Votazione al Parlamento europeo
RELAZIONE sulla proposta di regolamento del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio relativo al meccanismo unionale di protezione civile e al sostegno dell'Unione alla preparazione e risposta alle emergenze sanitarie, e recante abrogazione della decisione n. 1313/2013/UE (meccanismo unionale di protezione civile)
Data: 12.11.2026Riferimento: A10-0271/2026Risultato complessivo
Approvata- 424 A favore
- 105 Contro
- 83 Astensione
- 108 Non ha votato
Come contiamo
- I voti Favorevoli, Contrari e Astensione provengono dal verbale di votazione nominale del Parlamento europeo.
- «Non ha votato» è derivato: deputati con mandato nel giorno della votazione per i quali non è stato registrato alcun voto. Le astensioni non contano per questo.
- Le successive correzioni di voto vengono mostrate ma non modificano il risultato ufficiale.
- Ogni votazione (votazione globale, emendamento, votazione parziale) conta separatamente. Per questo i totali possono differire da pagine che contano in modo diverso.
Stato e procedura
Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.
- Votazione del
- Ultima fase documentata
- Plenaria · (1 giorno fa)
- Prossima fase prevista
- Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.
Svolgimento della procedura
2025/0223(COD) · COD
Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.
- Documentato: Deferimento
- Documentato: Esame in commissione
- Documentato: Plenaria
- Ultimo documentato: Plenaria
Nota sulla votazione per appello nominale
I dati aperti del Parlamento europeo sono in ritardo. Conosciamo questo passaggio dai risultati della votazione per appello nominale; il Parlamento di solito lo registra più tardi.
Attività documentate (21)
- Deferimento alla commissione
- Relazione della commissione presentata
- Emendamenti presentati in commissione
- Emendamenti presentati in commissione
- Emendamenti presentati in commissione
- Emendamenti presentati in commissione
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Relazione della commissione approvata
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Discussione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:
Fonti
Dati: EP Open Data API
Cronologia degli emendamenti (10)
Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Presentato da Catarina Martins · The Left
Aggiunto: Under no circumstances shall the actions, resources, assets, personnel or funding provided for under this Regulation be placed under military chain of command or be integrated into combat operations, collective defense or direct support to Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions.
Article 31 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Presentato da Catarina Martins · The Left
Aggiunto: 1a. The use of military assets and capacities for providing assistance through the Union mechanism shall remain a last resort, under civilian oversight, subject to formal proof of the unavailability of civilian means. The deployment of these military assets shall be strictly limited to non-combat transport and logistical support under civilian operational direction, and no funds under this Regulation shall be allocated for the procurement or maintenance of military-grade equipment
Recital 1 a (new)
Presentato da Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Mathilde Androuët +3 · PfE
Aggiunto: (1a) The current Union Mechanism has demonstrated its effectiveness, in particular during the summer of 2026, when numerous wildfires affected various European countries. This Regulation should therefore preserve the core function and the exclusive civilian character of the Union Mechanism in support of Member States’ primary responsibility. New tasks and objectives should be limited to what is necessary for that purpose, should not divert financial or operational resources from it, and should remain strictly within the limits of the Union’s supporting competence.
Recital 23 a (new)
Presentato da Aleksandar Nikolic, Mathilde Androuët, Silvia Sardone +3 · PfE
Aggiunto: (23a) It should be noted that the strong public support for the Union Mechanism relates to operational solidarity between Member States and not to the transfer of crisis management powers to the Commission. Defence and national security are the sole responsibility of each Member State under Article 4(2) TEU, and the Union’s role in security and defence is governed exclusively by the intergovernmental provisions of Title V of the TEU, in which the Commission has no executive role. The Union Mechanism should therefore remain a civilian mechanism and not serve as a framework for civil-military preparedness arrangements.
Article 5
Presentato da Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Mathilde Androuët +3 · PfE
Rimosso: Article 5 EU civil-military preparedness and cooperation The Commission shall work jointly with the High Representative to: (a) contribute to the development of measures to enhance civil-military preparedness and coordination of response within the Union, in consultation with the Member States; (b) develop arrangements to clarify roles and responsibilities and lay down priorities for preparing and responding to disasters and crises within the Union as well as Union-wide scenarios to form the basis of Union-level training and exercises, best practices, including standard operating procedures, and mechanisms for effective cooperation and communication in crisis scenarios.Aggiunto: deletedArticle 26
Presentato da Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Mathilde Androuët +3 · PfE
Rimosso: Article 26 Crisis Coordination Hub 1. Without prejudice to Article 25, a Crisis Coordination Hub (the Hub) is hereby established. The Hub shall build upon the structure and the capabilities of the ERCC, including its analytical and scientific capabilities, situational awareness, and 24/7 operational capacity for cross-sectoral crises. 2. The Hub shall closely cooperate with the EEAS Crisis Response Centre in the external dimension of cross-sectoral crises, with respect to its roles and competences. 3. The Hub shall anticipate and monitor risks connected to cross-sectoral crises, including producing regular operational-outlook briefings on cross-sectoral and all-hazard risks. 4. The Hub shall ensure coordination with relevant national authorities, as designated in accordance with paragraph 5, Commission services, Union institutions and bodies, and provide support in situations referred to in Article 29(1). 5. Member States shall designate contact points for the functioning of the Hub and inform the Commission accordingly.Aggiunto: deletedArticle 2 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Presentato da Anja Arndt, Marc Jongen · ESN
Aggiunto: 8a. Support provided under this Regulation shall not confer on the Commission or on the ERCC any power to direct national authorities, to determine national civil protection or health policy, or to order the deployment of national personnel, equipment or other assets. Assistance on the territory of a Member State shall require a request by that Member State and its express consent to the scope and practical arrangements of that assistance. The requesting Member State shall retain overall direction of operations on its territory. The assisting Member State shall retain command of its personnel and the right to withdraw its assistance.
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Presentato da Marc Jongen, Anja Arndt · ESN
Rimosso: The Commission shall work jointly with the High Representative to:Aggiunto: Civil-military cooperation supported under this Regulation shall be voluntary and shall respect national constitutional requirements and national chains of command. At the request of the Member States concerned, the Commission may:Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Presentato da Marc Jongen, Anja Arndt · ESN
(a)
Rimosso: contribute to the development of measures to enhance civil-military preparedness and coordination of response within the Union, in consultation with the Member States;Aggiunto: facilitate the exchange of technical expertise;Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
Presentato da Marc Jongen, Anja Arndt · ESN
(b)
Rimosso: develop arrangements to clarify roles and responsibilities and lay down priorities for preparing and responding to disasters and crises within the Union as well as Union-wide scenarios to form the basis of Union-level training and exercises, best practices, including standard operating procedures, and mechanisms for effective cooperation and communication in crisis scenarios.Aggiunto: facilitate participation in joint training and exercises. This Regulation shall not confer any power on the Commission or the High Representative to set binding national civil-military preparedness priorities or to task, deploy or command national military assets.
Voto per gruppo politico
Come hanno votato i gruppi politici
- 69A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 9Non ha votato
- 160A favore
- 1Contro
- 0Astensione
- 24Non ha votato
- 116A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 19Non ha votato
- 42A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 11Non ha votato
- 16A favore
- 2Contro
- 20Astensione
- 7Non ha votato
- 14A favore
- 26Contro
- 30Astensione
- 14Non ha votato
- 7A favore
- 10Contro
- 8Astensione
- 3Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 44Contro
- 25Astensione
- 16Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 22Contro
- 0Astensione
- 5Non ha votato
Membri
Visualizzati 10 di 720
| Nome | Paese | Gruppo | Posizione di voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore |