What Irena spoke about.

17

Jun

2026

Speeches SL

Watch

2025 Commission report on North Macedonia (A10-0162/2026 - Thomas Waitz)

Madam President, this report is a report on the European future of the Macedonian country. Why did I end up supporting it – although, of course, not the text as a whole? Because this country is not responsible for the obsession of some with its nation. You ask yourself, but you know: Who really has a problem here? Macedonians or those who can't even write an amendment without them, let alone a substantive amendment? Then they invest all their energy in some explanation of who is who. Quite an unusual hobby for 2026, right? Interpretation of the past. What are we, the Historical Academy or the European Parliament? The European Union was created to help nations build the future together. It is not for the purpose of issuing certificates of existence to one another. And certainly not in order to bring old nationalisms back to the European stage, preferably as modern as possible. (speaks in a language other than an official EU language)

20

May

2026

Speeches SL

Watch

Rights, support and protection of victims of crime (debate)

Dear Sir/Madam, This directive is an important step forward because it finally strengthens the protection of victims, access to psychological assistance, the protection of privacy and the prevention of secondary victimisation – I will repeat – at last. But I'm afraid I have something else to say. Some in this Chamber very much like to talk about the protection of victims until the victim also demands autonomy, his own right, his own decision, his own life after violence, after rape. Then, suddenly, we are again in the ideology and political interpretation of rights. Do you know – you can’t talk about the dignity of victims if you don’t trust women after trauma to decide their own lives. Secondary victimisation does not only occur in police stations or courts. Sometimes it also happens here, when the trauma of the victim turns into an ideological battlefield. Colleagues, colleagues. The European Union must not be a place where victims fear the system more than the perpetrator. We don't protect our victims by moralizing them. We protect them by believing in them. Thank you.

20

May

2026

Speeches SL

Watch

Recent proposals to fight poverty in the EU (debate)

Dear – “A nation should not be judged by how it treats its most privileged citizens, but by how it treats those most vulnerable.” Of course, Nelson Mandela's quote is not randomly chosen. This is not just a nice moral reminder, it is a mirror of Europe and a real test of the anti-poverty strategy presented. Because poverty in Europe today has the face of people who are working, who are struggling and who, nevertheless, barely come in a month. Often this is the face of a young person with two jobs or a single mother or a pensioner who has to choose between heating and food while paying their bills. Your figures, i.e. those of the Commission, also clearly show: Poverty in Europe today has the face of an employed person. And forgive me, but a society in which a decent life becomes a privilege is not a prosperous society. And this Commission's proposed strategy is very broad, and I welcome a lot of things in it. Child poverty, people with disabilities, housing, quality jobs – all this is absolutely important and in place. But the key part is unfortunately missing, and this is the realization of solutions. There is no proposal to increase the resources of the Child Guarantee. There is no suggestion on how to provide wages with which a person can live normally. We are still waiting for a proposal for a directive on minimum income and there is no solution even for adequate social security for precarious workers. Instead, almost all hopes are postponed to the forthcoming regulation on quality jobs, which is fine, but we cannot pretend that a single regulation alone will solve the problem of in-work poverty in Europe. We need all of these together if we really want a Europe with a prosperous society and a Europe that can be judged shamelessly by how it treats those most vulnerable.

19

May

2026

Speeches SL

Watch

Question Time with the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy - EU’s strategy to address the current crises in the Middle East

Mrs Kallas, your facial expressions do not go unnoticed when, for example, you are being asked questions about the double standards of the European Union. And this is not meant to be a criticism, because personally, let's say, I prefer this to some forced political correctness. But the problem is that many European citizens feel that Brussels is becoming more tired of questions about Gaza than of its own political powerlessness. And the Commission, in which you are also sitting, is supposed to meet with the Taliban in the name of pragmatic diplomacy. At the same time, the Israeli Government has always listened above all to what the Union cannot do, even though, if you ask me, it is fairer to say – it does not want to. That's why I'm asking you: If you believe that even the Taliban should be politically influenced, why does this same logic disappear with Benjamin Netanyahu? So where is the actual red line of the European Union today? Or yours? Because the consequences of having all these lines somehow mixed up are no longer felt only by Gaza, by the whole region and, in fact, by Europe itself.

