Votazione al Parlamento europeo

Modifica del regolamento (UE) 2023/956 per quanto riguarda la semplificazione e il rafforzamento del meccanismo di adeguamento del carbonio alle frontiere

Antonio Decaro – Proposta della Commissione
Data: 22.05.2025·Riferimento: A10-0085/2025
Relatore: Antonio Decaro

Risultato complessivo

Approvata
  • 564 A favore
  • 20 Contro
  • 12 Astensione
  • 123 Non ha votato
Stato e procedura

Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.

Votazione del
Ultima fase documentata
Gazzetta ufficiale · (392 giorni fa)
Prossima fase prevista
Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.
Pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale documentata

Svolgimento della procedura

2025/0039(COD) · COD

Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.

  1. Documentato: Esame in commissione4 giorni alla fase successiva
  2. Documentato: Deferimento8 giorni alla fase successiva
  3. Documentato: Esame in commissione36 giorni alla fase successiva
  4. Documentato: Plenaria8 giorni alla fase successiva
  5. Documentato: Negoziati42 giorni alla fase successiva
  6. Documentato: Esame in commissione61 giorni alla fase successiva
  7. Documentato: Plenaria36 giorni alla fase successiva
  8. Documentato: Firma9 giorni alla fase successiva
  9. Ultimo documentato: Gazzetta ufficiale
Attività documentate (30)
  1. Parere della commissione presentato
  2. Deferimento alla commissione
  3. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  4. Parere della commissione approvato
  5. Parere della commissione approvato
  6. Parere della commissione approvato
  7. Relazione della commissione approvata
  8. Presentazione in plenaria
  9. Presentazione in plenaria
  10. Presentazione in plenaria
  11. Presentazione in plenaria
  12. Presentazione in plenaria
  13. Presentazione in plenaria
  14. Presentazione in plenaria
  15. Presentazione in plenaria
  16. Presentazione in plenaria
  17. Discussione in plenaria
  18. Testo emendato in plenaria
  19. Rinvio in commissione per negoziati interistituzionali
  20. Votazione in plenaria
  21. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
  22. Accordo provvisorio approvato in commissione
  23. Presentazione in plenaria
  24. Presentazione in plenaria
  25. Discussione in plenaria
  26. Posizione del Parlamento in prima lettura
  27. Votazione in plenaria
  28. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
  29. Firma
  30. Pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
  1. Discussione in plenaria
  2. Votazione in plenaria
  3. Discussione in plenaria
  4. Votazione in plenaria

Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:

Fonti

Dati: EP Open Data API

Di cosa si tratta?

  • Simplification of CBAM system proposed.
  • Exceptions for electricity imports from EEA economic zones.
  • Rapporteur Antonio Decaro leads process.
Fonte: riassunto generato da IA con Mistral

Cronologia degli emendamenti (17)

Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.

  1. Emendamento 7Respinta

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point a

    Presentato da Antonella Sberna, Pietro Fiocchi, Stefano Cavedagna · ECR

    Rimosso: (a) the following paragraph 1a is inserted: ‘1a. The competent authority may decrease the amount of the penalty calculated in accordance with paragraph 1, considering one or more of the following factors: a) the extent of unreported information; b) the level of cooperation and readiness of the authorised CBAM declarant to comply with requests for information; c) the unintentional nature of the behaviour of the authorised CBAM declarant; d) the past compliance of the authorised CBAM declarant.;’ Aggiunto: deleted

  2. Emendamento 9Respinta

    Recital 29 a (new)

    Presentato da Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Aurelijus Veryga, Adrian-George Axinia +13 · ECR

    Aggiunto: (29 a) It is necessary to ensure effective implementation of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and to address the remaining regulatory loopholes, which result in circumvention of the established rules and, in consequence, put European production at risk of competitive disadvantage. It is therefore necessary to address the regulatory loopholes, through strict oversight and monitoring of CBAM application, in order to ensure a level playing field between European producers of CBAM goods and third country producers and effectively reduce global emissions.

