Speeches

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, It is only two and a half weeks before this landmark election in Moldova on 28 September, and we see what we have seen in elections there in the past, namely that Russian influence on these elections is already increasing massively in advance. President Maia Sandu stressed today that what is happening in Moldova must be a serious warning for the whole of Europe, and she is absolutely right, because Moldovan and therefore also European democracy is seriously endangered by this interference from Russia; There are examples from the past. At the same time, it also shows that this acceding country is an important bulwark against this Russian aggression; therefore it is important that we actively support Moldova not only now before the elections, but in principle as the European Union, in order to fend off interference, to strengthen the democratic process and to safeguard European fundamental values.

Madam President, Madam Commissioner, since the tragic collapse of the roof in Novi Sad, too many peaceful protesters have been threatened, tear gassed, defamed as terrorists and beaten up. Too many heads of students have been beaten by police batons and commanded by Vučić, the President of Serbia, himself. Too many red lines have been crossed. Yet still Vučić is a member of the European People's Party, but hopefully not for very long in the future. What we need is targeted sanctions, clear words. We have rightfully condemned the police brutality and the oppression through violence and everything that happened. Now we need to do more than just to condemn; we need to act. Targeted sanctions and also clear words by the European institutions like also the Commissioner was finding yesterday. It is our duty to support the people of Serbia and their fight for their freedom. It is in favour of Serbia, but against the brutal regime of Aleksandar Vučić.

Madam President, Commissioner! Housing in particular is one of the problems of European citizens, who are the same in all European Member States. Over the past 15 years, rents have risen by 26 percent on average, and people with the lowest incomes are already paying 40 or more percent of their disposable income for housing. This is an unreasonable state, because living is a fundamental right, the roof over the head is a fundamental right. That's why we need to do more: not only use cohesion funds for this, but much, much more. We need €300 billion of European money. We have to stop speculation, we have to stop speculation. short-term rentals How to regulate and contain Airbnb and the like. We must enable more subsidised housing, including for the middle class, in our competition law. We need to strengthen tenant protection to protect people from unjustified dismissals and extreme increases. And we must not forget about climate protection, which also requires money – for thermal renovation. Housing is a fundamental right that everyone should be able to afford in Europe.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, Something happened again: Champagne scandal, Le Pen, personnel affair and now also the investigation into alleged misappropriation of over 4 million euros in tax money. The list of scandals of the far-right parties from the European Parliament alone is long. And if we add to this what has been done in the national parliaments and in the municipal councils, then the list will be much longer. The FPÖ from Austria is often directly involved, and it is probably clear: This is not an isolated case, but a structural problem with this party. The accusations are large and must be fully clarified. A thorough and transparent investigation, a rapid investigation and also consequences for the parties involved are needed. And I think it's also significant today: Instead of clarifying what you actually have to say in your defence or as justification, you simply stay away from this debate as if nothing had happened. And it can't be like that. And one thing must be said quite clearly: The FPÖ and its MEPs, and also in national politics, are always very quickly offended when criticized. That's a bit cheap to complain about, but at the same time it's quite expensive to cash in. This is the method of the FPÖ, and we must firmly oppose it.

Madam President, Commissioner! The rumors surrounding the European Commission's MFF proposal are irritating, let's say mildly. Therefore, it should be emphasized: We have foreign policy challenges, but at the same time we also have the challenge of strengthening this European Union internally and making it a European Union of people. That's why it's important: Keeping the EU budget small also keeps Europe small. We want a large and strong Europe that courageously finances social-ecological transformation, social cohesion and just transformation. It is precisely for these questions that, in my view, three things are very central. Firstly: We need a European housing fund. Housing and housing costs are central interests of citizens. Secondly: We need money for infrastructure, for an express train system in Europe – and this is very urgent! And thirdly: We need a European Social Fund. If we ask ourselves where the money comes from? The digital companies with a digital tax would be an idea.

Madam President, it's been a long time since my first meetings and visit to Macedonia, or FYROM in those days, as it had to be called. Since those days, I have seen politicians in the country, some which were terribly corrupt and fled the country, but also others which beat the high effort to solving the problems in order to have a better future for the country, going beyond the line for a better future. Therefore, I would say that it is also important nowadays to have such politicians and for my colleagues also in the ruling party and the Government in North Macedonia to adopt the necessary steps in order to get the negotiations for the European Union membership. But I also call on the Bulgarian politicians to understand that an accession of North Macedonia is in the interest not only of North Macedonia, but especially also for Bulgaria. Therefore, they should work together and not try to block the accession of North Macedonia.

