What Irena spoke about.

Mr President-in-Office! If ever, at the time of the worst Covid restrictions, we have really all been able to see which advantage of the European Union is among the most crucial. We have seen how it is when practically all state border controls are back again, in Slovenia we have even been imprisoned in municipalities. Now let's tell Bob Bob again: Intra-Schengen border controls – without legitimate reasons – are inadmissible. They prevent the free movement of people. They make life difficult for those who work in a neighboring country. Above all, they create unnecessary divisions between countries. Even more so, after one country has done so, the others have to do it. Under the regulation, only temporary control for half a year is possible, and all the reasons for prolonging this period, which in some cases has already lasted for several years, are basically pulled by the hair. In these cases, the Commission should give a formal public opinion and protect the interest of the Union through action, with determination. Member States are invited to agree on common solutions – legal and justified. Whether this is possible or not is only in the mind.

Madam President, thank you very much. Under the rule of law mechanism, the Commission proposed to freeze the funds of Hungary. Finally, but we're not at the finish line yet. The first problem is that this concerns only part of the funds. The second problem is that from the current budget, the money is flowing smoothly to Hungary, despite corruption and the demolition of the rule of law. The third problem is that this is clearly creating a political agreement. Compromises with the Iliberal Governments, however, are not possible, you know, that is what the EU should have learned at some point. All right, I accept that the mechanism can be triggered again or extended. I also accept the penalty, and I hope that this is the case, that other levers of pressure are used through the Recovery and Resilience Fund for the independence of the judiciary or prosecution. There should be no concessions here, because I doubt that the Hungarian Government will change its actions in any way, at most for the worse. On the proposed measures to unlock funding, however, it appears that the Hungarian government is pretending to adopt reforms and the EU is pretending that these reforms are sufficient. I hope that the Member States are aware of this and will block at least this part.

Madam President. Colleagues and colleagues. The Member States of that Union are, as far as I know, on an equal footing. And – as far as I know – all our languages are also equal. And – as far as I know – we have a common market. And so I do not know why we should allow some multinationals that are in our markets not to take this into account. The rules that apply in our single market in the physical world must also apply in the digital world. Of course, legislation is also important here, that is clear. In this case, however, it is just as important, if not more important, to be aware that there should simply be no discrimination. That we should all have the right to choose, in this case to choose to watch a film or series with subtitles or synchronization in the native language. No language is more or less important, but it is certainly the most important language for everyone, i.e. Slovenian. I will therefore do my utmost to ensure that our multilingualism is respected at all levels, including at the level of all digital platforms. And because, as far as I know, Slovenia is not the only one facing this problem, my dear colleagues here, I am counting on you too.

Greetings fellow Members, Commissioner. Health is the foundation of everything. Without health, there is no functioning economy, school systems, social protection, politics ... nothing. As long as we have it, we like to forget it in our daily lives. But two years ago, we all received a clear warning, which also showed how very vulnerable individual countries are in the fight against crises of this magnitude. Managing cross-border threats and threats to public health depends, of course, on a number of factors. The first is to strengthen the mandate of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Its successful functioning will also depend on digitalisation, data collection and data processing, while ensuring adequate security. In the meantime, the quality of treatment and access to medicines should not depend on the country you come from. This is why we need uniform standards and their delivery, perhaps even joint procurement of health products through EMA. The most important thing is that we have an effective health system in place, because none of us knows the future. Health, as I said, is the foundation of everything.

President-in-Office. We're in the twenty-first century. I know you know, but unfortunately you also know that autocrats and democrats who threaten peace and human freedoms still exist. In the twenty-first century, even here on European soil. Thirty years after the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Milorad Dodik is destroying the state and institutions. He denies genocide. As if what people had already lived there wasn't enough. Thirty years after the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the war in Ukraine begins. Vladimir Putin is a criminal, and rightly so. Because that's exactly what it is. But what is Dodik? How can anyone not condemn his actions? Since some of his clients are connected to him, is he a less evil man? The citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina also deserve a better life, you know, and leaders who care, and we must support them, the citizens, on their way to the European Union. While we must resist, equally loudly, all autocrats and criminals, because the hypocrisy of the European Union in this context was long overdue. Even in their own ranks. The methods are very similar, unfortunately.

Mr. President! If you criticize, attacks follow. If there is no subordination, destruction follows. If you're not with this government, you have to leave. If you are not theirs, be careful. Yes, I am talking about the current situation in Slovenia. In the case of Poland and Hungary, however, we have seen that such a deviation from democratic norms transcends national frameworks and becomes a problem for the Union. It is true that the current Slovenian government has recently yielded to pressure. They released STA funding after nearly a year of manipulation. They took note of the names of the European Delegated Prosecutors after more than a year of legal farce. But don't let that fool you. All this problem is not solved, it is not known what will happen next year, and with prosecutors, the government is still making fun of independent institutions with its decisions on temporaryity and even some new legislative proposals. This indulgence is therefore only an escalation of pressure elsewhere. The prosecution, the judiciary, the police, the media, non-governments, independent regulatory agencies are trying to subordinate, silence, smear. By all means. Behind the alleged pluralism lies the destruction of institutions, behind conspiracy theories about the Communists there is clientelism and corruption. This is not a defence of traditional values. That's their negation. For the sake of the rich democratic tradition and integrity of individuals, our institutions have abstained so far. But how much longer? Where are the concrete responses? When will you learn that the situation in one Member State affects the whole Union?