Abstimmung im Europäischen Parlament

Erforderliche Reaktion der EU im Hinblick auf die Lage der Rechtsstaatlichkeit und der Grundrechte sowie auf die missbräuchliche Verwendung von EU-Mitteln in der Slowakei

Entschließungsantrag (gesamter Text)
Datum: 20.05.2026·Referenz: B10-0245/2026/REV1

Gesamtergebnis

Angenommen
  • 347 Dafür
  • 165 Dagegen
  • 25 Enthaltung
  • 180 Nicht abgestimmt
Status und Verfahren

Ergebnis laut Europäischem Parlament.

Abgestimmt am
Zuletzt dokumentierter Schritt
Plenum · (vor 275 Tagen)
Nächster geplanter Schritt
In der Quelle ist kein weiterer Schritt geplant.

Verfahrensverlauf

2026/2607(RSP) · RSP

Dokumentierte Verfahrensschritte. Daraus folgt nicht, dass ein Gesetz in Kraft getreten ist.

  1. Zuletzt dokumentiert: Plenum275 Tage seit Beginn dieses Schritts
Dokumentierte Schritte (7)
  1. Plenardebatte
  2. Einreichung für das Plenum
  3. Einreichung für das Plenum
  4. Einreichung für das Plenum
  5. Einreichung für das Plenum
  6. Plenarabstimmung
  7. Ergebnisse der Plenarabstimmung
Geplante Schritte (keine Bestätigung der Durchführung)
  1. Plenardebatte
  2. Plenarabstimmung

Verfahrensakte (OEIL) · Daten des Europäischen Parlaments
Abgerufen:

Quellen

Daten: EP Open Data API

Verlauf der Änderungsanträge (7)

Wortlaut wie vom EP veröffentlicht, auf Englisch.

  1. Änderungsantrag 1 · Entschließungsantrag B10-0245/2026/REV1 (PPE, S&D, Renew, Verts/ALE, The Left)Abgelehnt

    Recital C a (new)

    Eingereicht von Milan Uhrík, Milan Mazurek · ESN

    Hinzugefügt: Ca. whereas, pursuant to Article 4(2) TEU, the EU is bound to respect the equality of Member States before the Treaties as well as their national identities, inherent in their fundamental political and constitutional structures; whereas the assessment of the rule of law must be carried out objectively, impartially and on the basis of clearly established legal criteria, and must not be used as an instrument of political pressure against democratically elected governments or national parliaments;

  2. Änderungsantrag 2 · Entschließungsantrag B10-0245/2026/REV1 (PPE, S&D, Renew, Verts/ALE, The Left)Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 1

    Eingereicht von Milan Uhrík, Milan Mazurek · ESN

    Entfernt: Expresses deep concern over the deterioration of democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights in Slovakia; highlights that verifiable adherence by the Member States to both the rule of law and the Charter must be regarded as an essential precondition to receiving any EU funds; underlines Hinzugefügt: Underlines that all programmes and investments financed by the EU budget must serve the public interest; Entfernt: stresses that systemic deficiencies in the rule of law, in particular in the independence of the judiciary and in audit and control systems, endanger the protection of the EU’s financial interests;

  3. Änderungsantrag 3 · Entschließungsantrag B10-0245/2026/REV1 (PPE, S&D, Renew, Verts/ALE, The Left)Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 4

    Eingereicht von Milan Uhrík, Milan Mazurek · ESN

    4. Entfernt: Expresses deep concern about Hinzugefügt: Fully respects the constitutional amendments in Slovakia, Entfernt: in particular those restricting fundamental rights, the rule of law and the primacy of EU law; notes with concern that civil society organisations have warned that these amendments may violate fundamental rights; stresses that constitutional provisions must be formulated with sufficient precision to prevent arbitrary interpretation and must fully comply with obligations under EU law, including the Charter, as well as international human rights standards; recalls that the primacy of EU law and the binding nature of international obligations must be fully respected and that no constitutional provision can justify non-compliance with judgments of the CJEU or the European Court of Human Rights; calls on the Slovak authorities to ensure that its Constitution complies fully with EU law and international human rights law and to take into account the recommendations of the Venice Commission and international human rights bodies, in particular as regards the primacy of EU law, the rights to private and family life, non-discrimination on grounds of gender and sexual orientation and Hinzugefügt: emphasising that the right to Entfernt: education; Hinzugefügt: amend and adopt a national constitution is a sovereign and exclusive prerogative of each Member State; underlines that such processes are an expression of national constitutional identity, which the EU is bound to respect under the Treaties; recognises that the internal organisation of public authorities and the formulation of constitutional provisions fall within the primary competence of the Member States;

