| Rank | Name | Country | Group | Speeches | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Lukas Sieper | Germany DEU | Non-attached Members (NI) | 390 |
| 2 |
|
Juan Fernando López Aguilar | Spain ESP | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 354 |
| 3 |
|
Sebastian Tynkkynen | Finland FIN | European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) | 331 |
| 4 |
|
João Oliveira | Portugal PRT | The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL) | 232 |
| 5 |
|
Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis | Lithuania LTU | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 227 |
All Contributions (66)
Presentation of the Energy Package (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. In addition to the atrocities and grief that people in the Middle East are now experiencing, the US and Israel's attacks on Iran have also led to skyrocketing energy prices. Why do we have a system in Europe where the price of gas still sets the price of all electricity? This means that cheap wind and hydro power from, for example, Sweden suddenly becomes expensive, just because the gas price is rushing elsewhere. The right-wing in this House loves to talk about incentives, but marginal pricing in the electricity market must be the worst incentive structure for the green transition. It only leads to clinks in the checkout for energy companies when cheap electricity is exported expensively. In addition, the Commission now wants to collect bottleneck fees from Member States. Swedish electricity consumers want to take SEK 16 billion. Do it again and do it right.
Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran
Mr President, the brave Iranian people have once again risked their lives in the fight for freedom – freedom from dictatorship and gender apartheid. The recent peaceful protests have been met with brutal violence by the regime. The repression is the deadliest of the 21st century, and the regime have threatened protesters with the death penalty. I really welcome the decision to put the IRGC on the terror list. The Iranian people have the right to free elections and to choose their own future. Narges Mohammadi is one of those freedom fighters. She got the Nobel Peace Prize in 2023 while imprisoned for advocating for women's rights. In December last year, she wrote an article in Time magazine addressing the protests and how the international community can help, and I quote: 'Support Iran's civil society, independent media, and human rights and women’s rights defenders who are at the forefront of building a just and democratic future for their country. With global solidarity, democracy and peace are not just possible – they are within reach. The people of Iran are ready. Stand with them.' I am here today to say that we stand with you, freedom fighters of Iran.
Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy (debate)
Madam President, thank you very much. Increasing the cost of living is what worries people the most. Rents are rising, electricity prices are rushing, and food giants are earning big bucks as costs rise for ordinary people. In one of the world's richest countries, Sweden, we now have children with empty stomachs, among other children who are full. In fact, it's shameful. “Bit together!′′ has been Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson’s message to the children’s stomachs who are whispering. The right-wing solution is that the already poor give more to the already rich. Not everyone has had to tighten the belt. In Sweden, a director earns 103 times more than a nanny or cleaner. The richest have been rewarded with tax cuts of over five thousand kronor per month. A society that accepts empty babies while wealth grows at the top has lost its moral compass. It's not the kids who have to bite, it's the politics that have to change!
Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate)
No text available
CFSP and CSDP (Article 36 TEU) (joint debate)
I agree with everything that has been said about supporting Ukraine. But I can't really understand why you don't mention the genocide in Gaza in a single word. All over the world, people are protesting. They want to end the atrocities. In just one week, more than 300,000 people have signed a petition to stop the trade agreement with Israel, and if it becomes more than 1 million, the EU will be forced to act. I want to ask you: Why is it that the right cannot take a stand for Palestinians' right to peace and freedom and for international law?
Brutal repression against protesters in Iran (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. In a world where fascism is on the rise and the rights of the strong are rocking international law, the struggle of the Iranian people is so incredibly important. To my children I say: Look at the people on the streets of Iran, from Tehran to Isfahan, they have the courage to stand up to the oppression of the mullahs, they take the fight for the right to be who you are and say what you want. Our solidarity must not stop at fine words. There is a need for increased sanctions against those leaders who have blood on their hands. The assassins of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) will be stamped with terror and the EU will do everything in its power to restore stable channels of communication. To my Iranian sisters and brothers who have lost loved ones: We see you. We hear you. We'll take the fight with you. Until your freedom is no longer a dream. Because we long for you. The regime will fall.
