Speeches

Madam President, Commissioner, the impact of Brexit on fisheries extends beyond the geographical area of the United Kingdom and has important implications for the entire area of the North-East Atlantic Ocean, as well as for the European Union fleet operating in other parts of the world, such as the waters around the Falkland Islands, Greenland and Svalbard. The geopolitical scenario has changed with the Brexit. Also the governance framework, with changes in the balance of powers and in the relative positioning of all neighbouring countries that share fish stocks in the area. With the departure of the United Kingdom, the European Union has lost its bargaining power over important fishing nations. The result is that some take advantage of the weakness of the European Union, which must be reaffirmed as a guarantor of its fishing interests, in order to avoid any unjustified or unilateral limitation of access to water or resources for European Union vessels in the region. In addition, the United Kingdom, contrary to the spirit of good cooperation, discreetly but systematically discriminates against European Union fishermen by unilaterally introducing new fishing rules. It also refuses to grant access to European Union vessels that have traditionally fished there. All this leads to restrictions on the access of EU vessels to UK waters, contrary to the Trade and Cooperation Agreement signed. Access to UK waters and access to the EU market are intrinsically linked, and this has been the European Union's approach during the EU negotiations. Brexit. The European Union must be very firm in upholding this principle and, where appropriate, act.

Madam President, Commissioner, thank you for this communication, especially for including fisheries and aquaculture, which, together with the entire seafood value chain, are key sectors contributing to food security in the European Union. Thank you very much. However, the measures envisaged for fisheries are clearly insufficient. For months now, the fisheries and aquaculture sectors have been facing a difficult economic situation. We see with concern how ships from many Member States are mooring as a result of the sharp increase in costs. It is time to execute urgent actions and not beautiful words. Operators need to be compensated for lost revenues or additional costs, storage aid and compensation for temporary cessation of activities. In addition, we need to increase the aid ceiling. de minimis and an increase in the flexibility of year-on-year quotas. Exceptional circumstances require exceptional and courageous measures for agriculture, livestock and also for fisheries.

Madam President, Mr High Representative, Africa must be a priority continent for the European Union. To begin with, they separate us just fourteen kilometers and our interests are not only commercial and economic, but also political, migratory or security. We know it well in the Canary Islands. The European Union now has a great opportunity with the creation of the African Continental Free Trade Area to attract more investment, lay the foundations for its necessary industrialisation and job creation for young people. This will depend on our ability to mobilise investments in strategic sectors, trade and more business presence in the region. But none of the above will be possible without stability, institutionality and security. Legal security and also physical security. Commitments must be honoured. And I am thinking of the fisheries agreement concluded between the European Union and Senegal, which has been repeatedly breached. Africa needs investment in R&D. Multinational companies already have a strong presence. The challenge now is to support with more determination the presence of European SMEs. I hope that the EU-Africa Summit will successfully address all these challenges and challenges.

Mr President, the situation in Nicaragua is unsustainable: the continued authoritarian drift directly undermines human rights, democracy and all the values that we stand for in this House. What we experienced in the last fraudulent elections in the country is a new finding of something that we have been denouncing for a long time: the Ortega-Murillos are dynamite Nicaraguan democracy from within, from power, pushing for harsh repression that undermines freedoms; They intend to extinguish them completely and turn Nicaragua, sadly, into an autocratic, communist, personalist and family regime. We cannot stand idly by in the face of the communist challenge that threatens many Latin American countries, we must react and position ourselves with determination alongside the true democratic leaders of the region and civil society that stands firm in the face of the dictatorship of the extreme left; If we don't, more than one state will follow the path of Nicaragua, Venezuela or Cuba. By the way, they contrast the words against Ortega with his position in relation to Maduro, Mr. Borrell. Europe must unequivocally and seamlessly support that this resolution on the situation in Nicaragua includes measures condemning the regime and the permanent violation of human rights and ensure that not a cent of the European Union ends up in the hands of this authoritarian dictatorship, contrary to the principles with which we identify. The European Union must take decisive action: I urge, as we have done on other occasions, to activate the democratic clause of the Association Agreement, as well as the imposition of sanctions against all those who violate human rights in Nicaragua.

Mr President, we are still stronger than the volcano, let no one doubt it, but every day it costs us more; fifty-two days have passed since the eruption of the volcano on my Isla Bonita and there it continues, doing damage to homes, farms and infrastructure, but above all in the spirit of the palm trees: Believe me, listening to the volcano's uninterrupted roar for days and days is hard to bear. Solidarity has been an example in everything, and also the action of the Administrations, but we must take a step further: the aid has to come now, we have to move from words to deeds in Spain and in Europe. The victims need solutions to this catastrophe that has already changed their lives forever and they need them now: bureaucracy cannot be an impediment. La Palma and the palm trees look at Europe more than ever. We will resist, we will continue to be stronger than the volcano, but in this situation Europe cannot fail us.

Madam President, when the volcano continues to roar with force and the lava rivers continue, it is difficult to speak of anything other than survival and recovery. And recovery is what the island of La Palma needs in all areas, also in tourism. The Canary Islands as a whole need the certainty that the European Union must guarantee and La Palma, in particular, urgently needs, in addition to funds, a genuine recovery plan and tourism promotion. We talked about the end of the summer season and the stocktaking of EU actions in relation to the COVID certificate and the recovery of flights during the summer season. But we also have to talk about the winter season, because for regions like mine, the Canary Islands, the autumn/winter season is the real high season for tourism. When the cold reaches the rest of Europe, temperatures in the archipelago do not fall below twenty degrees. Canary Islands is a region that, with more than two million inhabitants, received fifteen million tourists every year. COVID-19 destroyed the sector and we are a long way from being able to recover its pre-pandemic figures. Now we cannot afford the slightest uncertainty. The Canary Islands is a privileged and safe destination. And tourism, an industry that activates the rest of the industries. Just as the lack of capacity of the European institutions to manage and support and renew their industrial and tourism modes has been criticised, we must welcome the creation of a European agency for tourism, whose headquarters would have no better location than the Canary Islands. I am confident that, with the efforts of all, tourism will continue to be the true economic engine of the Canary Islands, and in La Palma in particular, in addition, a guarantee of survival.

Madam President, the volcano that erupted a fortnight ago on my island, the island of La Palma, is ravaging houses, roads, water infrastructure and crops, but, above all, illusions. He's leaving a trail of pain, of broken personal stories, of thousands of evacuees. It is changing the island's own orography, which will no longer be heart-shaped. A heart that palm trees have shown and that has won the solidarity of so many people. Faced with this, we can only react because the worst remains: reconstruction; re-creating a home; continuing to grow the best bananas in the world; to try to live again leaving that nightmare as a sad memory of the strength of nature. That is why we urgently need the help of the European Union. We need to get funds to La Palma that will allow the palm trees to smile again. And I'm sure it will be, and you know why? Because all together we are much stronger than the volcano.

Madam President, my first words must necessarily be of gratitude. Firstly, to the shadow rapporteurs Pierre Karleskind, Manuel Pizarro, Rosanna Conte, Ruža Tomašić, Francisco Guerreiro and João Ferreira. His work has been fundamental. On the other hand, and most especially, I would like to express my special thanks to my colleague Francisco Millán Mon for leading the negotiations during the period when I was out of Parliament. It wasn't easy and he had to work hard to avoid reopening the entire deal and renegotiating this dossier, as some intended. If it had not been for him, surely today we would not be here debating the new Fund. Thank you, Paco! I would also like to express my appreciation to the successive presidencies of the Council that have been involved and especially to the German Presidency, which concluded this long road. Last but not least, my deep thanks to Commissioner Sinkevičius, who has been present at all our trilogues. We have had very tough debates, I recognize, in which we have each defended our position, but most importantly we have been able to reach an agreement. Thank you very much, Sheriff! This agreement is the result of the work of three years of difficult negotiations with the political groups and with the Council and the Commission, and with all the nuances that want to be made to it, today we can say that we have achieved a good agreement. An agreement that, although some – least of all, it is true – want to discredit, satisfies in a nutshell what was my first red line when I took over this report as rapporteur: that our fishermen fish in better conditions, but never fish more. The new Fund, with an allocation of EUR 6 108 million, will contribute to more sustainable fisheries, aquaculture and processing, support a blue economy and coastal communities and promote international ocean governance. Let us not lose sight of the fact that the Fund has been negotiated at an exceptionally difficult juncture, such as the loss of fishing grounds as a result of the Brexit, the paralysis of the seafood value chain due to COVID-19, the difficulties in achieving true generational renewal, the need to provide better conditions for fishing vessels while continuing to fight overcapacity, the need to simplify bureaucracy in order to be able to access these Funds or the obligations stemming from the CFP, such as the landing obligation and reaching the maximum sustainable yield. The challenge was huge and I sincerely believe that we have achieved it. The agreed Fund helps to address these challenges and to achieve increasingly ambitious objectives. The current bureaucracy is replaced by a simplified system that gives Member States the necessary flexibility to plan the needs of their sectors without jeopardising transparency and accountability. Therefore, the future Fund is easy to use. In addition, it is respectful of the rules of the World Trade Organization. It contains no harmful subsidies, no aid for the construction or acquisition of new fishing vessels, no increase in engine power, no direct subsidy for the increase of fishing capacity of vessels over 24 metres and only for vessels up to 24 and exclusively for the purpose of improving safety, working conditions or energy efficiency. And, in addition, a financial ceiling of 15% for the main measures of the fleet. It is environmentally friendly and contributes to achieving the objectives of the Green Deal. We agree that combating biodiversity loss and maintaining healthy ecosystems will require significant public and private investment at national and European level. In addition, the new EMFAF makes it possible to finance investments that improve the energy efficiency, safety and working conditions of EU fishing vessels, while ensuring the sustainability of the sector. It also encourages generational renewal by supporting the first acquisition of vessels by young fishermen. One of the successes of the European Parliament is that the new EMFAF will especially support small-scale coastal fisheries. Member States shall take into account in their programme the specific needs of this fishery. The same preferential treatment is reserved for fishermen without boats and shellfishers. It will also support European aquaculture, encouraging investment to strengthen the competitiveness of aquaculture production, and, in addition, introduces a crisis management plan that will allow support in emergency situations such as those experienced with COVID-19. I would also like to stress, coming from an outermost region such as the Canary Islands, that the final text of this agreement takes into account the specific constraints of these regions and that the current budget for the compensation of additional costs is maintained, which can be supplemented by Member States with State aid through a simplified procedure. In short, the new EMFAF will allow better fishing, not more fishing. It will not prevent the sector from investing in the safety and well-being of workers and in environmentally efficient engines and vessels, and will allow generational renewal, while providing all necessary safeguards to avoid overcapacity and overfishing. Member States already have a simplified Fund at their disposal and can start setting priorities and planning funding. But above all, we have managed to reach an agreement that obliges us to preserve and promote the fragile balance reached between environmental, social and economic considerations.