What Thomas spoke about.

17

Jun

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

The resilience of the European transport sector and the need to ensure the supply of essential goods amid ongoing geopolitical instability (debate)

17

Jun

2026

Answers DE

Watch

The resilience of the European transport sector and the need to ensure the supply of essential goods amid ongoing geopolitical instability (debate)

17

Jun

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

The resilience of the European transport sector and the need to ensure the supply of essential goods amid ongoing geopolitical instability (debate)

21

May

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Stop destroying videogames’ (debate)

Madam President, Commissioner! Dear colleagues! One thing in advance: I am not one of the 41 million Germans who regularly gamble, i.e. play video games. I have a lot of sympathy for this initiative. Anyone who purchases a license for a video game must be able to rely on the fact that they can basically play this game for as long as they want. After all, anyone who buys a book does not have to expect that the publisher will remove the book from the shelf after a few years. If the manufacturer of a video game can decide at its own discretion when to shut down the servers and thus end the enjoyment of the game, then the result would be that ultimately the customer would have to bear the risk of the economic success or failure of that game. This is manifestly incompatible with the principles of sound property and consumer protection. And that's why it's important to make sure that gamblers know what they're up to when they buy a video game.

20

May

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Financing EU priorities in a sustainable, predictable and resilient way through a new EU own resource from the online gambling and betting services sector (debate)

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen! Almost 130 billion euros were implemented in the European betting and gambling market in 2025. This business is growing dynamically and is becoming more and more digital. It is not uncommon for providers to be based in low-tax countries, notably Malta. And it's not completely harmless either: Gambling is known to be addictive and affects 5-6 million people in Europe. Therefore, it is fundamentally correct to tax this business. Whether this will create new own resources for the EU budget, however, is a completely different question. In any case, there is no own resource in the strict sense, because the Member States alone have the power to collect taxes. In this respect, a Europe-wide taxation in favour of the EU ‑ budget would not be possible without unanimity in the Council anyway. If you have them, you should use them better. Instead of giving Ms von der Leyen's commission even more money, we should join forces to drain tax havens and tax the digital companies appropriately.

28

Apr

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 (debate)

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen. When Ms von der Leyen presented the draft multiannual financial framework, many of you were outraged – and rightly so. This is because these plans, in particular the concept of national and regional partnership plans, result in Parliament being largely marginalised in both the allocation and the control of the use of the EU budget. Moreover, the negotiations with the Commission have not changed much in this respect, as the Court of Auditors has recently confirmed. It is therefore all the more astonishing that you now want to give the Commission even more money than it originally requested. Europe does not create added value by turning more and more money over Brussels. And we should also not give Mrs von der Leyen a money bag with which she can govern the Member States. What Europe needs are clear and simple rules for cohesion policy, for the common agricultural policy and for the protection of our external borders. This is our job as parliamentarians. But we are not the service providers and certainly not the useful idiots of the Commission.

27

Apr

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

One-minute speeches on matters of political importance

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, There is a lot of money going on in Brussels. Whether the money reaches the right people is sometimes very much the question. One example is the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund. This should be mobilised in the event of mass redundancies and show that Europe also has a social side. However, a closer look shows that more than half of the applications come from Belgium. So it seems that the authorities in Belgium are a bit smarter – or know the right people – when it comes to tapping into EU funds. And, of course, the funds must not replace payments from national unemployment insurance or national support programmes. This often means that it is not the redundant workers who benefit from the subsidies, but some consulting companies that make a good deal out of the impending unemployment. Don't you think we should take a closer look at what the Commission is doing with the European taxpayer's money? Europe does not become more social by feeding consultancies and bureaucracy monsters to the Commission.

10

Mar

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Presentation of the Energy Package (debate)

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen! I do not know how many energy packages the Commission is presenting here. European energy policy has become a bureaucratic monster, driving up energy costs more and more and giving the industry no more planning certainty. It's time to think about the basics. What Europe needs is safe, cheap and climate-friendly energy. For this we do not need a central planning commission in Brussels, which believes that certain forms of energy production must be privileged and others banned. Where we rely on imports, we should use all available supply instead of imposing sanctions on certain suppliers or, as is currently the case, blackmailing ourselves with American fracking ‑ liquefied petroleum gas. The pipeline infrastructure is the marketplace of the energy industry. This is a natural monopoly and must be developed in state hands. We don't need a bureaucratic climate. Green DealIt's a mechanism that CO2 priced in such a way that the costs of climate change are imposed on the polluter.

10

Feb

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire (debate)

10

Feb

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

European response to the attacks on the Ukrainian energy system causing a humanitarian crisis (debate)

9

Feb

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

One-minute speeches on matters of political importance

21

Jan

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

European Council meeting (joint debate)

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen. The war in Ukraine has already cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of people and destroyed large parts of the country. But now he is also destroying Europe and the European Union. While the American president wants to end the war in order to enrich himself with the natural resources of Ukraine, which President Zelenskyy promised him, the European Union is in debt to enable Ukraine to purchase arms in the order of 60 billion euros. The EU will remain seated on these debts, because the hope of Russian reparations payments is absurd wishful thinking. The winner is again Donald Trump, because a large part of the money will end up in the American arms industry. And this at a time when the US President is threatening EU Member States and reviling Europe as a continent in decline. Europe needs to think about itself. It is up to Europe to end the war on its continent, to overcome the division of Europe and to build bridges again to the largest country in Europe by population and area.

17

Dec

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime (debate)

Madam President, Commissioner! Dear colleagues! The conditionality regime is supposedly about protecting the EU budget, which is known to be adopted by Parliament and the Council. And that is indeed very important. The aim is to ensure that the funds made available by the European Union are spent in accordance with the law and regulations. As a rule, this should be conclusively regulated in the laws on the basis of which the money is distributed. And these laws are made by the legislator, that is, first and foremost by this Parliament. With the conditionality regime, however, another vehicle is now available to withhold funds that have already been approved by Parliament, without Parliament being able to influence them, solely on the basis of a Commission proposal and a qualified majority of the Council. There may be concerns about the rule of law in some Member States. But anyone who allows the Commission and the Council to withhold funds beyond the rules set by Parliament and without its consent is putting the axe to Europe's rule of law. Merry Christmas to you!

16

Dec

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

Presentation of the automotive package (debate)

26

Nov

2025

Questions DE

Watch

EU response to the continuous airspace violations and sabotage of critical infrastructure in the EU originating from Russia and Belarus (debate)

26

Nov

2025

Questions DE

Watch

EU response to the continuous airspace violations and sabotage of critical infrastructure in the EU originating from Russia and Belarus (debate)

26

Nov

2025

Answers DE

Watch

EU response to the continuous airspace violations and sabotage of critical infrastructure in the EU originating from Russia and Belarus (debate)

26

Nov

2025

Answers DE

Watch

EU response to the continuous airspace violations and sabotage of critical infrastructure in the EU originating from Russia and Belarus (debate)

26

Nov

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

EU response to the continuous airspace violations and sabotage of critical infrastructure in the EU originating from Russia and Belarus (debate)

25

Nov

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

2026 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate)

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen. It seems that Parliament can be celebrated for giving the Council a little more money for the budget. The question is whether this is really a success for Parliament. It is not in the interest of the citizens we represent here if more and more money is turned over to Brussels, which could be spent much more efficiently and transparently by the Member States, their regions or municipalities. More and more money for the Commission does not strengthen the role of this Parliament, but weakens it. What the Commission is planning for the next multiannual financial framework should be a warning to us. It is not a question of common rules, common standards and an approximation of living conditions in the Union, but rather of assuming new competences and governing the Member States more or less unchecked by Parliament. We are doing a disservice to Europe.

