| Rank | Name | Country | Group | Speeches | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Lukas Sieper | Germany DE | Renew Europe (Renew) | 487 |
| 2 |
|
Juan Fernando López Aguilar | Spain ES | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 454 |
| 3 |
|
Sebastian Tynkkynen | Finland FI | European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) | 451 |
| 4 |
|
João Oliveira | Portugal PT | The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL) | 284 |
| 5 |
|
Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis | Lithuania LT | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 273 |
All Speeches (178)
No, in the Spanish Parliament I would have much more time to talk and explain things; I only have a minute and a half here. But if what I am talking about is why I am talking about Spain, it is because we are talking about the rule of law, about a Commission report on the rule of law that criticises Spain and then nothing is incorporated into the question of the European Parliament, because they have agreed to it, because the big parties have agreed not to talk about anyone. You can't talk about anyone, but you can talk about Hungary, you can talk about Poland or anyone else. But no, we are not talking about Pedro Sanchez, and I point out that, unfortunately, the government of my country is the most corrupt in Europe right now.
Mr. President, condemned: one; processed: four. The person convicted of corruption is the Attorney General of the State; those prosecuted for corruption are the wife of Pedro Sánchez, the brother of Pedro Sánchez and two secretaries of organization of the Socialist Party, in addition to a brutal case of corruption, such as the illicit extraction of evidence on the same night as the Adamuz railway accident. This is a report on the rule of law in Europe, and there is not a single mention of the most corrupt government in Europe – the socialist government of Pedro Sánchez. The dwindling majority in this Parliament calls it a 'gentlemen's pact' - something that smells rotten in the Brussels swamp. You can't talk about democracy without condemning amnesties and pardons from politicians to politicians for a handful of votes. You cannot talk about freedom of expression and ask to apply the Digital Services Act to censor political discourse on social networks with sanctions and repression. You can't talk about equality and hide racism against white people, attacks on the Christian faith or growing insecurity on the streets of Europe. We cannot talk about justice and regularize hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants, putting the security and financial stability of Spain and all of Europe at risk. You can't talk about good management and use direct funding from Brussels in media and NGOs to compromise editorial independence. Look at: until the European institutions are subject to the same control and accountability mechanisms that apply to the Member States, this will be a paripé.
Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate)
Date:
27.04.2026 18:52
| Language: ES
Answers
I repeat: Talk to any cop, talk to any prosecutor, talk to any judge. If a correct analysis of the criminal profile of the sex offender is not done, it is not possible to find the solution. If we want to condemn all males for the mere fact of being males and propose measures to condemn males for the mere fact of being males, we will never find the solution. And, therefore, nationality, origin ... and convictions must be analyzed, what they think about women, those convictions that are imported, which consider that women are of lesser dignity than men, of course they must be fought!
Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate)
Date:
27.04.2026 18:50
| Language: ES
Answers
I don't know what intervention you've heard, but I haven't talked about it. I am concerned about all the rapes of all women and girls, of course. But I am also concerned that Governments hide the nationality and origin of the aggressors and that the media hide the nationality and origin of the aggressors. And there you don't say anything. I am concerned about all the victims and, of course, the highest sentences and permanent imprisonment for the most serious cases constitute a penitentiary policy and an absolutely essential penal policy. There is one thing called "special prevention of punishment": If you know that after six months or two years you are going out, you will commit the crime; If you know that you will never get out of an uncomfortable prison, you will not commit the crime.
Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate)
Date:
27.04.2026 18:48
| Language: ES
Speeches
Madam President, 5 000 sexual herds have raped women and girls in Spain since 2018, and you are proposing gender courses for police and prosecutors. The governments conceal the nationality and origin data of the aggressors, but we know that no less than 50% of the perpetrators were foreigners, multiplying almost by four the propensity to that crime with respect to the Spaniards, and if a good analysis of crime is not made, it is impossible to find the solution. Look, the non-consensual sexual act - and more, if it is exercised with violence or intimidation - has always been a crime. Noelia was not asked for consent to be placed in the juvenile facility where she was raped. Nor did they ask the more than 1,400 girls systematically raped by foreigners in Rotherham. You weren't heard. You propose the model of Sanchez, with which thousands of aggressors were released or saw the penalty reduced and are now on the street stalking their victims. We demand the highest sentences, the most uncomfortable prisons and life imprisonment for the most serious cases - and, of course, if they are foreigners, immediate deportation. In Spain, 5 400 violations were reported last year: fifteen a day, and going up, and you're going to make the same mistake as Pedro Sanchez in Spain. For you they are just statistics to ask for more money, more observatories, more plans and more chiringuitos. For us they are women and girls; They are our women and they are our daughters.
Madam President, after scandals such as the Qatargate or the Moroccogate, instead of prosecuting foreign states and NGOs for bribery of deputies and bureaucrats, the Commission launched this proposal for an anti-corruption directive which, unfortunately, in its final text will become the laundering and laundering of political corruption in countries such as Spain. It is a tepid proposal from the Commission, which in Parliament was slightly improved by our amendments, which proposed to ban amnesties and pardons for corrupt politicians, a widespread practice in the government of Pedro Sánchez, causing grandiose headlines in the popular ranks. But the final text is a very serious political error and an absolute technical disaster, because of that disastrous coalition of people, socialists and progressives that is a drag on Europe, more determined to adopt rules than in the justice and well-being of the people. A document supported by the Spanish socialists on corruption cannot be good. It will only be good for them, for Sánchez's relatives, his organizational secretaries and other socialist and separatist leaders mired in prevarications and embezzlements. A directive sanctifying Sanchez's criminal reform to benefit coup plotters in relation to the crime of embezzlement of public funds, which allows Member States to choose between the typical conduct being for their own profit or that of third parties or harming the interests of the entity is a scam. A directive that allows the crime of prevarication to be reduced to the cases and officials that the government decides - in this case Sánchez, when he has his brother and his candidate for Extremadura prosecuted in this matter - is a betrayal. A directive that does not prohibit pardons of corrupt politicians is nefarious. Today in Moncloa they will toast with champagne and in the street of Genoa they will sell headlines to their media.
No text available
No text available
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing (debate)
Date:
10.03.2026 09:54
| Language: ES
Answers
Of course, I'll have to agree with you. Climate policies have imposed a brutal increase in house prices. We defend flats, but affordable flats or cheap flats. They are flats that do not need a home automation or a whole set of things that are designed for you, because, indeed, we have some cojonudos salaries, some salaries that out there do not dream of them, but normal people can not pay for those houses. Therefore, what we need are cheap flats, affordable flats, flats for our young people, so that they can really start a family project.
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing (debate)
Date:
10.03.2026 09:51
| Language: ES
Speeches
Madam President, if the diagnosis is wrong, the treatment is propaganda. A ninety-five page document on the housing market in Europe that does not talk about the main problem: massive and uncontrolled immigration. Demand is skyrocketing and supply annihilated. In Spain, three million people have entered the last five years; three million people who require housing and who have strained the market to infinity. Not only the sale, but particularly the rent, curtailing the legitimate aspirations of young people and adults to have a home in property, as their parents and grandparents had, or a stable, lasting, fruitful lease for owners and tenants. And what about the foreign funds that buy tocateja taking advantage of tax incentives that ordinary Spaniards do not have? And you have created this problem with your roots, your regularizations, your family reunification and your false incomes of insertion. The supply has been wiped out and there is a shortage of housing, but this has not been triggered by any invisible hand. It has been their hands, those of the popular and socialist governments that have ruled for fifty years imposing abusive regulations on the rental market – hijacking the land to speculate from power with the future of young people –, restrictive policies, excess bureaucracy and taxation, and the abandonment of the protected housing policies, which were so successful and which gave home, light and bread to a Spain of owners that now returns to under-housing. Look, the solution is this: re-emigration, national priority in protected housing, freeing up the land and reducing as if there were no charges and taxes tomorrow. Everything else is propaganda because, in addition, those who govern the regions and the municipalities are those on this side of the benches.
Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate)
Date:
11.02.2026 11:37
| Language: ES
Speeches
Madam President, Europe is dying and you are decorating the coffin. Look, in Spain the real wage has stagnated since 1994 – 30 years of popular and socialist governments – and those under 65 are now poorer than in 2007. They have condemned two generations to misery. Farms and livestock holdings and the fishing fleet have been halved since 1990. The industry has disappeared, relocated because it has not a single incentive to stay in Europe. Venture capital does not reach Europe because in Europe the risk is you. They have been more concerned with the sexual practices of managers than with the productivity of companies. Of course, families are drowned in the shopping basket, housing, car, energy. Public employment, public spending, public debt, public deficit and immigration have grown. And all that is paid for by the self-employed, the employer or the worker, who, on the other hand, cannot buy a flat while you keep talking about climate neutral houses. With immigration they lie because all you want is cheap labor that lowers wages. Most immigrants are studying in public schools, doubling the dropout rate, doubling the unemployment rate and, of course, collapsing and taking over welfare and sheltered housing. But we have a plan, which is very simple: repeal the Green Deal, dismantle the welfare state of politicians, lower taxes, massively deport and deregulate as if there were no tomorrow.
Spain’s large-scale regularisation policy and its impact on the Schengen Area and EU migration policy (debate)
Date:
10.02.2026 19:25
| Language: ES
Answers
No text available
Spain’s large-scale regularisation policy and its impact on the Schengen Area and EU migration policy (debate)
Date:
10.02.2026 19:21
| Language: ES
Speeches
No text available
Building a stronger European defence in light of an increasingly volatile international environment (debate)
Date:
10.02.2026 11:49
| Language: ES
Speeches
No text available
Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate)
Date:
21.01.2026 16:01
| Language: ES
Speeches
Mr President, I thought I was coming to a debate promoted by the European People's Party, but there is no one! They didn't come! It's a lie! They have debated the returns of illegal immigrants and have not come! The left, of course, has absolutely boycotted it. Look, since 2015, when Merkel said that "everyone should come, everyone should be here, do not worry", nine million people have entered Europe asking for asylum, most of them without rights, plus another four million Ukrainians under the Temporary Protection Directive. There have been four and a half million illegal crossings – in Spain, more than 400 000 – and there are millions who enter legally through ports and airports and, when they finish their travel or study permits for tourism, they do not return to their countries because you – those who have not come to debate – encourage them to stay and plunder taxpayers to pay them food, clothing, health, education and subsidies of all kinds, even if they do not work, even if they commit crimes, even if they sexually assault women and even if they insult nations. The People's Party is late, as always. It is no longer about facilitating voluntary returns, we need a massive plan of expulsion, deportation and remigration: expulsion of those who have entered Europe illegally, deportation of those who, although legal, commit crimes and remigration of all those who live in Europe devouring aid and subsidies. And we're gonna do it because you guys don't care.
Mr President, Europe is weak and dependent because of you: because they mercilessly implement a green pact, because they opened the doors to mass immigration, closed nuclear ones, signed devastating trade agreements for the primary sector and put the cross and hijab at the same height. They repeat the rule-based order as a Tibetan mantra, but that expression is not part of international law. They talk about sovereignty and pressure legitimate governments by taking European funds away from them. They talk about equality, but Hungary is controlled by hitmen and Sánchez's corrupt government enjoys systematic leniency. They talk about human rights, but they promote censorship in networks. They invoke international legality today, but here, in the Union, the violation of borders, unilateral secession or hasty recognition of political entities has been tolerated. And on top of that we pay the assailants. Turkey has occupied part of Cyprus since 1974. Morocco violates the UN resolutions on Western Sahara or publicly maintains illegitimate aspirations and claims on Spanish land such as the Canary Islands, Ceuta or Melilla. Turkey and Morocco continue to receive billions of European funds. Gibraltar is a Spanish territory illegitimately occupied by the United Kingdom. Quiet. Russia invaded Crimea and you, quietly, because Germany was already doing well with cheap Russian gas to shut down the nuclear ones. Obama, with his collaboration, promoted overthrows and military interventions in Libya, Egypt, Syria or Yemen. Quiet. And what about the European money with which al-Yulani is killing the Druze or Kurdish minorities? Or the one that feeds governments that consent to the genocide of Christians in Africa? Or their complicity with repression, drug trafficking and famine in Venezuela or Cuba? Look, the rules-based order has always been an instrument of power. You only care about the who, not the what.
Pending approval of the Hungarian national plan for Security Action for Europe (SAFE) funding in light of persistent concerns around the allocation of public funding (debate)
Date:
20.01.2026 22:02
| Language: ES
Speeches
Madam President, I am sometimes asked why I intervene in debates where the Hungarian people and Viktor Orbán are attacked. The answer is clear: with this I anticipate the first wall of defense of the Spanish people and of a future government in which VOX, like Orbán, makes the flag of freedom, security and prosperity; where VOX promotes the defense of parents against pressure groups, of borders against invasion, of our culture against violence. surprisedsecurity against crime; and a comprehensive remigration plan is put in place. Look, this debate is an invention, a pure interference in the upcoming elections. And you are very predictable, you want to achieve a change of government in Hungary to place a puppet government aligned with its policies on gender, immigration or freedom of expression. Those who want to exclude Hungary, for political reasons, from receiving Community funds attack the democratic principle and weaken Europe's security. But how are you going to defend the sovereignty of any other State if you attack that of a Member State? Look, Orbán will win and VOX will win. And someday here there will be a majority that will reject these hopes.
