Speeches

Dear Chairman, Honourable Commissioner, colleague and colleague, for me, the DMA is actually something broader than the fight for European digital sovereignty. If Europe is to adopt rules, it must have both the strength and the capacity to enforce them. This topic is also directly related to the protection of citizens online, let's not forget this, and the position of European media and creative industries, security and data protection. That is why, to my mind, the implementation of the DMA must bring real results, more choice for citizens, fairer conditions for small and medium-sized enterprises, more transparency and less dependence on closed digital systems, which we have actually heard the biggest players do not come from the territory of the European Union at all. Digital markets are changing at a fast pace, in particular with the development of artificial intelligence, cloud services and data ecosystems. If implementation is delayed, the market closes, I would say, even before the law starts to operate. Therefore, the DMA has to level the playing field, so that a few big players do not control the digital market as it is now.

Dear Chair, Honourable Commissioner, colleague and colleague, I would say that Europe must leave the bureaucratic labyrinth. The problem is not goals. To me, the problem is implementation. Good ideas in practice, unfortunately, sometimes become additional forms, double procedures or unclear rules. This means more costs for those who are the least able to cope with it: small and medium-sized enterprises, craftsmen, farmers, all those who do not actually have legal and administrative capacity. The aim is simple and I therefore welcome this intention of the Commission - less administration and more results. However, what is required by those who are in the real world and face problems on a daily basis is predictability. It's something they could do. We need, of course, a combination of both regulatory, structural and fiscal measures. In any case, the simplification proposed must not mean lowering standards. So, from this communication we expect to listen to practice and clear rules, impact assessment and finally ensure implementation. The goal is common, but we certainly need to be faster and listen to a little more Members who have inputs from the economy directly.

Dear Chairman, colleagues, these circumstances expect from politics the strength and speed of reaction and that is why I will share with you the reaction of the Government of the Republic of Croatia. It has already adopted a tenth package of measures worth around €450 billion, aimed specifically at mitigating rising energy prices and protecting citizens' standards. The main focus is on limiting the price of fuel and electricity to prevent a greater impact on households and the economy. Without these measures, prices would be higher, and this is how partial growth is depreciated. For citizens, electricity prices in Croatia remain the same until October this year with additional savings on bills, and the most vulnerable receive 70 euros per month. Entrepreneurs are also restricted by the price of electricity in order to remain competitive. The State shall ensure the stability of gas prices. The package includes support for public transport, agriculture, students and investments in renewable energy. Politically, the measures are a response to the global energy crisis and rising prices, to social protection and to preserving economic stability. This will be a good example for many countries in the region.

Dear Chair, colleagues and colleagues. I agree with you that prevention is actually about practicing sports or a healthy lifestyle. However, when we talk about adolescents, we need to be aware that we are talking about a generation that is growing up in the digital age and we need to be aware that, unfortunately, 80% of adolescents in the European Union do not carry out physical activity for one hour a day. That is why I consider it a truly serious problem and the unavailability of equal opportunities for children to play sports. Therefore, prevention must also begin in the family, in kindergarten, in school and in the local community. Obesity is often also associated with mental health, self-esteem, stigma and quality of life. That is why our response must also be complete, without judgment, without simplification and without shifting blame exclusively to the individual. In Croatia, the country from which I come, the Action Plan for Prevention was adopted, and the Croatian Institute of Public Health through the program Living healthy and monitoring childhood obesity is already building the foundations for targeted preventive measures. However, in the end, if we want a serious health policy, then prevention and treatment of obesity must become an integral part of that policy, not a footnote.

Dear Chairman, Honourable Commissioner, so few debates are so unison among political dissent and different clubs, as it seems this evening. This is actually a technical issue, but also with very concrete legal and political consequences, because if we ask why this is important, the Convention strengthens legal certainty, simplifies the recognition of court decisions and reduces costs for citizens and businesses in cross-border disputes. What is very important is predictability, and predictability itself cannot be without that mutual trust, investment or stable relationship. In the context of enlargement, these steps may not be spectacular, but they are also crucial when talking about enlargement, I certainly want to underline that we support, of course, the European path of these two countries. The European perspective of the Western Balkans is not built, of course, by declarations, but by concrete alignment with European and international legal standards. However, it is important to point out that a mere formal accession to international instruments is not sufficient. It must be a real mirror of changes in practice through consistent and sincere implementation of adopted acts. Of course, this integration is not measured by the number of conventions signed, but by how they are applied in the daily work of courts and institutions. At the same time, it is important to stress that the European Parliament must be involved in such procedures in a timely and formal manner, as we are on the same side here. You are not on the other side of the Parliament, but we would no longer want this disharmony or misunderstanding to become a debate in this House. This is not a procedural trifle, but an issue of institutional balance and democratic accountability that we all stand for. In conclusion, support for this process means support for legal certainty, regional stability and credibility of the European path of Albania and Montenegro.

Madam President, dear Commissioner, dear loved, I will continue in Croatian. Dear Commissioner, it's not fair. The Honourable Chair, therefore, is not fair that children do not have equal access to education, and equal access continues to strongly shape the life chances of children and young people across Europe. Often, unfortunately, not through talents, but through the circumstances in which they grow up. Differences continue to occur at multiple levels: regional, territorial, between urban centres and rural or remote areas, where schools are often poorly equipped and students’ path to education is longer and more demanding. There are, of course, socio-economic differences among children from lower-income families, who have less access to additional teaching, digital tools and stable learning conditions, which, of course, affects their educational opportunities. Particular attention is required by the digital divide, it is true, we live in the digital age, but not all children, unfortunately, can follow it, which has become more visible in recent years. Differences in access to the internet, devices and digital skills deepen existing inequalities. We must also not ignore the obstacles faced by minorities and children from vulnerable communities. Education is still not equally available. Our response, I agree with you, must be common and decisive, we must have strategic investments. That is why we trust that the next financial perspective will not ignore this fact, that you will fight for enough funds and what you said in your speech, we must take care of who will teach our children. Because education is the foundation of Europe's future, and it is up to us to make it just for all. I'll just do a little digression: in Croatia, about two percent of young people between the ages of 18 and 24 are not included in education, while the EU average is about 10 percent. We have to show that we can change. This demonstrates the power of a public, accessible and inclusive education system. Formal education provides different opportunities for social inclusion and access to the labour market. We all have to work together on this.

Dear Chairman, online piracy, a live event, above all sport, but let's not forget about music and cultural content, is becoming one of the unresolved challenges of the European digital and cultural space. Data shows that 12% of EU citizens already access illegal online sports broadcasts, and among young people aged between 15 and 24, this figure rises to 27%. This means, in fact, that one whole generation is accustomed to viewing content outside the law. Estimates show more than €1 billion of illegal revenue per year in the European Union, while sports leagues; broadcasters and the cultural sector loses the funds that finance the development of sport, content production and, of course, the creative industries. At the same time, piracy does not exist in a vacuum, it is also a consequence of the distorted market for sports media rights. When rights are fragmented, even prices are high, and key broadcasters connected sometimes with state actors outside the European Union, trust in the market is weakening and citizens are turning to illegal solutions, which is by no means good. Illegal sports transfers bring billions of euros a year to criminal networks and illegal betting. It's not a petty offense, it's organized crime. The percentages of illegal approaches pose an economic and legal challenge because piracy creates huge black money and, Commissioner, we have to do something.

Dear Chair, colleague and colleague, digital networks are today as strategic as energy or defence. Of course, without a secure and resilient connectivity, there is no competitiveness, there is no modern industry and there is no real European sovereignty. This is an opportunity to kick-start investment in optics, 5G and 6G networks, and to accelerate infrastructure modernisation. However, DNA must answer one very specific question – information resilience in an age of connected mobility. That is why I thank and welcome that the proposal recognizes the issue that I initiated ten days ago, and which was supported by many colleagues, I thank them for this, in a letter to the President of the Commission and Vice-President Virkkunen in which I highlighted the importance of the position of radio in cars, which is now regulated by Article 112 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Any automotive radio receiver installed in a new vehicle of category M, placed on the Union market for sale or hire, shall contain a receiver capable of receiving and reproducing at least the radio services provided by means of digital terrestrial radio broadcasting. Thanks for that, I think we almost made it. Today, cars are turning into computers on wheels, and with this proposal, we are closer to the goal of keeping the radio in them. This is not only a matter of culture and media pluralism, but also of public security. In crises, power outages or network failures, radio is often the last medium that remains available to citizens. I believe that this is also a European value that we must defend. That is why, while building Europe's digital sovereignty, DNA must at the same time protect the public interest, keep radio present and easily accessible in new vehicles. Thank you for supporting this.

Dear President, Commissioners, colleagues, when digital systems fall, schools suffer, public institutions suffer, citizens suffer, hospitals suffer, the whole system suffers. In the last year alone, ENISA has registered almost 5,000 serious cyber incidents in the European Union. This shows that threats are day-to-day, sophisticated and on the rise, and therefore, thanks to the Commissioner, for announcing the strengthening of ENISA as well as simplification. The Cybersecurity Act strengthens ENISA and introduces a single certification system for digital products and services to make the market safer, and what is very important is greater trust. A key part of our response is also the NIS 2 Directive, which extends obligations to critical sectors and imposes stricter liability, including high financial sanctions for serious misconduct. However, we need to be honest and face reality, so that implementation is not uniform. By mid-2025, less than half of the Member States had fully transposed NIS 2 into national law, creating loopholes in our defence. And I will conclude, Europe must be digitally open, no doubt, but cyber-impeachable and we must not compromise on this.

Thank you very much, but answer me, please, then to the question how do you mean to prevent what happens every second, say, on encrypted online platforms where at least two photos or videos of child sexual abuse are shared? One in seven children in elementary school arranged a face-to-face meeting with a person they met online. I'm sure the parents didn't say: ‘Yes, you can’. And finally, this year, Europol detected in 2000 a link to terrorist and violent extremist content targeting minors who are not accidental victims but intended targets. Then how would you handle it?

Dear Chair, Honourable Commissioner, I believe that the European Democracy Shield must be much more than an administrative measure and that it must be a geopolitical response and a backstop for the European Union, so it is of utmost importance to see how the Centre for Democratic Resilience will function. Why? Because we live in a time when democracy is no longer attacked only by cannons or weapons, but by propaganda, false narratives, election manipulation, cyberattacks and economic blackmail. We've finally realized that we can't be naive anymore. Democracy Shield is the first comprehensive framework that protects us from external authoritarian regimes that seek to undermine our institutions and polarize our society. I agree, we need stronger media, transparency of political funding, but we need to protect cyber security, elections and defence against foreign influence. This means defending our way of life, and in the end I welcome your announcement of digital literacy in schools, that is, media literacy for informed citizens.

Dear Chairwoman, colleagues, I will repeat, Croatia is among the few Member States that have already clearly defined rape as a non-consensual relationship in their criminal code and introduced criminal liability for digital violence and abuse of intimate content, thus becoming an example of good practice among EU countries. At the same time, the revised Anti-Trafficking Directive from last year extends protection to women who are exposed to forced pregnancy, surrogacy and the exploitation of motherhood. According to the 2024 analysis, there is sadly more and more so-called commercial surrogacy in third countries, exploiting poor women from Asia and Eastern Europe. Women from poor communities are recruited. However, giving birth to children for organ trafficking, sexual abuse, is the most horrific form of business that we must also talk about. This is not freedom of choice, it is a form of modern slavery. In 2022, we declared commercial surrogacy a form of exploitation of women that violates their rights and human dignity. We are now three years later. Have we taken a step forward or backwards?

Dear Chair, I am glad that you mentioned cyberbullying and I agree with you and I hope that you will support the EPP Group initiative that we have been talking about for several years, which is the extension of the definition and that cyberbullying, in fact, becomes a criminal offence in all Member States of the European Union where it is not yet. As far as this Directive is concerned, I must say that my country, from which I come, Croatia, has already taken steps there and that sexual abuse, rape and others are already in the domain of crime. So, are you in favor of cyberbullying criminalization, as is EPP?

Dear President, colleague and colleague, when we talk about culture, we are not talking about trade. We talk about language, about the way we see the world, about who we are. And it is precisely our European identity in the digital space that is under threat. More than 65% of the video-on-demand market revenue in Europe is generated by three major non-European services, Netflix, Amazon Prime and Disney Plus. European content, although it accounts for about 30% of the catalogue's offer, is only 16% of the total time. In other words, more than 80% of the time European citizens spend watching content is spent on non-European programmes. The AVMSD is not a market barrier, but a tool for Europe to protect its voice, in Italy, in Germany, in Poland, in Croatia. Without it, European authors, directors and producers would be overwhelmed by the global content that dominates our screens. In this sense, the Directive does not erect walls, but opens doors. When the European Union asks 30% of content on platforms to be of European origin, it is not a bureaucratic quota, it is a defense of our culture. That is why I call on the Commission and the Member States to firmly and uniformly defend the obligations of this Directive in the Transatlantic Dialogue.

It is clear that in Serbia we do not see a democratic, but a despotic narrative, a coquette as appropriate to the European Union, and on the other hand a very coquett to Russia and China. I would like to send a clear message to the citizens of Serbia: We do not change power here, we seek democratic change here and we ask that reforms be fulfilled for every country that wants to become a member of the European Union. Over the past year in Serbia, we have witnessed intimidation of protesters, arrest of journalists, pressure on civil society and attempts to portray any criticism as a threat to the state. This is not the way to Europe, it is the way back to fear and silence. The rule of law, freedom of expression and an independent judiciary are not traded goods. They are a prerequisite for membership. Serbia cannot simultaneously request the opening of chapters and close the mouth of its own citizens.

Dear Chair, Honourable Commissioner, Colleagues, Sigfrido Ranucci is the target of an attempted attack precisely because he did his job: expose corruption, abuse of power and irregularities. His courage reminds us of the most important thing. Freedom of the press is not guaranteed when journalists can speak, but when they can do so without fear. We keep saying: there is no place to intimidate journalists in the European Union. However, according to the European Federation of Journalists, in the first six months of this year alone, there were 709 cases of violations of media freedom. These are not isolated incidents. It's a pattern that worries. The murder of Dafne Caruana Galizia in Malta, we talked about it earlier today, the assassination of Jan Kuciak in Slovakia and now the attempt to attack Sigfrid Ranucci are reminders that there is no democracy without free journalism. We will talk about that free so-called journalism in Serbia a little later today. That is why I welcome the European Commission's initiative for a European media freedom law, which for the first time clearly sets out that Member States must guarantee the independence of journalists, the protection of sources and the transparency of media ownership. Sigfrido Ranucci has survived, but what we have to ensure is that the next journalist doesn't have to be a hero to do his job.

The enlargement of the European Union is not only an administrative process or a set of technical chapters, it is a political act, an expression of our vision and our responsibility, but also of the responsibility of the Member States that would like to join the European Union. At a time when borders in Europe are being redrafted, when autocracies question its values, enlargement is the answer, not the risk, but it can only be a success if the Union remains credible and able to decide, while respecting the principle of equality. At the same time, we must preserve what makes Europe unique, the balance between big and small members, new and old members. Our message must be clear: enlargement yes, reforms yes, but a Europe of equal members must remain the heart of the Union. We need to be able to react quickly, that's right, but speed must not replace responsibility. There are mechanisms that allow progress without losing balance: passerelle clauses, structured cooperation and constructive restraint. No lifting of veto rights.