Madam President, thank you for contributing to this important debate and also thank you, Commissioner, for the work. There is a huge necessity for reform in front of Albania – I think this is one conclusion we can draw. It is true that the polarisation in the political field is very deep. But one thing is different to other countries in the Western Balkans: everybody is pro‑European in the Albanian Parliament and also in the Albanian society itself. I think this is also the power which can lead to implement all the necessary reforms. This is the power which can lead towards the European Union. We have to say, the success of these reforms is in the interest of Albania and the Albanian citizens, but it's also in the interest of the European Union and the European citizens. Therefore, it's worth working on this. Finally, I also want to say that very soon, the European Parliament will open its antenna office, which is responsible not only for Albania in Albania, but will be also a liaison office for implementing all these reforms in the Western Balkan countries. So, this is also an argument which counts for the upcoming debates. But at the end, all the best also to Albania to keep the speed going on in reforms and in the end, they will be European.

Madam President, Madam Commissioner, dear colleagues, in the last 30 years, Albania and the citizens of Albania have faced many obstacles. Just remember the hard Enver Hoxha regime, which was the hardest we had in the eastern Europe communist sphere. Then after the regime change, even in 1997, they had a pyramid scheme crisis where, again, everybody lost the little savings they had. The country had to overcome these obstacles and has also gone through an enormous change, like few other countries in Europe did. Since 2009, Albania has been on its EU journey. In 2009, Albania applied for membership. In 2014, it became an official accession candidate. In 2022, this negotiation started and in 2024, the first negotiation chapter was finally opened. We see already that these statistics and numbers show that this is a long story. Today, we discuss the first annual report in this term on the progress of Albania as a candidate country. The report covers the Parliament's response to the Commission enlargement, reports both of 2023 and 2024, the state of play and the latest developments of Albania's progress in joining a deal. I have to say – and on this point, I also want to thank the colleagues and shadow rapporteurs in the AFET Committee – the report was adopted with a large majority of 57 votes in favour, 11 against and six abstentions. Thank you all for this constructive work which has been done. Secondly, before coming also a little bit to the content of the report – I'm just looking for where they are – I think also there is the Albanian delegation today here in the European Parliament from the Albanian Parliament. Welcome to the European Parliament and I hope that your work and our work will lead also that you in the future will sit amongst us here in the European Parliament. Welcome to your House. So, the main topic of the report is, of course, progress concerning also some issues like the democratic institutions and how they have developed. Media freedom, what are the open issues there? For example, that we have in media freedom still the question of instant transparent ownership. So, it's not the freedom of journalists to ask questions, but it's the question of who owns the media platform. We have the question of involvement of civil society. We have the question of fundamental rights, the rule of law, of social economic reforms, of environment and of regional cooperation and foreign policy. In October 2024, Albania started the negotiations on Cluster 1. In December came Cluster 6, in April 2025 came Cluster 2 and in May came Cluster 3. Now, Albania has opened 24 out of 33 negotiation chapters. We welcome this fast progress and Albania has been called a front runner by you, Madam Commissioner Marta Kos – I think this is very right that they are a front runner. There are a lot of positive remarks to be made. We see good progress in the implementation of the justice reform, including also the waiting process in SPAK, in steps in environmental protection and also in full alignment with foreign policy. To come to an end, of course, we see a lot of things to be done. As I mentioned before, there is the media situation, but also the implementation of OSCE audio recommendations, which have to be done on a broader political maturity and have to be done also sure in the future. Finishing, I think I just want to say that we fully support Albania's objective to be front runner and to open all the other clusters, but it's more important also to close the clusters and to work on the reforms. I think if the speed and this unification on the whole country to join the European Union will continue, they will also manage. Our report is a positive one, but putting the points also on the things which have to be changed.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, Serbia has been in critical condition for years: the irregularities in the 2023 elections, the regular curtailment of media freedom, the pressure on journalists, the curtailment of public broadcasting, corruption and nepotism, including around the President’s family, and the summit of the whole, namely the burglary of the roof in Novi Sad with the tens of dead. The problems of the country have a name, and the name is Aleksandar Vučić. Aleksandar Vučić has Serbia in his brutal stranglehold – and what he strangles there is Serbia’s democracy. But we can also be proud, namely, of civil society and the thousands of students from Serbia who are resisting, who are standing up, who want one thing: Reforms and a country with justice, rule of law and democracy and cleanliness. This is what Europe stands for. That is why we support Serbian students in their struggle for Serbian democracy.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, On March 19, Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu was unjustly detained. It was not only the attack on a single politician, but on the entire Turkish democracy itself and on many, many others who were also arrested that day. This arrest is also an attempt to silence the last bastion of the political opposition and to get a city that stands for freedom and progress under the control of the government and the president. Since then, there have been mass protests, hundreds of thousands taking to the streets week after week. And despite the arrests of the demonstrators and journalists, the protests are not diminishing, and the CHP, the opposition party, continues to be involved here. What we are seeing here is that the Erdoğan regime, which is increasingly moving away from democratic principles and its own people, is also destroying democracy in such a way that we must say: This has no place in Europe. Therefore, ladies and gentlemen: full solidarity with the demonstrators and freedom for Ekrem İmamoğlu.

Mr President! Ladies and Gentlemen! The economic problems we face on a global scale – they need a strong Europe. A strong Europe can only grow from the middle and can only grow through cooperation and cooperation and not through division. But what we see and the signs that trouble us. In Germany, in the Bundestag, the CDU and its leader Merz Wortbruch are committing, and they are pacting with the far-right AfD. In Austria, too, the People's Party is bursting the government negotiations in order to negotiate afterwards with the far-right liberals and also to risk and be ready that such a person is then Chancellor of Austria and thus also sits in the European Council and blocks another and Europe from the solutions that we need a bit. Anyone who is willing to see Herbert Kickl first as a security risk, but then also to give the key to the Chancellery and the way to the European Council, commits betrayal of Europe. Europe needs the middle. That is why I appeal to the European People's Party: Don't go that way! You don't have to leave him, and you shouldn't leave him either.

Madam President, Dear colleagues, I think many of us felt the same way when we heard the terrible news of Alexei Navalny's death a year ago. We were horrified, but unfortunately not surprised. Too many opponents of Putin face the same fate. Anyone who criticizes the Kremlin in Russia is living dangerously: Anna Politkovskaya, Boris Nemtsov, Alexander Litvinenko are just a few of the prominent victims. Anyone who advocates democracy in Russia lives dangerously. Oppositionists are discredited as foreign agents. Punishment camps, torture, persecution of their families – all this is the order of the day. The human rights situation is now devastating – and not only since Putin’s withdrawal from the European Convention on Human Rights. Human rights groups are banned, let's just think of Memorial's example. The independence of the Russian prosecutor's office is also evident in the current trials against Alexei Navalny's lawyers. Freedom of the press and freedom of the media are also non-existent. Since 2022, almost all independent media have been banned or blocked, and all others have been heavily censored and equated. This all shows: Putin is an enemy of democracy, and his first victim is democracy in his own country. His first victim was the people of Russia. Alexei Navalny's wife Julija was in plenary here in the European Parliament exactly one year ago and said the following: My husband will never see what the beautiful Russia of the future will look like, but we must see it. And there are still people like her in Russia who believe in a better future. People who courageously fight for democracy and a better future. People who are willing to give everything for democracy and justice and risk their lives. Among these people was Alexei Navalny. These people need our solidarity, but also our very clear commitment to human rights, democracy and freedom in Russia, in Europe, all over the world. And our stand against all the enemies of democracy all over the world.

Madam President, Ladies and Gentlemen! It has been more than 100 days since the tragedy of Novi Sad. Since that day, there have been protests all over the country, all over Serbia. The people who are on the streets are not hooligans, but ordinary citizens who peacefully protest for the rule of law. That is why it is also important to express our fullest solidarity with the protesters in Serbia. Nevertheless, despite peaceful protests: They are brutally beaten down by the police. This violence, this violence of the regime of Aleksandar Vučić, must also come to an end. The demand is quite simple, namely justice and functioning institutions in Serbia – a country that is no longer supposed to be corrupt. It is precisely these days that Aleksandar Vučić has again achieved a sad record – namely: Serbia is among the top three most corrupt countries in Europe. These are things that the people in Serbia, the ordinary students, no longer want and we with them.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen. Donald Trump is back and, unlike last time, prepared this time. He has new, dangerous friends: Tech oligarchs who dance to his whistle and, on the other hand, continue to do business, evade taxes and exploit workers. What is coming to us is not only a step backwards for the Americans, but for the entire world, for the world political stage. Europe must be a counter-model. And to be a counter-model, that is: We do not want Donald Trump's social and democratic cuts, we want to strengthen social cohesion in Europe. The last few weeks have been such a foretaste of the next four years. Let's just think of these insane expansion fantasies: Threats against Greenland, against Denmark, against Canada, planned mass deportations, all these things. When Ursula von der Leyen says: Pragmatic waiting is good – from my point of view. But we must not leave Donald Trump's madness uncommented. The EU Commission's loud silence in recent weeks has been really too loud, ladies and gentlemen!

