The next item on the agenda is the debate on the report by Manuela Ripa, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on detergents and surfactants, amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 (COM(2023)0217 – C9-0154/2023 – 2023/0124(COD)) (A9-0039/2024).
The next item on the agenda is the debate on the oral question to the Commission on working conditions for teachers in the EU by Dolors Montserrat, on behalf of the Committee on Petitions (O-000002/2024 – B9-0007/24) (2023/3015(RSP)).
Multilateral negotiations in view of the 13th WTO Ministerial Conference in Abu Dhabi, 26-29 February 2024 (debate)
At the end of the debate, a motion for a resolution was tabled, which some colleagues have already mentioned. The debate is closed. The vote will take place today, 8 February 2024.
Multilateral negotiations in view of the 13th WTO Ministerial Conference in Abu Dhabi, 26-29 February 2024 (debate)
The next item on the agenda is the debate on the Commission statement on the multilateral negotiations with a view to the 13th session. WTO Ministerial Conference in Abu Dhabi from 26 to 29 February 2024 (2024/2527(RSP)).
Before entering the agenda, however, I have to make a statement: Mr Fabio Massimo Castaldo is a member of the Renew Europe Group with effect from 8 February 2024, i.e. as of today.
The next meeting will take place tomorrow, Tuesday 6 February 2024 at 9 a.m. The agenda has been published and is available on the European Parliament's website.
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
The next item on the agenda was one minute (Rule 172). I would like to draw your attention to the fact that you can take the floor for the one-minute speech from your seat.
Improving the socio-economic situation of farmers and rural areas, ensuring fair incomes, food security as well as a just transition (debate)
Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, It is an individual decision in Germany on agricultural diesel that has caused the barrel to overflow for the farmers. The barrel of overflowing because they are simply fed up with decisions being made over their heads – fed up with the fact that over decades, politics at national and European level has always launched new regulations that have brought bureaucracy. And many of these proposals have also now been put forward by the Von der Leyen Commission. Clearly, we need uniform European rules on plant protection. But do we really need a phytosanitary regulation that makes it impossible to manage 80% of the land? Do we really need new difficulties in terms of emissions protection, as is currently being discussed? Ladies and gentlemen, I do not think so. What we need is a culture of trust in our farmers rather than a culture of mistrust. And you can see very well here in the European Parliament who stands with the farmers, who votes how in the votes here on this law in the European Parliament. And I invite everyone to actually do that, because that's very revealing. In any case, we Free Democrats see the path we want to take – one of less bureaucracy and confidence in agriculture.
Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, I would like to speak today not about a file included in the 2024 work programme, but about one mentioned in the 2022 work programme. It is about MDMS – multimodal digital mobility services – a dossier that would actually be able to finally give European citizens more information about when they travel across borders when they use different modes of transport. But it seems that the Commission is incapable of presenting a proposal. In doing so, I would like – sometimes – instead of constantly proposing new regulations that nobody needs, to finally focus on where a real advantage, a real European added value, could actually be offered to citizens. Because even today, travelers in a free Europe still have problems with booking, with connecting trains, if something fails. To actually intervene here would be a real step forward that we would be making on the European side. Unfortunately, the Commission seems incapable of presenting a proposal.
Schengen area: digitalisation of the visa procedure - Schengen area: amending the Visa Sticker Regulation (Joint debate – Schengen area)
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, Mr Vice-President. First of all, I would like to say that the Schengen area is certainly one of the greatest achievements of this European Union, and we should defend and protect it so that people can continue to move freely in Europe. Since many of the Romanian and Bulgarian colleagues here have expressed their regret that they are not yet part of the Schengen area, I would like to say at this point, especially as a German: We hope that Bulgaria and Romania will join the Schengen area as soon as possible. The proposal, which is now being voted on today on the digitalisation of visa procedures, is certainly a good one, because it is important that digitalisation is introduced in this area. Above all, however, he makes the procedures better, ladies and gentlemen! People who apply for a visa no longer need to hand in their passports, forgeries of visas are prevented and our consulates are relieved, and hopefully this will shorten the often far too long duration of visa procedures. Overall, a very, very good proposal that makes the abuse of visa procedures more difficult and simplifies and standardises procedures. This brings Europe even closer together, and we therefore agree with that.