21

Oct

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections (debate)

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen! Why do we want to give more and more money to the Commission? As a Parliament, it is our task to supervise and control the Commission. Our task is to ensure that the Commission does not exceed its competences, and it is also our task, in any case, not to give the Commission administrative competence and budgetary resources where the corresponding tasks can be carried out more transparently, efficiently and democratically at the level of the Member States, the provinces and the municipalities. The Commission's draft multiannual financial framework should be a warning to us. What Ms von der Leyen is striving for is a domination of the bureaucracy, which, with the golden reins of money, is governing Member States in order to enforce its so-called reform agenda. The money is to be approved by Parliament, otherwise it does not have much to say. Dear colleagues, I can only recommend not to participate. We should not be under suspicion of being the useful idiots of the Commission.

20

Oct

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

One-minute speeches on matters of political importance

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, Poland has not extradited the suspect for the attacks on the Nord Stream pipelines to the Federal Republic of Germany, but released them. This is a scandal, because the decision of the Polish court is a blatant breach of law. The fact that the Ukrainian is urgently suspect is not disputed in Poland either. That's why he should have been extradited. This is a terrorist attack on critical infrastructure, which is also owned by companies and Member States of the European Union. An attack that not only endangered Europe's security of supply with natural gas, but also released a large amount of climate-damaging greenhouse gases. The fact that Poland apparently has no sanctions against the European Union and that even the German government is prepared to accept this verdict shows how hypocritical all the chatter about the rule of law in the European Union is. If law is broken and acts of terrorism go unpunished, then this is not an advertisement for the alleged European community of values.

8

Oct

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

EU strategy with regard to Iran’s nuclear threat and the implementation of EU sanctions resulting from the snapback mechanism (debate)

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, One wonders: Why does the so-called Snapback Actually now? Why – and this seems to be what this is all about – do sanctions against Iran need to be tightened again in order to prevent the country from developing nuclear weapons? I would like to remind you that it was only three months ago that the United States, with a military strike according to President Trump, caused serious damage to Iran's nuclear program and threw it back for years. There is no point in reinforcing sanctions now. It's not about Iran's nuclear program. Rather, it is about Russia, with which Iran has now allied itself. Perhaps Europe would also like to make itself popular with the American president, who has never thought of the nuclear agreement with Iran and who, with such good behavior, can perhaps be persuaded to supply weapons to Ukraine again. Isn't that pathetic? In the past, Europe was a power of peace. Today, Europe seems to prefer to ignite and fuel conflicts.

6

Oct

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

Revision of the Visa Suspension Mechanism (debate)

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen! Visa-free travel for stays of up to 90 days is a major advance in civilisation. And it is also European in the best sense, because our continent, and in particular the European Union, stands for freedom of movement, openness to the world and diversity. The prerequisite, of course, is reciprocity. And that's a good thing, because reciprocity creates the incentive for other countries to open their borders as well. And, of course, it is true that this freedom of movement must not become the gateway to illegal immigration or, as in the case of Vanuatu, can be obtained by acquiring citizenship to some extent. With the amendments now proposed, however, we are opening the door to what I believe is a potentially disastrous politicisation of free movement. The victims are the citizens of the states, who, for whatever reason, may not want to adapt to our sometimes specifically European values or do not want to follow some of our objectives, such as the imposition of economic sanctions, which are extremely controversial in their effect. I'm afraid: We make friends with such a visa policy – according to the motto: The world is supposed to recover from the European nature – probably not.

10

Sep

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

Implementation of EU-US trade deal and the prospect of wider EU trade agreements (debate)

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen! It has been pointed out several times that Ursula von der Leyen and Donald Trump's tariff deal is unbalanced and violates European interests. More serious, however, is the fact that the President of the Commission has made promises that are not only absurd in terms of content, but also that she cannot keep at all. If it promises the American president that the European Union will buy $750 billion worth of oil and gas in the US over the next three years, it would mean that we are completely dependent on expensive American fracking LNG for gas. But she could not promise that anyway, because it is not paid from the budget of the European Union. And I can hardly imagine that European energy companies are so stupid as to buy natural gas only in America. In this respect, the breach of contract is pre-programmed, which Donald Trump will take as an opportunity to blackmail us again. Mrs. von der Leyen should take her hat; She's just not fit for the job.