19

May

2026

Speeches SL

Watch

EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate)

Madam President! If today someone can use a single algorithm to paralyze a hospital, erase confidence in elections, or trigger panic among millions, then cybersecurity is no longer just a technological topic, is it? Who will make the rules in the future: democratic institutions or non-transparent systems without accountability? When one hacker with publicly available artificial intelligence hacked into several Mexican government agencies and stole sensitive data, it should be an alarm for all of us. Since then, threats have only increased. Advanced AI systems are tools, and like any tool, they can either protect or destroy. We can't afford to be naive anymore. Of course, European legislation is important, but it will not protect us on its own. We need more European capabilities, more investment in cyber resilience and less dependence on foreign tech giants. We have talent, we have companies. Now is the time to stop subsidising European technologies and start using them. Because if technology advances faster than we are able to protect our democracy, then the question will no longer be what artificial intelligence can do. The question will be whether we will still decide on her or whether she will decide on us.

29

Apr

2026

Speeches SL

Watch

Topical debate requested by a political group (PfE) (Rule 169) - Commission interference in democratic process and elections (topical debate)

Mr. President! There is no need to think twice about who is behind the title of this debate on the Commission's alleged interference in democracy. Patriots, of course. Patriots only in the name, but in fact defenders of foreign interests, European not under any other way. We are already accustomed to these perverse games of blaming someone for your actions, but in this debate, this propaganda is perhaps the most obvious. The Commission has quite rightly frozen the assets of the Orban regime. European taxpayers cannot and will not finance the corruption of those who are now fleeing the country in fear. Now for the actual interference. Interference is when the U.S. Vice President is involved in the campaign for Orban. Interference is when Israelis seem to get involved in a campaign in Slovenia for Janša, Orban's lacquer, of course. Therefore, the title of this debate is completely wrong. The problem is not that the Commission is working too hard and interfering. The problem is that he works too little against foreign interference. And to say that is patriotic, you know, but this title is a nice experiment, a bad game, an even worse scenario. It is very clear who really defends Europe and their home in this Chamber. It is also clear who is selling it. Patriot, nothing.

29

Apr

2026

Speeches EN

Watch

EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (joint debate)

Madam President, many believe that politics and integrity don't go together. I believe they do – if one dares, of course. Our responses to the Middle East situation are predictable, too slow and, above all, ineffective and selective. So when Merz speaks about Trump in a way that normalises dangerous escalation in Iran, that's not even Realpolitik. It's irresponsible. The EU must not follow the imposed rules of escalation, even less legitimise it. This is no distant geopolitical game. This is a crisis created by the genocidal Israeli Prime Minister and his puppets. And while they wage war, European citizens foot the bill. One bill at a time, all Europeans are being punished for a war we did not start. But we can help end it – diplomacy is powerful, if one dares. Through a clear, united foreign policy stance, that's the fastest way to ease the energy crisis. And we must, of course, stop our dependence on others because we are vulnerable with that. It is time we dare to be firm and credible, have integrity, dare to think for ourselves and stand for international law, peace and protection of our EU citizens. It is possible to do all three. I promise.

27

Apr

2026

Speeches SL

Watch

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate)

Mr. President! Consent. Basically a very simple concept, colleagues, even if you want to turn it around, there on the right above all. There can be no different interpretations, never and nowhere. This concept follows questions with only one of two possible answers: "Yes" or "No"? That's it. And as a child, you are not always happy when, say, your mother says ‘no’. Ask my five-year-old daughter, I'd like to confirm. I'm not a perfect parent, but I don't want him to ask me: ‘Mom, can you?’, because it has to. I want him to understand, even as an adult. That's why I'm asking those adults today, what exactly isn't clear here? Under the Istanbul Convention, rape is any sexual act without free and clear consent and has been signed by all Member States. Beware of this hypocrisy now – these same countries would not have it in actual legislation, because it is a national competence. Please, please. This is purely a matter of political will. Is it or isn't it? That is to say, the will of those who have clearly forgotten that without a clear ‘yes’ there is nothing. And today we do not decide on complex legal nuances, we decide on the basis. If we understand ‘yes’ or ‘no’, that is it. We'll protect the victims...

11

Mar

2026

Speeches SL

Watch

Child sexual abuse online: protect children, not perpetrators (topical debate)

9

Mar

2026

Speeches SL

Watch

Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors (debate)

9

Mar

2026

Speeches SL

Watch

Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors (debate)

11

Feb

2026

Speeches SL

Watch

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy (debate)

Madam President! Historically, politics have been a tool of social division, often by race or religion, always following the same logic: We are against them, rich or poor, we are against you. Today, the unimaginably rich in many places dictate state, even world politics. You know, Musk-Trump, for example. The motive is clear: Protecting your own interests and money at your expense. This is why this anti-poverty strategy is crucial. It clearly outlines the guidelines for reducing child poverty, requires adequate social protection. Unfortunately, it must even demand access to basic goods such as food and water. I welcome the demand for a directive on a decent minimum income, but the key fair taxation of high wealth is missing. The richest would not live worse, and the most vulnerable would have their lives incomparably improved. I am looking at you, Commission, and I will pay attention to the action plan, which will show whether you really want equality. Because there's enough politics for you, it's time to start working for us, too.

11

Feb

2026

Speeches EN

Watch

Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate)

Madam President, colleagues, it's no secret that we are watching a dangerous contagion spread across Europe – from Orbán in Hungary to Janša in Slovenia, from the shadows of PiS in Poland to Fico in Slovakia. Fico's style is not just authoritarian, it is deeply paranoid. As we see elsewhere, illiberal politics turns opponents into traitors and critics into enemies. This paranoia has a purpose: if every opposition member, journalist or judge who checks your power is part of an evil plot, then crushing democracy becomes necessary. Fico is using this narrative not to save Slovakia, but to save his own skin. He is dismantling justice to protect a corrupt inner circle. While his friends enrich themselves, the economy stagnates and the people suffer. This destruction of democracy is the price of his power: a price he is happy for Slovak citizens to pay. But let me be clear: Fico is not Slovakia, just as Orbán is not Hungary. The Commission must stand with the people who refuse to pay that price.

11

Feb

2026

Speeches SL

Watch

State violence in Minneapolis and the rule of law in the United States (topical debate)

Madam President! Rations, gunshots, murders, fear, division into ours and the problem. With a promise: We will restore order, dear ones, the problem will be removed. So, first you define a group of people as a problem, and then an apparatus that proves this problem every day, even when it is not. It's not security, it's control, it's power. This is a method that does not solve problems because it needs them. This is Minneapolis today. This is Donald Trump with logic, if you frighten society enough, she will accept everything: walls, deportations, agents, registries, offices. And watch him break, this is also today the Slovenian Democratic Party of the SDS with Janez Janša at the forefront. Dear Slovenians, our new deportation office will solve everything, just allow us to come to power. It's not a problem-solving method, it's a method. Demonstrate determination – artificial. Create a sense of emergency – artificial. Because a scared man doesn't ask much. As if history has never shown where such a classification of undesirables leads. A country that can't manage reality begins to manage people. And when a politician begins to look for problems that he can spectacularly remove, it usually means that he can't solve the real problems. Somewhere else, voters have already opted for such a policy, even under the influence of fear. The consequences are now being felt directly in Minneapolis. We have the freedom to choose freely and responsibly.

