Vote au Parlement européen

Structure et taux des accises applicables aux tabacs manufacturés et aux produits connexes du tabac (refonte)

Tomáš Kubín - Proposition de la Commission au Conseil
Date: 17.06.2026·Référence: A10-0161/2026
Rapporteur: Tomáš Kubín

Résultat global

Rejeté
  • 181 Pour
  • 439 Contre
  • 38 Abstention
  • 61 N'a pas voté
Statut et procédure

Résultat tel qu'enregistré par le Parlement européen.

Vote du
Dernière étape documentée
Autres activités · (il y a 149 jours)
Prochaine étape prévue
Aucune autre étape n'est prévue dans la source.

Déroulement de la procédure

2025/0580(CNS) · CNS

Activités documentées de la procédure. Elles ne prouvent pas qu’une loi est entrée en vigueur.

  1. Documenté: Renvoi58 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  2. Documenté: Examen en commission187 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  3. Documenté: Plénière9 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  4. Dernier documenté: Autres activités149 jours depuis le début de cette étape
Activités documentées (12)
  1. Renvoi en commission
  2. Adoption de l’avis en commission
  3. Dépôt du rapport en commission
  4. Dépôt d’amendements en commission
  5. Adoption du rapport en commission
  6. Dépôt en séance plénière
  7. Dépôt en séance plénière
  8. Dépôt en séance plénière
  9. Dépôt en séance plénière
  10. Autre activité documentée
  11. Vote en séance plénière
  12. Résultats du vote en séance plénière
Activités prévues (réalisation non confirmée)
  1. Vote en séance plénière

Fiche de procédure (OEIL) · Données du Parlement européen
Consulté le:

Sources

Données : EP Open Data API

De quoi s’agit-il ?

  • Réforme de la directive sur les taxes sur le tabac pour harmoniser les droits d'accises.
  • Intégration de nouveaux produits nicotiniques comme les cigarettes électroniques et les sachets de nicotine.
  • Ajustement des taux de taxation tous les trois ans .
Source : Résumé généré par IA avec Mistral

Historique des amendements (8)

Texte tel que publié par le PE, en anglais.

  1. Amendement 89Rejeté

    Recital 3

    Déposé par César Luena · S&D

    (3) It is necessary to ensure that the Supprimé: Union’s Ajouté: Union's fiscal legislation on tobacco and tobacco related products continues to ensure the … mind that tobacco and tobacco related products can cause serious harm to Supprimé: health , that Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan2 Ajouté: health, that Europe's Beating Cancer Plan set the goal of reaching a tobacco-free Europe and that the Union is Party to the World Health Supprimé: Organization’s Ajouté: Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Supprimé: Control . Ajouté: Control. This health protection objective is particularly pressing as the European region has the highest prevalence of smoking globally1a and the Union is not on track to meet the targets it committed to in its Beating Cancer Plan. To achieve this twin objective the EU and the Member States should … tobacco trade, notably illicit imports of tobacco and related products from third Supprimé: countries3. Ajouté: countries. In addition, excise duties resulting in higher retail prices are proven to have a meaningful impact on reducing consumption of tobacco products. Therefore, minimum excise rates should be set at a level to encourage the cessation of tobacco consumption and to prevent substitution amongst product types. New products (liquids for e-cigarettes, other manufactured tobacco, nicotine pouches and other nicotine products) Ajouté: also have increasing popularity, especially among young people, Supprimé: and besides Ajouté: frustrating the progress in achieving a tobacco-free Europe by 2040. Besides the intrinsic public health risk these products represent, Supprimé: they also have the potential of opening the way towards conventional smoking. Ajouté: including as a gateway to conventional smoking and to dual use of both conventional and novel products, their rapid proliferation makes the ambitious recast of this Directive an urgent and once-in-a-generation opportunity to make tobacco and nicotine products less affordable, protect Europeans from addiction, and generate public revenue for health systems. 1a World Health Organisation, "WHO global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco use 2000–2024 and projections 2025–2030", October 2025, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240116276 2 Europe's Beating Cancer Plan, COM(2021) 44 final. 3 In the case …

  2. Amendement 90Rejeté

    Recital 3 a (new)

    Déposé par César Luena · S&D

    Ajouté: (3a) The World Health Organization does not recommend the use of nicotine-containing products (liquids for e-cigarettes, other manufactured tobacco, nicotine pouches and other nicotine products) for smoking cessation and instead advocates for strengthening health systems to provide evidence-based cessation measures, including behavioural counselling and approved pharmacotherapies. Instead, these products, whether combustible or smokeless, pose a growing threat to cardiovascular health. While tobacco smoking continues to cause millions of deaths annually, the rapid uptake of e-cigarettes, heated tobacco and synthetic nicotine pouches, particularly among the youth, risks reversing decades of progress in tobacco control. The precautionary principle therefore requires that all such products be subject to excise duties commensurate with their addictive properties and public health risks1a. 1a Münzel, T., Crea, F., Rajagopalan, S., & Lüscher, T. (2025). Nicotine and the cardiovascular system: Unmasking a global public health threat. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf1010. and Chen, D. T.-H., Grigg, J., & Filippidis, F. T. (2024). European Respiratory Society statement on novel nicotine and tobacco products, their role in tobacco control and “harm reduction”. European Respiratory Journal, 63(2), 2301808. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01808-2023.

  3. Amendement 91Adopté

    Recital 4 a (new)

    Déposé par César Luena · S&D

    Ajouté: (4a) The Union is a Party to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Article 5.3 of that Convention requires that, in setting and implementing tobacco control policies, Parties act to protect those policies from commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry. The legislative process leading to this Directive, including any delegated and implementing measures adopted pursuant to it, should be conducted in full compliance with that obligation. The use of studies, data or projections produced by or on behalf of tobacco industry actors should be treated with particular caution and should not, in itself, constitute a basis for reducing the ambition of minimum excise duty rates or extending transitional periods.

  4. Amendement 92Rejeté

    Recital 15

    Déposé par César Luena · S&D

    … excise duty on cigarettes should include, in addition to a specific component Supprimé: calculated per unit of the product, Ajouté: set at EUR 215 per 1000 cigarettes, a proportional component Supprimé: based on Ajouté: set at 63 % of the retail selling price, inclusive of all taxes. The turnover tax on …

  5. Amendement 93Rejeté

    Recital 18

    Déposé par César Luena · S&D

    Supprimé: (18) A certain degree of convergence would help ensure a high level of … the price of tobacco and tobacco related products, which in turn influences Supprimé: consumers’ Ajouté: consumers' consumption habits. Fraud and smuggling undermine tax induced price levels, in particular … and thus jeopardise the achievement of tobacco control and health protection objectives. Ajouté: The risk of illicit trade should not be invoked to justify the reduction or limitation of minimum excise duty rates. Empirical evidence consistently demonstrates that the primary drivers of illicit tobacco trade are weak enforcement capacity, organised crime, and gaps in customs cooperation rather than the level of taxation itself. The appropriate response to illicit trade is strengthened enforcement, enhanced cross-border cooperation between competent authorities, and investment in track-and-trace systems, not the suppression of legitimate public health taxation objectives. Member States and Union institutions should ensure that resources allocated to anti-smuggling measures are commensurate with the scale of the challenge, and that the Excise Movement and Control System (EMCS) and track-and-trace obligations under Directive 2014/40/EU are fully enforced.

  6. Amendement 94Rejeté

    Article 12 – paragraph 3 a (new)

    Déposé par César Luena · S&D

    Ajouté: 3a. The newly adjusted minimum tax level shall not be lower than the minimum excise duty applicable in the Member State immediately prior to the rate adjustment pursuant to paragraphs 2 and 3. Where the adjustment would result in a lower level, the minimum excise duty shall remain unchanged at its pre-adjustment level.

  7. Amendement 95Rejeté

    Article 12 – paragraph 4

    Déposé par César Luena · S&D

    … 16, Article 20(2) and Article 22(2) and adjusted in accordance with paragraphs Supprimé: 2 and 3 Ajouté: 2, 3 and 3a of this Article from the first day of the year following the …

  8. Amendement 96Rejeté

    Article 12 – paragraph 4 a (new)

    Déposé par César Luena · S&D

    Ajouté: 4a. The adjustment of minimum Union rates pursuant to this Article shall not be subject to any upper limit. Any cap on the periodic adjustment would risk reproducing the structural erosion of minimum rates that characterised the period of application of Directive 2011/64/EU, contrary to the public health and internal market objectives of this Directive.

Vote par groupe politique

Comment les groupes politiques ont voté

Les membres

Montrer 10 de 719

Position de vote
NomPaysGroupePosition de vote
SlovénieEPP
Pour
PologneEPP
Pour
AllemagneEPP
Pour
TchéquieEPP
Pour
EspagneEPP
Vote prévuAbstentionVote émis : Pour
CroatieEPP
Pour
LituanieEPP
Pour
PologneEPP
Pour
PologneECR
Pour
DanemarkRenew
Pour
Afficher plus
Suivez-nous sur Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en