The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies (debate)
Madam President, thank you very much. You on the right claim that the 28th order simplifies Europe. To benefit big business, you want to reduce democratic influence and tear up the laws that protect working conditions. Under the 28th regime, Sweden's statutory right to five weeks' leave may cease to apply. The same applies to our anti-discrimination laws and whistleblower protection. Lower wages here, weaker employment protection there, and preferably without trade union transparency, please! For Sweden, this is a real threat to the entire Swedish model, with collectively agreed conditions and security on the labour market. Breaking down labour law is not simplification, it is a deterioration. To those of you on the right who are driving this change and deterioration: Why do you want to turn the European single market into a smorgasbord, where anyone who can afford to circumvent the rules always wins?
2030 Consumer Agenda (debate)
No text available
European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’ (debate)
No text available
Phasing out Russian natural gas imports and improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies (debate)
No text available
EU response to the continuous airspace violations and sabotage of critical infrastructure in the EU originating from Russia and Belarus (debate)
No text available
Ending all energy imports from Russia to the EU and closing loopholes through third countries (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. A little over two weeks ago I was sitting in a shelter in the Ukrainian city of Lviv. That night, Russia sent over 130 Shahed drones and around 30 cruise missiles and ballistic missiles against the city in an attempt to knock out the Ukrainian heat and water ahead of winter. I will never forget how the fear and sorrow settled over the city, nor will I forget the pungent, pungent smell of the bombed-out fuel depot. I also don't forget the family that died that night when the roof of their house was hit. To buy Russian energy is to pay for war crimes against Ukraine, wrote the Ukrainian foreign minister the day after the attack, and I can only agree. Today, EU countries buy Russian gas for more money than the EU provides in financial support to Ukraine. In the first half of this year, the EU bought Russian liquefied gas for the cost of 140,000 drones. To continue like this is to pour money into Russia's war treasury. It is to prolong the war, and it is also to give Putin power over European energy prices. It's over! I am so very pleased that this Parliament has taken a clear position on stopping Russian gas and oil and on taking action against the Russian shadow fleet. The EU should not pay for war crimes. Point.
The EU’s role in supporting the recent peace efforts for Gaza and a two-state solution (debate)
Madam President, thank you very much. I would like to begin by thanking you. Thank you to everyone at flotillan. Thank you to all the millions of people around the world who take the streets and demonstrate. You have taken the responsibility that world leaders have so cowardly refused to take. You have been mocked and scoffed at from this hall and from governments like the Swedish one. The indulgence of these leaders towards Israel and the genocide of Palestinians will go down in history as an unprecedented and unforgivable betrayal. We are witnessing genocide in real time. You see it, I see it, everyone in this House sees it. The pressure on Israel must increase. More people have to go to the streets and squares. Political sanctions must be imposed on Israel and the war criminals must be brought to justice. The goal is a free Palestine, that a free Palestine will emerge between the olive groves.
Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single market (debate)
Madam President, thank you very much. I would like to begin by thanking the rapporteur for the way in which these negotiations have been conducted. At the same time, there is no denying that there are major ideological differences here, which is good in itself, because this should be the case in politics. The problem, I think, is what governs Europe. It is this neoliberal, obsolete belief in deregulation. Deregulation is the freedom of the market, not the freedom of man. When the railways were deregulated, responsibility was split, safety deteriorated and trains were delayed. When the electricity market was deregulated, we were promised lower prices, but we had runaway costs and electricity companies that take home the big buck. When welfare opened up to private actors, it would bring diversity, but instead we got segregation, kindergartens where children go hungry and schools run as businesses rather than knowledge institutions. Deregulation moves power from all of us to businesses. They turn citizens into customers and fundamental rights into goods in a market. We need to reverse that trend. We need stronger public responsibility for welfare, for infrastructure and for our common future. For society is actually best when it is governed by rules and common decisions, by solidarity with each other and not by profit-making interests.
