EN
FrançaisVote in the European Parliament
2025 Commission report on Serbia
Overall Result
Adopted- 468 For
- 116 Against
- 79 Abstention
- 56 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (156 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2255(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (12)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Progress towards EU membership only possible with rule of law reforms and stronger democratic standards
- Serbia needs free and fair elections to resolve its political crisis
- MEPs denounce long-standing manipulative anti-EU narrative spread by government controlled media
Amendment history (1)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Paragraph 20
Tabled by Danilo Della Valle · The Left
… and consistently addressing its significant shortcomings, lack of progress and even backsliding;
Removed: welcomes the initial improvement made in addressing Serbia’s shortcomings by the Commissioner for Enlargement and the announced suspension of funds earmarked for Serbia over legislative reforms;Added: opposes the suspension of pre-accession funds for Serbia, as this would not weaken the political elite in power, but rather primarily penalise the population, rural areas and the most vulnerable; is concerned that such financial blackmail risks pushing Serbia towards non-European investors, including Chinese state-owned consortia with weaker social and environmental standards; warns against any potential systematic attempts by Serbia to impede the accelerated …
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Renew Europe (Renew)- 71For
- 1Against
- 2Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)- 48For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)- 163For
- 2Against
- 8Abstention
- 12Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)- 46For
- 5Against
- 28Abstention
- 5Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)- 125For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 10Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)- 6For
- 62Against
- 3Abstention
- 14Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)- 1For
- 23Against
- 2Abstention
- 1Did not vote
Non-attached Members (NI)- 2For
- 19Against
- 4Abstention
- 2Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)- 6For
- 3Against
- 32Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Germany | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Bulgaria | EPP | For | |
 Poland | ECR | For | |
 Lithuania | ECR | For | |
 Spain | S&D | For | |
 Estonia | S&D | For | |
 Austria | Renew | For | |
 Portugal | S&D | For | |
 Italy | S&D | For | |
 Sweden | Renew | For |
