Speeches

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, with Mr Mato's very balanced report on the CFP, we call on the Council and the Commission to pay more attention to the socio-economic importance of fisheries, as well as to the important role that fisheries play in our food supply. This is urgently needed, because the fishing industry has been hit hard in recent years. That's why the helm really needs to change. Unnecessarily restrictive measures that go beyond their purpose, such as the landing obligation and the pulse ban, must be removed. Fishermen must have sufficient access to their fishing grounds. The TAC and quota system has certainly proved its worth, but the current implementation with sometimes very drastic annual reductions creates a lot of uncertainty. I therefore wholeheartedly support the rapporteur's call for a multi-annual quota.

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, at a time of geopolitical tensions and uncertainty, it is very important to establish new strategic partnerships and strengthen existing ones. The European Union and India can do a lot for each other in this regard. In the field of trade and investment, but certainly also in the field of digitalisation and maritime security. In particular, to counterbalance China's increasing influence and aggression in the Indo-Pacific region. The rapporteur makes good recommendations in all these areas, but with her report we are also putting our finger on the sore spot, namely the human rights situation in India, which is becoming increasingly worrisome in many areas, especially around religious minorities. I am thinking of the anti-conversion laws and the inadequate action against Hindu extremists that sometimes make the lives of Christians and other religious minorities quite difficult. In recent years, attacks and intimidations against religious minorities have increased sharply. Ethnic conflicts also have an increasing religious component, as in Manipur. India needs to step up its efforts to investigate and prosecute those responsible for violence against religious minorities. Our message today is crystal clear: We support intensified cooperation with India, but only on condition that India takes our concerns about human rights seriously and actually solves the problems mentioned.

( – Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, while we are talking here, 136 hostages are being held by Hamas and other terrorist organisations. For over a hundred days. Hamas does not allow the Red Cross and other organizations to access the hostages to provide medical care. Ondertussen frustreert Hamas de humanitaire hulpverlening door hulpkonvooien te kapen om zo haar eigen strijders te bevoorrechten en de burgerbevolking aan haar lot over te laten. All this is unacceptable. Meanwhile, the unfounded lawsuit against Israel at the International Court of Justice has turned the world upside down. Well, what's to be done? 1. Unconditional release of all hostages and immediate access to the Red Cross. 2. Humanitarian aid through Israel and Egypt must continue. 3. Do not call for a permanent ceasefire yet, because as long as Hamas is not eliminated, there is no peace and no perspective, including for the civilian population in Gaza.

Mr President, for the Christian community in Plateau State in Nigeria, Christmas night ended in a nightmare this time. Two hundred of them were brutally murdered by Muslim extremists. Many hundreds were seriously injured. And what did we hear from the European Commission and the High Representative? No conviction, no statement, not even a post on X. Nothing at all. That is, of course, very bad, Mr President. All the more so as these attacks do not stand alone, but fit in with the pattern of increasing extremist violence in the region. I therefore call on the Commission and the High Representative to break the silence, to convey our concerns to the Nigerian authorities and to urge them to prosecute the perpetrators and to improve the protection of Christian villages. We must not leave the Christians in Nigeria to their fate.

Madam President, I would like to thank Mr Gahler for their support for our proposal, and we can agree to postpone this debate to the next session in February.

Mr President, last Christmas recess we were startled by reports of horrific attacks by extremists on Christian villages in Nigeria. Two hundred innocent villagers were killed and many hundreds seriously injured. Unfortunately, these attacks are not isolated. The region is increasingly confronted with extremist violence. No matter how you look at this situation, looking away from the ECR group is in any case not an option. The situation is too serious for that. We therefore propose that a statement by the Commission and the Council be put on the agenda on this subject with the title: “Recent attacks on Christian villages in Nigeria”. This is to reflect together on how we as Europe can contribute to stopping the violence there in the region.

You ask what a healthy and stable family is. I am convinced that it is in the best interest of a child to grow up with a father and with the mother. And I do not believe that it is in the best interest of a child not to be informed and not to grow up with the biological mother. I believe in the classic marriage and family with the father and the mother. I think that is the best way we can deal with our families in the European Union. And again, I think it is primarily a matter in which the Member States themselves have to make their own choices.

