What Birgit spoke about.

17

Jun

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Protecting children’s safety and mental health from the risks posed by social media – our duty to act now (debate)

Madam President, Imagine that a child opens an app only briefly. The algorithm has only one goal: maximum length of stay, maximum profit. Like a pull, it draws children and sometimes adults deeper and deeper into echo chambers, where they only hear what they want to hear and believe what the algorithm shows them. Emotional, extreme content is rewarded, facts, nuances, doubts are buried. The algorithm knows: Anger lasts longer than reason, fear scrolls further than truth. And while children in rabbit holes Disappearing and adults being locked up in rage bubbles through hatred and hate speech, the platforms are slashing billions. Genuine child protection starts with the design itself: no infinite feeds that use exhaustion as a feature; No algorithms or systems to be addictive. Instead of mere age verification, we need effective enforcement of our laws and respect for democratic values. Those who do not respect this must not simply continue to operate in the European market.

16

Jun

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Achieving digital sovereignty and resilience for Europe, in light of recent developments affecting access to advanced AI technologies (debate)

20

May

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Rights, support and protection of victims of crime (debate)

Madam President, Severely traumatized, they cope with their arduous everyday life and yet find no peace. We are talking about survivors of serious crimes. All too often they are left alone with the physical, psychological and financial consequences. And again and again they are even contacted directly by perpetrators. Unannounced. Unexpected. Legal? Unfortunately, yes. And that will remain the case if we do not act now. With the vote tomorrow, we will focus on the needs of the victims. We close gaps in protection, protect the personal data of the victims from access by the perpetrators. We facilitate access to advice, support, support and compensation. We ensure better awareness of judges, police officers and others. And this protection should apply regardless of where in the EU a person has been the victim of a crime, so that those affected do not have to endure even more suffering than in the act itself. And ladies and gentlemen, if I have to hear here in the House that violence exists only because there is migration, it is a slap in the face of all the victims. And I would like to apologise to all victims for such statements. (The speaker rejected questions on the ‘blue card’ procedure by Lukas Sieper and Arkadiusz Mularczyk.)

28

Apr

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (debate)

Mr President! A report on fundamental rights in the EU should be positive. Unfortunately, the negotiations were difficult due to opposition from the right, the text could have been stronger. The compromise is acceptable and thus received at least a broad majority. But our fundamental rights are under attack, eroded – in the Member States, but also here. So there are unbearable amendments for tomorrow's vote. Attempts are being made to redefine the work of the ECJ in accordance with right-wing ideology. There is incitement against people from third countries, homosexual and transgender people, women. I am curious to see how the political groups, in particular the so-called political centre, react to these requests. After the Hungarian elections and a clear ECJ ruling on Article 2 of the Treaties, we can vote strongly for Europe and our fundamental rights tomorrow. It would be an important sign, especially after the report on the Charter of Fundamental Rights was blocked by conservatives.

26

Mar

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application (A10-0040/2026 - Birgit Sippel) (vote)

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, Just two weeks ago, this Parliament adopted a position by an overwhelming majority, with the participation of, among others, EPP, S&D and Renew – a position based on facts and the concrete experience of five years with the transitional regulation. We have taken responsibility for the protection of children while respecting fundamental rights. And we deliberately opted for an extension – with evidence-based, necessary and proportionate adjustments. With this position, we entered the trilogues to negotiate as co-legislators, in anticipation of an exchange and mutual willingness to compromise. But that didn't happen. The Council has evaded the debate, has in fact risen from the negotiating table or has not even arrived there. The experience of recent years shows that the recognition of known material works and should continue to take place without cause. At the same time, there are no reliable technologies to reliably determine the context, intentions and legal classification of unknown material or grooming. A targeted restriction is not a step backwards, but urgently needed. That is why, as a parliament, we must remain consistent. Let us confirm our overwhelming majority position and give legislators another chance to talk. And colleagues, I can't resist: I find it almost fun – with all the pressure that has arisen in recent days – to work with how much dirt and dirt and fake claims just because you don't have clear facts for your own point of view.

