What João spoke about.

17

Jun

2026

Speeches EN

Watch

Preparation of the European Council (joint debate)

Mr President, Minister, Commissioner Šefčovič, I only have one minute for a very long agenda in the Council, so I'll concentrate on competitiveness to once again ask for speed and urgency. On speed – okay, Europe is moving a bit faster, but the rest of the world is moving at warp speed and we keep falling behind, basically because we are massively underestimating the gigantic impact of AI and its exponential growth – massively. The events of the past few weeks should be a wake-up call – I'm not sure they were. This is where boldness comes in; if competitiveness is really our priority, we cannot put AI as a sub, sub, sub-point of the Council agenda, or a footnote of recycled funds in the MFF. AI should be the main point of the agenda because AI's challenge is essential for Europe and should be treated as an emergency. Therefore, I urge this Council to make bold choices now – change the MFF to multiply investment in AI and remove regulatory barriers that make it impossible to train AI models in Europe. It is hard, I know, it means making tough choices about the MFF. Some things we like will get less money so that the things we need get more money. It is Europe's long-term relevance that is stake. Be bold, there is still time ...

20

May

2026

Speeches EN

Watch

High time to deliver on the Single Market, providing certainty and predictability for EU businesses and quality jobs (continuation of debate)

Madam President, Mr Vice-President of the Commission, dear colleagues, today I want to talk about madness, because 33 years after the creation of the single market, we are still imposing tariffs on ourselves. It's madness because Europe's competitiveness crisis is fundamentally a single market crisis. Another sign of madness: while EUR 10 trillion sit idle in European bank accounts, our start ups move to the US for funding, often with European money. Europe does not lack capital – Europe leaks capital. So it's madness not to complete the capital markets union. It is also madness that our trading services with the rest of the world grow faster than between our own Member States. And why? Because our companies are lost in a maze of 27 national jurisdictions. It is madness, and it is because we insist on resisting harmonisation. And finally, it is madness that this happens because certain national governments are too blind to see the obvious: that their national interest depends on the success of the European project, specifically on the success of the single market. It's madness not to see this. So for those of us who are not mad, the choice is simple: one market instead of 27 alibis.

19

May

2026

Speeches PT

Watch

Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba (debate)

Madam President, Madam High Representative, hunger, misery, fear, despair and political repression in Cuba are no accident. The humanitarian crisis is above all the deliberate result of a brutal communist regime that has for more than six decades mercilessly oppressed its own people for the benefit of a corrupt elite. The regime threatens, arrests, tortures and lets all those who oppose it rot in the dungeons. One of these, who was tortured savagely and always resisted, was José Daniel Ferrer, leader of UNPACO (Patriotic Union of Cuba), the most representative movement of the Cuban opposition. Mr Daniel was recently in the European Parliament presenting a plan for the transition to democracy in Cuba. In our conversations, José Daniel did not ask for money, he did not ask for weapons, he did not ask for external interventions – he asked for political support. You asked, for example, that the European Union immediately suspend the political dialogue cooperation agreement with Cuba, because it confirmed what we all suspected, Madam High Representative: the money under this agreement does not reach the Cuban people; It finances the regime's repressive apparatus and fills the pockets of the communist elite, while the Cuban people starve to death. It is a shame that Europe continues to give oxygen to this torsionary tyranny by prolonging the humanitarian crisis. And José Daniel Ferrer asked for something else: that the inaction of the European Union does not make Cuba move from a communist dictatorship to a dependence on Washington. It is a lucid and courageous position that Europe must support. Enough of complicity with communism. There is only one choice: either the European Union suspends this cooperation agreement by standing with those fighting for freedom in Cuba, or it will be complicit in the continued oppression of the Cuban people. As the valiant Democrats in Cuba say: Homeland or life, you will win.

