| Rank | Name | Country | Group | Speeches | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Lukas Sieper | Germany DEU | Non-attached Members (NI) | 390 |
| 2 |
|
Juan Fernando López Aguilar | Spain ESP | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 354 |
| 3 |
|
Sebastian Tynkkynen | Finland FIN | European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) | 331 |
| 4 |
|
João Oliveira | Portugal PRT | The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL) | 232 |
| 5 |
|
Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis | Lithuania LTU | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 227 |
All Contributions (61)
Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures (debate)
Mr President, I would like to congratulate the rapporteur and highlight the work that has been done during all these years and, above all, during the complicated negotiations, which has made it possible to achieve a balanced compromise that makes it possible to respond to the main national interests. The amendment of the Directive establishes a European regulatory framework that reinforces the polluter pays principle, in line with the Green Deal, and which is a further step for the transport sector in the fight against climate change. This European framework will ensure uniformity of guidelines across the Union, providing legal certainty and ensuring fair competition between European transport undertakings. The agreement does not impose road charging obligations on Member States; these continue to maintain their competence. It also provides the necessary flexibility of instruments to enable States to adapt and respond to their territorial, socio-economic and population distribution particularities, as well as to the needs of their road transport system. Ultimately, the final agreement combines climate commitment with socio-economic and territorial commitment to make further progress towards a green and just transition for all EU territories.
Harmonised EU approach to travel measures (debate)
Mr President, Commissioner, two years ago, the Member States of the European Union began to introduce the first restrictive and containment measures against the COVID-19 virus. Among them, travel restrictions, with the purpose of protecting the health and safety of all. From the outset, we in Parliament's Tourism Working Group have called for uniform and binding measures across the Union to travel safely. From time to time, we bring this matter back to the House and ask again for the Commission's support and impetus. Last autumn, when we thought that the situation was more or less controlled, the new Omicron variant appeared, again creating uncertainty, cancellations of flights and other means of transport, accommodation reservations, as well as stress on European passengers, companies and workers in the tourism sector. We cannot anticipate the emergence, and its effect, of new variants, but what we can do is establish a protocol for joint action from the European institutions. The situation at all times is different, but the ability to react should be immediate and effective, always. The European tourism industry has been exemplary all these months: raised solutions in the most difficult times, such as the European seal of hygienic certification and the same digital COVID certificate; has united, has created, even, clusters sustainable tourism, as it has done in my region, Aragon, models of shared governance that demonstrate that to advance in a more resilient, sustainable and innovative tourism model, a transversal understanding of all parts of the sector is necessary. Let us follow their example, work in unison and put in place European measures that benefit everyone.
Stocktaking of the European Year of Rail (debate)
Mr President, Commissioner, the truth is that I agree with much of your speech. Just one year ago we held a debate on our expectations for the European Year of Rail and today we have the opportunity to take stock of this European initiative and we can say that it has served to convey to citizens the advantages of rail, but also to highlight the challenges that must be overcome to achieve that long-awaited single European railway area. The most tangible initiative of this European year has been Connecting Europe Express, a train that travelled 26 countries, crossed 33 borders and leaves us with many lessons learned, but also a list of tasks to be done to overcome the current lack of interoperability of the trans-European rail network: On its route, this train had to face three different track gauges, use fifty-five locomotives for the different signalling systems and types of electrical voltage and even change drivers several times. Making these challenges clear is only intended to help us renew our commitment to European rail, a commitment that comes at an opportune time to include many of these lessons in the revision of the Trans-European Transport Network Regulation, the proposal for which was presented yesterday by the Commission. But we need your help, Commissioner, and the commitment of the Member States: Public-private partnerships need to be increased to invest in infrastructure, advance projects and meet deadlines; there is a need to create incentives for rail to make it more competitive, more attractive and more affordable; effective use must be made of European funds, Next Generation EU, in complementarity with other European funds, such as the EDF or the ERDF, and a European vision must be advocated. Political will – and cross-border cooperation on projects with high European added value – is needed to boost and continue the implementation of the European Rail Traffic Management System, the European track gauge and the electrification of the network. The European Year of Rail is over, but our commitment must remain intact so that the next Connecting Europe Express serves, as its name suggests, to connect Europeans in an effective and fast way.