11

Mar

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Child sexual abuse online: protect children, not perpetrators (topical debate)

11

Mar

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application (A10-0040/2026 - Birgit Sippel) (vote)

10

Feb

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Spain’s large-scale regularisation policy and its impact on the Schengen Area and EU migration policy (debate)

10

Feb

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Spain’s large-scale regularisation policy and its impact on the Schengen Area and EU migration policy (debate)

21

Jan

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate)

Mr President! 2026 – a crisis year. Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine is not coming to an end, it seems to be increasing in aggression. Donald Trump uses violence in his own country as a means of pressure, ignores international law, ruthlessly puts the axe to transatlantic cooperation. The Iranian regime is attacking its own people, but the Conservatives think of nothing better than starting a debate on migration in this House for the tenth time and chewing back the ever-same demands for deportations and outsourcing of our humanitarian responsibilities to third countries. But the majority of refugees worldwide remain close to their home region. The number of asylum applications across the EU has fallen over the past year. And yet, before Christmas, the EPP, together with the far-right factions, effectively undermined the fundamental right to asylum in the EU. There is a need for discussion on migration. Our labour market lacks a workforce and vacancies often remain vacant. Small and medium-sized enterprises in particular are affected. But simplification, acceleration and genuine pan-European harmonisation, legal pathways for jobseekers are neglected. And at the same time, whether people flee persecution and violence or poverty and lack of prospects, once here, they want to work, earn a living and participate in society. But there is often a lack of integration. Instead of starting directly with language and integration courses, asking for qualifications, offering training, many people often remain on hold for years, are doomed to inaction, while at the same time we are desperately looking for apprentices and workers in many places. We can no longer afford this madness. So how about putting on a new record at the beginning of the year? Last sentence: Make migration and integration policies positive and proactive in the interest of people and the economy. In 2026, there could be a...

20

Jan

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Tackling AI deepfakes and sexual exploitation on social media by making full use of the EU’s digital rules (debate)

Madam President, AI – Freedom through innovation? In fact, we see innovation without responsibility, power without accountability. AI chatbots like Grok's are a systematic violation of dignity and fundamental rights. They are trained to undress, sexualize, and force images of real people into poses they never agreed to. Women are degraded to objects, children to digital victims. A thousand times. This function is no coincidence. It is the desired result of a culture that puts growth above the interest and protection of all for few. But we cannot tolerate dignity and rights being trampled on, people being sexualised without their knowledge and children becoming collateral damage to digital business models. And that is why we need clear bans on such AI sexualisation, a consistent digital tax, personal liability of providers, effective supervisory authorities and yes, also temporarily blocking access to the European market. Let's enforce rules that protect us in Europe.

17

Dec

2025

Questions DE

Watch

Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime (debate)

Madam President, Respect for our values is a prerequisite for EU membership, and they must apply in practice. Conditionality is designed to protect our budget when breaches of the rule of law put it at risk. And that this mechanism is lawful has been confirmed by the European Court of Justice, and it is also in the interest of our citizens. Funds must not go to governments where courts no longer decide independently, where prosecutors are politically instrumentalised, where civil society is criminalised and put before the choice between silence and prosecution, where non-transparency, incorrect procurement procedures, interference with journalists undermine measures against fraud, corruption and mismanagement. And the Commission needs to apply this conditionality mechanism consistently, also linked to other instruments, such as Article 7. The credibility of the EU must be: No rule of law, no EU money.

