| Rank | Name | Country | Group | Speeches | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Lukas Sieper | Germany DEU | Non-attached Members (NI) | 390 |
| 2 |
|
Juan Fernando López Aguilar | Spain ESP | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 354 |
| 3 |
|
Sebastian Tynkkynen | Finland FIN | European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) | 331 |
| 4 |
|
João Oliveira | Portugal PRT | The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL) | 232 |
| 5 |
|
Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis | Lithuania LTU | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 227 |
All Contributions (79)
AccessibleEU and the strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities: state of play and the future of EU accessibility policy (debate)
No text available
EUCO and situation in the Middle East (joint debate)
No text available
EUCO and situation in the Middle East (joint debate)
No text available
Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate)
No text available
State violence in Minneapolis and the rule of law in the United States (topical debate)
No text available
Spain’s large-scale regularisation policy and its impact on the Schengen Area and EU migration policy (debate)
Mr. President, look, this is manual: The same people who today denounce here that in Spain migrants are going to be regularized are those who have been defending those who take advantage of the fact that they do not have papers. They are the ones who, while talking about ending the mafias, question that the only measure that really combats them is not carried out. They talk about managing migration in an orderly, regular and safe way until it is time to do so and, then, no longer. They accuse migrants of living on aid and when they are regularized so that they can contribute, then neither. What are we up to, ladies and gentlemen? What puts Schengen at risk is not regularising, but keeping thousands of people in administrative invisibility. Because let's be clear and clear, if a person's situation is irregular, it is easier for you to exploit them without having a work regulated by rights. This is not just about roles, it is about building a dignified society and the right to have rights. That's what we're up to. To regularize is to put an end to the underground economy, so that we do not allow ourselves to have first and second-class citizens. To regularize is to ask for a society where the latter compete against...
Extreme weather events in particular in Portugal, southern Italy, Malta and Greece: European response in strengthening readiness, preparedness and solidarity mechanisms (debate)
No text available
Extreme weather events in particular in Portugal, southern Italy, Malta and Greece: European response in strengthening readiness, preparedness and solidarity mechanisms (debate)
No text available
Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate)
Mr. President, what is the economic crisis? The guilt, of the migrant. That the house is inaccessible? The guilt, of the migrant. That healing is collapsing? The guilt, of the migrant. The Popular Party no longer hides: has chosen to feed the specter of the migration crisis, competing in the race of hate with the far right and its slogans. We saw it in Badalona, where they evicted four hundred people in the middle of winter and without a housing alternative, giving gasoline to racism and putting the coexistence of that territory at risk. They have found the perfect alibi to hide that they have no political proposal, none to solve people's real problems. It is very cruel to encourage fear and hatred against migrants by a handful of votes. His only idea is to expel, expel and expel. It doesn't matter where and it also doesn't matter under what conditions. And, in parallel, the Commission, which is adding to this moral drift, is approving a machine of mass deportations and turning its back on human rights. Let's see if this rings a bell: "First, they came for the migrants and I didn't speak because I wasn't a migrant; Then they came after me, and by that time there was no one left who could speak for me. We're seeing it on the streets of the United States and we don't want it to happen here. Ladies and gentlemen, we are in this House because we have a responsibility to prevent dehumanisation from killing the European project.
European Council meeting (joint debate)
Madam President, we have entered the era of world disorder. Contempt for international law and the sovereignty of nations is a path we have already suffered in the past. The annexation of Austria and half of Europe by the Nazis still resonates in our heads. We already know how that chapter of the story ended. Today fascism has new faces, but the same old and dangerous forms: Trump threatens to invade Greenland, imposes his tariffs as blackmail, deals Gaza with his club of thugs and allows illegal intervention in Venezuela. Meanwhile, the European Union is an accomplice bystander. Mrs Kallas, your role is being regrettable. We Europeans don't want to be Trump's vassals or vassals. Europe needs to take immediate action: suspend the trade agreement with the United States, activate the anti-coercive instrument, stop using the dollar as a reference currency and act in favor of multilateralism. Because Trump is not a reliable partner, he is today Europe's greatest enemy. Get out of your offices and your lukewarm statements and do something now.