19

May

2026

Speeches EN

Watch

EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate)

Madam President, Minister, Commissioner, first, we are urgently debating cybersecurity and preparedness in the EU today, because we became suddenly aware that several new AI systems are especially good at detecting and exploiting system vulnerabilities like they were superhackers on steroids. But the real threat is – and has been for some time – less sophisticated and far more dangerous. The threat is not that AI now has superhacking capabilities; the real danger is the automation of cyberattacks on an unprecedented scale. By exploiting basic vulnerabilities and scaling them through automation, malicious actors – be they criminal or state actors – can now attack our infrastructure 24/7 at virtually zero cost. It is a cheap, automated assembly line of disruption. And, dear colleagues, we know that our usual regulations, bureaucratic checklists will not defend us from this automatic cyber warfare. We need to have our own automated collective defence, and here's how to do it: first, we must enforce real time cross-border threat-sharing across the Union, and then we must adequately fund ENISA to be an AI-driven, continuously vulnerability-patching institution. In other words, we must fight automated scaled attacks with automated resistance in real time. And we need this tomorrow. But perhaps, most importantly, we must be able to be the adults in the room and state clearly that those who treat AI development as an arms race are foolish, dangerous and may lead to drastic consequences for humanity. The only sensible thing to do, as in the previous dangerous arms race, is to agree internationally on how to oversee the development of AI.

25

Mar

2026

Speeches PT

Watch

Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 19 March 2026 (debate)

Madam President, Commissioner, President Costa, last week's European Council innovated on one thing: it has concrete deadlines rather than intentions. He says that the diagnosis is already made and that now what is needed is to do, and to do in deadlines that mark and that are short. They are short, at least by European standards. But it does more: it strongly links the issues of energy, defence and industrial policy to economic growth; and it clearly says that fragmentation and barriers within the single market are the first and main reason for our delay. And this – it has to be said – is the fault of the ‑ Member States that have not yet realised that their national interest depends more on the success of the European project than on their own navels. Now that we are going to build this 'One Europe, One Market', I think it is a good time to reaffirm that the strategic autonomy we stand for so much cannot be an excuse for state leadership or protectionism. There can be no interventionist drifts in the Industrial Accelerator Act or subsidies that distort competition. The Council asks ‑nos for a European preference. I find a European performance more effective, and that performance depends on our companies gaining scale, having access to capital and having a true single market. Because the truth – we all know – is that if our companies are competitive, they do not need protection, and if they are not, it is not protection that will save them, or at least it will not save them without detriment to competitors or taxpayers.

10

Mar

2026

Speeches EN

Watch

Single Market: how to move from an incomplete single market to one market for one Europe (debate)

Madam President, Commissioner, Minister, Europe's so-called competitiveness crisis is, in fact, a single market crisis, because our potential is huge – 450 million inhabitants and EUR 18 trillion in GDP – but we don't make proper use of it. Example A: today there are EUR 10 trillion in savings idle in European bank accounts, while our start-ups ask the US for financing. Some say Europe lacks capital; I say Europe leaks capital, because we have failed to build a proper market to retain capital here. That is what the savings and investment union can help achieve. Example B: did you know that since 2020, our trade in services with the rest of the world has actually grown faster than the trade between our own Member States? This is amazing and slightly depressing. We find it easier to trade with external markets than with ourselves. We neglect our own home market, where companies are lost in a maze of 27 different national jurisdictions. We need the 28th regime to do this. There are dozens of other important measures I can mention, from the recognition of qualifications to the integration of the energy and telecoms market, from the end of gold-plating to the review of ring-fencing, from labelling rules to Letta's fifth freedom, innovation and knowledge. So much to do and this Parliament has an important role to play. But national governments matter more. Why? Because most are too selfish and shortsighted to see that their national interests is ultimately always aligned with European interests. The choice is simple. Do you want a single market or do you want 27 ...

11

Feb

2026

Speeches EN

Watch

Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate)

Madam President, Commissioner, President of the Council, the Draghi message was clear: Europe is losing ground on growth, productivity and innovation. So, President Costa does well to convene leaders for urgent talks about competitiveness and as well to invite Mario Draghi and Enrico Letta to be there. Let's hope their presence serves as a wake up call. Let's hope that some urgent action can be agreed on, because the truth is, 18 months after the Draghi Report, its implementation is painfully slow. According to the European Policy Innovation Council, over 60 % of the 383 Draghi recommendations are basically untouched, and those include most of the important reforms that would truly help European growth. In fact, we have little to no progress to show on crucial reforms such as the reform of the single market, the reform of State aid rules, the capital markets union and the liberation of energy policy from national politics. So, because Renew is serious about reforming Europe, we reaffirm our three main priorities set out in a letter we sent to the Council. On these, we must have clear and actionable conclusions tomorrow and the upcoming Council in March. First, the savings and investments union. Europe has huge savings and tiny investment, which is absurd. Time to end fragmentation and eliminate barriers and have a single strong supervisor. We need private capital financing Europe's future, not sleeping in bank accounts. Secondly, the issue of energy sovereignty – affordable, clean, secure energy; a real single energy market; integrated grids, more storage and less dependency. National interests cannot block this reform anymore, because no economy can be competitive if its energy is expensive. Finally, to reduce our technological dependence, on things like AI, cloud computing, or cybersecurity, Europe must stop outsourcing its digital future. But please, please do this without falling into the protectionist trap of those who think every sector is strategic. It's just not true. It's time to act quickly, but it is also time to act smartly.