  3. Emendamento 10Respinta

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b

    Presentato da Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Aurelijus Veryga, Adrian-George Axinia +13 · ECR

    … for the import of goods refers to the same goods by CN Rimosso: code Aggiunto: code, same third country operator and countries of origin as the CBAM declaration submitted for the preceding calendar Rimosso: year.; Aggiunto: year, provided that the third country operators are registered in the CBAM registry in accordance with Article 10.;

  4. Emendamento 12Respinta

    Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a

    Presentato da Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Aurelijus Veryga, Adrian-George Axinia +13 · ECR

    … default values shall be based on the average emission intensity of the Rimosso: ten Aggiunto: 10% of exporting countries with the highest emission intensities for which reliable data can be applied for that type of goods.; Aggiunto: if the number of exporting countries for which reliable data are available is higher than 30, the default values shall be based on the average emission intensity of the three countries with the highest emissions intensities for which reliable data are available’;

  5. Emendamento 13Respinta

    Recital 27 a (new)

    Presentato da Patryk Jaki, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Dominik Tarczyński +2 · ECR

    Aggiunto: (27 a) Coking coal is a critical raw material of strategic importance for European industry, which underpins the green and digital transition. Listed under Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a, coking coal is of a strategic importance for the overall Union economy, and therefore its internal European production should be promoted. Imports of coking coal from third countries with less stringent environmental legislation in place negatively impact the European domestic production of coking coal and places European producers at a competitive disadvantage and risks undermining Union's climate and industrial objectives. In order to ensure the level playing field between the European production of coking coal and its imports from third countries, the Commission should present, as part of its assessment referred to in Article 30(2) the possibility to extend the scope of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 to cover the coking coal sector. 1a Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials and amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020 (OJ L 1252, 3.5.2024, p.1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1252/2024-05-03).

  6. Emendamento 14Respinta

    Recital 27 b (new)

    Presentato da Patryk Jaki, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Dominik Tarczyński +2 · ECR

    Aggiunto: (27 b) Soda ash is a fundamental chemical compound that is used in a wide range of industrial processes, including the manufacturing of glass, chemicals, detergents and metallurgical operations. The production of soda ash is highly energy-intensive and, within the Union, is subject to stringent climate and energy legislation, notably the obligations under Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. Soda ash is imported from third countries with less stringent climate and energy legislation and significantly lower energy prices, which places Union producers of soda ash at a competitive disadvantage and risks encouraging carbon leakage. Therefore, the Commission should present, as part of its assessment referred to in Article 30 (2) of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 the possibility to extend the scope of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 to cover the soda ash sector. 1a Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/87/oj).

  7. Emendamento 15Respinta

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new)

    Presentato da Patryk Jaki, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Dominik Tarczyński +2 · ECR

    Aggiunto: (23 a) in Article 30, paragraph 2 is amended as follows: (a) the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: 'Before the end of the transitional period referred to in Article 32, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Regulation. The report shall be accompagnied by a legislative proposal.' (b) the second subparagraph, point (a)(iii), is replaced by the following: '(iii) goods at risk of carbon leakage other than those listed in Annex I, and specifically organic chemicals, polymers, soda ash and coking coal';

  8. Emendamento 17Respinta

    Recital 1 a (new)

    Presentato da Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek +6 · PfE

    Aggiunto: (1 a) Union industries exporting goods that fall within the scope of the CBAM are not compensated for the high and constantly increasing costs incurred by the EU ETS or protected from possible retaliatory measures imposed by trading partners. In the context of the comprehensive review, the Commission will introduce an export adjustment mechanism, address the issue of circumventing measures, and guarantee that CBAM exporters are protected from third countries' retaliatory measures.

  9. Emendamento 18Respinta

    Recital 1 b (new)

    Presentato da Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek +6 · PfE

    Aggiunto: (1 b) The Union is the only major region in the world to have introduced a significant price on CO2, but the incentive effect of such a carbon pricing on trading partners has not been clearly demonstrated. The introduction of the CBAM is causing concerns among Union economic actors, particularly the energy-intensive industries already pressured by the Union's excessive environmental legislation. In the context of the comprehensive review, the Commission will remove the phase-out of the free allowances under the EU ETS if a level playing field is not ensured.