10

Feb

2026

Speeches SL

Watch

Presentation of the action plan against cyberbullying (debate)

22

Jan

2026

Speeches SL

Watch

A new action plan to implement the European Pillar of Social Rights (debate)

Madam President! We have been talking about the green and digital transitions in Europe for years. Undoubtedly important, but the transition that many feel the most today is the one from universal security to insecurity. Despite high levels of employment, we still have parents who are unable to pay their bills, young people without the opportunity to have their own roof over their heads, workers who are worried that the algorithm will replace them tomorrow. That is why we need a real, truly social Europe, and it starts in childhood. Almost a quarter of children are still at risk of poverty, while the Child Guarantee remains unimplemented and this must be the first step. Others: access to quality jobs for all. And the third: A social Europe without housing is not a social Europe. This Action Plan should be aligned with the European Affordable Housing Plan with clear objectives and obligations. And most importantly: We need the resources to do this, so we need to secure enough of them in the next budget. Social Europe is not a slogan, it is a choice and it is a necessity for the safety of people. That is why we need an action plan that is truly a plan and not just a list of some nice goals.

21

Jan

2026

Speeches EN

Watch

Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania (debate)

Mr President, the Baltic states have been a beacon of media freedom since their independence, rising from the shadows of repression to build some of the most resilient democracies in Europe. But today, that legacy is under threat in Lithuania. The governing coalition is moving with alarming speed to dismantle the independence of the national broadcaster. They are not 'reforming' – they are attempting a political takeover. This is a textbook violation of the European Media Freedom Act. Under that act, public service media are rightfully recognised as a public good and protected precisely for such cases. This is additional to the Charter, to the founding Treaties, everything the EU stands for and is built upon. All the red lights are blinking in Lithuania, while the Commission still hesitates to start the infringement procedures via the courts. After Hungary, after Slovakia, when will the EU learn that if you do not protect independent public media by enforcing your own laws, you are spitting and weakening the EU itself, the very same as the Lithuanian Government is doing right now to their own legacy of media freedom.

21

Jan

2026

Speeches EN

Watch

European Council meeting (joint debate)

Mr President, colleagues, Commissioner, Council, as Mark Carney said yesterday, the power of the less powerful begins with honesty. So, let's be honest: Donald Trump will not change. Waiting him out is not a policy, even less a strategy. It is cowardice. All the flattery, all the appeasement brought exactly nothing except a spectacular failure. First, the EU Commission President accepted humiliating tariffs to protect the rules by bending. Then the humiliation came at the Alaska summit, then for the Trump‑Netanyahu so‑called peace where we traded our moral stance for less than nothing – a good time to remember now when all of you are shocked by this bizarre and cynical 'Board of Peace' proposal. Thierry Breton was denied a US visa, but is not the first one. ICC judges and the UN Special Rapporteur are also being sanctioned as drug lords for only doing their jobs. When will it be enough to understand that the rule of international law is falling apart under the whims of a crazy narcissist driven by the poisons of his own propaganda? Which, by the way, many of you so‑called patriots here openly admire and seek to replicate. To replicate what? Federal agents shooting people on the streets? Greenland must be the line in the sand to finally stand up. In all honesty, we are neither weak nor without power, just lacking the guts. That is a big difference. And while Washington is mocking us, deliver something real. Come on, hit back where it hurts! There is no other way with a bully like that. Call things what they are. Stop treating Trump as if he was rational. Fight back based on our values and rules, not only when it is convenient because to keep kneeling to an unstable egomaniac is not negotiating with a partner. It is obeying a madman.

18

Dec

2025

Speeches EN

Watch

European Democracy Shield – very large online platform algorithms, foreign interference and the spread of disinformation (debate)

Mr President, 'whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government' was once said in a country that now seems to prove the opposite. Europe is squeezed from the revisionist east by trying to subvert democracy from within, while across the Atlantic we hear that our laws are anti‑democratic and anti‑freedom. Ironically, the one trying to lecture us on genuine democracy is the one spreading lies, suing the free press and playing with democratic institutions like a schoolyard bully, all while pressuring us to abandon the very tools that keep our elections fair and our press independent. The European Democracy Shield is an admirable and necessary initiative in a world hostile to Europe by alleged friends and foes alike. But Europe already has laws like the DSA and EMFA. All the Commission needs to do is have the guts to enforce them. Europe's strength is in the rule of law and the firm enforcement of the democratic standards it has built. Only then will we choose the future we want, not the one others draw for us.

