Mr. President, no homeland, no car, no house. In 1990, homeless bureaucrats usurped the power of democratic governments and subordinated their decisions to the agendas of the UN and third countries. We created 28% of the world's product and China did not reach 2%. We are now evenly matched and have a trade deficit of $460 billion. Forty years in Brussels, they have been more concerned with gaining power and planning the lives of businesses and families than with promoting prosperity, property, freedom and economic independence. Without demographics, military capability, energy and raw materials there is no relevant power. We import 57% of energy, but lobbies have criminalised coal, nuclear power, oil and gas. The emissions allowance system has put an end to heavy industry and we now buy European cars produced in Morocco. Their unfair trade agreement policies condemn our producers and immigration subsidies have destroyed stable employment and living wages. Red, green and blue social democracy has devastated Europe. The future is about changing everything.
Reviewing the ETS system to support European competitiveness (topical debate)
Madam President, pay for producing, pay for investing, pay for creating jobs, pay for creating wealth... European companies are plundered by climate fanaticism. Emissions trading – the flagship of the European Green Deal – has become a condemnation of our economy. Because of you, who voted in favour and who continue to vote in favour, our industry is forced to pay for CO.2 which it produces in the production process. You knew what was going to happen, but you didn't care about the consequences. They decided to deindustrialize Europe and put thousands of workers out of work. Automobile factories are closing, there are mass layoffs, relocation of steel and aluminum, the alloys or ceramics industry in Castellón are on their way to disappearing, the port of Algeciras is losing traffic to that of Tangier and energy bills are devouring family economies. Meanwhile, China and India produce more than ever. They grow up and we don't. Of course the whole system has to be reviewed, but to be repealed, with all its European Green Deal. If we want to be competitive, we cannot force our companies and workers to compete with their hands tied behind their backs.
Madam President, I refer to Rules 38, 173 and 207 of the Rules of Procedure. Yesterday the dwindling majority of this Parliament perpetrated a fraud to turn this House into an assembly hall to hand over to Angela Merkel, one of the great leaders of Europe's current weakness, a European Order of Merit that has been pulled out of its sleeve. They suspended the sitting in breach of the Rules of Procedure without a vote in plenary. They did a political act with the plenary half empty and, in order not to be noticed, they began to fill with figures and occupy the seats of our political groups. The dozens of Members who were not here yesterday did so because we wanted to show our rejection, because that was the expression of the popular will, because that is what our voters asked us to do, and not respecting reality is to cover up democracy. In addition, they did so using the ushers, who, embarrassed, no longer knew what to do. The half-empty plenary reflects its European Union; that of complacent politicians, isolated from the real reality, that out there, that which demands respect for democracy and workers.
High time to deliver on the Single Market, providing certainty and predictability for EU businesses and quality jobs (continuation of debate)
Madam President, a European market in which European products systematically compete at a disadvantage with those outside is not a market, it is a condemnation. An internal market altered from Brussels every day by the massive influx of people, goods, services and foreign capital, without control and without complying with what we impose on ours, is not a market, it is the law of the jungle. An internal market where companies devote more resources to complying with absurd regulations and directives to circumvent sanctions instead of innovating, producing and creating jobs is not a market, it is a programmed suicide. A market is exchange, it is cooperation, not creating European champions from above. The methodical market planning promoted by the European Commission, for ideological reasons, such as climate fanaticism, or for economic reasons, such as pressure from powerful groups, has placed the European economy in a state of prostration: the car industry, steel, aluminium, nuclear power or the primary sector devastated by its policies. Free trade agreements such as Mercosur, agreed by popular and socialists, are unfair, distort the principle of fair competition, force businesses to close and send our people to the streets. These agreements make us dependent on third countries that today are allies and tomorrow will be adversaries. And if you don't ask Merkel, she left the European economy dependent on Russian gas. Europe needs work, savings, investment and production and that requires protecting the strategic, securing the essential and concluding trade agreements only where we have real advantages. European nations demand sovereignty, security and prosperity and workers stability, living wages and housing.
Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly (debate)
Mr President, the United Nations must be restarted. They must be restarted for wanting to become a global power at the service of the powerful by imposing an ideological agenda on sovereign states, limiting real democracy and provoking millionaire transfers from the Western middle classes to that conglomerate of agencies, funds, bodies and committees that are not accountable to anyone. And they must be restarted because they have turned their backs on non-negotiable principles that are in their Universal Declaration of Human Rights: the preferential right of parents to educate and choose the education of their children, the family as a natural and fundamental element of the society protected by the State, the right to life, freedom, security, freedom of expression and thought in the face of censorship and the freedom to profess publicly the religion of our parents without being accused of a hate crime or directly murdered for being Christians in Africa. The United Nations must restart and end funding and cooperation with narco-states, terrorist and Islamist groups and with all those cultures that denigrate women in their dignity and proper protection, threatening international peace and security and peace and security on our streets.
No, in the Spanish Parliament I would have much more time to talk and explain things; I only have a minute and a half here. But if what I am talking about is why I am talking about Spain, it is because we are talking about the rule of law, about a Commission report on the rule of law that criticises Spain and then nothing is incorporated into the question of the European Parliament, because they have agreed to it, because the big parties have agreed not to talk about anyone. You can't talk about anyone, but you can talk about Hungary, you can talk about Poland or anyone else. But no, we are not talking about Pedro Sanchez, and I point out that, unfortunately, the government of my country is the most corrupt in Europe right now.
Mr. President, condemned: one; processed: four. The person convicted of corruption is the Attorney General of the State; those prosecuted for corruption are the wife of Pedro Sánchez, the brother of Pedro Sánchez and two secretaries of organization of the Socialist Party, in addition to a brutal case of corruption, such as the illicit extraction of evidence on the same night as the Adamuz railway accident. This is a report on the rule of law in Europe, and there is not a single mention of the most corrupt government in Europe – the socialist government of Pedro Sánchez. The dwindling majority in this Parliament calls it a 'gentlemen's pact' - something that smells rotten in the Brussels swamp. You can't talk about democracy without condemning amnesties and pardons from politicians to politicians for a handful of votes. You cannot talk about freedom of expression and ask to apply the Digital Services Act to censor political discourse on social networks with sanctions and repression. You can't talk about equality and hide racism against white people, attacks on the Christian faith or growing insecurity on the streets of Europe. We cannot talk about justice and regularize hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants, putting the security and financial stability of Spain and all of Europe at risk. You can't talk about good management and use direct funding from Brussels in media and NGOs to compromise editorial independence. Look at: until the European institutions are subject to the same control and accountability mechanisms that apply to the Member States, this will be a paripé.
Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate)
I repeat: Talk to any cop, talk to any prosecutor, talk to any judge. If a correct analysis of the criminal profile of the sex offender is not done, it is not possible to find the solution. If we want to condemn all males for the mere fact of being males and propose measures to condemn males for the mere fact of being males, we will never find the solution. And, therefore, nationality, origin ... and convictions must be analyzed, what they think about women, those convictions that are imported, which consider that women are of lesser dignity than men, of course they must be fought!
Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate)
I don't know what intervention you've heard, but I haven't talked about it. I am concerned about all the rapes of all women and girls, of course. But I am also concerned that Governments hide the nationality and origin of the aggressors and that the media hide the nationality and origin of the aggressors. And there you don't say anything. I am concerned about all the victims and, of course, the highest sentences and permanent imprisonment for the most serious cases constitute a penitentiary policy and an absolutely essential penal policy. There is one thing called "special prevention of punishment": If you know that after six months or two years you are going out, you will commit the crime; If you know that you will never get out of an uncomfortable prison, you will not commit the crime.
Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate)
Madam President, 5 000 sexual herds have raped women and girls in Spain since 2018, and you are proposing gender courses for police and prosecutors. The governments conceal the nationality and origin data of the aggressors, but we know that no less than 50% of the perpetrators were foreigners, multiplying almost by four the propensity to that crime with respect to the Spaniards, and if a good analysis of crime is not made, it is impossible to find the solution. Look, the non-consensual sexual act - and more, if it is exercised with violence or intimidation - has always been a crime. Noelia was not asked for consent to be placed in the juvenile facility where she was raped. Nor did they ask the more than 1,400 girls systematically raped by foreigners in Rotherham. You weren't heard. You propose the model of Sanchez, with which thousands of aggressors were released or saw the penalty reduced and are now on the street stalking their victims. We demand the highest sentences, the most uncomfortable prisons and life imprisonment for the most serious cases - and, of course, if they are foreigners, immediate deportation. In Spain, 5 400 violations were reported last year: fifteen a day, and going up, and you're going to make the same mistake as Pedro Sanchez in Spain. For you they are just statistics to ask for more money, more observatories, more plans and more chiringuitos. For us they are women and girls; They are our women and they are our daughters.