Preventing sexual harassment in public institutions: latest revelations and resignations in Spain and institutional responses (debate)
Date:
17.12.2025 16:39
| Language: ES
Speeches
Mr. President, Paco Salazar, Moncloa's advisor, denounced for harassment. The president of the Diputación de Lugo, denounced for harassment. The government delegate in Castilla y León, denounced for harassment. Mayors in Córdoba, Valencia and Malaga, denounced for harassment. All socialists, all undercover and protected for months by the party that claims to defend women. "I do believe you"... but not so much. And they are not isolated cases, it is a complete system. The complaints came to Ferraz and Ferraz buried them. They knew who they were and what they were doing. And instead of acting, they were promoted. The day before yesterday we learned that, in Granada, a former councilor of the Popular Party was assaulted in his house, raped in a group, beheaded and thrown through a ravine. His partner was tortured and killed in a bathtub. His executioners were four criminals, two of them illegal immigrants. It happened three years ago, but we found out the day before yesterday, when the sentence was handed down. Three years of absolute silence. Not a minister, not a banner, not a minute of silence. Not a strong condemnation against the heteropatriarchy, not a single headline in the regime's media. Today we also know in the Canary Islands the conviction of an illegal Moroccan who repeatedly raped and brutally beat a sixty-year-old woman. Nor will they make banners because you do not defend women: You select victims and you choose the culprits. You acquit your own and condemn others. They make the law, they accuse whoever they want and on top of that they want to pass sentence. But look, that's over. As long as you cover up harassers and silence abominable crimes, we will continue to defend every young man and woman who has been raped. Fall whoever falls, until you fall.
The urgent need to combat discrimination in the EU through the horizontal anti-discrimination directive (topical debate)
Date:
17.12.2025 13:53
| Language: ES
Speeches
Mr President, European socialists want to talk about discrimination. Well, come on, let's get to it. Discrimination is prohibiting the most humble from entering cities with their cars because they cannot afford an electric car. Discrimination is shielding Christmas markets for fear of an Islamist attack, but blaming everything on Islamophobia. Discrimination is working half the year for a relentless government by charging you taxes, but weak with criminals. Discrimination is the fact that immigrants have preferential access to public assistance and to officially protected housing. Discrimination is condemning thousands of young people to live sharing a flat with ten strangers while, for example, the socialist Zapatero multiplies his fortune by ninety by becoming a mediator of the narco government in Venezuela. Discrimination is telling women to avoid certain zones or schedules for fear of being raped. Discrimination is taking away workers' money to give it to unions sold to the government. Discrimination is supporting Hamas but arresting young people for sending memes in private chats. Discrimination is that our children do not eat pork at school because the menu has to be halal. Discrimination is watering money to countries that do not protect Christians persecuted and massacred by Islamist terror. Discrimination is that the president of the government congratulates Ramadan, but not Christmas. Discrimination is signing trade agreements that harm our farmers and ranchers. Discrimination is throwing crosses and subsidizing mosques. But look at you, your time is over. The banner of justice and freedom has been raised by patriots across Europe. And we're gonna win.
No text available
Presentation of the European Affordable Housing Plan (debate)
Date:
16.12.2025 15:43
| Language: ES
Answers
No text available
Presentation of the European Affordable Housing Plan (debate)
Date:
16.12.2025 15:41
| Language: ES
Speeches
No text available
Protecting citizens' right to make cash payments and ensuring financial inclusion (debate)
Date:
26.11.2025 21:27
| Language: ES
Speeches
No text available
The situation of Christian communities and religious minorities in Nigeria and the Middle East, and Europe’s responsibility to protect them and guarantee freedom of conscience (topical debate)
Date:
26.11.2025 13:22
| Language: ES
Speeches
No text available
Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded (debate)
Date:
24.11.2025 18:26
| Language: ES
Speeches
No text available