10

Feb

2026

Speeches PT

Watch

Extreme weather events in particular in Portugal, southern Italy, Malta and Greece: European response in strengthening readiness, preparedness and solidarity mechanisms (debate)

7

Oct

2025

Speeches EN

Watch

Time to complete a fully integrated Single Market: Europe’s key to growth and future prosperity (debate)

Madam President, Commissioner, Minister, today we say it is time to complete the single market, but that implies we're almost there. But are we? Really? Let's take a look. We should by now have the 28th regime, but we don't. What's blocking it? We should have a European energy market, but we don't. Is the French nuclear lobby blocking it? A European telecoms market – we should have it, but we don't. What's blocking it? We should have a capital markets union, but we don't. Are the national market supervisors blocking it? Or a complete banking union – we should have it, but we don't. Are the Sparkassen in Germany blocking it? We should have harmonised labelling or recycling rules, but we don't. What is blocking it? We should have our academic and professional qualifications recognised across Europe, but we don't. Again, what's blocking it? Because without a true single market, Europe is blocked, either by selfish economic or national interests or by its own infuriatingly slow pace and bureaucracy. No wonder we don't have any European company in the top 25 most valuable anymore. No wonder our young talent prefers to go work elsewhere. We can and must unblock Europe. It will take courage and speed. But let's unblock Europe.

10

Sep

2025

Speeches EN

Watch

State of the Union (debate)

Madam President, Frau von der Leyen, allow me to address you directly to remind you of the great wisdom of Spider-Man. With great power comes great responsibility. You have great power, Frau von der Leyen, you lead the executive unit of our Union. And I had a chance to talk to you, and also to Council President Costa, before your mandate began. Do you remember? So I'll ask you again today what I asked you at the time. Show leadership. That means decide exactly what needs to be done and then actually doing it, forcing it through. Show courage by treating what is important better than what it is urgent and not trying to please everybody, as you've seen, it's not going to be possible. And show speed, please, show speed, because we know we can move faster and we know we are running out of time. I mean, we didn't need Draghi to tell us of this, that we're running out of time and also that we run an existential risk. So I say again, you have great power. You have the great responsibility to reform the EU before it is too late. And there are four years left in your mandate. Use them to show leadership, to show courage, to show speed. Renew Europe will be here to help you. But the primary responsibility is yours. For Europe's sake, I wish you success and good luck.

9

Jul

2025

Speeches PT

Watch

Arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic

Mr President, Commissioner, Joseph Figueira Martin has been in prison without charge for almost 15 months in the Central African Republic. It is captive in inhumane and degrading conditions. He has health problems that get worse every day and does not have any medical support. Joseph Martin must be released immediately. This description is unfortunately identical to many others that this House has appreciated in other emergency resolutions. It is identical, but it is not the same and the differences are large and politically significant. Joseph Martin was not initially detained by the Central African Republic authorities. He was arrested and tortured and held in total isolation by the Wagner mercenary group, which has one of its largest detachments in the world, always in Russia's pay, in defence of its interests. Joseph Martin, far from being a spy, was an expert at a humanitarian NGO in Bangui. It turns out that this NGO is American and that was enough for the mercenaries of the Wagner Group to accuse him, without any evidence, of being an American spy. Therefore, honourable Members, in supporting this resolution, will be saying that they do not accept that Russia's interference in third countries promotes the violation of the human rights of European citizens and will also be saying that they will never accept that the threat that Russia poses to Europeans has even the slightest parallel with what Joseph Martin has already suffered. For us, there is the warning. For Joseph Martin, immediate freedom.

9

Jul

2025

Answers PT

Watch

EU-US trade negotiations (debate)

There is no direct link between Trump's tariffs and the international tax regime. What I do know is that many of these low effective corporate tax rates that the honourable Member mentions are not illegal, they are the use of the current tax regime, which exists a little all over Europe. The honourable Member is asking whether there should be a way to, and it is difficult to determine the tax base per Member State, or whether there is a way to detect and collect CIT at European Union level. And if that's the question, our answer, and any liberal's, is this: Tax responsibilities are to fulfill like any other.