Egypt, in particular the sentencing of Hisham Kassem
Mr President, Commissioner! Unfortunately, once again Egypt, we almost have to say, ladies and gentlemen. And indeed, under President Al-Sisi, Egypt does not come to rest. Today we are talking about Hisham Kassem. He is one of the leaders of the , a coalition of liberal opposition parties to be silenced. He is accused of being politically motivated, and his appeal is on October 7, so in a few days. We here in the European Parliament call for the immediate and unconditional release and the suppression of all politically motivated accusations. He joins in. We had an emergency resolution a few months ago regarding Alaa Abdel Fattah, who is still in prison and has not been able to see his autistic son for two years. A thousand others are in prison for freely expressing their opinions. Elections are soon to be held in Egypt, and the opposition is on the rise. We call on the Egyptian authorities to stop harassing potential presidential candidates, such as Ahmed al-Tantawi, and to ensure that elections can actually be held freely and fairly.
Need for a speedy adoption of the asylum and migration package (debate)
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, In 2015, there was a major migration crisis in the European Union. We are now eight years later, and we are holding the debates as we did eight years ago. I believe that the citizens of the European Union do not understand why it takes so long for politics to regulate such an issue and find solutions. I believe that we have a responsibility to move forward now and actually do nails with our heads before the European elections. And we are not far from it. But on the other hand, it is unacceptable for the crisis regulation to be taken hostage in the Council for political reasons in order to play political games. I don't care if it comes from the left or the right side of the political spectrum. It is unacceptable if a debate is blocked and progress on this migration pact is blocked, only to somehow gain benefits for oneself in elections. There is too great a risk that we will fail with this migration pact, and we must not allow this to happen under any circumstances. I believe that we must act quickly now, and the Council must act quickly. Incidentally, I also believe that many of the points we have in the debate could already be implemented by the Member States today. If we succeed, then we will also get back in control of migration, then we will get the procedures at the external borders, high rule of law and humanitarian standards and a crisis mechanism that actually helps in the crisis.
Corrupt large-scale sale of Schengen visas (debate)
Thank you, colleague. First of all, I trust the Commission. And I heard what Commissioner Schinas said at the beginning. He said that there are questions that have not been answered. And we, as European Parliamentarians, we request from the Polish Government that all the questions that the Commission has sent are answered correctly. This is the reason why in Germany there is no trust anymore in the situation in Poland – because the Polish Government has sold visas to foreigners and they have entered the Schengen Area without any allowance normally. So please make sure that this Polish Government is working on replying to all questions and then freedom of movement in the European Union will be reinstated.
Corrupt large-scale sale of Schengen visas (debate)
Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, Freedom of movement is undoubtedly the greatest achievement of the Schengen area. But this freedom of movement is now in doubt - unfortunately - on the border between Germany and Poland. The German government has been forced to reintroduce border controls due to the visa scandal in Poland. Ladies and gentlemen, do you think that a German government makes this fun to annoy the Polish people? On the contrary: We would be happy if we could rely on the Polish government and maintain freedom of movement in the Schengen area. But your government, the Polish government, which pretends to care about migration issues, but in reality in the past has always delayed any progress at the European level on migration - your Polish government has sold visas to other people who are not actually allowed into the Schengen area. This is why the Polish population today has to suffer from border controls. Dear colleagues, instead of throwing fog candles here, you should rather be involved in clarifying this scandal. That would be your duty to the Polish people and to all Europeans, so that borderless travel in Europe is possible again. (The speaker agreed to respond to a question about the "blue card" procedure.)