17

Dec

2025

Speeches SL

Watch

The urgent need to combat discrimination in the EU through the horizontal anti-discrimination directive (topical debate)

Mr. President! More than 15 years of delay, inequality and the debt the European Union owes to its people. Such a long blockade of the horizontal directive is not a technical stalemate, it is a first-rate political absurdity and, in essence, a conscious decision that creates inequality as a legal fact. Millions of people across Europe remain unprotected in access to housing, education, goods, services simply because of who they are. And that's not a coincidence. This is due to our indecisions, in fact. This directive is not an ideological project, it is not protectionism of minorities, it is a minimum of equality. However, the Commission almost withdrew it in February. It is a great indicator of how quickly fundamental rights can disappear. And while the far right openly attacks equality and human rights, civil society is fighting for them, and they are the ones who have essentially stopped the withdrawal of this directive, not us or the fabulous political will. The hierarchy of discrimination must fall. The beginning is clear: adoption of this Directive. This will be a test of our values, after all, we have been learning about it for more than 15 years. That was enough.

16

Dec

2025

Speeches SL

Watch

Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work

16

Dec

2025

Speeches SL

Watch

European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’ (debate)

25

Nov

2025

Speeches SL

Watch

Digital Package (debate)

Mr. President! I absolutely agree: We need to adapt the legislation to make it more coherent, to eliminate duplications and to make it easier for our companies to do business. It's in everyone's interest. But the way you approached it is not suitable and, above all, will not have the desired effect. Because you combine certain things where they are incompatible. Otherwise, I am glad that you took our Renew letter into account and removed from this digital package at least those really most controversial amendments. But the main problem remains. You loosen the fuses and widen the door for storing AI systems with Europeans’ personal data. And this will hardly help European startups who tried to comply with the rules, but it can be a gift to American giants. So it's like customs, but here as a currency, you're offering the data of our citizens. Apparently for free. Yesterday, the U.S. Secretary of Commerce was direct. He said: "We only lower tariffs on steel and aluminium if you water down your laws for our tech companies". And that is why I would expect directness and sincerity from our side. The privacy and fundamental rights of Europeans are not traded. It's a dot.

21

Oct

2025

Speeches EN

Watch

Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy (debate)

(The speaker spoke in a non-official language) It's in Serbian, but something should sound familiar. That's what the regime in Serbia called the people on the streets: Nazis. Let that sink in. Do you know that Novi Sad literally means 'new now'? The protesters' wish is simple: a new future. Not tomorrow. Not after another round of no doings. Now. So now get this grotesque irony, this theatre of power: those ordering the beatings called the beaten 'Nazis'. They invent fake students, 'Ćacis', while the real students bleed for democracy. And here comes the truth: the real students are the ones teaching us all the real lesson of courage. It's our turn to teach one back. To the students: we stand with democracy, with you. To the autocrats in Belgrade, your time of impunity is ending. Targeted sanctions should come to every single one responsible. Oh, and don't rush with those textbooks you promised, because your lesson by force is over. History will grade you. (The speaker spoke in a non-official language). We will see soon enough. I choose justice, I choose Novi Sad, new and now.

21

Oct

2025

Speeches SL

Watch

Delayed justice and rule of law backsliding in Malta, eight years after Daphne Caruana Galizia’s assassination (debate)

Mr. President! "There are crooks everywhere you look." This is a quote from Daphne Caruana Galizia and this quote gives a good description of the situation that still prevails in Malta years after her murder. She was telling the truth, exposing corruption, demanding accountability, everything that should be taken for granted in a democracy. And as her actions were resoundingly resounding, so is her murder, but yet justice is nowhere to be found. Those who pulled the trigger are in jail. Those who gave the order are at large and those who obstructed the investigation are still in their positions. And what does the government do? She's withdrawing the flower from her memorial site. The Commission's findings show that progress is not, which is completely, completely unacceptable. No corruption case has resulted in a final conviction, and journalists are still working in a hostile and dangerous environment. It is a European problem because the whole Union suffers without punishment. Therefore, it is high time for action, to change the situation that Daphne has warned us about, and not to let the thief be where our lives are decided.