9

Jul

2025

Speeches EN

Watch

EU-US trade negotiations (debate)

Mr President, Madam Minister, Mr Commissioner, the present EU‑US trade environment is so bizarre that today, 9 July, the only source of relief is that we did not receive a letter. But it is only a temporary source of relief. In three weeks we will be anxious again, waiting to receive another letter or perhaps reach a personal agreement, or perhaps a late night post telling us which tariffs will apply. This would be laughable if it were not so serious. We are the largest commercial partnership in the world. We represent some 30 % of global trade and 43 % of global GDP, and we depend on whether the letters arrive or not and on the whims of an unpredictable administration. In the meantime, the existing tariffs, the 10 % baseline, the 50 % on steel and 25 % on cars are strangling our growth. And the same is true for the relentless appreciation of the euro. 14 % since the beginning of the year, equivalent to another hidden tariff. Now we have a political agreement, we need to move to sectorial agreements. Speed is important, but we will not be able to close all files by 1 August. So let's be smart and not start with those like aircraft parts and medical equipment in which the EU has some leverage. In time, a deal is possible as well as urgent. Also, urgent is closing other free trade deals around the world and making them come into force much faster. The benefits of free trade for our citizens cannot, so to speak, be lost in translation.

18

Jun

2025

Speeches PT

Watch

Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy system (debate)

Mr President, Commissioner, without modern infrastructure there is no energy transition, no competitiveness and no future. The electricity grid is the backbone of the European economy and is indeed outdated, congested, fragmented and unprepared for a demand that is estimated and expected to grow strongly. The beautiful report we are debating here today shows the way: more investment, more technology, more market. It is €584 billion by 2030 to meet growing demand and integrate renewables and strengthen interconnections. In return, we will have lower prices and higher competitiveness. Households and businesses could save up to €40 billion, and the economy could grow almost as much. This is a year, every year. It is not a green utopia; This is liberal techno-sustainability. We need clear rules, fast updates, private investment and digital innovation. The electrification of Europe cannot be delayed by the bureaucracy or protectionism of some countries, which meant that only this week the link between the Iberian Peninsula and France was agreed. As Draghi said, without networks there is no growth or strategic autonomy and therefore the choice is simple: Either we move forward with courage or we stay in this dependency, unable to compete. It is time to connect Europe to the current.

18

Jun

2025

Speeches PT

Watch

Safeguarding the rule of law in Spain, ensuring an independent and autonomous prosecutor's office to fight crime and corruption (debate)

Mr President, the abuses of the rule of law occur both in right-wing extremist regimes, such as Hungary, which we have discussed at length today, and in so-called moderate left-wing regimes, such as Spain, whose situation should inspire real concern. Because in Spain, the Prime Minister, Pedro Sanchez, always puts his personal and political interests before the rule of law. He passed an amnesty law negotiated under the cover of fugitives from justice; exerted unacceptable pressure on magistrates and journalists; went into "spiritual reflection" to avoid pronouncing on his wife's problems; He invented a position to employ his brother and now the Koldo case, a serious corruption scandal involving close collaborators, is revealed. This isn't everything, but it's too much. Because the brazen partisanship of the state apparatus by Sanchez's PSOE undermines trust in democracy, gives strength to extremists and paralyzes the country. Spain has been without a budget for two years and the parliament does not work. The rest of the country also does not work, which already affects other countries, such as Portugal, which still does not know why it ran out of electricity for almost a day, since Redeia, chaired by Beatriz Corredor, a friend of Sanchez, has not yet produced a report on the blackout almost two months ago. Mr President, Sanchez's opportunism and cynicism are dangerous to democracy.

21

May

2025

Speeches PT

Watch

Single Market Strategy (debate)

President, Commissioner Séjourné, the Communication "Single Market Strategy" was published today. Thirteen months after the Letta report, nine months after the Draghi report. In fact, the European Union still does not break speed records and, in this case, it is not even because it does not find the topic important, because Draghi already told us that barriers to the single market can cost 10% of European GDP – 10% of European GDP. Removing these barriers would mean taking a six- or seven-year leap at once, just imagine. The IMF tells us that these barriers to the single market are equivalent to tariffs of 45% on goods and 110% on services. Removing these barriers was like Trump being elected four or five times and starting a tariff war. And yet, the ideas in the document are good, the document is good: the focus of implementation, an scorecard with many indicators to monitor better, the ‘once only’ system, service passports... There are many good simplification measures in this document. But the main way of removing barriers is the harmonisation of rules and the harmonisation of rules, Commissioner, which often comes up against the short-sightedness and even selfishness of some Member States, the European Council and even this Parliament. With short-sighted and selfish politicians, there will be no real single market and, in fact, there will be no European project. The challenge is clear to all of us. It is time to see clearly and to think about the common good.

