—
Geographical Indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products (debate)
I support the need for clear information for consumers and strengthening their protection, and I welcome the update of the current regulation in response to the challenges of today. Combining regulations and procedures, simplifying administrative procedures and clearer and more coherent rules can only contribute to improving the system of protection for both consumers and producers. That is why I strongly condemn the approach of the rapporteur who tried to use this important report to promote particular national interests at the expense of measured and universally applicable rules as well as unfounded prejudging of the results of the protection of traditional Croatian dessert wine prošek. Existing rules to comply with geographical origin requirements are already sufficiently robust, universally applicable and proven to protect producers of top-quality European products. In the case of Croatian Prosecco and Italian Prosecca, there are substantial differences between the two products and the average European consumer cannot be confused by choosing between dessert, dark syrupy and dense prosecco in a half-litre bottle and aperitif sparkling light Prosecca in a standard wine bottle. The EU legislative process, of which the drafting of the Report is an essential part, should not be based on national exclusivity but on equity and universal applicability.