Mr President, with the Parenting Regulation, the European Union is on a slippery slope. After all, it enters an area that belongs to the Member States, namely family law. I know: this Regulation is limited to cross-border situations involving relocation to another country. But we can't ignore it: This regulation will soon force Member States to recognise parenting relationships that they consider to be inappropriate on the basis of their own considerations. For example, parent-child recognitions where the biological mother is kept out of the birth certificate. I am talking about surrogacy, in which many Member States are rightly very reluctant, partly because of the exploitation that goes with it. I can't possibly go along with this. I therefore very much hope that you will be able to support our amendments which seek at least to exclude surrogacy from the regulation. In the meantime, let's continue to invest in healthy and stable families. (The speaker agreed to answer a blue card question)

Mr President, the report on which we are going to vote this week is crystal clear: Europe needs to rethink its relationship with China. We have become too dependent on China. Concrete measures are also needed against Chinese interference and espionage in Europe. The report also rightly pays due attention to the continuing violation of human rights. Take religious freedom, for example: the one-party state's control of religious activities is becoming increasingly strict. In the meantime, the sinification of religion continues unabated, among other things by prescribing party propaganda in religious buildings. Camera surveillance, intimidation and arrests of believers are the order of the day, whether Christians, Uyghurs or Tibetans. There is nothing less fitting here than a strong condemnation. I hope that you, the Council and the Commission, will actively address this in your dialogue with China. In this context, it is also of strategic importance to improve EU-Taiwan relations. After all, Taiwan is a reliable partner with which good business can be done.

Mr President, Mr High Representative, ladies and gentlemen, in our search for solutions in this terrible war, we must not leave any possibility unexploited. I'm thinking of the hostages. If there is room to free them again, for example through humanitarian breaks, then we must of course take advantage of that opportunity. However, the one-sided pressure on Israel to achieve a long-term ceasefire is not justified. This is especially true of Hamas. Hamas is the biggest obstacle to peace. And speaking of obstacles, let's also look at the bad role of UNRWA in this conflict. Through the system of inheritance, in which refugee status automatically passes from parents to children, UNRWA artificially maintains a gigantic refugee problem. As a result of this approach, 70% of Palestinians in Gaza are now refugees in their own country. As a result, UNRWA has actually become part of the problem. It's time for you to face that, too.

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, in the Netherlands there are often watchers at abortion centres. Volunteers who let women know that there are alternatives. They offer financial, practical, social and psychological help, help to mother and child. And that saves lives. A European directive on combating violence against women and domestic violence is currently being negotiated. An important theme, certainly, but there is a very bad provision in this package. In our negotiating mandate there is a proposal to also qualify preventing or trying to prevent an abortion as a crime. So if I soon have a good conversation with a woman who is considering an abortion, and I suggest that she think about alternatives or offer her a leaflet on the street, am I punishable? That can't be true! Then we're going to punish someone who's trying to protect an unborn child, someone who's helping women in need. I call that really merciless. Instead of providing care, we are going to ban an outstretched hand. I therefore call on the negotiators to reconsider this part of the package. What's going on here is a really bad road.

Mr President, Mr High Representative, Commissioner, I would like to ask the following questions to all those who today feel that they should criticise Israel in particular, including Mr Borrell: Who has held more than 200 innocent civilians hostage for more than six weeks? That's right, Hamas. Who sowed death and destruction on October 7 at a peaceful music festival and in many kibbutz? That's right, Hamas. Who uses innocent civilians as a human shield? That's right, Hamas. Certainly, everything must now be aimed at getting all hostages free as soon as possible. We have seen the despair and sadness in the eyes of their relatives who told us their harrowing stories. The fact that there is now an agreement on the release of a first group is hopeful in this respect. But let's not forget: In order to achieve a lasting peace, Hamas will really have to disappear from the scene. Israel deserves our continued support in this fight.