11

Mar

2025

Answers PT

Watch

European Council meetings and European security (joint debate)

Mr Oliveira, I believe that if we do not stop Putin, there is no housing, there is no education, there is no health that is worth any European. So it is the honourable Member who has to explain: Why, three years ago, since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, have you consistently advocated a policy of appeasing tyrants like Vladimir Putin? That is what the honourable Member has to explain.

11

Mar

2025

Speeches PT

Watch

European Council meetings and European security (joint debate)

Madam President, Mr President-in-Office of the Council, Commissioners, ladies and gentlemen, the world has changed a lot since the last plenary sitting here in Strasbourg. On February 13, the last day of this plenary session, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the following sentence: "The United States is no longer available to ensure Europe's security". Clarinho like water. As the President of the Commission said just now, the time for illusion is over. That is why the European Council, the Council last Thursday, was right to relax the rules of the Stability and Growth Pact, to create a new line of financing and even to change the mandate of the European Investment Bank to allow credits for defence projects, which, incidentally, clearly shows the dormant way in which this European institution was looking at the defence industry. The Council has therefore done well. You did well, but that's not enough. Because it is urgent to define a European defence architecture, because, without this, the industrial plan that is long talked about will remain vague, joint purchases will remain uncoordinated and Europe's defence will remain dependent on others, including in its nuclear component. So the end of illusion time requires these quick and decisive responses, but we already know that speed has risks – and it is worth talking about these risks here today. the risk of systematically overtaking and side-by-side with the European Parliament; the risk of the Commission and its President becoming essentially a decorative figure in the face of political initiatives by Macron, Starmer, Merz or, perhaps, others; and the risk of destroying NATO, for which no one has a credible alternative today. So that, ladies and gentlemen, is our challenge: saving Europe – starting with Ukraine, which deserves our help so much – without destroying its institutions. And it is our responsibility to rise to this challenge.

12

Feb

2025

Speeches EN

Watch

Competitiveness Compass (debate)

Mr President, Mr Commissioner, Minister, the Competitive Compass has finally set Europe in the right direction: the direction of growth by creating the conditions to make the most of the creativity of our citizens and the strength of our companies; and the direction of simplification. Yet another attempt to cut the red tape that is strangling our families and our businesses. But let us make sure this time we make it work. But, if the Competitive Compass is not to be just another pretty strategy document gathering dust on some Brussels shelf – and to avoid what Draghi calls Europe's slow agony towards economic and political irrelevance – we need decisive and urgent action, and we need to need to change. And we're all aware that change always faces resistance. Resistance from those who benefit most from the current state of affairs: vested interests, bureaucrats, rent seekers. And resistance also from those who always say, 'Yes, but…' They agree in theory, but they always drag their feet in practice and thus ensure that nothing gets done. As liberals, Mr Commissioner, we are glad to confront them all and we urge the Commission to do the same. We will be supportive and constructive but will also be watchful and hold the Commission to account if we fail, because Europe's future depends on us winning the race and at the moment we are struggling to even reach the starting line.

21

Jan

2025

Answers PT

Watch

Geopolitical and economic implications for the transatlantic relations under the new Trump administration (debate)

Mr João Oliveira, your blue card question is undermined by two facts: the fact that I did many and therefore did not even hear what I said, because the answer to your question was in my speech. What do we have to do? It is not a question of distancing ourselves from the United States, it is a question of being autonomous in relation to our interests. Europe should no longer have dependencies on defence, the economy and a number of other aspects for a long time. And it is also undermined by the fact that everything happening in the world, for you, is a way of attacking the United States or defending the interests of those autocracies from which your party has never distanced itself. Therefore, a recommendation: ask fewer "blue card" questions and listen more to what your co-religionists say.

