Vote au Parlement européen

Modification du règlement (UE) 2023/956 en ce qui concerne la simplification et le renforcement du mécanisme d’ajustement carbone aux frontières

Antonio Decaro - Proposition de la Commission
Date: 22.05.2025·Référence: A10-0085/2025
Rapporteur: Antonio Decaro

Résultat global

Adopté
  • 564 Pour
  • 20 Contre
  • 12 Abstention
  • 123 N'a pas voté
Statut et procédure

Résultat tel qu'enregistré par le Parlement européen.

Vote du
Dernière étape documentée
Journal officiel · (il y a 392 jours)
Prochaine étape prévue
Aucune autre étape n'est prévue dans la source.
Publication au Journal officiel documentée

Déroulement de la procédure

2025/0039(COD) · COD

Activités documentées de la procédure. Elles ne prouvent pas qu’une loi est entrée en vigueur.

  1. Documenté: Examen en commission4 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  2. Documenté: Renvoi8 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  3. Documenté: Examen en commission36 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  4. Documenté: Plénière8 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  5. Documenté: Négociations42 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  6. Documenté: Examen en commission61 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  7. Documenté: Plénière36 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  8. Documenté: Signature9 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  9. Dernier documenté: Journal officiel
Activités documentées (30)
  1. Dépôt de l’avis en commission
  2. Renvoi en commission
  3. Dépôt d’amendements en commission
  4. Adoption de l’avis en commission
  5. Adoption de l’avis en commission
  6. Adoption de l’avis en commission
  7. Adoption du rapport en commission
  8. Dépôt en séance plénière
  9. Dépôt en séance plénière
  10. Dépôt en séance plénière
  11. Dépôt en séance plénière
  12. Dépôt en séance plénière
  13. Dépôt en séance plénière
  14. Dépôt en séance plénière
  15. Dépôt en séance plénière
  16. Dépôt en séance plénière
  17. Débat en séance plénière
  18. Texte amendé en séance plénière
  19. Renvoi en commission pour négociations interinstitutionnelles
  20. Vote en séance plénière
  21. Résultats du vote en séance plénière
  22. Accord provisoire approuvé en commission
  23. Dépôt en séance plénière
  24. Dépôt en séance plénière
  25. Débat en séance plénière
  26. Position du Parlement en première lecture
  27. Vote en séance plénière
  28. Résultats du vote en séance plénière
  29. Signature
  30. Publication au Journal officiel
Activités prévues (réalisation non confirmée)
  1. Débat en séance plénière
  2. Vote en séance plénière
  3. Débat en séance plénière
  4. Vote en séance plénière

Fiche de procédure (OEIL) · Données du Parlement européen
Consulté le:

Sources

Données : EP Open Data API

De quoi s’agit-il ?

  • Simplification du système CBAM proposée.
  • Exceptions pour importations d'électricité depuis zones économiques EEE.
  • Rapporteur Antonio Decaro dirige le processus.
Source : Résumé généré par IA avec Mistral

Historique des amendements (17)

Texte tel que publié par le PE, en anglais.

  1. Amendement 7Rejeté

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point a

    Déposé par Antonella Sberna, Pietro Fiocchi, Stefano Cavedagna · ECR

    Supprimé: (a) the following paragraph 1a is inserted: ‘1a. The competent authority may decrease the amount of the penalty calculated in accordance with paragraph 1, considering one or more of the following factors: a) the extent of unreported information; b) the level of cooperation and readiness of the authorised CBAM declarant to comply with requests for information; c) the unintentional nature of the behaviour of the authorised CBAM declarant; d) the past compliance of the authorised CBAM declarant.;’ Ajouté: deleted

  2. Amendement 9Rejeté

    Recital 29 a (new)

    Déposé par Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Aurelijus Veryga, Adrian-George Axinia +13 · ECR

    Ajouté: (29 a) It is necessary to ensure effective implementation of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and to address the remaining regulatory loopholes, which result in circumvention of the established rules and, in consequence, put European production at risk of competitive disadvantage. It is therefore necessary to address the regulatory loopholes, through strict oversight and monitoring of CBAM application, in order to ensure a level playing field between European producers of CBAM goods and third country producers and effectively reduce global emissions.

  3. Amendement 10Rejeté

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b

    Déposé par Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Aurelijus Veryga, Adrian-George Axinia +13 · ECR

    … for the import of goods refers to the same goods by CN Supprimé: code Ajouté: code, same third country operator and countries of origin as the CBAM declaration submitted for the preceding calendar Supprimé: year.; Ajouté: year, provided that the third country operators are registered in the CBAM registry in accordance with Article 10.;

  4. Amendement 12Rejeté

    Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a

    Déposé par Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Aurelijus Veryga, Adrian-George Axinia +13 · ECR

    … default values shall be based on the average emission intensity of the Supprimé: ten Ajouté: 10% of exporting countries with the highest emission intensities for which reliable data can be applied for that type of goods.; Ajouté: if the number of exporting countries for which reliable data are available is higher than 30, the default values shall be based on the average emission intensity of the three countries with the highest emissions intensities for which reliable data are available’;

  5. Amendement 13Rejeté

    Recital 27 a (new)

    Déposé par Patryk Jaki, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Dominik Tarczyński +2 · ECR

    Ajouté: (27 a) Coking coal is a critical raw material of strategic importance for European industry, which underpins the green and digital transition. Listed under Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a, coking coal is of a strategic importance for the overall Union economy, and therefore its internal European production should be promoted. Imports of coking coal from third countries with less stringent environmental legislation in place negatively impact the European domestic production of coking coal and places European producers at a competitive disadvantage and risks undermining Union's climate and industrial objectives. In order to ensure the level playing field between the European production of coking coal and its imports from third countries, the Commission should present, as part of its assessment referred to in Article 30(2) the possibility to extend the scope of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 to cover the coking coal sector. 1a Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials and amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020 (OJ L 1252, 3.5.2024, p.1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1252/2024-05-03).

  6. Amendement 14Rejeté

    Recital 27 b (new)

    Déposé par Patryk Jaki, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Dominik Tarczyński +2 · ECR

    Ajouté: (27 b) Soda ash is a fundamental chemical compound that is used in a wide range of industrial processes, including the manufacturing of glass, chemicals, detergents and metallurgical operations. The production of soda ash is highly energy-intensive and, within the Union, is subject to stringent climate and energy legislation, notably the obligations under Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. Soda ash is imported from third countries with less stringent climate and energy legislation and significantly lower energy prices, which places Union producers of soda ash at a competitive disadvantage and risks encouraging carbon leakage. Therefore, the Commission should present, as part of its assessment referred to in Article 30 (2) of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 the possibility to extend the scope of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 to cover the soda ash sector. 1a Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/87/oj).

  7. Amendement 15Rejeté

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new)

    Déposé par Patryk Jaki, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Dominik Tarczyński +2 · ECR

    Ajouté: (23 a) in Article 30, paragraph 2 is amended as follows: (a) the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: 'Before the end of the transitional period referred to in Article 32, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Regulation. The report shall be accompagnied by a legislative proposal.' (b) the second subparagraph, point (a)(iii), is replaced by the following: '(iii) goods at risk of carbon leakage other than those listed in Annex I, and specifically organic chemicals, polymers, soda ash and coking coal';

  8. Amendement 17Rejeté

    Recital 1 a (new)

    Déposé par Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek +6 · PfE

    Ajouté: (1 a) Union industries exporting goods that fall within the scope of the CBAM are not compensated for the high and constantly increasing costs incurred by the EU ETS or protected from possible retaliatory measures imposed by trading partners. In the context of the comprehensive review, the Commission will introduce an export adjustment mechanism, address the issue of circumventing measures, and guarantee that CBAM exporters are protected from third countries' retaliatory measures.

  9. Amendement 18Rejeté

    Recital 1 b (new)

    Déposé par Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek +6 · PfE

    Ajouté: (1 b) The Union is the only major region in the world to have introduced a significant price on CO2, but the incentive effect of such a carbon pricing on trading partners has not been clearly demonstrated. The introduction of the CBAM is causing concerns among Union economic actors, particularly the energy-intensive industries already pressured by the Union's excessive environmental legislation. In the context of the comprehensive review, the Commission will remove the phase-out of the free allowances under the EU ETS if a level playing field is not ensured.

  10. Amendement 19Rejeté

    Recital 1 c (new)

    Déposé par Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek +6 · PfE

    Ajouté: (1 c) The CBAM has been introduced to compensate the effect of the EU ETS in order to address carbon leakage. As currently designed, the CBAM will not ensure a level playing field. For those reasons, the Commission will review the EU ETS and the CBAM by the end of 2025 for a potential deletion of these two measures.

  11. Amendement 23Rejeté

    Recital 27 b (new)

    Déposé par Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek +6 · PfE

    Ajouté: (27 b) Revenues generated from the application of the CBAM shall not be allocated to the general budget of the Union. Those revenues shall remain under the responsibility of the Member States where they are collected and shall be used exclusively for domestic purposes, in particular to support industries and sectors most affected by the Union's environmental policies.

  12. Amendement 25Rejeté

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 24 a (new)

    Déposé par Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek +6 · PfE

    Ajouté: (24 a) the following article is inserted: 'Article 32a The Commission shall suspend the application of this Regulation in the following cases: (a) where clear and substantiated evidence demonstrates that its implementation significantly distorts competition or leads to retaliation from third countries;or (b) where no viable, sustainable, and low-cost technological alternatives are currently available on the Union market.'

  13. Amendement 26Rejeté

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25 – point a

    Déposé par Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek +6 · PfE

    … Articles 21 to 22(1), Article 22(3), Articles 27 and 31 shall apply Supprimé: from 1 January 2026.; Ajouté: after the entry into force of the legislative proposal following the comprehensive review.;

  14. Amendement 27Rejeté

    Annex II – paragraph 1

    Déposé par Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek +6 · PfE

    1. The threshold referred to in Article 2(3a) shall be set at Supprimé: 50 Ajouté: 110 tonnes of net mass.

  15. Amendement 29Rejeté

    Recital 1 a (new)

    Déposé par Marion Maréchal, Laurence Trochu, Guillaume Peltier +1 · ECR

    Ajouté: (1 a) The structural issues threatening the aluminium industry continue to be unadressed making the CBAM an ineffective tool for preventing carbon leakage in the aluminium sector, and creating substantial problems for the European aluminium supply chain — a highly energy-intensive and complex industry that operates as a price-taker in extremely competitive global markets, where Europe relies on imports for more than half of its needs. It is therefore necessary to suspend the implementation of the CBAM final phase and the phasing-out of free allowances for the aluminium sector until solutions are adopted in the future review of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 which fully assess the competitiveness of the aluminium sector.

  16. Amendement 30Rejeté

    Recital 1 b (new)

    Déposé par Marion Maréchal, Laurence Trochu, Guillaume Peltier +1 · ECR

    Ajouté: (1 b) To avoid unfair competitivity for exporters of goods listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2023/956, ETS free allocations and indirect cost compensation should be maintained at current levels.

  17. Amendement 31Rejeté

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25 – point a

    Déposé par Marion Maréchal, Laurence Trochu, Guillaume Peltier +1 · ECR

    … 22(1), Article 22(3), Articles 27 and 31 shall apply from 1 January Supprimé: 2026.; Ajouté: 2026, except for aluminium goods listed in Annex I which need complementary measures to avoid carbon leakages and unfair competitiveness from third countries.;

Vote par groupe politique

Comment les groupes politiques ont voté

Les membres

Montrer 10 de 719

Position de vote
NomPaysGroupePosition de vote
AllemagneGreens/EFA
Pour
RoumanieS&D
Pour
AllemagneEPP
Pour
FrancePfE
Pour
FinlandeECR
Pour
EspagneS&D
Pour
HongriePfE
Pour
BelgiqueEPP
Pour
ItalieEPP
Pour
SuèdeS&D
Pour
Afficher plus
Suivez-nous sur Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en