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, on reducing the use of plant protection products, I see interesting developments in agriculture and horticulture: the use of natural fighters in closed crops, for example. Or look at innovations in mechanical weed control. Developments that we need to facilitate as much as possible. However, the proposed 50% reduction in 2030 raises major questions, leaving enough room to intervene in the event of diseases and pests? I'm afraid not. The definition of sensitive areas is also problematic. It leads to a total ban on the use of plant protection products in large parts of Europe, with all the consequences for food production. A different approach is therefore needed. No rigid, unachievable objectives, but above all support for initiatives from the sector. Certainly initiatives that reduce the environmental impact, such as precision farming and the use of low-risk resources.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, Commissioner, I am pleased to be able to present our report on the implementation of the Eel Regulation to you. First of all, I would like to thank all the shadow rapporteurs, all the staff involved and the secretariat of the Committee on Fisheries for their excellent cooperation. There is now a report that has broad support and absolutely deserves follow-up. Our main conclusion is that the current approach, both by the Council and the Commission, is far too one-sidedly aimed at limiting fishing. It has to be different. The Eel Regulation requires an integrated approach, which explicitly also looks at factors outside fisheries. Unfortunately, that happens too little. Fishing is already severely restricted, while other factors have a much greater impact on eel stocks. Unfortunately, the implementation of the Eel Regulation by the Member States leaves a lot to be desired. The fact that several Member States do not even bother to submit a report to the Commission on the implementation of the management plans is a sign in this respect. What are we specifically asking the Member States to do? Firstly, we call for much greater efforts by Member States to remove migratory barriers. After all, the eel is a migratory fish that comes to Europe from the Sargasso Sea and then swims back to reproduce. And on that trek he encounters all kinds of barriers. I understand very well that dams and dikes and locks are indispensable in many places, but there are plenty of innovative possibilities on the market to make them passable, such as fish stairs and fish-friendly pumps in mills. These opportunities are not yet being sufficiently exploited. Secondly, we ask the Member States to continue to expand glass eels. This gives young eel the opportunity to spread across Europe and preserves sustainable fishing. Thirdly, we call for better control and a tougher approach to the illegal trade in glass eels. Criminals still smuggle suitcases full of glass eel to China, where millions of euros are paid for this poaching. We really need to stop this. More attention should also be paid to other factors that influence the eel, such as water pollution, parasites and cormorants. Certification and traceability can play an important role in all this. In this respect, we see great initiatives from the sector. Let's cherish and support them. In our report, we also make concrete recommendations to improve the governance of eel management. For example, we call for the establishment of an expert group that can monitor Member States’ management plans and also serve as a platform to exchange good practices. We also recommend investing more in scientific research and making greater use of the knowledge and skills of fishermen. Mr President, the eel is a beautiful fish, a miracle of creation. With the broad approach that we in Parliament are advocating, it must be possible to improve eel stocks, to give both eel fishermen and eel farms a future and to enable consumers to continue to enjoy a delicious eel sandwich.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, waves of antisemitism are currently sweeping Europe and the rest of the world. An entire population is removed. That we have allowed this to happen in Europe, with our so-called high-quality European values. There's only one thing that fits here: Great collective shame. Since 7 October, the number of anti-Semitic incidents in the Netherlands alone has increased by 818 %. Even many of our universities are no longer able to provide Jewish students with a safe environment. In Brussels, protesters carried a flag with a swastika. The police stood by and looked at it. Let us not forget that Jew-hatred goes hand in hand with hatred of the State of Israel. We therefore need to tackle both. Otherwise, our fight against anti-Semitism is by definition a lost battle. What matters now is leadership and decisiveness. A zero-tolerance policy against anti-Semitism, but really. I really do not understand that some countries still allow demonstrations with very bad slogans that actually call for Jews to be expelled from their own countries. This should not be tolerated by the police. Furthermore, the detection and prosecution of those guilty of anti-Semitism should be a top priority. And let the EU finally ban organizations in Europe that openly sympathize with Hamas. I asked written questions to put organization Samidoun on the list of terrorist organizations. Here, too, more decisiveness is needed. I also call attention to a recent study by UN Watch, which shows that several teachers employed by UNRWA have openly supported Hamas's horrific actions. I would ask you, President of the Commission, to take this into account in your review of the aid. If the European Union is to be a credible community, it must act now.

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, if we want to be assured of food in the future, we must now ensure that a new generation of young farmers can start. Unfortunately, there are quite a few obstacles: availability of land; access to capital, loans rejected; the economic perspective of the sector, ever-changing rules and new requirements. Just to name a few examples. What we need is a stable policy. Not always different rules, but a clear framework that creates certainty for the future. And a better economic revenue model. How do we ensure that the competitive position of farmers in the EU is maintained? More attention needs to be paid to this. I am therefore pleased that we have included in this report that new policies must always be tested for their effects on young farmers. Finally, let's give our farmers, young and old, the appreciation they deserve. They are the ones who take care of our food and contribute to a liveable countryside on a daily basis. I would also like to thank the rapporteur and colleagues for their good cooperation on this excellent report.