17

Dec

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

The urgent need to combat discrimination in the EU through the horizontal anti-discrimination directive (topical debate)

Mr President! Discrimination is prohibited. Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights is clear. But hate crime and hate speech are on the rise across the EU, both online and offline. Laws are being pushed that specifically discriminate against and criminalize minorities, such as so-called Gay-propaganda-Laws and PrideBanned in Hungary. This is how fears are stirred up and how people are to be made increasingly invisible to the public. Whether religious minorities, people with disabilities, the elderly, LGBTIQ people, third-country nationals, many others face barriers to housing, education, healthcare and access to services in everyday life. Women in particular are often disadvantaged on several occasions. That is why we finally need a uniform level of protection for everyone in all areas of life. However, the horizontal anti-discrimination directive has been blocked in the Council since 2008. This is unacceptable. And that is why I call on the Council: End the blockade, finally complete the Anti-Discrimination Directive!

16

Dec

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’ (debate)

12

Nov

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

The first European Annual Asylum and Migration report and the setting up of the Annual Solidarity Pool (debate)

Madam President, With a large majority, Parliament and Member States have adopted a new asylum system and clearly: Shared responsibility and solidarity are essential for successful implementation. It is not a positive start for the Commission to ignore legally binding timelines, but it is good that it has now come out of the coup and presented its report on the migration situation and solidarity. The fact that this rather fact-based task has become a highly political process in which many Member States have focused solely on their supposed own advantage is disappointing. And the little constructive behaviour of the German Minister of the Interior has also contributed to this. Now the time is running out. The delay that Commissioner Brunner has accepted must pay off. Member States must adopt a convincing solidarity pool in December, because without shared responsibility and solidarity, the new system that we urgently need will not work.

22

Oct

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

Allegations of espionage by the Hungarian government within the EU institutions (debate)

Madam President, Two people meet, whisper, exchange documents. What sounds like a scene from a spy movie was a bitter reality, according to research by investigative journalists. From 2013 to 2018, Hungarian intelligence services are said to have set up an espionage network in EU institutions and attempted, under diplomatic cover, to recruit EU staff to share confidential information. According to reports, this was done with the knowledge of then-Ambassador Olivér Várhelyi, now EU Commissioner. Earlier research shows that the Hungarian secret service monitored OLAF investigators who investigated the misuse of EU funds, including in the vicinity of Orbán's family. Further reports prove the use of spyware against journalists, lawyers, politicians. Parliament’s PEGA Committee and the European Court of Human Rights strongly criticised these practices. Basically: Wherever governments monitor civilian, critical actors, democracy is under attack. And those who spy on their partners violate an essential foundation of trusting cooperation. We now need transparency and consistency. I welcome the Commission's announcement of an internal investigation. But this must not remain hidden. This Parliament and the public have a right to know what has happened and how such activities have gone unnoticed for years. Should even a part of the accusations be confirmed, it must not remain with admonishing words. Clear consequences will then be needed, including at the head of the Commission. We must ensure that Europe remains a place where all of us, as citizens and institutions, can live and work freely, safely and without fear of surveillance in a free and democratic Europe.

21

Oct

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

Changing security landscape and the role of police at the heart of the EU’s internal security strategy (debate)

Mr President! Freedom and security are under pressure. There are hybrid threats, cyberattacks, extremism and fears of social insecurity, exclusion, hatred and hate speech, both offline and online. More than ever, we need police and authorities who work on a case-by-case basis, who are technically, personally and in their training at the level of the times. This also includes a wide range of skills and knowledge, from cyber and intercultural competence to trusting cooperation with civilian actors. Trust is also based on respect for freedoms and fundamental rights, on confidentiality of communications, both online and offline. Therefore: More and more surveillance is not an option, but increases fears. What we need, however, is an overall monitoring bill so that we can systematically protect security, freedom and fundamental rights, and rebuild trust in people and authorities. Only together can we strengthen freedom and security.

