Votazione al Parlamento europeo

Relazione 2025 della Commissione sulla Macedonia del Nord

Thomas Waitz – Proposta di risoluzione (insieme del testo)
Data: 17.06.2026·Riferimento: A10-0162/2026
Relatore: Thomas Waitz

Risultato complessivo

Approvata
  • 411 A favore
  • 120 Contro
  • 120 Astensione
  • 68 Non ha votato
Stato e procedura

Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.

Votazione del
Ultima fase documentata
Plenaria · (157 giorni fa)
Prossima fase prevista
Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.

Svolgimento della procedura

2025/2254(INI) · INI

Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.

  1. Documentato: Deferimento56 giorni alla fase successiva
  2. Documentato: Esame in commissione117 giorni alla fase successiva
  3. Ultimo documentato: Plenaria157 giorni dall’inizio di questa fase
Attività documentate (11)
  1. Deferimento alla commissione
  2. Relazione della commissione presentata
  3. Relazione della commissione approvata
  4. Presentazione in plenaria
  5. Presentazione in plenaria
  6. Presentazione in plenaria
  7. Presentazione in plenaria
  8. Presentazione in plenaria
  9. Discussione in plenaria
  10. Votazione in plenaria
  11. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
  1. Discussione in plenaria
  2. Votazione in plenaria

Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:

Fonti

Dati: EP Open Data API

Di cosa si tratta?

  • North Macedonia EU candidate since 2005 with 71 % public support.
  • Demand for constitutional amendments to open accession negotiations.
  • Criticism of rule-of-law deficits and anti-corruption efforts in North Macedonia.
Fonte: riassunto generato da IA con Mistral

Cronologia degli emendamenti (8)

Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.

  1. Emendamento 3Respinta

    Paragraph 73

    Presentato da Thomas Waitz · Verts/ALE

    Rimosso: 73. Strongly urges the Joint Multidisciplinary Expert Commission on Historical and Educational Issues of Bulgaria and North Macedonia, established as a result of the Treaty of Friendship, Good-neighbourliness and Cooperation with Bulgaria, to achieve clear and tangible results; underlines that the texts should reflect the interpretation of historical facts and figures from the common history of both peoples based on objective, authentic and evidence-based historical sources and documents, scientific interpretation and historical events, as stipulated in the second protocol to the Treaty with Bulgaria; Aggiunto: deleted

  2. Emendamento 5Respinta

    Citation 4

    Presentato da Stanislav Stoyanov · ESN

    – having regard Aggiunto: to the negotiating framework for North Macedonia approved by the Council on 18 July 2022 and to the Council conclusions of 18 July 2022 on Enlargement – North …

  3. Emendamento 6Approvata

    Recital J a (new)

    Presentato da Ivaylo Valchev · ECR

    Aggiunto: Ja. whereas finding a common approach to communicating and engaging with the past and establishing a culture of remembrance in a mutually respectful way is the foundation on which Bulgaria and North Macedonia should build their future relationship; whereas the relationship between the future generations of North Macedonia and Bulgaria will be a reflection of the education processes in the two countries;

  4. Emendamento 7Respinta

    Paragraph 2

    Presentato da Ivaylo Valchev · ECR

    … essential when aligning national legislation with the EU acquis throughout the negotiations; Aggiunto: notes with regret that North Macedonia has lost precious time and momentum in its EU accession process, while some other candidate countries have made significant progress towards EU accession;

  5. Emendamento 8Respinta

    Paragraph 7

    Presentato da Ivaylo Valchev · ECR

    … closing of accession negotiations as major political milestones in the enlargement process; Rimosso: reiterates its call to enhance the EU’s capacity to act through simplified processes, such as the use of qualified majority voting in the intermediate steps in the enlargement process, fully in line with the Treaties;

  6. Emendamento 9Approvata

    Paragraph 38 a (new)

    Presentato da Ivaylo Valchev · ECR

    Aggiunto: 38a. Commends the Government of North Macedonia for its rapid response to the antisemitic arson attack targeting a Jewish community building in Skopje on 12 April 2026; recalls that this is not the first arson attack against an ethnic community in the country, as in June 2022 the Bulgarian Cultural Club in Bitola was subjected to arson; calls for any future hate-motivated crimes to be met with the same level of swift and determined action to hold the perpetrators accountable;

  7. Emendamento 9Respinta

    Paragraph 38 a (new)

    Presentato da Ivaylo Valchev · ECR

    Aggiunto: 38a. Commends the Government of North Macedonia for its rapid response to the antisemitic arson attack targeting a Jewish community building in Skopje on 12 April 2026; recalls that this is not the first arson attack against an ethnic community in the country, as in June 2022 the Bulgarian Cultural Club in Bitola was subjected to arson; calls for any future hate-motivated crimes to be met with the same level of swift and determined action to hold the perpetrators accountable;

  8. Emendamento 10Respinta

    Paragraph 76 a (new)

    Presentato da Ivaylo Valchev · ECR

    Aggiunto: 76a. Expresses serious concern about the refusal by the authorities of North Macedonia to accept the offer of emergency energy assistance from Bulgaria at a time of declared energy crisis in the region; underlines that energy security in the Western Balkans is of strategic importance for regional stability, economic resilience and the well-being of citizens, and stresses that it must not be used as a tool in political disputes or be held hostage to short-term political considerations; calls for constructive, pragmatic and depoliticised cooperation in the field of energy, in line with the principles of solidarity and good neighbourly relations underpinning the EU accession process;

Voto per gruppo politico

Come hanno votato i gruppi politici

Membri

Visualizzati 10 di 719

Posizione di voto
NomePaeseGruppoPosizione di voto
FranciaRenew
A favore
RomaniaEPP
A favore
Paesi BassiS&D
A favore
ItaliaS&D
A favore
SpagnaS&D
A favore
SlovacchiaEPP
A favore
ItaliaS&D
A favore
PoloniaS&D
A favore
SpagnaS&D
A favore
GermaniaEPP
A favore
Mostra altro
Seguici su Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en