  10. Emendamento 19Respinta

    Recital 1 c (new)

    Presentato da Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek +6 · PfE

    Aggiunto: (1 c) The CBAM has been introduced to compensate the effect of the EU ETS in order to address carbon leakage. As currently designed, the CBAM will not ensure a level playing field. For those reasons, the Commission will review the EU ETS and the CBAM by the end of 2025 for a potential deletion of these two measures.

  11. Emendamento 23Respinta

    Recital 27 b (new)

    Presentato da Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek +6 · PfE

    Aggiunto: (27 b) Revenues generated from the application of the CBAM shall not be allocated to the general budget of the Union. Those revenues shall remain under the responsibility of the Member States where they are collected and shall be used exclusively for domestic purposes, in particular to support industries and sectors most affected by the Union's environmental policies.

  12. Emendamento 25Respinta

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 24 a (new)

    Presentato da Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek +6 · PfE

    Aggiunto: (24 a) the following article is inserted: 'Article 32a The Commission shall suspend the application of this Regulation in the following cases: (a) where clear and substantiated evidence demonstrates that its implementation significantly distorts competition or leads to retaliation from third countries;or (b) where no viable, sustainable, and low-cost technological alternatives are currently available on the Union market.'

  13. Emendamento 26Respinta

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25 – point a

    Presentato da Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek +6 · PfE

    … Articles 21 to 22(1), Article 22(3), Articles 27 and 31 shall apply Rimosso: from 1 January 2026.; Aggiunto: after the entry into force of the legislative proposal following the comprehensive review.;

  14. Emendamento 27Respinta

    Annex II – paragraph 1

    Presentato da Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek +6 · PfE

    1. The threshold referred to in Article 2(3a) shall be set at Rimosso: 50 Aggiunto: 110 tonnes of net mass.

  15. Emendamento 29Respinta

    Recital 1 a (new)

    Presentato da Marion Maréchal, Laurence Trochu, Guillaume Peltier +1 · ECR

    Aggiunto: (1 a) The structural issues threatening the aluminium industry continue to be unadressed making the CBAM an ineffective tool for preventing carbon leakage in the aluminium sector, and creating substantial problems for the European aluminium supply chain — a highly energy-intensive and complex industry that operates as a price-taker in extremely competitive global markets, where Europe relies on imports for more than half of its needs. It is therefore necessary to suspend the implementation of the CBAM final phase and the phasing-out of free allowances for the aluminium sector until solutions are adopted in the future review of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 which fully assess the competitiveness of the aluminium sector.

  16. Emendamento 30Respinta

    Recital 1 b (new)

    Presentato da Marion Maréchal, Laurence Trochu, Guillaume Peltier +1 · ECR

    Aggiunto: (1 b) To avoid unfair competitivity for exporters of goods listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2023/956, ETS free allocations and indirect cost compensation should be maintained at current levels.

  17. Emendamento 31Respinta

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25 – point a

    Presentato da Marion Maréchal, Laurence Trochu, Guillaume Peltier +1 · ECR

    … 22(1), Article 22(3), Articles 27 and 31 shall apply from 1 January Rimosso: 2026.; Aggiunto: 2026, except for aluminium goods listed in Annex I which need complementary measures to avoid carbon leakages and unfair competitiveness from third countries.;

Voto per gruppo politico

Come hanno votato i gruppi politici

Membri

Visualizzati 10 di 719

Posizione di voto
NomePaeseGruppoPosizione di voto
GermaniaGreens/EFA
A favore
RomaniaS&D
A favore
GermaniaEPP
A favore
FranciaPfE
A favore
FinlandiaECR
A favore
SpagnaS&D
A favore
UngheriaPfE
A favore
BelgioEPP
A favore
ItaliaEPP
A favore
SveziaS&D
A favore
Mostra altro
Seguici su Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en