  4. Änderungsantrag 4 · Entschließungsantrag B10-0245/2026/REV1 (PPE, S&D, Renew, Verts/ALE, The Left)Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 15

    Eingereicht von Milan Uhrík, Milan Mazurek · ESN

    15. Entfernt: Expresses deep concern about the deterioration of media freedom and pluralism in Slovakia, including political interference in public service media, pressure on journalists through a climate of hostility, smear campaigns and disinformation, the use of strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs), including by high-ranking political figures, and the risk of a concentration of media ownership in politically aligned hands, combined with dismissals of key cultural institution leaders, which risk creating a chilling effect on press freedom and public discourse; stresses that a weakened media environment significantly reduces democratic scrutiny and facilitates corruption in the implementation of EU funds; calls on the Slovak authorities to fully implement the Commission’s recommendations regarding the media, in particular as regards the legal framework for public service media, in compliance with the European Media Freedom Act and ensuring editorial independence and the protection of journalists; calls on Slovakia to fully and effectively comply with the European Media Freedom Act and urges the Commission to closely and proactively monitor its implementation; recalls that the Slovak authorities have to respect the freedom of expression and arts in the functioning and funding of cultural institutions, and to refrain from the misuse of legal actions that restrict public debate; pays tribute to Ján Kuciak following his assassination and to his essential work as an investigative journalist; calls on the Slovak authorities to ensure that justice is served in this case; Hinzugefügt: Stresses that the regulation and organisation of the media landscape are part of the sovereign prerogative of the Member States, while emphasising the fundamental principle that journalists and media outlets should maintain strict impartiality, professional independence and objectivity in their reporting;

  5. Änderungsantrag 10 · Entschließungsantrag B10-0245/2026/REV1 (PPE, S&D, Renew, Verts/ALE, The Left)Abgelehnt

    Recital D a (new)

    Eingereicht von András László · PfE

    Hinzugefügt: Da. whereas the Commission has applied blatant double standards in respect of the rule of law; whereas rule of law debates and reports have been abused and weaponised against governments that defend their sovereignty in line with the EU Treaties;

  6. Änderungsantrag 12 · Entschließungsantrag B10-0245/2026/REV1 (PPE, S&D, Renew, Verts/ALE, The Left)Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 1 a (new)

    Eingereicht von András László · PfE

    Hinzugefügt: 1a. Condemns any attempt to use rule of law reports or other mechanisms to blackmail democratically elected governments; calls on the Commission to apply rule of law principles equally to all Member States and applicant countries; condemns the double standards applied by the Commission with regard to human rights; calls on the Commission and Parliament to adhere to rule of law principles and the principle of non-interference in domestic politics and national elections;

  7. Änderungsantrag 13 · Entschließungsantrag B10-0245/2026/REV1 (PPE, S&D, Renew, Verts/ALE, The Left)Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 14 a (new)

    Eingereicht von András László · PfE

    Hinzugefügt: 14a. Recalls that the European Court of Auditors, in its special report 11/2025, found that while NGOs have a strong influence on the EU’s decision-making process, there is a lack of transparency regarding the EU funding granted to these entities; expresses serious concern over grave irregularities in the management of European taxpayers’ funds in the case of the NGO Projekt Fórum, which, according to publicly available information, led to an order for the recovery of EUR 113 400 by the European Education and Culture Executive Agency in connection with the project Mirrors of Europe;

Abstimmung nach Fraktion

So haben die Fraktionen abgestimmt

Mitglieder

Anzeige 10 von 717

Stimmverhalten
NameLandFraktionStimmverhalten
FrankreichS&D
Dafür
DeutschlandGreens/EFA
Dafür
PolenEPP
Dafür
PolenEPP
Dafür
DeutschlandEPP
Dafür
ÖsterreichS&D
Dafür
KroatienS&D
Dafür
SchwedenS&D
Dafür
LitauenGreens/EFA
Dafür
SpanienS&D
Dafür
Mehr anzeigen
Folge uns auf Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en