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, protein is an essential part of our food system. I am pleased that both vegetable and animal proteins have been given an important place in this report, because they go hand in hand. I would like to underline three specific points: Firstly, in order to promote the cultivation of protein crops: the importance of new breeding techniques. Second, circularity. In this report, too, we call for more scope for not being allowed to reuse nutrients from animal manure. Commission, when will you finally come forward with the recognition of Renure as a substitute for fertiliser? Finally, I would like to stress the importance of fisheries. Fresh seafood is a high-quality protein source that replenishes itself over and over again. I call on the Commission and the Member States to take forward the concrete recommendations in this report, putting farmers and fishermen at the heart of it.

Mr President, Commissioner, Minister, ladies and gentlemen, the horrific acts of Hamas have deeply shocked us all. They have once again confronted us with the harsh reality. Israel is facing a nothing-and-nobody-forgiving terrorist organization. What we have to do is therefore crystal clear: Support Israel unconditionally in its fight against Hamas. But the hand must also be in its own bosom. Has the EU done enough to stop terrorism? The answer is: No! We have transferred millions to the Palestinian Authority, while the same Authority facilitates terrorism by, for example, paying generous salaries to relatives of deceased terrorists. What about the water pipes? Paid with European money that Hamas uses to make missiles. That is why I call on you: Support our amendments to the budget resolution which make the subsidy in Palestinian territories subject to very clear conditions. Of course, emergency aid is needed, but Hamas's aggression must not remain without consequences.

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, I regret to say that I cannot agree with the agreement on fisheries control that is now before us. For me, the pain point is mainly with the mandatory camera surveillance. A measure with which we place an entire sector in advance in the suspects' bank. In addition, with this camera surveillance you try to improve compliance with a measure that is simply very unworkable in practice. I am referring to the landing obligation which obliges fishermen to land unsaleable fish. A measure that completely overstepped its purpose. That is why I say: no cameras, stop stacking checks and stop this landing obligation. To be honest, I am also very critical of the new traceability obligations. I foresee a lot of administrative burden and little added value. Thank you to the rapporteur for all her efforts, but unfortunately I do not see enough of our wishes in the final package.

Mr President, Commissioner, the Armenian people of Nagorno-Karabakh suffered historically from Azerbaijan last week. 120 000 Armenians who had to leave everything behind. A crime right outside the door of the European Union. And what did the Member States do, what did the Council do, what did the European Commission do? They let it all happen. The European External Action Service continues to speak of Azerbaijan as a reliable partner. It's incomprehensible. In fact, the European Union even facilitates Azerbaijan by buying a lot of gas. This has to stop. Those who do not take action now give Azerbaijan a license to continue with enemy actions, including on Armenian territory. I'm very worried about that. I therefore urge you to: 1) suspending the gas deal with Azerbaijan; 2) the imposition of sanctions against those responsible for the blockade and the attacks; 3) a UNESCO mission to safeguard cultural and Christian heritage; 4) extension of the European mission in Armenia with access to the Azerbaijani side of the border. Mr Borrell promised a strong response last week in the event of a forced departure of the Armenians. The region is empty. But where is the European Union? This is worrying, especially since the raid does not come as a surprise. Last summer I was at the border between Armenia and Azerbaijan. I spoke to people from Nagorno-Karabakh who, due to the blockade of the Laçın corridor, were unable to return to their families and work. Their emotional stories about the humanitarian situation touched me deeply. I've seen the despair in their eyes. Armenia now desperately needs European support and decisiveness. I'm counting on your cooperation.

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, 30 years ago, the wolf was undoubtedly an endangered species and there was every reason to give it the highest European protection status. However, the situation is now completely different. There are now more than 21,000 wolves in Europe. The wolf is no longer threatened. The wolf itself has become a threat to sheep, ponies, calves and grazers that are used in nature management, such as mouflons in our area on the Veluwe. I am pleased that the European Commission is taking our resolution seriously, is now clearly calling on Member States to take measures under Article 16 of the Directive and is seriously considering amending and reducing the protection status. There's every reason for that. Let us bring legislation into line with a new reality. I call on the Commission to speed up this process. And let us give regional authorities more room to take management measures where necessary.

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, antisemitism has many faces. We see it on the far right. We see it on the left. We see it in the BDS movement. We see it among those who present the State of Israel as a neocolonial product. Yes, anti-Semitism, we see it everywhere. And against all these different manifestations of anti-Semitism, we will have to continue to vigorously resist. Among other things, it is important that all Member States implement the working definition of the IHRA and also use it as a starting point for enforcement. The IHRA is, as you know, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. Within Europe, the Commission's action plan against antisemitism, as well as the special coordinator, is doing a very good job, which I appreciate. But outside Europe, in its foreign policy, the Commission is making big strides so that Palestinian leader Abbas simply shows impunity for understanding the Holocaust. It is true that the External Action Service is renouncing it in cautious terms, but that remains the case. And we see the same attitude around the Palestinian schoolbooks. Nice words from the Commission, but no deeds: no discontinuation of the subsidy, while we know very well that these textbooks are still full of Jew-hatred. Commissioner, why don't you tell Abbas: “As long as you do not take back your words about the Holocaust, we as the EU will stop our donations. And we do the same with the textbooks, as long as they have not been cleaned up.” You can, moreover, look forward to my amendments to these textbooks again during the budgetary discussions. I count on the support of all of you, because anyone who wants to be credible in the fight against anti-Semitism does not just leave it to words.

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, the rapporteur's conclusion is clear: “As long as Turkey does not change course, the accession process cannot be resumed.” I understand that position, but after 20 years of waiting in vain for improvement, we really need to take a step forward. It is high time for the Council to deprive Turkey of its status as a candidate country, because Turkey continues to discriminate and intimidate Christians. Turkey still refuses to recognise the Armenian Genocide and Turkey still refuses to recognise Cyprus. Moreover, Turkey simply does not belong to Europe. Not geographically, but not culturally or religiously. "Yes, but as a neighbour and NATO ally, Turkey is of great strategic importance?" Surely, and that also calls for continued cooperation, for example in the form of a renewed partnership agreement. But there is no point in continuing to regard Turkey as a candidate country.

Mr President, Commissioner, ten years ago the Council adopted the guidelines on freedom of religion. The existence of these guidelines is, of course, a good thing. But what about its implementation? I have serious doubts about this and that is why I have requested this debate today. For example, Article 70 requires a three-yearly evaluation, but no implementation or evaluation report has ever been published in ten years. There would also be regular consultations with Parliament on the persecution of the faith, but in ten years' time this has never taken off. The post of EU Envoy remained vacant for three years and now he has finally been appointed, but in ten years' time the human resources to which he can fall back have always been very minimal. Mr President, more needs to be done, because persecution of faith is only increasing worldwide. Look at a country like Nigeria, where 50,000 Christians have been killed for their faith in the last 20 years. Or look at the situation in Manipur, which we talked about yesterday. I therefore have three specific requests to the Commission: 1) present a thorough implementation report of the guidelines in the short term; 2) give the EU Envoy a permanent mandate and provide additional staff so that he can do his job well; 3) come forward with proposals to designate 24 June, the date on which the guidelines were adopted, as European Day for the Fight against Persecution of Faith. I would like a response from the Commission. We must not leave the oppressed church with millions of believers in the cold. I hope and pray it doesn't take another 10 years.

Mr President, Commissioner, a debate on India is often about opportunities for trade. Today, unfortunately, we have to talk about human rights, about the situation in Manipur, where the ethnic conflict is becoming increasingly religious. The sad balance of the last ten weeks: 120 people killed, 50 000 displaced and 250 churches destroyed. Unfortunately, the issue is not an isolated one. Throughout India, non-Hindus such as Christians face increasing intolerance, violence, destruction, discrimination. We also see it in the anti-conversion laws in various states. Our joint resolution is crystal clear. We call on India to do everything in its power to stop ethnic and religious violence, punish perpetrators and eradicate Hindu extremism. Without firm guarantees in these areas, I do not think there can be a new trade agreement with India.