Speeches

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, on 25 April in Milan we saw something very serious: The Jewish Brigade was attacked and driven out of the march by left-wing extremists hand in hand with pro-Pal activists. A fact that should make everyone think, because here it is not only anti-Semitism but is yet another demonstration of a now consolidated dynamic and that is that the extreme left tends to attack anyone who does not think like you: Today the Jews, yesterday the police, tomorrow the journalists or the political opponents. It is a spiral of hatred that has been growing for years all over Europe. So the question is simple: Where will all this hate come from? We can no longer afford to minimize. So we are asking the European Union to get out of ambiguity for once, and we are also asking in this House on the left to find the courage to distance itself from those who, in the streets, use violence and undermine freedom of expression.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the pro-Gaza European movement has remained at home in the face of the brutal repression of the Iranian people fighting for freedom. He remained silent in the face of the thousands of black sacks of corpses, the mass executions of the ayatollahs, who are considered untouchable only because they are anti-Zionist and anti-American. No flotilla leaving, no busy high school, no street demonstrations, just a scandalous double morality that puts ideology before the rights of Iranian women and young people. It would be comical, if it were not tragic, to see the self-styled progressives, champions of secularism, who fought Christianity in every way, now coalescing with the worst theocratic dictatorship in the world. The same ones that today open the doors to radical Islam, to the Islamic veil, to sharia, with the intent, very often flagged, also to replace Europeans and to transform Europe into a branch of Tehran. Iran burns in their indifference, but not in ours. Long live the West! Long live democracy! And live freedom!

Look, I don't understand what the Trumpist strategy could be other than to support an opposition that has finally managed to overthrow what has always been a real dictatorship, a real regime. His compatriot was freed thanks to Trump's intervention, thanks to those who finally dared to oppose a regime that exiled 8 million Venezuelan citizens. So what do you still take to the streets to demonstrate in favor of Maduro? Do you realize what you are doing?

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the left is crying, protesting and tearing its clothes not because a people, the Venezuelan people, has been oppressed and hungry, but because it has been freed by a dictator whose only merit, in fact, was the communist faith. Who will miss Maduro? The 8 million Venezuelans forced to flee the country? Certainly not foreign companies, which have suffered a proletarian expropriation of 20 billion dollars, and certainly not that 80% of the population that is reduced to poverty in one of the countries that was among the richest in the world and which is destroyed by failed statist policies and where today, to go to the hospital, you have to bring the gauze from home bought on the black market. For the League, diplomacy is the priority path, as well as the self-determination of peoples, but we firmly condemn anyone who, under the excuse of international law, has tried to justify a ferocious dictatorship only because it is aligned with the worst communist ideology.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, European industry is stuck at the stake, our cities are hostage to the violence perpetrated by illegal immigrants and they are building the largest mosque in Europe out here. But, for the left, the top priority is to launch a European anti-discrimination directive, which, incidentally, has been stalled for 17 years, and does not realize that there is no discrimination more urgent to deal with than the one that Europe is doing to itself and to Europeans. Because, in the name of ideology and political correctness, everything that until yesterday was the foundation of our society, today is openly discriminated against and ghettoized: not only our Christian roots, but also our industry, our agriculture, our cars. The opening to Islamization and the stop to traditional engines are only the most recent examples of this delirium of myopia and self-harm. And, then, if we do not want to succumb, we need an act of courage and responsibility to change this Europe as soon as possible, which is under the illusion of having a future by favouring its competitors and being ashamed of itself.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, do we want to build electric cars? We are subordinate to Beijing. Do we want to build modern defense systems? Beijing must authorize us. Do we want progress, innovation and the future? We depend on Beijing. Because, with the Green Deal and its nefarious industrial policies, this short-sighted and ideological Europe has sold off its economy to its biggest competitor, China. Today we are indignant about the 350 000 jobs lost in the sector alone.automotive due to Chinese competition, restrictions on exports of rare earths; We are alarmed by the 300 billion trade deficit with China flooding us with cheap products, but we have not yet understood that the worst is yet to come, because together with strategic autonomy we risk losing our freedom too. It is time, then, for Europe to back down from its crazy agenda. green, before condemning itself to a future of poverty, decline and geopolitical irrelevance.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the exploitation of motherhood is a form of violence against women and must therefore be fought without goodwill and without hypocrisy. For this reason it must also be fought within the Roma communities, where it is known that motherhood is often used as a laissez-passer to live with impunity of illegal acts, thus allowing certain men to exploit pregnant wives and daughters, sent perhaps to pickpocket in the subways, saving them from justice, thanks to an endless succession of infinite and risky pregnancies. The left, champion of minorities, has always closed its eyes to this scourge, bartering women's rights for submission to political correctness. The League, on the other hand, has always opposed it and today, finally, thanks to the DDL Sicurezza, even pregnant women will be able to face certain forms of detention. This will therefore be a turning point, not only to stop the criminal activities of the Roma, but above all to put an end to a shameful practice, which humiliates motherhood and tramples on women's rights.

(IT) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, radical Islam shows all its ruthless inhumanity in Afghanistan. Women, girls and girls are left to die, buried alive under the rubble, because the Taliban interpretation of the Koran prohibits male rescuers from touching their bodies. Thus, after stripping women of their right to study and work, Islamic extremists also strip them of their right to be saved. Today we are talking about their drama in this House. But with what credibility does Europe care about these women after it has helped to spread Islam, even the fundamentalist one, with absurd initiatives such as the promotion of the Islamic veil or the Koran in Europe? Saman Abbas and all the others remind us how certain abuses today are the sad reality of our home too. So if Europe wants to send a message of hope to the women of Kabul, first condemn obscurantist Islam at home.

Thank you for your question, because I am part of a party, the League, whose Minister of Economy and Finance, Minister Giorgetti, was among the main opponents of a measure that was born with good wishes, which was to protect the house at the end of COVID and to allow Italians to restructure it at the expense of the State through the 110 % bonus, the infamous "superbonus", which proved to be a failure and turned out to be a huge black hole for the state coffers. And it is only thanks to the presence of the Lega in government, with Minister Giorgetti, that today the mess that made us ridiculous in the eyes of other European citizens and also at international level – because it served to rebuild homes for those who had their second home by the sea – is no longer there and we can still have credibility in the use of funds today.

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, the left has a problem with private property, it has shown this in fact by nominating and giving voice to figures such as Ilaria Salis, who have made abusive occupations their political flag and who always defend illegality, as in the case of the opposition to the eviction of Leoncavallo. We are on the side of common sense. Thanks to the new security decree – strongly opposed by the left – we defend private property with a sword, providing for immediate evictions and severe penalties for those who illegally occupy it. Unfortunately, Europe is also a succubus of this radical left and demonstrates this with absurd measures, such as the greenThey will once again penalise homeowners. Europe has not understood that for Italians the house is not a whim or any good, but it is family, it is tradition and it is culture. The house is sacred. And then it is not enough to allocate some funds, however conditioned as always to absurd rules greenBut we must protect property, as political scientist Walter Lippmann said: Without property, there is no freedom.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the European Commission has succeeded in destroying our country's economy, but it has certainly made China's economy rich. In fact, because of electrification and the forced ecological transition, we are now completely dependent on a communist country and certainly not a democratic one. And while we get bogged down in the Green Deal, between constraints, prohibitions and green bureaucracy, China has invaded us with goods produced without respecting any rules, and has stolen our intellectual property and new technological patents. And while he digs, refines and sells at the price he wants the raw materials, that price that today, coincidentally, is rising. Guess who will pay the final bill? We are. Here is the paradox, therefore, served: We want electric cars, wind turbines and batteries, but we refuse to look for or produce the materials needed to build them in Europe. So, we have to understand that it is already too late and we have to reverse the course, otherwise from the green transition we will actually only be left to the green.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, even a child knows that it is not possible to build the roof of a building unless the foundations are first built. Yet this short-sighted and ideological Europe has done so. Defying the laws of common sense and rationality, it imposed its electrical transition by decree, without, however, worrying about setting up an adequate production and distribution network that would guarantee the necessary foundations for the noble objective of environmental sustainability. The result today is before everyone's eyes. The building of the Green Deal It would have already collapsed on itself if coal-fired power plants, Middle Eastern oil, Chinese technology, but above all the enormous efforts of citizens and businesses that today find themselves paying the most expensive bills in the world. You started from ideology and now, just now, you are wondering how to do it in practice, with a resounding delay that will cost us millions more euros. So much to pay the price of your crazy choices are always the same: the citizens I cram and the businesses I shut down.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the cancellation or delay of a flight has serious consequences for people's lives and work. They can ruin a holiday costing sacrifices, make a customer lose or blow up a deal. Today, Europe, with a new regulation, intends to squeeze the rights of travellers, increasing the hours of delay of aircraft needed to be compensated, and thus effectively reducing reimbursements by up to 85%, and lengthening the time for rerouting on other flights. We will oppose any attempt to harm consumers, but in the same way we will continue to fight against absurd rules. green, Like the ones that are taxing our European airlines, which oblige them, and only them, to use a share of ecological fuels five times more expensive than traditional ones, thus effectively benefiting foreign companies. It is time for Europe to finally be on the side of those who make it grow and prosper, protecting its citizens and valuing its businesses.

(IT) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, if you are black and persecuted, there will always be a progressive ready to tear his clothes to welcome you – and so far everything is fine. But if you are white and persecuted, no one in this Parliament cares. The European Union has always prided itself on being at the forefront of anti-racism and anti-discrimination: This is why we have welcomed millions of self-styled refugees from Africa. Yet, we find that there are some discriminations that are not worthy of attention from the European Union. In South Africa, we are witnessing a systemic racial persecution of white citizens, the Afrikaners, who have been living in that land for centuries: land confiscation, threats, assassinations, rapes, with the approval of the South African government, supported by political parties that even praise the murder of the white man. The United States of America has rightly decided to welcome these persecuted families, while from Brussels not a single word, nor any will to save them.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, while Europe is dealing with tariffs, tariffs are already among us. And Trump didn't put them: You have put them in these years, when you have cut off the legs of manufacturing, trade, agriculture, with bureaucratic burdens that cost our companies 154 billion euros every year, so much more than the 100 billion euros in which the future American tariffs have been estimated. You have self-imposed tariffs even when you have launched short-sighted ideological policies such as the Green Deal, stopping the endothermic engines that are only leading Europe to productive desertification and unemployment, depriving families of their purchasing power. So, instead of pointing the finger at those leaders who choose to do the interest of their country, take an example and cancel all those impositions that are leading Europe to industrial and geopolitical suicide. Otherwise, tariffs are yet another convenient scapegoat to cover up the failures of self-defeating policies, unable to give Europe a future: The future he deserves.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, once again I am appalled by a surreal debate in this House, which has been going on for far too long: Taxpayers' money to integrate Roma communities. We are talking about 21 billion euros only between 2014 and 2020. Well, I don't think it takes a plethora of officials or experts to understand that these programs are resounding failures: It is enough to take a tour of the Milanese or Rome subways to witness every day the odious phenomenon of Roma pickpockets, who also claim that stealing is their job. It is enough to take a tour of a Roma camp to see that there is neither legality nor integration there, or to talk to a school leader to understand that the participation of Roma children in school is close to absences of up to 100%. So, here, the money that we use for these programs, let's give it to the police to bring security back to our cities, because to integrate the Roma it is enough that they do only one thing: that they respect the rules, just as all of us citizens do.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, today in this House you want to talk about better wages, the right to health, the right to education, but then I ask you why when the Italian Government asked to be able to invest in order to reduce the cost of labour, to give more weight to wages, to restructure schools, to strengthen the health system, the answer was: No, the stability pact is untouched! Today you radically change your mind and instead give us permission to make debt. Debt, however, not for the benefit of citizens, but at the expense of citizens, putting a debt of €850 billion on their shoulders and on those of future generations: a monstrous figure that will not benefit the community but the car manufacturers, who will finally come out of the crisis to which Europe has condemned them, building some useless and dangerous tank. Enough hypocrisy, we who are always on the side of Italian citizens will never be your accomplices.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, today, the Commission is giving us yet another strategy to relaunch European industry, after having sunk it with its own hands. Yet, in your "Clean Industry" plan, we fail to see any substantive changes: Confirm the insane race to the electric; Just whisper the phrase "technological neutrality" and snubbed the use of nuclear power for civilian purposes. In addition, in the face of the collapse of the electric car, instead of reversing on the Green Deal In a completely inconsistent way, you decide to invest €850 billion to build tanks. Since the tanks were green? And you do it, moreover, without any parliamentary mandate and asking, once again, enormous sacrifices to those citizens who, because of your wicked policies, cannot reach the end of the month. The problem is that while in here we waste time playing Risk, out there China every day blows us market share and every minute lost to save our businesses is a tombstone on European competitiveness.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, once again the Made in Italy It is in danger because of Europe. This Mercosur free trade treaty risks causing incalculable and irreversible damage to our agricultural businesses, but also to our citizens. This agreement will eliminate 92 % of European duties on imports from these countries. Too bad that, in this way, we will find ourselves on the tables produced with low quality standards and hygienic standards lower than European ones. Not only: these foods will be sold at bargain prices, unfairly competing with our producers and could therefore also put the health of our citizens at risk. And, once again, it will be farmers and consumers who will pay the costs of Brussels' nefarious policies.

Do you not think that, before eliminating any duty to make us invade by agricultural products poor in terms of quality, to sell a few more cars, it would be appropriate instead to review our European policies and stimulate our domestic demand and not that of foreign countries?

Mr Pereira, you mentioned European car manufacturers who, thanks to this treaty, could finally sell their cars in South America. But you do not know that today, thanks to short-sighted European policies, these companies no longer sell a car in Europe. Stellantis recorded -36% of car sales in Europe in 2024; 300 000 cars sold: Numbers from the 1950s. And this is because, if in 2025 the sanctions are not eliminated, these car manufacturers, to meet the targets, know what they are already doing? The production of traditional cars is decreasing. The alternative is to buy green certificates from houses that produce cars outside Europe. So maybe these duties instead of putting them, in fact...

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the car industry is dying under the blows of extremism. green The European Commission and those responsible are sitting here in this House. Instead of backtracking, however, you have invented the strategic dialogue onautomotiveIt is nothing but smoke in your eyes and you are the first to be aware of it. Meetings shrouded in fog, far from prying eyes, no public agenda, no precise goal. And how will it end? I'll tell you what: in bar talk, which only serves to clear your conscience, rather than to give concrete answers to one of the most strategic sectors of European industry, which you have brought to your knees. Instead of so many useless conferences and secret meetings, do the one thing that European citizens ask of you: cancel the stop to traditional engines to 2035, put an end to the season of ideology green Let's start with pragmatism.