21

Jan

2025

Speeches PT

Watch

Geopolitical and economic implications for the transatlantic relations under the new Trump administration (debate)

Mr President, Commissioner Šefčovič, representative of the Council, how many alarms do Europe have to sound to wake up? The economic decline of the European Union for decades was an alarm. The Draghi, Letta, Niinistö reports were an alarm. Trump's inauguration is yet another alarm, because Trump's world is not based on rules and values is based on interests and power. That is why Europe must wake up and be autonomous in its interests and regain power in the economy and in defence. But how to wake up? With strategic focus, because you can not waste time with collateral issues and wokisms that only reinforce the extremes to the left and right. Courageously, because you're going to have to take risks and you're not going to please everyone. And quickly, because the reforms are difficult and the effects time-consuming. There's no more time to waste! And wake up for what? To be autonomous in its defence, to deepen the single markets and grow, to defend free trade. And to simplify, simplify, simplify and kill the European bureaucratic monster. Europe – Commission, Council and Parliament – has already shown that it reacts well in crisis situations. Trump is the biggest crisis of all. With all confidence in the strength of democracy and freedom, Europe must wake up, but it must wake up now.

27

Nov

2024

Speeches PT

Watch

Topical debate (Rule 169) - Budapest Declaration on the New European Competitiveness Deal - A future for the farming and manufacturing sectors in the EU (topical debate)

Mr Vice-President, Commissioner, the Budapest Declaration is one of the best things that has come to us from Hungary in recent times. Talk about economic growth. Finally. It talks about deepening the single market. Excellent. He talks about starting the Capital Markets Union. Great. It's about embracing the technologies of the future. Fantastic. And even mobilizing private investment. Wow! And even better, it promises a simplifying revolution: Cutting red tape, cutting red tape. And he says all of this is to be done urgently. Brilliant! It looks like it was written by a liberal. But the problem is this: the statement has to translate into tangible actions and results, otherwise it will serve for some newspaper headlines, but nothing more. And that's not enough. The Commission that we have just elected today must start work now on the concrete reforms that will restore competitiveness to the whole economy, including the manufacturing industry and agriculture that we are discussing here today. And it should not do so by creating dependency on subsidies. Therefore, the appeal to the new Commission is: do not postpone problems any longer, adopt concrete reforms that improve people's lives. It's time.

26

Nov

2024

Speeches PT

Watch

The Autumn 2024 Economic Forecast: a gradual rebound in an adverse environment (debate)

26

Nov

2024

Speeches EN

Watch

Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and Russia (debate)

Madam President, Commissioner, the war in Ukraine is not for land or borders. It is a war for the soul of Europe and its values – a Europe where freedom is defended and democracy triumphs over tyranny, a Europe where aggression is met not with hesitation, but with resolve. We must continue to support Ukraine, whatever it takes. And 'whatever it takes' means more weapons, air defence systems, ammunitions, long-range weapons and the permission to use them. It also means more effective sanctions and continued diplomatic support, because Ukraine's fight is our fight, and a victory for Putin or Kim Jong Un would be a defeat for us all. Too often we have hesitated and delayed. How many lives and how much suffering would have been saved if we had acted quicker? I do not know about the Hungarian Presidency, but this Parliament is clear: we will not hesitate, we will not tire, we will not let democracy yield to tyranny.

23

Oct

2024

Speeches EN

Watch

U-turn on EU bureaucracy: the need to axe unnecessary burdens and reporting to unleash competitiveness and innovation (topical debate)

Mr President, if I said to you, let's cut red tape, you would all agree. It's in all our programs. Yet nothing really changes. And it's not for lack of trying. In 2000, there was a Lisbon strategy for simplification. It failed. In 2002, there was a better regulation agenda. It failed. In 2007, there was the Stoiber Group action program. Didn't do very much. In 2012, Refit. Same thing. In 2014, Juncker's 'big on big, small and small'. This probably failed because the title was a bit silly. They all failed to make any real difference because the Member States resist and gold plate European legislation, because our own EU bureaucrats are afraid of losing power, because our own legislative process favours the regulatory Christmas tree, which everyone puts something on. And frankly, because we as MPs are failing at our jobs, not only are we not simplifying, we are complicating things further. So why should this attempt, this time be different? Because if we fail again, things that are important will fail too and people will suffer in their daily lives. Help to Ukraine will come too late, houses will take too long to build and cost too much, renewables installation will take too long and cost too much, cross-border rail links will take too long and cost too much, as will cross-border energy grids, etc. and we will never bridge the great gap to the US. So do you want to get re-elected? Because this is what it takes. If you want to get re-elected, let's do something about this now.