9

Jul

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

Lessons from Budapest Pride: the urgent need for an EU wide anti-discrimination law and defending fundamental rights against right-wing attacks (topical debate)

Madam President, With ever new measures, Orbán discriminates against or oppresses people in Hungary. At the same time, discrimination, hate speech and violence based on sex, sexual orientation, colour, religion, disability, age and poverty are on the rise across the EU. The fact that Ms von der Leyen wants to withdraw the Equal Treatment Directive right now is an attack on the fundamental rights of all people. Now she says she needs a ‘clear signal’ from the Council or Parliament to reconsider this withdrawal and hoped it would not happen. However, with the majority decision of the two responsible committees, there is this signal. Same with the letter from the Conference of Committee Chairs. And also in the Council – contradiction by a majority of Member States. So when the Commission claims that it did not receive a signal, it deliberately turns a deaf ear and falls into the backs of those who urgently need this directive. In doing so, the Commission is harming our democracy and fundamental rights in Europe.

17

Jun

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report (debate)

Madam President, An analysis of the rule of law situation in all Member States once a year is an important tool. But at the same time, the results of the 2024 report clearly show that: We need more than one report. The EU institutions – above all the Commission as guardian of the Treaties – must finally use all the means at their disposal to defend democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights. We need more and much faster infringement procedures. The disbursement of funds must be much more closely linked to compliance with our values, through the conditionality mechanism and the MFF, and the horizontal equality directive must not be withdrawn. Example Hungary, in recent months alone: The Orbán regime has pushed laws through parliament that further restrict freedom of assembly, including by abusing facial recognition technologies targeting LGBTIQ+ people. The constitution was changed to put alleged child protection above other fundamental rights, and transgender people were de facto denied their identity. A new transparency law threatens to completely eliminate the remaining Hungarian civil society. Far too often I have had to ask this one question in plenary: What else has to happen? Therefore, once again: For me it is clear – the report is an important basis, but we need more concrete activities.

16

Jun

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

Statement by the President - 40th anniversary of the Schengen area agreement

Madam President, 40 years of the Schengen Agreement – how did it come about and why is it still important today? After centuries of war, after the Second World War, another idea finally prevailed in Europe: talk to each other and yes, also argue with each other in order to find common interests and solutions; This is invaluable, especially in the face of current crises and wars. At the same time, this cooperation was the basis for the greatest achievement of our Union: the Schengen agreement, the abolition of percussion trees and controls at our internal borders. This has not only fueled the rapid exchange of goods and services and brought benefits. It simplifies people's cross-border encounters for work, exchange programs, leisure time, and concretely identifies common interests. We also want to achieve this for the Member States that are working to join the Schengen area, because these meetings and their consequences are an important prerequisite for a strong Europe that represents itself and its values with global self-confidence. But the increasing border controls in Member States are putting the axe to success so far. They are building new barriers and can ultimately destroy our common Europe. These controls do not solve any problems, on the contrary: They are a pretense of a solution based on hatred, exclusion, isolation, they are the end of good neighbourliness in Europe and cost us a lot of trust. Therefore, in view of this 40th anniversary, it is very clear: We must tackle the real challenges, reinvigorate the founding idea of Europe, oppose hatred and exclusion and finally end border controls. That would be the best contribution to the celebration of 40 years of Schengen.

7

May

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

Malta's Golden Passport scheme circumventing EU sanctions against Russia (debate)

Mr President! The European Court of Justice has clearly ruled: Golden passports are a mere marketing of EU citizenship status and are therefore incompatible with the basic concept of EU citizenship laid down in our Treaties. And I add: Golden passports and golden visas are simply special rights for the rich. All too often they are linked to corruption, money laundering, tax evasion, and they endanger democracy and security in Europe. That is why we have been campaigning for years for the end of the golden passports and for clearer and stricter controls on golden visas across the EU, for example in the new anti-money laundering package. The ECJ ruling now is important, also as a signal to all Member States. The Maltese government has declared that it respects the court ruling. This must be permanent and also apply to similar systems throughout the EU.