Rule of law and EU funds management in Slovakia (debate)
I understand that my colleague here claims that I am from Renew, but I am not. I'm from The Left. I'm also a lawyer at heart, and that means I'm extremely concerned. I am extremely concerned about all the attempts that I see when trying to circumvent fundamental human rights, when by proposing this new constitution and the change, it is trying to circumvent not only European law but the European Convention on Human Rights, the Convention on the Rights of the Child and international treaties. I think that should worry everyone in this House, regardless of which party group you belong to.
Rule of law and EU funds management in Slovakia (debate)
Madam President, thank you very much. Slovakia is now trying to circumvent EU law, the European Convention on Human Rights, the Convention on the Rights of the Child and international treaties. Let's make sure they don't get away with it. The right to control one's own body is non-negotiable. Women's right to abortion must be a cornerstone of any democracy. Deteriorating for LGBTQ people, denying same-sex couples the right to start a family – this is institutionalised discrimination, and it must never be normalised. Creating a social climate that is suspicious because of gender, sexual orientation or background is dangerous. Giving in to reactionary forces that make a difference between people and people is dangerous. It's really dangerous. To the people of Slovakia, I would like to say: Your struggle for freedom and dignity is also our struggle. We see you, we hear you, and we are with you.
Package travel and linked travel arrangements: make the protection of travellers more effective and simplify and clarify certain aspects (debate)
Madam President, thank you very much. Imagine standing alone, stranded on a platform with packed bags in your hands and no one taking responsibility for the situation. You should contact the travel agent, who will refer you to the train company, who will refer you back to the travel agent. This is the reality for many travelers. Too often, companies have too much power and people too little. There are parts of this proposal that are good. For example, it is good that the traveler should have the right to choose money instead of value cheques, and that is something that I have pushed for. But a lot remains before you as a traveler can actually feel completely safe. Far too often, corporate profits take precedence over people's right to security, and it is the responsibility of politics to ensure that no one is left alone on the platform.
Public procurement (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. We need to be clear. Public procurement has become a race to the bottom. When the lowest price often wins, it is no longer quality that controls, then it is the backs of the workers that are bent. We see companies squeezing wages, ignoring collective agreements and sending out responsibility in long subcontracting chains. The result: workers who are exploited, workplaces without safety and, in the worst case, deaths at work. This is the reality when the pursuit of profit is allowed to take precedence over people's lives. In Gothenburg, the city was not even allowed to demand a collective agreement. The current EU rules came to an end, and that is completely absurd. Authorities across the EU do not dare to impose fair conditions. They're afraid of being sued by corporate lawyers. That's what happens that can't happen. Foolish companies, sometimes pure criminals, take home procurements while serious companies are knocked out. Is that how we really want to spend our tax dollars? No, we should build security, not exploitation. Public procurement should be a guarantee of quality and good conditions, not a springboard for cheating and cynical profit hunting. You have to be able to set high standards for companies that receive tax money. No man should have to risk his life because someone else offered the cheapest.
Stopping the genocide in Gaza: time for EU sanctions (topical debate)
Madam President, thank you very much. In Gaza, mothers try to breastfeed their children, but they don't have any milk to give because they themselves are starving. I would like to ask you to reflect on what it does to a person to see their child fade away from hunger – not being able to help, not being able to comfort. And as a mother, I can't imagine any worse pain. For 620 days you have looked away, you have asked us to be silent about the genocide, you have turned your back on the Palestinians. For 620 days you have been sitting on the power to act, but you have chosen not to do so. Do you not understand that your children will judge you for it? Let the message from the streets and squares of Europe echo in here. The occupation will fall, the bombs will be silenced, the genocides will be condemned and Palestine will be free. Act. Act now.
Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. Sometimes I wonder if we live in the same reality. If you ask the Commission or the EPP or the right in my country what is threatening the European economy, you will be told that environmental requirements are too high for businesses, that it is too difficult to open up the public sector to competition, that there is a need for fewer rules and more liberalisation. But I see a completely different reality. I see people who barely get enough wages to feed, I see workers who are forced to move from country to country, from gig to gig in a market where security is seen as a barrier to flexibility. I see an internal market that, rather than lifting the conditions for everyone, drives a race to the bottom: on wages, labour law, welfare and the environment. What we are debating today is permeated by the same logic. Fewer barriers, faster procurement, more flexibility, less democratic influence – all for the market. But what happens when we break the rules for companies? We also often tear down protection for people. We tear down rules that are there to safeguard our everyday lives, to secure fair working conditions, to preserve our environment and to keep democracy alive. We on the left want to say that this is the wrong way. We don't need fewer rules, we need the right rules: rules that protect people, not profit margins, rules that put climate, equality and security above market logic. For it is not we who are unrealistic – it is the blind belief in deregulation that is the real threat to the future.
High levels of retail food prices and their consequences for European consumers (debate)
Madam President, thank you very much. People struggle to afford food, but what does the ruling right do in Sweden and in the EU? Nothing. In Sweden, three food wholesalers decide prices and take home billions of dollars, while families with children are forced to opt out of basic goods. Three food giants – it is an oligopoly and it drives prices up every day. The right often talks about the importance of competition, but when it comes to ordinary people being able to afford to eat their fill, the right ... does nothing. How can it be reasonable for a few companies to control what we eat and what it costs? Over a hundred years ago, people, mostly women and workers, went out in the potato uprising all over Sweden. I actually see a similar desperation as then, even though it's been a whole century. Food prices are politics. Food should be a right for everyone and everyone should be able to afford a good cup of coffee.
Crackdown on democracy in Türkiye and the arrest of Ekrem İmamoğlu (debate)
Madam President, thank you very much. On Thursday, Swedish journalist Joakim Medin was arrested in Turkey. He is now imprisoned in Marmara High Security Prison, and is accused of violating Erdogan. This is, of course, completely unacceptable and there is total political agreement in Sweden on this. I send my thoughts today to Joakim and to Joakim's family at this difficult time. Freedom of the press is a fundamental right in the EU. Journalists should be free to report even news that those in power find bothersome. And that Erdogan in this way tries to intimidate into silence must therefore be condemned. Joakim must be released. Today, I would like to ask the Commission and the Polish Presidency to express their clear support for the immediate release of the Swedish journalist Joakim Medin, and for all possible pressure to be put on Turkey to stop intimidating and imprisoning journalists.
CFSP and CSDP (Article 36 TUE) (joint debate)
Madam President, thank you very much. Last week, 15 paramedics and rescue workers were executed by Israeli forces. We dig them up in their uniforms with the gloves on. They were here to save lives. Instead, they end up in a mass grave," says a UN chief. At the same time as this happened, Sweden's Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard went to Israel on a pure propaganda trip. And Israel's foreign minister, of course, praised the visit and praised Sweden for having broken its support for vital UNRWA. It's an unimaginable shame. Minister for Foreign Affairs Maria Malmer Stenergard! Called the Commissioner! You have the power to stop the genocide. You have a duty to stand up for international law. Your indulgence against the brutal Israeli regime will go down in history as an unprecedented betrayal.
Deteriorating situation in Gaza following the non-extension of the ceasefire (debate)
Madam President, thank you very much. The EU's indulgence towards the Israeli government will go down in history as an unprecedented betrayal, not only of the Palestinian population but also of international law. As a lawyer, I am horrified. I am appalled that the rules we agreed upon after the Second World War – that the horrors we had then witnessed would never happen again – seem to be worth zero and nothing. For how can the EU meet Israeli representatives and talk about cooperation when genocide is going on? How can the EU accept that member states ignore the ICC arrest warrant against Israeli ministers? How can the EU close its eyes when Israel sabotages the ceasefire, prevents emergency aid from reaching Gaza and allows the bulldozers to roll into the West Bank? The EU must now clearly and genuinely, not only in words, support the initiatives that exist around the reconstruction of Gaza and really, not only in words, distance itself from any proposals that involve displacement of people and violations of international law.