EN
EspañolVote in the European Parliament
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize DAS1131, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Motion for a resolution
Date: 25.11.2025Reference: B10-0489/2025Overall Result
Adopted- 453 For
- 171 Against
- 19 Abstention
- 76 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (353 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2893(RSP) · RSP
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (2)
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The approval of genetically modified maize DAS1131, engineered for pest resistance and glyphosate tolerance, faces scrutiny due to unresolved health and environmental concerns.
- Scientific assessments by EFSA did not address cumulative or long-term risks, including interactions with pesticide residues.
- Field trials were conducted under limited conditions, failing to reflect diverse agricultural environments.
- The European Parliament demands the withdrawal of the Commission’s proposal and calls for stricter GMO approval procedures.
- Emphasis is placed on aligning decisions with the precautionary principle and international sustainability commitments.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For25
- 25For
- 2Against
- 1Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For21
- 21For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 5Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For49
- 49For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For30
- 30For
- 33Against
- 0Abstention
- 12Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For50
- 50For
- 115Against
- 5Abstention
- 18Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For117
- 117For
- 1Against
- 4Abstention
- 14Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For65
- 65For
- 6Against
- 8Abstention
- 6Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For59
- 59For
- 14Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For37
- 37For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Germany | ESN | For | |
| Germany | ESN | For | |
 Denmark | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Estonia | Renew | For | |
 Croatia | EPP | For | |
 Italy | S&D | For | |
| Italy | PfE | For | |
 France | ECR | For | |
| France | Renew | For | |
| Germany | Greens/EFA | For |