1

Apr

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

Presentation of the New European Internal Security Strategy (debate)

Mr President! In 2020, the Commission presented its last Internal Security Strategy. At that time, we were still at the very beginning of the coronavirus pandemic, the Russian war of aggression on the entire Ukraine seemed unthinkable, the extent of hybrid threats, targeted misinformation and manipulation was hardly conceivable, the destruction of democracy as a result of Donald Trump's second term was at best evil utopia. Much has happened and the new internal security strategy is therefore coming at an important time. Rarely has people's need for security been so strong, uncertainty so comprehensive, amplified by social exclusion and financial insecurity. And yet: We must not let ourselves be driven by fear, uncertainty and seemingly simple ideas, because they do not help, quite the contrary. We had to learn this when, around 2014, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rightly invalidated the Data Retention Directive at the time. Now we need to create sustainable, fundamental rights-compliant solutions, and to do so, we need to track down the actual security gaps and rationally analyse challenges. These include the fight against increasingly professional organised crime as well as protection against attacks on sensitive infrastructure, protection against natural and environmental disasters, the fight against extremism and terrorism. Even if some people don't like to hear it: In Germany, most politically motivated crimes were committed on the right-wing spectrum in 2023. Also important: the protection against hate crimes and hate violence, the protection of women from femicide, the protection of democracy and the rule of law. All of this must be aimed at a strategy for internal security, because only in this way can we sustainably strengthen people's trust and sense of security.

11

Mar

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

Presentation of the proposal on a new common approach on returns (debate)

Madam President, The return of people to their countries of origin is part of a functioning asylum system and here we need to become more effective – I agree with Commissioner Brunner. However, in view of the proposal presented today, this may seem to me to be the only point on which we agree: Restrictions on legal remedies, in part possibly contrary to our fundamental rights, the massive extension of detentions to two years, including for unaccompanied minors, and the possibility of setting up deportation centres in third countries without clearing what should happen to the people there and what minimum standards apply there, not to mention controls. And despite the far-reaching impact on fundamental rights, the Commission has once again failed to analyse the possible impact of its proposal – there is again no impact assessment. All this fits seamlessly into the Commission's narrative under Ms von der Leyen that migrants are potentially a threat. I reject this narrative. And Mr Brunner, we will have to incorporate some improvements to your proposal to make it work.

22

Jan

2025

Questions DE

Watch

Links between organised crime and smuggling of migrants in light of the recent UN reports (debate)

Madam President, Anyone who is persecuted in their home country has a legal right to asylum in Europe and is therefore not illegal upon arrival in Europe. And I'm tired of listening again and again, people use smugglers to come to Europe. As if this was a free decision in the morning: "Oh yes, I don't buy a ticket, I use the smuggler to come to Europe. I love being beaten up, persecuted, blackmailed and raped." It's not like that! But people are not only made false promises, but the safe way to Europe for vulnerable people is increasingly made impossible by pushbacks, rejections, border closures and much more. And therefore: Yes, safe escape routes are a way to deprive criminal smugglers, brutal traffickers of business. And we should consider the many possibilities of ResettlementTake advantage of programmes of family reunification and safe arrival in Europe and do not limit ourselves to criminal law alone.

21

Jan

2025

Questions DE

Watch

Need to enforce the Digital Services Act to protect democracy on social media platforms including against foreign interference and biased algorithms (debate)

Madam President, Digital platforms, protecting democracy – this is where we see a dangerous alliance: the return of imperialists on the one hand and tech oligarchs on the other, who together want to ruthlessly increase their profit, their power. But how free, open and diverse can a society be when people are unilaterally overwhelmed with opinions or fake news, while others are increasingly confronted with discrimination, hatred or even threats of violence? So-called echo chambers avoid the diversity of perspectives, solidify existing prejudices, which are often scattered unreflected with sometimes fatal consequences, especially for young people. The platforms accept that this constant chase for likes, after recognition by other psychological stresses amplifies. In addition, permanent tracking and profiling destroys the confidentiality of communications – for less profit. It is time to ban personalised advertising. Conclusion: The Commission must now consistently implement our digital legislation – DSA, GDPR, AI, ePrivacy – and also apply competition law in a targeted manner. We stand for democracy and fair competition, against hatred and exclusion. Those who do not respect this have no place with us.