RAPPORT sur la proposition de règlement du Parlement européen et du Conseil relatif au mécanisme de protection civile de l’Union et au soutien de l’Union en matière de préparation et de réaction aux situations d’urgence sanitaire, et abrogeant la décision nº 1313/2013/UE (mécanisme de protection civile de l’Union)

Texte tel que publié par le PE, en anglais.

1. Amendement 333 · Projet d'acte législatifRejeté

   Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)

   Déposé par Catarina Martins · The Left

   Ajouté: Under no circumstances shall the actions, resources, assets, personnel or funding provided for under this Regulation be placed under military chain of command or be integrated into combat operations, collective defense or direct support to Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions.

2. Amendement 334 · Projet d'acte législatifRejeté

   Article 31 – paragraph 1 a (new)

   Déposé par Catarina Martins · The Left

   Ajouté: 1a. The use of military assets and capacities for providing assistance through the Union mechanism shall remain a last resort, under civilian oversight, subject to formal proof of the unavailability of civilian means. The deployment of these military assets shall be strictly limited to non-combat transport and logistical support under civilian operational direction, and no funds under this Regulation shall be allocated for the procurement or maintenance of military-grade equipment

3. Amendement 335 · Projet d'acte législatifRejeté

   Recital 1 a (new)

   Déposé par Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Mathilde Androuët +3 · PfE

   Ajouté: (1a) The current Union Mechanism has demonstrated its effectiveness, in particular during the summer of 2026, when numerous wildfires affected various European countries. This Regulation should therefore preserve the core function and the exclusive civilian character of the Union Mechanism in support of Member States’ primary responsibility. New tasks and objectives should be limited to what is necessary for that purpose, should not divert financial or operational resources from it, and should remain strictly within the limits of the Union’s supporting competence.

4. Amendement 336 · Projet d'acte législatifRejeté

   Recital 23 a (new)

   Déposé par Aleksandar Nikolic, Mathilde Androuët, Silvia Sardone +3 · PfE

   Ajouté: (23a) It should be noted that the strong public support for the Union Mechanism relates to operational solidarity between Member States and not to the transfer of crisis management powers to the Commission. Defence and national security are the sole responsibility of each Member State under Article 4(2) TEU, and the Union’s role in security and defence is governed exclusively by the intergovernmental provisions of Title V of the TEU, in which the Commission has no executive role. The Union Mechanism should therefore remain a civilian mechanism and not serve as a framework for civil-military preparedness arrangements.

5. Amendement 337 · Projet d'acte législatifRejeté

   Article 5

   Déposé par Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Mathilde Androuët +3 · PfE

   Supprimé: Article 5 EU civil-military preparedness and cooperation The Commission shall work jointly with the High Representative to: (a) contribute to the development of measures to enhance civil-military preparedness and coordination of response within the Union, in consultation with the Member States; (b) develop arrangements to clarify roles and responsibilities and lay down priorities for preparing and responding to disasters and crises within the Union as well as Union-wide scenarios to form the basis of Union-level training and exercises, best practices, including standard operating procedures, and mechanisms for effective cooperation and communication in crisis scenarios. Ajouté: deleted

6. Amendement 338 · Projet d'acte législatifRejeté

   Article 26

   Déposé par Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Mathilde Androuët +3 · PfE

   Supprimé: Article 26 Crisis Coordination Hub 1. Without prejudice to Article 25, a Crisis Coordination Hub (the Hub) is hereby established. The Hub shall build upon the structure and the capabilities of the ERCC, including its analytical and scientific capabilities, situational awareness, and 24/7 operational capacity for cross-sectoral crises. 2. The Hub shall closely cooperate with the EEAS Crisis Response Centre in the external dimension of cross-sectoral crises, with respect to its roles and competences. 3. The Hub shall anticipate and monitor risks connected to cross-sectoral crises, including producing regular operational-outlook briefings on cross-sectoral and all-hazard risks. 4. The Hub shall ensure coordination with relevant national authorities, as designated in accordance with paragraph 5, Commission services, Union institutions and bodies, and provide support in situations referred to in Article 29(1). 5. Member States shall designate contact points for the functioning of the Hub and inform the Commission accordingly. Ajouté: deleted

7. Amendement 340 · Projet d'acte législatifRejeté

   Article 2 – paragraph 8 a (new)

   Déposé par Anja Arndt, Marc Jongen · ESN

   Ajouté: 8a. Support provided under this Regulation shall not confer on the Commission or on the ERCC any power to direct national authorities, to determine national civil protection or health policy, or to order the deployment of national personnel, equipment or other assets. Assistance on the territory of a Member State shall require a request by that Member State and its express consent to the scope and practical arrangements of that assistance. The requesting Member State shall retain overall direction of operations on its territory. The assisting Member State shall retain command of its personnel and the right to withdraw its assistance.

8. Amendement 344 · Projet d'acte législatifRejeté

   Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

   Déposé par Marc Jongen, Anja Arndt · ESN

   Supprimé: The Commission shall work jointly with the High Representative to: Ajouté: Civil-military cooperation supported under this Regulation shall be voluntary and shall respect national constitutional requirements and national chains of command. At the request of the Member States concerned, the Commission may:

9. Amendement 345 · Projet d'acte législatifRejeté

   Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a

   Déposé par Marc Jongen, Anja Arndt · ESN

   (a) Supprimé: contribute to the development of measures to enhance civil-military preparedness and coordination of response within the Union, in consultation with the Member States; Ajouté: facilitate the exchange of technical expertise;

10. Amendement 346 · Projet d'acte législatifRejeté

    Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b

    Déposé par Marc Jongen, Anja Arndt · ESN

    (b) Supprimé: develop arrangements to clarify roles and responsibilities and lay down priorities for preparing and responding to disasters and crises within the Union as well as Union-wide scenarios to form the basis of Union-level training and exercises, best practices, including standard operating procedures, and mechanisms for effective cooperation and communication in crisis scenarios. Ajouté: facilitate participation in joint training and exercises. This Regulation shall not confer any power on the Commission or the High Representative to set binding national civil-military preparedness priorities or to task, deploy or command national military assets.