Madam President, after scandals such as the Qatargate or the Moroccogate, instead of prosecuting foreign states and NGOs for bribery of deputies and bureaucrats, the Commission launched this proposal for an anti-corruption directive which, unfortunately, in its final text will become the laundering and laundering of political corruption in countries such as Spain. It is a tepid proposal from the Commission, which in Parliament was slightly improved by our amendments, which proposed to ban amnesties and pardons for corrupt politicians, a widespread practice in the government of Pedro Sánchez, causing grandiose headlines in the popular ranks. But the final text is a very serious political error and an absolute technical disaster, because of that disastrous coalition of people, socialists and progressives that is a drag on Europe, more determined to adopt rules than in the justice and well-being of the people. A document supported by the Spanish socialists on corruption cannot be good. It will only be good for them, for Sánchez's relatives, his organizational secretaries and other socialist and separatist leaders mired in prevarications and embezzlements. A directive sanctifying Sanchez's criminal reform to benefit coup plotters in relation to the crime of embezzlement of public funds, which allows Member States to choose between the typical conduct being for their own profit or that of third parties or harming the interests of the entity is a scam. A directive that allows the crime of prevarication to be reduced to the cases and officials that the government decides - in this case Sánchez, when he has his brother and his candidate for Extremadura prosecuted in this matter - is a betrayal. A directive that does not prohibit pardons of corrupt politicians is nefarious. Today in Moncloa they will toast with champagne and in the street of Genoa they will sell headlines to their media.
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing (debate)
Of course, I'll have to agree with you. Climate policies have imposed a brutal increase in house prices. We defend flats, but affordable flats or cheap flats. They are flats that do not need a home automation or a whole set of things that are designed for you, because, indeed, we have some cojonudos salaries, some salaries that out there do not dream of them, but normal people can not pay for those houses. Therefore, what we need are cheap flats, affordable flats, flats for our young people, so that they can really start a family project.
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing (debate)
Madam President, if the diagnosis is wrong, the treatment is propaganda. A ninety-five page document on the housing market in Europe that does not talk about the main problem: massive and uncontrolled immigration. Demand is skyrocketing and supply annihilated. In Spain, three million people have entered the last five years; three million people who require housing and who have strained the market to infinity. Not only the sale, but particularly the rent, curtailing the legitimate aspirations of young people and adults to have a home in property, as their parents and grandparents had, or a stable, lasting, fruitful lease for owners and tenants. And what about the foreign funds that buy tocateja taking advantage of tax incentives that ordinary Spaniards do not have? And you have created this problem with your roots, your regularizations, your family reunification and your false incomes of insertion. The supply has been wiped out and there is a shortage of housing, but this has not been triggered by any invisible hand. It has been their hands, those of the popular and socialist governments that have ruled for fifty years imposing abusive regulations on the rental market – hijacking the land to speculate from power with the future of young people –, restrictive policies, excess bureaucracy and taxation, and the abandonment of the protected housing policies, which were so successful and which gave home, light and bread to a Spain of owners that now returns to under-housing. Look, the solution is this: re-emigration, national priority in protected housing, freeing up the land and reducing as if there were no charges and taxes tomorrow. Everything else is propaganda because, in addition, those who govern the regions and the municipalities are those on this side of the benches.
Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate)
Madam President, Europe is dying and you are decorating the coffin. Look, in Spain the real wage has stagnated since 1994 – 30 years of popular and socialist governments – and those under 65 are now poorer than in 2007. They have condemned two generations to misery. Farms and livestock holdings and the fishing fleet have been halved since 1990. The industry has disappeared, relocated because it has not a single incentive to stay in Europe. Venture capital does not reach Europe because in Europe the risk is you. They have been more concerned with the sexual practices of managers than with the productivity of companies. Of course, families are drowned in the shopping basket, housing, car, energy. Public employment, public spending, public debt, public deficit and immigration have grown. And all that is paid for by the self-employed, the employer or the worker, who, on the other hand, cannot buy a flat while you keep talking about climate neutral houses. With immigration they lie because all you want is cheap labor that lowers wages. Most immigrants are studying in public schools, doubling the dropout rate, doubling the unemployment rate and, of course, collapsing and taking over welfare and sheltered housing. But we have a plan, which is very simple: repeal the Green Deal, dismantle the welfare state of politicians, lower taxes, massively deport and deregulate as if there were no tomorrow.
Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate)
Mr President, I thought I was coming to a debate promoted by the European People's Party, but there is no one! They didn't come! It's a lie! They have debated the returns of illegal immigrants and have not come! The left, of course, has absolutely boycotted it. Look, since 2015, when Merkel said that "everyone should come, everyone should be here, do not worry", nine million people have entered Europe asking for asylum, most of them without rights, plus another four million Ukrainians under the Temporary Protection Directive. There have been four and a half million illegal crossings – in Spain, more than 400 000 – and there are millions who enter legally through ports and airports and, when they finish their travel or study permits for tourism, they do not return to their countries because you – those who have not come to debate – encourage them to stay and plunder taxpayers to pay them food, clothing, health, education and subsidies of all kinds, even if they do not work, even if they commit crimes, even if they sexually assault women and even if they insult nations. The People's Party is late, as always. It is no longer about facilitating voluntary returns, we need a massive plan of expulsion, deportation and remigration: expulsion of those who have entered Europe illegally, deportation of those who, although legal, commit crimes and remigration of all those who live in Europe devouring aid and subsidies. And we're gonna do it because you guys don't care.
Mr President, Europe is weak and dependent because of you: because they mercilessly implement a green pact, because they opened the doors to mass immigration, closed nuclear ones, signed devastating trade agreements for the primary sector and put the cross and hijab at the same height. They repeat the rule-based order as a Tibetan mantra, but that expression is not part of international law. They talk about sovereignty and pressure legitimate governments by taking European funds away from them. They talk about equality, but Hungary is controlled by hitmen and Sánchez's corrupt government enjoys systematic leniency. They talk about human rights, but they promote censorship in networks. They invoke international legality today, but here, in the Union, the violation of borders, unilateral secession or hasty recognition of political entities has been tolerated. And on top of that we pay the assailants. Turkey has occupied part of Cyprus since 1974. Morocco violates the UN resolutions on Western Sahara or publicly maintains illegitimate aspirations and claims on Spanish land such as the Canary Islands, Ceuta or Melilla. Turkey and Morocco continue to receive billions of European funds. Gibraltar is a Spanish territory illegitimately occupied by the United Kingdom. Quiet. Russia invaded Crimea and you, quietly, because Germany was already doing well with cheap Russian gas to shut down the nuclear ones. Obama, with his collaboration, promoted overthrows and military interventions in Libya, Egypt, Syria or Yemen. Quiet. And what about the European money with which al-Yulani is killing the Druze or Kurdish minorities? Or the one that feeds governments that consent to the genocide of Christians in Africa? Or their complicity with repression, drug trafficking and famine in Venezuela or Cuba? Look, the rules-based order has always been an instrument of power. You only care about the who, not the what.
Pending approval of the Hungarian national plan for Security Action for Europe (SAFE) funding in light of persistent concerns around the allocation of public funding (debate)
Madam President, I am sometimes asked why I intervene in debates where the Hungarian people and Viktor Orbán are attacked. The answer is clear: with this I anticipate the first wall of defense of the Spanish people and of a future government in which VOX, like Orbán, makes the flag of freedom, security and prosperity; where VOX promotes the defense of parents against pressure groups, of borders against invasion, of our culture against violence. surprisedsecurity against crime; and a comprehensive remigration plan is put in place. Look, this debate is an invention, a pure interference in the upcoming elections. And you are very predictable, you want to achieve a change of government in Hungary to place a puppet government aligned with its policies on gender, immigration or freedom of expression. Those who want to exclude Hungary, for political reasons, from receiving Community funds attack the democratic principle and weaken Europe's security. But how are you going to defend the sovereignty of any other State if you attack that of a Member State? Look, Orbán will win and VOX will win. And someday here there will be a majority that will reject these hopes.