Vote in the European Parliament
How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?
Overall Result
Adopted- 426 For
- 119 Against
- 40 Abstention
- 134 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (214 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2053(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (9)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Livestock sector as pillar of EU agriculture with €214.3 billion in value.
- Focus on animal health , climate resilience and generational renewal in farming.
- Demand for stable legal framework and bureaucracy reduction for farmers.
Amendment history (8)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +84 · Members
Added: 11a. Urges the Commission to come forward with an integrated and holistic European food policy that ensures alignment between all policies that affect food production and consumption in the EU and addresses interconnected challenges such as public health and climate change;
- Amendment 2Rejected
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +81 · Members
Added: 15a. Stresses that intensive livestock farming is a major contributor to soil and water pollution and significantly contributes to higher greenhouse gas emissions, thus reducing biodiversity in the EU;
- Amendment 3Rejected
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +76 · Members
Added: 18a. Stresses that the concerning level of concentration in the processing and retail sectors of the livestock value chain contributes to farmers’ precarious situation; calls on the Commission to strictly implement anti-trust legislation in these sectors by using all available tools at its disposal;
- Amendment 4Adopted
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +86 · Members
Added: 27a. Calls for the incentivisation of extensive and grass-based livestock farming, particularly under the CAP;
- Amendment 5Rejected
Paragraph 37 a (new)
Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +83 · Members
Added: 37a. Expresses its concerns over the ineffective implementation and poor enforcement of current EU animal welfare legislation;
- Amendment 6Rejected
Paragraph 37 b (new)
Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +71 · Members
Added: 37b. Underlines the importance of a shift towards plant-based food consumption, better animal welfare during the entire production cycle, and the promotion of higher animal welfare standards both internationally and domestically;
- Amendment 7Rejected
Paragraph 39 a (new)
Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +75 · Members
Added: 39a. Calls on the Commission to propose a harmonised and mandatory system for method-of-production and origin labelling that provides information on farming, transport and slaughter methods, and information on the welfare of animals throughout their entire life cycles;
- Amendment 8Rejected
Paragraph 46 a (new)
Tabled by David Cormand, Sebastian Everding, Li Andersson +80 · Members
Added: 46a. Emphasises, in particular, the essential role of hedgerows in livestock farming landscapes, especially in bocage systems, as key agroecological infrastructure that provide multiple ecosystem services, including biodiversity conservation, carbon sequestration, water retention, shelter for animals and landscape quality; stresses that the preservation and restoration of hedge networks must be recognised as an integral part of sustainable livestock farming and rural heritage, and must receive financial support;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 44For
- 16Against
- 5Abstention
- 12Did not vote
- 134For
- 1Against
- 4Abstention
- 46Did not vote
- 66For
- 0Against
- 5Abstention
- 10Did not vote
- 72For
- 32Against
- 4Abstention
- 27Did not vote
- 71For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 14Did not vote
- 15For
- 3Against
- 9Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 24For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 0For
- 23Against
- 12Abstention
- 11Did not vote
- 0For
- 44Against
- 1Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |