16
Jun
2026
Watch
Achieving digital sovereignty and resilience for Europe, in light of recent developments affecting access to advanced AI technologies (debate)
Mr President, the European technological sovereignty package means good news, as it is allegedly aimed at strengthening Europe's digital autonomy and resilience. However, the package mainly supports a market‑led expansion of data centres and artificial intelligence infrastructure, risking either market fragmentation between Member States or the shift from third country dependencies, like China or the USA, to dependency on European oligopolies. Please be aware that the problem is not only that Europe takes sufficient chips, cloud and artificial intelligence infrastructure. The political problem is that the Commission risks defining sovereignty mainly as an industrial and market objective, instead of a democratic, social and ecological objective. Our concerns are so far: the balance between technological sovereignty and democratic control; simplification cannot be a synonym for deregulation, as we are seeing in the AI Omnibus; the open-source strategy must not remain symbolic, but seriously taken; and the energy dimension of the package. We will reject any revival of nuclear power‑based solutions. So good intentions in the headlines, but a lot to be improved in the fine print.