Reviewing the protection status of wolves and other large carnivores in the EU (topical debate)
Madam President, Commissioner! I have followed the debate here and it is exciting to hear how different the views on the subject are, depending on whether you come from a region where there is a wolf or not. I come from Lower Saxony, in the north of Germany, and at the end of August in Gräpel, which is about 60 kilometers from me, 55 sheep were torn and 50 more injured from 112 in total who have been on this pasture. It's south of Hamburg. This is not a flat and this is not an uninhabited area. After the official wolf monitoring in Lower Saxony, we have 50 packs, plus individual animals, plus couples. Lower Saxony is a country with about 8 million inhabitants and slightly larger than the Netherlands. Just so you can visually imagine how great the pressure on grazing animal husbandry is at the moment with us. Because the wolf is a cultural follower. He walks through our villages and he prefers to tear pasture animals, because this is the easiest prey. A few years ago, we also said: Yes, you have to shoot individual animals. Yes, you have to raise the fences. We need to improve monitoring. But that's no longer enough for the stock of wolves we have today. We finally need a lowering of the protection status, even if it is only regional for individual areas. But we need this lowering of the protection status so that we can finally get into active wolf management.
Madam President, Commissioner! Alternative fuels are undoubtedly the key to decarbonising aviation. Also the only key we have, because electrification, as other colleagues have already said, will take some time. Now it's time to build up production capacity. And we are setting the right framework conditions for this with this law. As the European Union, we are at the forefront of decarbonisation and must ensure that other regions follow suit in this global sector, otherwise there will be distortions of competition to the detriment of European industry. In my view, it is now important that the Commission swiftly Book&Claimimplementation of the system and, if necessary, the SAF allowances to set the right framework conditions to ensure that the market take-up of alternative fuels – and, by the way, many different alternative fuels – is then also ensured, so that the industry actually becomes greener and we can say in the future: Flying is no longer the difficult means of transport, but we can board the plane with a clear conscience.
EU-Tunisia Agreement - aspects related to external migration policy (debate)
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, Yes, we need migration agreements with third countries. And the sections in the Tunisia agreement on the economic stabilization of the country are not at all bad in terms of content. But I wonder: Why now? Why now that President Kais Saied is turning the country into an autocracy? Why not when we had democratic structures in Tunisia? Is Kais Saied really a reliable partner for us in the European Union? I don't think so. Just six days ago, opposition activists were arrested again in Tunisia, judges are simply dismissed without further ado, and on migration issues, is he a good partner? Can someone be a good partner who simply exposes migrants in the desert to Libya without water? I don't think so. In the six weeks following the conclusion of the agreement, the number of migrants from Tunisia to Europe increased by 70%. I don't think this agreement works that way. For me, it must be clear: No human rights, no democracy – no agreement.
Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, I think it is good that the proposal for the greening of transport is finally here. The issue of emissions measurement in particular is, I believe, one with which we can achieve greater transparency for citizens. We as Free Democrats will fight for this report to uphold technological neutrality. I believe that in order to transport goods in a CO2-neutral manner, we need as much technology as possible that is available to us. Because forwarding companies are usually medium-sized companies, and they need the right vehicle with the right infrastructure for their business model, dear colleagues! I would like to say at this point, because this is how the fear of the giant trucks is opened up: Larger trucks, longer trucks are more ecological because they emit less CO2 per tonne of freight transported. They also have a lower axle load per axle and are therefore quite good to use for road traffic. And they can be used well on defined routes and are therefore a good contribution to the decarbonisation of transport.
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 29-30 June 2023, in particular in the light of recent steps towards concluding the Migration Pact (debate)
Mr President, Madam Minister, Commissioner! It is good that the Member States have now agreed. Das ist ein Zeichen der Handlungsfähigkeit in einer Frage, in der Europa viel zu lange nicht handlungsfähig gewesen ist. Now we can finally begin negotiations between the Council and Parliament. As Free Democrats, we support the paradigm shift towards more order in migration and the introduction of border procedures, of course with high humanitarian and rule of law standards. In addition to reducing irregular migration, we also need to broaden the pathways of migration to the labour market. Because we need immigration into our labour market if we want to maintain prosperity in Europe. We Liberals are proposing a European talent pool for this. However, it is now important that Member States also find a position on the crisis mechanism. The rules for normal times are important, but it is crucial that we as Europeans also have an answer for times of crisis. The Member States must now deliver.