2030 Consumer Agenda (debate)
No text available
Preventing sexual harassment in public institutions: latest revelations and resignations in Spain and institutional responses (debate)
Mr. President, the cases of sexual harassment that we are seeing show that patriarchy continues to permeate everything and is present on the left and on the right, because machismo is a scourge. Harassment is a matter of power - you know it - and combating it requires real feminist policies: ending the pay gap, inequality and ensuring the presence of women in equal power spaces. And this is not achieved by hiding cases under the carpet until they burst, nor with cosmetic solutions. But, of course – certainly not – not with hypocritical speeches by those who have, among their ranks, the same cases of harassment, without having protocols to confront them. Because, deep down, what worries them is not the victims, but the opportunity to use them as political weapons. If it were not so serious, it would seem like a joke that the Popular Party now goes as a defender of women while cutting programs against gender violence in autonomous communities such as Madrid and agrees with the denialists of gender violence. So, of those who hold patriarchy, lessons, just ones.
The urgent need to combat discrimination in the EU through the horizontal anti-discrimination directive (topical debate)
Mr. President, ore, progress, wok, lobby gay, climate fanatics, gender ideology... With what contempt are these words vomited! The far right wants to impose its language of hatred. The fight against discrimination and the defense of human rights are devalued by calling them goodism, making the ostentation of evil a propaganda tool. Hatred is never innocent and always ends up translating into violence. One in five people in the European Union suffers insults, aggression, discrimination... just because they are who they are or love who they love. Far-right violence has become France's second most troubling threat and the deadliest danger to people in the United States. In Spain, in my country, a far-right terrorist cell has recently been dismantled, and we saw it also this summer, when ultra- and far-right neo-Nazi groups encouraged the organization of hunts against migrants. There is every reason to make urgent progress on the horizontal anti-discrimination directive, which has been paralysed for 17 years, and for hate speech to finally be considered a crime. We are safe in it, and so is our life. Commissioner: We have to stop this war against hatred, against the different. Hatred can ravage our model of civilization. It has already happened in interwar Europe and they intend to do it again, because – by reversing Robe Iniesta (Extremoduro) – although some people were only taught hatred and greed, we will not stop trying to widen their souls.
Recent developments in Palestine and Lebanon (debate)
No text available
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
No text available
Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded (debate)
No text available
Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded (debate)
No text available
The new 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework: architecture and governance (debate)
Mr President, what a piece of paper Mrs von der Leyen has: Neither the political groups that put it where it is can support a budget that prioritizes military spending over social spending, which is what is necessary. The reality does not fit in their figures. The reality is that inequality is growing in the European Union, that there is a housing crisis across Europe and that people cannot make ends meet. And his proposal not only fails to respond, but also breaks down social cohesion, which is one of the pillars of the European Union. Social spending translates into an indeterminate 14% in which, because it fits, it even fits military training. And they do the same with the European Social Fund, diluted among other items and without any specific objective. Spanish and European organisations working with the most vulnerable groups are highly concerned. Listen to them, because they are working side by side with the people who suffer. The European Social Fund is one of the best tools we have and have had. If Mrs von der Leyen is so concerned about the safety of Europeans, this should be her highest priority.
The first European Annual Asylum and Migration report and the setting up of the Annual Solidarity Pool (debate)
Madam President, Commissioner, today we should be taking a step towards a compulsory solidarity mechanism. However, what he is presenting to us here today is not solidarity, it is abandonment. Obviously, Spain, Italy, Greece, Cyprus, the southern border of Europe, we are the ones who have the most migratory pressure; that's obvious. What seems to us to be a joke is that, of the 27, you have determined that only nine countries are going to contribute or are in a position to contribute and to show solidarity - nine out of 27, Commissioner. And that if this can be called contributing, because it is choosing between welcoming or paying for not doing so. That is, it is an a la carte solidarity. It is unacceptable to call solidarity a mechanism that leaves out central countries of the European Union. We need to ensure that we are not left alone to the countries of the South or to the people who need a dignified reception. Your proposal, unfortunately, is not a solidarity mechanism, but an amendment to solidarity, because the data clearly show that Europe is not currently facing a migration crisis, it is facing a crisis of values that threatens the European project, and with this proposal you are just finishing it off.
Breast cancer: the importance of screening (debate)
Thank you for your question. Anxiety is what women live when we undergo a test and no one gives us a result. Anxiety is what we live when we go to a health service and there is a waiting list so huge that we are not able to know if we are going to get out alive or not of a screening process. Therefore, the political opinion that awakens in me a situation like the one we have experienced in Andalusia is that responsibilities must be purged.
Breast cancer: the importance of screening (debate)
Madam President, more than 2 000 women have their lives hanging in the balance as a result of the mismanagement of the Andalusian Government. 2,000 women who needed follow-up and never got a call. Some of them, unfortunately, are gone. That wasn't a mistake, it was political negligence. The system failed because there is a strategy to make it fail. Weakening the public to end up privatizing everything. It is not an isolated case, it is a model that we see repeated in the Valencian Community, in Murcia and in each territory where money is put ahead of life. Cancer does not discriminate between rich and poor people, but the possibility of overcoming it with a timely diagnosis, of course. It depends on quality public and universal services. We need to strengthen our public health with resources, with health professionals who have good working conditions, and decent, and, above all, with policies that prioritize health over economic benefits. Cuts cost lives, gentlemen, and dismantling health care costs lives.
First anniversary of the DANA floods in Spain: improving EU preparedness (debate)
Mr President, twelve months have passed since the damage that took more than two hundred and thirty-five people ahead. Twelve months in which we have seen in the streets the dignity of the Valencian people in the face of the indignity of a Valencian Government that continues to lie without assuming responsibilities. This tragedy showed that denying the climate emergency kills. What happened in the Valencian Country was not bad luck or an error of coordination, it was an indecent abandonment of functions and was a consequence of cutting in public services, in prevention and also, or therefore, in human lives. And in the meantime, Mr. Mazón continues to rely on the deniers who eliminated the emergency unit to continue governing there. And why? Why does he do it? Because Mazón chooses power in the face of truth. And the People's Party consents to it. We demand political responsibility, truth and reparation so that this tragedy is not repeated and that water does not take what politics failed to protect. Victims are still waiting for answers and deserve justice.
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections (debate)
Mr President, Commissioner, Minister, few things show the wrong direction of this European Union better than this budget. The European Union was born as a project of peace between peoples, on the rubble of war and fascism. It was born to guarantee rights, equality, dignity for all. Today that project is being betrayed: instead of investing in peace, war is financed; instead of protecting people, resources are diverted from social funds to weapons; Instead of saving lives, millions of euros are spent on erecting higher walls and letting people die at sea. This budget is not a coincidence, it is an embarrassing political decision. We are not just talking about figures, but about a Europe that has lost its way with leaders who have chosen war over life and justice. Citizens need to invest in housing, education, health, social justice ... but this budget abandons Europeans and Europeans.
Recent peace agreement in the Middle East and the role of the EU (debate)
Mr President, in one week Israel has broken the ceasefire more than fifty times, blocked the entry of humanitarian aid, continued to kill and murder and is consolidating occupation and colonisation. What is the European Union waiting for to react, to do something? This is not a peace plan and you know it. Nor, it's not even a cease-fire. This is a perfect strategy to continue the second phase of the genocide. And you keep looking to the side. Excuses are no longer worth it. With bombs there is no peace. Without justice there is no peace either. We want all those responsible tried and convicted. Commissioner, where are the measures that Mrs von der Leyen presented in this Parliament on 17 September? Where are the sanctions? Where are the suspensions? Where are the consequences? We've been waiting for more than a month and nothing. Zero is the absolute that you have presented. People don't believe in you anymore. The streets are still demanding...
Summer of heatwaves in the EU: addressing the causes and providing adequate housing and health policies to address record-breaking temperatures (debate)
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, more than 3 600 people have died in Spain this summer because of the heat, 84% more than last summer. They are not statistics, they are lives: Most of them are very vulnerable people, working people, the elderly and even children. And no, it's not just a Southern European thing. Every year, Europe breaks temperature records and heat waves. And yet we continue to hear denialist speeches. They call us climate fanatics, as if climate change is an ideological issue, when it is a killing reality. Therefore, we must act and we must act now: We need to adapt our cities, our homes, our schools and our workplaces. In Spain, pioneering legislation has been put in place to protect working people, with measures as basic as stopping activity during hot peak hours or when there are weather alerts. Because protecting people is not so difficult, it is just a matter of political will, and this Parliament has to take the step if it does not want to end up suffocated by the denialism of the far right.