Mr President! Dear colleagues, The news from Kyrgyzstan is more than worrying. On November 13, Temirlan Sultanbekov was arrested at the party headquarters of the Social Democrats. He was pressured by the authorities without his lawyer to withdraw his candidacy for the upcoming elections, and as a result, the entire Social Democrats were removed from the ballot papers. All this is a violation of all human rights. All this is incompatible with democracy. We must therefore condemn this in the strongest possible terms from this place, here in the European Parliament. But we also have to be very clear: We demand the release of Temirlan Sultanbekov. We call on Kyrgyzstan to release him immediately. A message also to Temirlan, whom I also know personally, who is still in detention and is also on hunger strike: We here in the European Parliament will not forget you. We will fight for your freedom until you are free.

Madam President, Ladies and gentlemen, EU enlargement needs a new boost, and the Western Balkans region in particular needs a European perspective with fundamental European values. When we look at Serbia, we see that the last few weeks have been marked by massive protests. Why? Because on November 1, a station roof collapsed in Novi Sad, 15 people, including two children, have died. The reason for the collapse was tree defects due to corruption and mismanagement. Since then, we have seen student protests in Serbia against Vučić’s government and against Vučić’s regime; Protests, some of which are violently suppressed. That is why we must also say from here: Full solidarity with the students demonstrating in Serbia, because they are demonstrating against corruption of the Vučić regime, they are demonstrating for democracy and for a European perspective of Serbia.

Mr President! Housing is a fundamental right and everyone should have a right to adequate and, above all, affordable housing. But more and more Europeans are suffering from the massive rise in housing costs, rent costs, but also from the housing shortage, that it is often not even possible to find a home, and that temporary leases often create very strong precarious conditions. As we can see: The market does not regulate everything, and in the area of housing you can even say it fails, the market. Therefore, policy initiatives for affordable housing are needed. And it's not just about the price, it's also about quality and it's also about the energy and climate issue. Vienna, my hometown, is an example of how the issue of housing can be regulated very well for all citizens in a socially just way. But now it is also time for housing to reach the top of the EU agenda. That is why I am glad that a Commissioner for Housing has been able to push through in order to finally set accents for socially affordable housing at European level.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen! This neglected location policy of the last few years now falls on our heads. It is not only the current crises, but it has long been the case that states such as China or the United States of America are passing by Europe because they are investing more, because they are also investing more public money in their business location. If we do not soon see that something is turned back, we lose value creation, and this also affects our jobs in the end and endangers our welfare state model. We need investments in future technologies, in infrastructure, where we have done too little for years. If we think only of the lack of electric charging stations, we have a large investment gap at European level. We need a pact for growth, innovation and jobs. That is, an Europe-firstStrategy needs to be anchored so that European companies also have a preference when it comes to public tenders. We need more money for the business location, we need more investment in European infrastructure, much, much more. That's what we have to fight for.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, ladies and gentlemen, ladies and gentlemen! In the face of these devastating images, which have been seen not only in individual Member States but in central Europe as a whole, we have seen how we are also united in this crisis, in this disaster as a European Union, as citizens. At the beginning of a speech on this subject, it is necessary to say thank you; Thank you to all the helpers of the fire brigades, the military, the volunteers, but also, for example, the mountain rescue, which meanwhile had to free people from avalanches due to the snow masses, and, and, and, and, also, the civilian population, which has done great things here. The second thing that needs to be said is: We need to prepare more for these disasters, and we must finally recognise – all of us here in the House, including on the outside right – that denying climate change makes no sense, but that it is important to prepare for the consequences of climate change and, if possible, to combat its effects. This is urgently needed. As we have also seen, renaturated rivers can absorb more water. That is why we must follow the path of Green Deals Also very special and go on together.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, Enlargement policy is one of our strongest instruments, especially in this unstable global situation. But only if we are serious about them. That is, each country according to its progress, according to the necessary reforms that will be taken. But this also means that we must prevent ourselves from becoming unreliable and then, for example, the enlargement from bilateral processes of individual Member States may be blocked. And at the same time we must also say: If countries step back, then there must also be the possibility of stopping or stepping back, if necessary, in the enlargement process. But - and this is, I believe, also a very important point - the enlargement process will only be successful if we also prepare for an enlarged Union within the European Union and set up decision-making in Europe in such a way that it is also possible with 30 or more Members – that is, with a strong Parliament and with majority decisions and fewer decisions in the Council.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, The Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act are milestones, global milestones in the fight against hate speech and disinformation. The European Union is leading the way here, creating the first global set of rules to finally hold online platforms accountable. With these regulations, this legal-free space, this Wild West in the digital sector, is finally ended, according to the principle: What is illegal offline in real life must also be illegal in the digital space. Platforms are required to fight and erase illegal content, hate speech, disinformation and fake news. But now, with this law, we must also get the platforms not to ignore this law, but also to act, that they also apply the regulations strictly, and if not, our courts also condemn these platforms and force them to act in accordance with the law. The reality shows: Fake news is increasing. Artificial intelligence has one more thing on it, and we have to see that legality and law finally prevail here again.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, It has been exactly one month since the elections were held in Serbia. And as my previous speaker and the Commissioner have already said, there is a list of irregularities that have occurred in these Serbian elections: Phantom voters, vote-buying, one-sided media coverage and, and, and is, the list of accusations, which in my opinion must be fully clarified. Transparency is needed here. And for transparency, the government must take care of it. But Prime Minister Brnabić and President Vučić do the opposite. Instead of providing transparency, they criticize international election observers, as well as myself, in the strongest possible terms. This is not only to be rejected, but it shows quite clearly that the criticism that has been expressed is completely blacked out in the reports. However, we cannot accept such an approach as the European Union. We must ensure that the rule of law and all transparent processes are respected, including in Serbia.