EU response to the transport poverty (debate)
Mr President, Commissioner, there is no doubt that greater climate ambition is necessary to combat climate change and that the contribution of the transport sector to reducing emissions is unavoidable. But we must not forget that this transition must be fair and, something very important: must be perceived by European citizens as an opportunity. And that happens because the decarbonization of transport is accompanied by an increase in its competitiveness and the connectivity of all territories. Transport is an international sector and climate commitment must be global. That is why the European Union must be a leader in IMO and ICAO. We must avoid creating CO2 tax havens in third countries where we can continue to pollute without any consequence and to the detriment of many European jobs and companies. We need to accompany this transition with sufficient economic resources to mitigate the possible adverse impacts, especially among the most vulnerable groups and the most affected regions. A social climate fund without conditionalities will be indispensable to ensure the affordability and accessibility of transport, to boost public transport, including in rural areas, and to incentivise the purchase of zero-emission vehicles. Our bet: a socially and territorially responsible green sector in line with the red-hearted Green Deal we stand for.
Presentation of the Court of Auditors' annual report 2020 (debate)
Madam President, Commissioner, President Lehne, the annual report of the Court of Auditors is the basis for the discharge procedure for the European budget. For the Committee on Budgetary Control this report is of the utmost importance, and this should be the case for the whole of Parliament. So I just hope that next year we can have this debate in prime time. But hey, 2020 was a difficult year for everyone, but I would like to highlight the resilience demonstrated by the European institutions during the pandemic, which have been able to adapt quickly to continue fulfilling their mandate while protecting the health of their workers and introducing new and innovative ways of working, some of which have come to stay. The Court of Auditors is an example. It has been able to continue its audit work, in which it has estimated the same overall error rate as in 2019, which shows that things have been done well despite the difficulties. That is why we should not value European policies only with parameters such as the absorption rate, because these policies have a multiannual projection and what is really important is their final result and their long-term impact, not the fixed photo at the end of the year and, much less, the comparison with the previous multiannual financial framework. The year 2020 is a clear example. Simplify bureaucracy, give clear rules, digitize systems: all this will improve that overall error data.
Statute and funding of European political parties and foundations (debate)
Madam President, Commissioner, European political parties have a fundamental role to play in representing the will and diversity of European citizens and bringing them closer to the European institutions. That is why it is important that they have adequate public funding. This funding should be transparent and comply with the principle of sound financial management, as it is part of the general budget of the European Union. For this, clear, simple but strict rules are needed, which help to avoid errors and always under effective controls that allow detecting any abuse. We are pleased that the Authority for Political Parties has developed a set of principles to operationalise the right to campaign in the European elections, as we called for in the resolution of 6 April 2011, because of their importance for the future of the Union. On the other hand, we must ensure that registration and membership criteria allow for democratic, genuine and inclusive representation. Most importantly, European political parties must respect the founding principles of the Union enshrined in the Treaty on European Union and any infringement must be effectively sanctioned in order to prevent undemocratic attitudes from entering the institutions. As draftsman of the opinion of the Committee on Budgetary Control, I am pleased to see that our opinion has been widely taken up.
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022 - all sections (debate)
Madam President, Commissioner Hahn, we all know the great impact that COVID-19 has had on European transport and tourism, sectors that are very important for the proper functioning of our internal market. Transport accounts for around 5% of European GDP and tourism for around 10%, both of which employ millions of Europeans; if that were not enough, the need to move towards a more sustainable model of economy becomes imperative, and that implies a great effort of these sectors in investment and planning at European and national level, so there is no other: the 2022 budget should be the budget for European socio-economic recovery. In transport we have important challenges: developing European corridors, deploying alternative fuels infrastructure, improving passenger transport and freight distribution through multimodality, making infrastructure more resilient to climate change and adapting it to technological developments such as autonomous cars; Luckily, we have the European transport agencies - ERA, EASA and EMSA - whose role is key in this transformative process, and we need their budget to reflect this.
Assessing the Union’s measures for the EU tourism sector as the end of the Summer season nears (debate)
Madam President, Commissioner, Next Generation, the vaccination campaign or the COVID certificate are European achievements of which we can be very proud. These are measures achieved thanks to the collaboration, coordination and good management of the European and national institutions. The EU COVID certificate has achieved its objective of facilitating and incentivising cross-border mobility and, in addition to the health certification seal, has allowed tourism to start recovering to some extent this summer, and, although far from pre-pandemic volumes, it sheds some light on the terrible scenario left by the pandemic. For example, Spain, where almost 80% of the adult population is vaccinated, is already perceived as a safe destination and tourist numbers are increasing. In addition, it has been a success of technological homologation, since the controls of the certificate have worked without setbacks. And I would like to highlight the work being done by the Commission on that roadmap to prepare the sector for the green and digital transition. But we need to do more. You know, Commissioner Breton, that from our Committee on Transport and Tourism we have been asking you for more ambitious actions and that the response to this crisis will be more Europe, just as it has been in the field of health. Despite not having competences in health matters, we have been courageous and have opted for a European Health Union. Therefore, I wonder why they do not consider establishing in the same way a European tourism Union that develops a true European policy that allows for the creation of mechanisms for prevention and early management in the face of possible future crises. Twenty-seven million people work directly or indirectly in the European Union in the tourism sector and have been seriously harmed. What are we waiting for?
EU Road Safety Policy Framework 2021-2030 – Recommendations on next steps towards "Vision Zero" (debate)
Mr President, Commissioner Dalli, every year around 22 700 people die and 120 000 are seriously injured on European roads. The commitment of my S&D Group to the "vision zero" objective is firm, and to achieve this a clear commitment to investment in road safety is needed. Public road users, especially the most vulnerable, must be protected, a responsible attitude at the wheel must be promoted and vehicle safety must be strengthened and, above all, investment in infrastructure must be made. It is key to reducing road mortality. But we also need mobility plans that are committed to more sustainable and safer transport models, such as public transport, and that support active mobility. It is essential to address practices that have intensified with the pandemic, such as the increase in delivery workers, whose safety and health should be guaranteed from a European framework, or the increase in new micromobility devices, such as scooters and electric bicycles, whose use should also be regulated, as well as to provide parking areas that prevent these from hindering the public road. As you can see, this report proposes ambitious measures and, therefore, I hope that the Commission will study it thoroughly.
Decent working and employment conditions in the aviation sector - Impact of the COVID-19 crisis on aviation (debate)
Mr President, Commissioner, COVID-19 has been an unprecedented blow to the aviation sector. We are all aware of this, and it is urgent to work on its recovery. In addition, we have been calling for years for a social agenda for aviation and the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008, which has been open and on stand-by since 2015, something incomprehensible. If the working conditions of the sector were already precarious, with atypical forms of employment, social dumping and unfair competition, after the pandemic they are even more so. We have to act now. The Commission itself acknowledged in 2019 the existence of abusive practices that flout national and European social legislation. And, as the Commissioner has said, in the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, she promised a proposal for revision by the end of this year. We need aviation to recover to ensure the connectivity and cohesion of all European territories, but it must be done in a sustainable and socially responsible way. Decent working conditions must be ensured for all staff. And I would like to ask the Commission to be a real ally on this path and to act accordingly. Responsibility and competitiveness do not have to be at odds.
Connecting Europe Facility - Streamlining measures for the realisation of the TEN-T - Railway safety and signalling: Assessing the state of play of the ERTMS deployment (debate)
Mr President, Commissioner Vălean, I am glad that we can finally finally approve the new Connecting Europe Facility 2021-2027. It has been months of hard work, tough negotiations, and I would like to congratulate the rapporteurs on the good result achieved. The next CEF will continue to boost investment in sustainable infrastructure and the decarbonisation of transport, creating European added value and strengthening the Union's socio-economic and territorial cohesion. The European Green Deal calls for more sustainable, smarter and resilient mobility, and we have made this new CEF responsive and markedly green, by allocating 60% of the budget to projects that support the Union’s climate objectives and by prioritising more sustainable modes of transport, such as rail, inland waterways and motorways of the sea. Transport funding over the next seven years will help improve the mobility of Europeans, making it safer, more innovative and accessible to all, including passengers with reduced mobility. It will also promote multimodality, strengthening the connection with ports and airports. At the same time, it will also improve the efficiency of rail freight transport, with particular emphasis on urban nodes, bottlenecks, missing links and cross-border projects. As you can imagine, this agreement represents an opportunity to advance the development of trans-European networks and corridors, such as the Atlantic and the Mediterranean, which run through Spain, and an important socio-economic boost for our regions, such as my own ⁇ Aragón ⁇ , with the passage of the Cantabrian-Mediterranean corridor. On the other hand, the agreement on the "smart TEN-Ts", which we also approved in this plenary, will help speed up the implementation of the network, thanks to greater clarity and simplicity in authorisation and public procurement procedures, of particular importance for cross-border projects. This will provide legal certainty for developers and will therefore also be an essential private investment attraction mechanism. Finally, the new CEF will emphasise synergies between the transport, energy and digital sectors, which will promote a more efficient cross-sectoral effort in areas such as connected and automated mobility and alternative fuels, and benefit all European citizens.