
Plenary speeches · European ParliamentPlenary speeches · EU Parliament
What Hans spoke about.
- All Contributions
- 51 Since July 1, 2024
- Time at the Floor
- 1.3 h 79 min
- Average speech length
- 1:38 Rank: 114 / 696
Activity
Monthly speechesSpeeches Ranking
Since July 1, 2024
- 1
Lukas SieperGermany
Renew405
- 2
Sebastian TynkkynenFinland
ECR365
- 3
Juan Fernando López AguilarSpain
S&D343
- 4
João OliveiraPortugal
GUE/NGL236
- 5
Vytenis Povilas AndriukaitisLithuania
S&D217
Original language distribution of speeches
51 Speeches
The Trump administration waiving of sanctions and tariffs required on Russia under the Graham Act (debate)
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen. The European Union should send President Trump a thank you card, because he has suspended the punitive tariffs of the Graham law at the last moment, which many here in the house would have liked to welcome with standing ovations. The Graham law would have affected not only Moscow, but also the EU. Hungary, Slovakia, France and Belgium are among the largest bu
Humanitarian situation in Ukraine (debate)
Order of business
Europe's response to reduced US military deployments in Europe, particularly at its Eastern flank in the light of the latest US decisions (debate)
Madam President, The United States withdraws troops it had transferred to Europe in the wake of the Ukraine crisis. This was politically announced and therefore foreseeable. If you are worried that the US will soon abandon Europe completely, you can turn to the other side with peace of mind: Great powers tend to make their vassals tremble occasionally. The United States will certainly not give up
EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate)
Madam President, Modern AI needs top-level research. But we distrust excellence and declare social democratic mediocrity to be a political virtue. AI needs a strong interplay of universities, capital, start-ups and large-scale industry. But we stifle entrepreneurship in regulations and reporting obligations. AI needs top personnel and attractive conditions. But we scare off the best minds and pref
Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine (debate)
Madam President, From the outset, the European Parliament has reiterated and rightly condemned Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine in violation of international law. However, it has not yet condemned the US war against Iran, which is also contrary to international law. The US war against Iraq in 2003, with more than 500,000 civilian deaths, has not yet been condemned. This is obvious and pr
Tackling barriers to the single market for defence - Flagship European defence projects of common interest
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen! The European Union loves crises. After all, crises are a wonderful means of enforcing extraordinary policy measures. Typical features of crisis rhetoric are, first, the existential threat: Climate death, corona death, Russian death. Second, the time pressure: We must act immediately! Thirdly, the alleged lack of alternatives. Fourthly, the nature of the measu
Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the Ukraine Support Loan for 2026 and 2027 (vote)
Building a stronger European defence in light of an increasingly volatile international environment (debate)
Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challenges (debate)
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen! Mr Pozņaks' drone report is characterised by excellent expertise, but it completely ignores the actual danger situation in which we find ourselves. We must bear in mind that Europe today faces a heap of security policy shards. For decades, it had been believed that geopolitical influence could be exerted solely as an economic power. But only those who have their
CFSP and CSDP (Article 36 TEU) (joint debate)
Mr President! Ladies and Gentlemen! In terms of security policy, Europe is facing a heap of shards, in all directions: Overstretched to the east and entangled in a hopeless war, open and defenseless to the south, to the west in conflict with our own leading power and to the north to the Arctic, we are heading towards an iceberg. And it could get worse. A withdrawal of the US from Europe would leav
Order of business
Madam President, I refer to Rule 10(4) of the Rules of Procedure, according to which insulting remarks must not be made in parliamentary debates. In December, during the debate on cases of pro-Russian espionage, Mr Kelleher of the Renew Group described members of the right and left as useful idiots. This expression characterizes people as manipulable and stupid. It degrades other Members and damag
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)
Madam President, Colleagues! The US National Security Strategy shows that international relations are being reorganized. The goal of the United States is now to reach a strategic balance with other major powers. As a result, Europe will have to take more responsibility for its own security in the future. It is therefore not in the European interest to make Ukraine the total frontline state, the st
Condemnation of the terrorist attack against the Hanukkah celebrations in Sydney and solidarity with the victims and their families (debate)
EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine (debate)
EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine (debate)
European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’) (debate)
Mr Sieper, it is wrong to assume that it would be in Russia’s interest to dominate and control Ukraine as a whole. Because then you wouldn't have gone into invasion with such a small army. The goal of Russia is: no NATO membership of Ukraine and the return to Ukraine's neutrality status, as was the case until 2014. That was and would be the best thing for this country, and that is why we should su
European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’) (debate)
Mr Sieper, thank you very much for the question. Due to its temporal interpretation, the EDIP project will no longer be able to benefit Ukraine in any way. What it will do, however, is to provide a strong incentive for Russia to move the western border with Ukraine, the line of contact, as far west as possible. This is not in Ukraine's interest.
European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’) (debate)
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen! It is perfectly true that the European states themselves want to master the technological and industrial foundations of their defence capabilities. However, it is completely wrong to include Ukraine as an equal and even privileged partner in this project. Because the country is in a war that it threatens to lose and is paralyzed by notorious corruption. Suppo
Stepping up funding for Ukraine’s reconstruction and defence: the use of Russian frozen assets (debate)
Mr Colleague, the mistake you are making is that Russia would ever pay reparations. Russia simply won't do that. How are you going to force Russia to make such reparations payments? You can't do it. The result is: Either the central bank reserves must actually be expropriated, or the EU will remain seated on its gifts to Ukraine.
Stepping up funding for Ukraine’s reconstruction and defence: the use of Russian frozen assets (debate)
Madam President, The planned seizure of Russian assets is not an expression of the rule of law. It's their hollowing out. State immunity is a cornerstone of the international order. Does the EU want to bring down this order? A reparation loan sounds harmless, but here is nothing more than the legally camouflaged expropriation. In doing so, the EU opens a Pandora's box. If we confiscate foreign cen
Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations (debate)
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen. If you want to make the EU a central state, you should say so to EU citizens. Those who lay their hands on the unanimity principle – and this is exactly what this report does – lay their hands on the sovereignty of the Member States. They claim that Article 49 allows for a transition to qualified majority voting without amending the Treaties. Here we are apparen
Declaration of principles for a gender-equal society (debate)
Here I can refer – I reply in German – to what Mrs Boßdorf has already said. These are issues to be decided by the peoples in their national legislation and not at the level of the European Union, as Slovakia has done. If a people decides to criminalize abortion, that is a decision that that people are allowed to make.
Declaration of principles for a gender-equal society (debate)
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen. Equal rights for women are fully realized in European societies. And that's a good thing. If you want to talk about equality, you should not consult the left-green education emergency, but the evolutionary psychology. A man with 100 women can have a hundred times more children than a man with only one. A woman who has 100 men, on the other hand, cannot have a si