Madam President, dear colleagues, as you all know, on 17 December there have been another early elections in Serbia, in national and also in the capital of Belgrade, and other municipalities. This also we know: we are plagued by irregularities, like phantom voters, like pressure on voters, as well as decisive involvement of the President and the ruling party’s systemic advantage, and which undermined the electoral process. When international election observers, like from the European Parliament and like myself, also raised this issue, the Government of Serbia and the President himself attacked these international observers. So, therefore, I am happy that a majority of the groups and of this House has the plan now and agreed to have a debate during this plenary. I’m also looking forward that we will have a resolution which we also support as the S&D Group.

Mr President, Commissioner! One year after Qatar and, above all, Morocco Gate, one must say: Firstly, the European Parliament has reacted. There was the Special Committee of Inquiry, which also dealt with proposals to revise the Rules of Procedure. Important measures, including anti-corruption measures, have been presented and some of them have been implemented. All dates of MEPs must be made public, assets must be made public, conflicts of interest must be disclosed. These are long-standing demands that have finally been implemented. But is that enough? No, it's far from over. All transparency alone will not solve the problem sustainably. We need clear and strict rules to make the Moroccan and Qatari gates impossible in the future. For example, it must no longer be possible and be tolerated that some MEPs here in the House are both a mandater and a lobbyist at the same time. A reform of the Rules of Procedure is needed. The one we made was a first step, but we have to move on, and for that we also need majorities in the house. Very often – I have the impression – the majorities for strong reforms, for more transparency, are prevented precisely by those who often denounce many things. It can't go on like this!

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, Commissioner! More and more young people can not afford their own apartment, whether for purchase or rent. The COVID crisis, precarious employment, poor pay have once again neatly exacerbated the problem that existed before. And while people cannot afford the rent, the loan rates for their real estate loan can not afford, on the other hand, the real estate corporations and the banks are still getting richer and richer. And that is why the question is currently being asked across Europe: What can we do? And that means: Housing is a fundamental right, and politics must finally act. This means: Rent brakes against the extremely high rent increases that are currently taking place, more resources from national governments, better access to EU funds for housing, strong, secure tenancy and social housing, social, quality and affordable social housing. And I would also like to use the example of Vienna at this point and congratulate you on the fact that Vienna has now again been chosen as a livable city, namely because it is socially fair and because it offers good housing opportunities with a high proportion of social housing for the people in this city.