Vote in the European Parliament

How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?

Carlo Fidanza – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 30.04.2026·Reference: A10-0088/2026
Rapporteur: Carlo Fidanza

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 426 For
  • 119 Against
  • 40 Abstention
  • 134 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (214 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2053(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral91 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage305 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary214 days since this step began
Recorded activities (9)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee report adopted
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Plenary debate
  8. Plenary vote
  9. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Livestock sector as pillar of EU agriculture with €214.3 billion in value.
  • Focus on animal health , climate resilience and generational renewal in farming.
  • Demand for stable legal framework and bureaucracy reduction for farmers.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (8)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1Rejected

    Paragraph 11 a (new)

    Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +84 · Members

    Added: 11a. Urges the Commission to come forward with an integrated and holistic European food policy that ensures alignment between all policies that affect food production and consumption in the EU and addresses interconnected challenges such as public health and climate change;

  2. Amendment 2Rejected

    Paragraph 15 a (new)

    Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +81 · Members

    Added: 15a. Stresses that intensive livestock farming is a major contributor to soil and water pollution and significantly contributes to higher greenhouse gas emissions, thus reducing biodiversity in the EU;

  3. Amendment 3Rejected

    Paragraph 18 a (new)

    Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +76 · Members

    Added: 18a. Stresses that the concerning level of concentration in the processing and retail sectors of the livestock value chain contributes to farmers’ precarious situation; calls on the Commission to strictly implement anti-trust legislation in these sectors by using all available tools at its disposal;

  4. Amendment 4Adopted

    Paragraph 27 a (new)

    Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +86 · Members

    Added: 27a. Calls for the incentivisation of extensive and grass-based livestock farming, particularly under the CAP;

  5. Amendment 5Rejected

    Paragraph 37 a (new)

    Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +83 · Members

    Added: 37a. Expresses its concerns over the ineffective implementation and poor enforcement of current EU animal welfare legislation;

  6. Amendment 6Rejected

    Paragraph 37 b (new)

    Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +71 · Members

    Added: 37b. Underlines the importance of a shift towards plant-based food consumption, better animal welfare during the entire production cycle, and the promotion of higher animal welfare standards both internationally and domestically;

  7. Amendment 7Rejected

    Paragraph 39 a (new)

    Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +75 · Members

    Added: 39a. Calls on the Commission to propose a harmonised and mandatory system for method-of-production and origin labelling that provides information on farming, transport and slaughter methods, and information on the welfare of animals throughout their entire life cycles;

  8. Amendment 8Rejected

    Paragraph 46 a (new)

    Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +80 · Members

    Added: 46a. Emphasises, in particular, the essential role of hedgerows in livestock farming landscapes, especially in bocage systems, as key agroecological infrastructure that provide multiple ecosystem services, including biodiversity conservation, carbon sequestration, water retention, shelter for animals and landscape quality; stresses that the preservation and restoration of hedge networks must be recognised as an integral part of sustainable livestock farming and rural heritage, and must receive financial support;

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
SpainEPP
For
PolandEPP
For
ItalyECR
For
ItalyECR
For
GermanyRenew
For
ItalyECR
For
FranceRenew
For
PolandECR
For
BulgariaEPP
For
IrelandS&D
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en