officiel.
- Chaque vote (vote global, amendement, vote partiel) compte séparément. C'est pourquoi les totaux peuvent différer des pages qui comptent différemment.
Statut et procédure
Résultat tel qu'enregistré par le Parlement européen.
- Vote du
- Dernière étape documentée
- Plénière · (il y a 556 jours)
- Prochaine étape prévue
- Aucune autre étape n'est prévue dans la source.
Déroulement de la procédure
2025/2542(RSP) · RSP
Activités documentées de la procédure. Elles ne prouvent pas qu’une loi est entrée en vigueur.
- Dernier documenté: Plénière
Activités documentées (8)
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Débat en séance plénière
- Vote en séance plénière
- Résultats du vote en séance plénière
Activités prévues (réalisation non confirmée)
- Débat en séance plénière
- Vote en séance plénière
Fiche de procédure (OEIL) · Données du Parlement européen
Consulté le:
Sources
Données : EP Open Data API
De quoi s’agit-il ?
- Marché unique pilier central de l’intégration européenne.
- Priorité à la compétitivité face aux défis géopolitiques et climatiques.
- Exigence de simplification et réduction de la bureaucratie pour les PME.
Historique des amendements (12)
Texte tel que publié par le PE, en anglais.
Recital E (new)
Déposé par Hanna Gedin · The Left
Ajouté: E. whereas the green and digital transitions require an update to single market rules in order to set the right conditions to achieve a fairer, more sustainable and digitally fit EU; whereas regulatory tools must be aligned with those policy objectives; whereas single market rules to boost competitiveness must not come at the expense of safe and good-quality jobs within the EU;
Paragraph 5
Déposé par Hanna Gedin · The Left
5.
Supprimé: WelcomesAjouté: Stresses that the proposal for a regulation on a public interface connected to the … workers and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 (COM/2024/531), which should lead toSupprimé: simplification and strengthened enforcement; notes also that digitalisation could significantly reduce administrative burdens for cross-border services and ensure better access for businesses and consumers; calls, in this regard, for a single declaration portal and the digitalisation of A1 forms for cross-border services;Ajouté: strengthened enforcement, must not lead to a decline in wages and working conditions and a race to the bottom;Paragraph 16
Déposé par Hanna Gedin · The Left
16. Considers that
Supprimé: the single market isAjouté: State aid measures are a key tool in times ofSupprimé: crisis if the Member States can act in a coordinated way;Ajouté: crisis; highlights the key role that the relaxation of State aid rules played in keeping the EU single market afloat during the COVID-19 pandemic and during Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine; calls, therefore, for greater certainty and proactive measures in relaxing State aid rules for future crises that the Union may face, for the benefit of the single market; considers that the recently adopted Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Act2 will …Paragraph 29
Déposé par Hanna Gedin · The Left
… to protect consumers against greenwashing by establishing requirements for substantiation and verification; Ajouté: stresses, against this background, the importance of maintaining and reinforcing sustainability laws such as the Green Claims Directive, the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive1a and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive1b; ______________ 1a OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj. 1b OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj.
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Déposé par Piotr Müller · ECR
Ajouté: 2a. Highlights that ongoing barriers and political pressure to expand regulations have constrained the development of the single market, as noted in the Draghi report; calls for a shift towards a regulatory approach that empowers companies to grow, innovate and lead internationally, thereby restoring the single market as a true engine of growth and competitiveness;
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Déposé par Piotr Müller · ECR
Ajouté: 2a. Highlights that ongoing barriers and political pressure to expand regulations have constrained the development of the single market, as noted in the Draghi report; calls for a shift towards a regulatory approach that empowers companies to grow, innovate and lead internationally, thereby restoring the single market as a true engine of growth and competitiveness;
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Déposé par Piotr Müller · ECR
Ajouté: 21a. Stresses that the implementation of the DSA must fully respect freedom of expression; underlines that actions against illegal content must not restrict lawful speech and calls for proportionate and transparent enforcement to protect an open and democratic digital space;
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Déposé par Piotr Müller · ECR
Ajouté: 21a. Stresses that the implementation of the DSA must fully respect freedom of expression; underlines that actions against illegal content must not restrict lawful speech and calls for proportionate and transparent enforcement to protect an open and democratic digital space;
Paragraph 35
Déposé par Piotr Müller · ECR
… for Ukraine’s gradual integration into the EU single market and sectoral programmes; Ajouté: firmly opposes, however, any further liberalisation of trade with Ukraine beyond the current framework unless and until full alignment of production standards and regulatory requirements is achieved, particularly in the agricultural sector; stresses that any easing of customs duties or safeguard measures must remain strictly conditional on Ukraine meeting the EU’s rigorous standards and must be accompanied by clear guarantees of compensatory mechanisms, including subsidies, ensuring the protection and competitiveness of European producers operating within the EU; underlines that the Member States neighbouring Ukraine have been disproportionately affected by surging imports resulting from autonomous trade measures and must not bear the burden of unfair competition;
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Déposé par Klara Dostalova · PfE
Ajouté: 15a. Stresses the need, in the current context of high inflation in the energy and food sectors, and as highlighted in the 2025 Consumer Conditions Scoreboard, to reduce the financial burden on consumers and businesses, particularly owing to the EU regulatory framework resulting from the European Green Deal; strongly calls for the adoption of targeted legislative measures to protect consumers and businesses against excessive energy costs and speculative manipulation;
Paragraph 24
Déposé par Klara Dostalova · PfE
… recent years; highlights the significance of Digital Product Passports in these processes; Ajouté: urges the Commission to take legal action that would grant the Member States the discretion to impose fees on consignments in cases of heightened inflows from non-EU countries; calls, therefore, for a reinforced market surveillance framework and a revision of …
Paragraph 37 a (new)
Déposé par Klara Dostalova · PfE
Ajouté: 37a. Emphasises that the exercise of simplification should not be limited to the anecdotal deletion of some excessive reporting requirements; calls on the Commission to put in place a real ‘SME test’ to conduct an in-depth assessment of the impact of recent and upcoming EU legislation on competitiveness, so as to identify and eliminate any redundant, excessive or contradictory regulatory requirements further burdening businesses; urges the Commission, in this regard, to present an ‘SME omnibus’ before the end of 2025;
Vote par groupe politique
Comment les groupes politiques ont voté
- 5Pour
- 2Contre
- 7Abstention
- 15N'a pas voté
- 96Pour
- 1Contre
- 4Abstention
- 87N'a pas voté
- 75Pour
- 0Contre
- 3Abstention
- 58N'a pas voté
- 32Pour
- 3Contre
- 19Abstention
- 26N'a pas voté
- 42Pour
- 1Contre
- 0Abstention
- 10N'a pas voté
- 54Pour
- 0Contre
- 0Abstention
- 21N'a pas voté
- 2Pour
- 32Contre
- 21Abstention
- 30N'a pas voté
- 0Pour
- 19Contre
- 2Abstention
- 6N'a pas voté
- 0Pour
- 22Contre
- 1Abstention
- 23N'a pas voté
Les membres
Montrer 10 de 719
| Nom | Pays | Groupe | Position de vote |
|---|---|---|---|
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour |