Need for an adaptation of the EU legal framework on sustainable biofuels (debate)
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, you can write a book: How to destroy the European economy. And you, Commissioner, can perhaps contribute to the drafting of the chapter on the automotive sector. For the first time, the European Union imports more cars from China than it exports: the trade balance between the European Union and China in 2025 is -6 billion – considering that in 2019 it was +23 billion. Exports fell by 34%. Hundreds of thousands of jobs have already been lost and more will be lost in the future. Focusing everything on the electric car is wrong, we depend on China for raw materials. We call for technological neutrality. It is not up to you to decide what kind of car European citizens should buy. The alternative of biofuels is concrete and can be a great European bet. Yet your contribution to decarbonisation of biofuels is limited to only 3%, of which only 1% is of biological origin. All this, moreover, only from 2035. This is an unacceptable and ridiculous proposal, but I think you understand that too, Commissioner. Consumer freedom should not be boycotted, because a just transition cannot be an imposed transition that devastates the European sector, as you are doing.
Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban's adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts
(IT) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, if an Afghan woman is beaten with a stick by her husband until he breaks her bones, and if the same woman manages to prove before a judge that it was he who tanned her like this, this man risks 15 days in prison. However, if the same man abuses his dog, the penalty is five months, five months against 15 days in prison. This is the new code of criminal procedure according to the Taliban: submissive women, beaten women, women forced to wear veils, women forced to burka, women who cannot work, who cannot study, who cannot go out on their own. The Taliban, in the name of Allah and Sharia, systematically deny women's fundamental rights. And how do you respond? You have officially invited the Taliban to Brussels. In short, legitimize those who trample on women and their rights in every way, every day. It is unacceptable. Shame on you! But I turn to you, left-wing feminists: Where did you end up? Hit a beat, if you still exist.
EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (joint debate)
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the crisis is strong: planes on the ground, gasoline to the stars, heavy bills. So what does the European Union do? Puts the turbo: plan to accelerate the Union. And what's inside the piano? Solar panels, social leasing for the diffusion of batteries, in short: more Green Deal. But then you didn't understand anything! Citizens and businesses are asking for more! They ask you for less taxes, less environmental obligations, less bureaucracy. We have asked you to suspend the ETS, we have asked you to derogate from the Stability Pact: You did it for the purchase of weapons, why not for the energy crisis and to help families and businesses? But no! Ursula and Dombrovskis say: First there must be recession. I mean, it's like going to the ER and saying, We'll give medicine to the sick man after he's dead. But you're not well! We must try to prevent the recession; Care should be given sooner! Please don't let this catastrophe happen. Wake up!
Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (debate)
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, this is absurd: The European Commission's report on the situation of fundamental rights is the usual unbalanced ideological document, which looks at reality with a single lens: that of the left; But this time the most extreme. Eight points are devoted to migration policies, denouncing alleged obstruction of NGOs and condemning anti-immigration rhetoric. Nothing about the consequences of out-of-control migration policies. Then there are twenty-one points on racism, highlighting discrimination against Arabs, black Europeans, people of Asian descent and Muslims. There is even talk of Roma who, poor people, suffer the violence of the police. Of course, Islamophobia is mentioned. But there is no trace of anti-Christian hatred, no reference to submissive women – we are talking about fundamental rights – those who are forced to wear Islamic headscarves. Nothing about forced marriages. Nothing about female genital mutilation! You do not defend rights: You choose which rights to defend and which not.
Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, many Christian citizens are regarded as security threats. Do you know where? In Turkey, the country that someone on the left, just a few years ago, wanted inside Europe. The chronicles report a general deterioration of rights in Turkey, with the authorities increasingly and repeatedly targeting Christians and journalists. Numerous foreign correspondents have been arrested or expelled in recent months. Over the past five years, more than 200 Christian workers and their families, a total of 350 people, have been expelled from Turkey, many of whom have lived there for decades. Anti-Christian hate crimes in the country have more than doubled. It is increasingly urgent for the European Union to take action to protect Christians from discrimination and harassment. Christians are the most persecuted religious group in the world. However, this is hardly ever discussed in the European Parliament. It's disgraceful.
Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, there are demonstrations throughout Europe against the Islamic regime in Iran. I don't know if any of you participated in these demonstrations, I do. People are afraid to be photographed, to be put on video. They cover their faces with masks. And you know why? Because, while freely demonstrating in our countries for freedom, they are afraid that relatives still living in Iran may be arrested or even killed simply for being tied to them. So where is Europe? Where is Europe, if the people in our nations are not free to demonstrate, why else are their relatives killed? We must raise our heads and join the battle for freedom.
State violence in Minneapolis and the rule of law in the United States (topical debate)
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, it is absurd, indeed absurd, for the European Parliament to waste time talking about incidents of alleged brutality by ICE agents in the United States. I say this because we should perhaps discuss something else, but here, whenever we talk about law enforcement, it is always done with the acts of alleged violence that they would put in place, never those who instead suffer. You must know that in my country, practically every week, there are agents attacked by antagonists and social centers and left-wing extremists, who turn the squares into war zones. This is the reality that citizens live, but the left even pampers these people. We here should give a clear signal to those who raise their hands against the state: zero tolerance. Instead, I find it shameful that we have here a colleague like Ilaria Salis, who comes from the social centers of the extreme left and who has distinguished herself by acts of violence. This very person here has stood in solidarity with those who devastate our cities and attack the policemen. Instead, we should, first of all, take care of the safety of citizens and give dignity to our agents. Then maybe, in short, if you want to continue to solidarity instead, you will certainly never have our consent. We will always be on the side of law enforcement.
Situation in Venezuela following the extraction of Maduro and the need to ensure a peaceful democratic transition (debate)
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the left is always on the wrong side. In the squares all over Europe we see parades, demonstrations with banners such as "Free Maduro". In short, on the left they defend a dictator who has starved a people and killed and imprisoned opponents. On the other hand, in recent decades we have often seen the left talking positively about communist regimes in Venezuela and Cuba. How courageously do left-wing parties talk to us about respect for human rights and freedom? We have seen painful images of left-wing extremists insulting happy Venezuelans for the fall of Maduro. That is, practically these ridiculous revolutionaries wanted to explain to those who fled Venezuela how to live in their country. On the left, therefore, instead of being happy about the fall of a dictator, they are practically grieving. What can I say? Absolutely pathetic.
Brutal repression against protesters in Iran (debate)
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the Iranian people are begging for help, but Europe does not even find the courage to openly denounce the Islamic regime in Tehran. Your shyness is shameful, you cannot speak the truth, to say that it is an Islamic dictatorship. During the demonstrations, women remove the Islamic veil imposed by the regime. And then I wonder: Where are the left-wing feminists? Where are you? Your silence is embarrassing, it is disgusting. It is also unworthy that the European Union should promote this veil as a symbol of integration on official posters. Millions of people risk the massacre, thousands of opponents, at best, end up in prison. The Iranians demand freedom, they want the fall of the Iranian regime. Ayatollah, they refuse the ShariaThey beg us not to leave them alone. Their battle is and must also be our battle. Europe must have the strength to be the protagonist of their liberation.
UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) (debate)
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, EU policies have helped China to emerge in the field of green technologies. Who said that, Commissioner? Did I say that? No, did any of the Patriots say that? No. any dangerous sovereignists? Not even. Ursula von der Leyen said: After six years of his disastrous leadership, he made this revelation in a letter in which he speaks of a strategy for Europe's competitiveness. In essence, those who gave China dominance over green energy still claim to explain how to revive European industry. And yet it was she, pushed by the fanatics green, to drag the car sector towards the abyss. Now, on the eve of COP 30, we are preparing to impose new unrealistic goals, while countries like China and the United States follow a completely different path. You, the first Commissioner, spoke of reciprocity. Here it is: Not exactly what is happening. After these admissions, von der Leyen should only resign and not continue to lead Europe towards production failure.
Europe’s automotive future – reversing the ban on the sale of combustion cars in the EU (topical debate)
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, Commissioner, you said, as von der Leyen said, that the future is electric. Well, since this is your proxy, I would like to ask you: Do you know how many trucks and trucks have been sold in my country, in Italy, in recent years? In 2023, 72; in 2024, 213; That is, we are talking about about 1 % of the market. These are ridiculous numbers, you'll agree, let's face it. You treated consumers as idiots, thinking that they would easily swallow the obligation of electric cars that, I emphasize, are not sold despite the billions of public money put into incentives. You just have to give people the freedom to choose, the freedom to choose whether to buy a car with gasoline, diesel, electric, biofuels, hybrids, hydrogen, methane. Freedom! You must archive the Green Deal and stop your mania for regulating everything, for imposing everything, for deciding everything. You must have the courage to cancel the ban on the sale of diesel cars and gasoline by 2035. With your choices you only brought redundancies. That's enough! Stop it!
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the Manchester attack is only the latest dramatic episode of violence linked to Islamic extremism. How long will you do nothing in the face of the danger of radical Islam? How long will you be silent in the face of attacks, beatings and intimidation against Jews? How long will Europe submit to those who dream of sharia on our continent? Because, let's be clear, that's exactly what's happening. The European institutions, the left in particular, are dominated by the Islamic communities and close their eyes to the extremism that is spreading ever more strongly, targeting the Jews, but also us Christians. A weak and silent Europe is useless, if we do not defend our values and freedoms, we will end up being trampled on by those who dream of an Islamic Europe. We don't have to bend. I don't want Islamic Europe.
The EU’s role in supporting the recent peace efforts for Gaza and a two-state solution (debate)
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the European Commission, through a spokesperson, has said that it supports the Flotilla mission, acknowledging the humanitarian commitment of activists. I remember that no humanitarian aid was brought and that those who were there did not fill half a truck. It is therefore clear to everyone that there was no intent of humanitarian aid, it was simply a media operation. No children from Gaza were helped by that mission. I also remember subtly that many of the participants in that mission are even opposed to Trump's peace plan, which practically the whole world recognizes favorably. The Commission has supported those who evidently have even more extreme positions than Hamas, people who say "Palestine free from the river to the sea", which means Israel canceled.
Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles (debate)
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, last term you decided to impose the electric car, obviously limiting the consumer choices of citizens. Here, in this warrant try to put a piece of paper. Why? Because you understood that these vehicles have a strong environmental impact, which requires the extraction of critical raw materials for which, look at it, we are dependent on China. So much so that, even today, the rapporteur has spoken of reducing dependence on imports. So what are you doing? Are you changing the rules? But it goes! You decide to do what? To impose new rules and new leaps towards producers, towards demolishers, which will eventually result in higher costs for citizens. This regulation also weakens everyone's freedom to do what they want with their car. Decide to put constraints on selling cars outside the European Union and then put crazy constraints on recycled plastic. Yes, because you decide that a percentage of new cars must have recycled plastic, and of this recycled practice, of this percentage, a part must come not from any good, from any product, but from other vehicles. In other words, sheer madness! We are tired of a European Union that, instead of strengthening its strategic industrial sectors, weakens them and then proposes corrective measures that do not solve anything. I mean, when you realize it, it'll be too late.
Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, a certain left cannot quite put 'Islamic' close to the word 'terrorist'. We have also seen this in this resolution, just as we have seen the images of the bloody church in Damascus, which should shake consciences. Yet some media, some institutions – including European institutions – and left-wing parties have long tried to erase the horror: chilling scenes that are of a clear Islamist matrix. Denying it is simply indecent and I say it by looking at the very people who wanted to deny it. The Syrian Christian community remains, of course, particularly exposed under this transitional Islamic government, with which now, even, some have in mind to cooperate. The real risk is that of having a new caliphate, institutionalized and legitimized by Europe. Enough silence against the continuous persecution of Christians, also because – we must say it clearly, we must say it here – Christians are the most persecuted religious group in the world. The European Union is – as it were – almost afraid to say that these crimes are the result of Islamic extremism. This silence reeks of submission and not only of submission, but also of a shocking retreat on our values. But do you realize? You slap those who ask for help, those who want to profess their faith and those who refuse to bow to Islamism.
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, we are here to discuss US tariffs on European products, but there is only one reality, namely that the real tariffs that scare businesses are those imposed by Europe itself. And the anti-European right does not say so, says one like Mario Draghi, who a few months ago spoke of the long-standing inability of the European Union to face its high regulatory obstacles, much more damaging - he says - for the growth of any tariff that the United States could impose. According to the International Monetary Fund, Europe's internal barriers are equivalent to a 45% tariff for production and a 110% tariff for services. So – among other things, pending a possible agreement with the United States, I cannot fail to mention the arrogant attitude taken in the negotiations – Europe in general has been suffering from weak growth for decades. Instead of helping companies, what has Europe done in recent years? Over the past five years it has produced an impressive number of standards. I give you the numbers: more than 13 000. Do you want to know how many have been produced in the United States in recent years? 3 500. Enough of this oppressive bureaucracy: The real damage is only you.
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, continue to propose ideological and unachievable targets, such as the 90% reduction in emissions by 2040. Yet every day, entire European manufacturing sectors are calling for a change of course. Von der Leyen and Ribera ignore the alarm cry of businesses, workers, families and consumers, who are increasingly affected by your crazy choices. Your Green Deal is estimated to cost around €1 285 billion by 2050. For Italy alone, we are talking about 40 billion euros per year. These expenses for buying new cars, renovating homes or paying green taxes fall entirely on citizens and businesses. We are in the midst of a crisis, and according to trade unions, European industry is losing 500 jobs a day. But you don't care at all. Let's be clear: According to some estimates, in the last ten years, compared with a reduction of ten points in the emissions of the countries of the European Union, the rest of the world has increased them, emissions, by 120, therefore twelve times as much. European citizens must know that this Commission is building a future of degrowth, which only some left-wing fanatics like. I am also saying this to you, Commissioner, who, theoretically, should not like these fanatics of the left.
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, we are tired of those who want to criminalise fishermen and the economic sectors linked to the sea. We would not want the new EU rules on the seas to be driven once again by ideology, by the proliferation of rules and prohibitions and by attempts to target traditional fishing. Consideration should be given to the fact that considerable efforts have already been made to comply with European regulations. The ecological transition cannot be truly sustainable if it does not take into account the sea and the people who depend on it. We therefore want European fisheries to be protected by introducing mirror clauses in all trade agreements to ensure that imports meet the same quality, environmental and social standards as European fishermen. We cannot accept ecological rules that only penalise European operators. We also call for our fishermen to be able to operate without facing unfair competition from third-country vessels, which are often engaged in unsustainable fishing practices. We want to defend national sovereignty also over the seas, together with local traditions and needs, without suffering centralised models imposed by the European Union, which lead to new regulations and additional burdens for sea-related economic activities. In short, we defend our seas and we also defend those who work in our waters.
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, why is the European Union wasting EUR 17 million of public funds on projects on Islam, Islamophobia and sharia? Why do we see among the European funds, given in recent years to universities and associations, so many projects related to the Koran? Here are some of the titles of the funded studies: "Animals in the Philosophy of the Islamic World"; Then there's another one: "Mapping the evolution of Sharia"; or "Understanding past history to address Islamophobia of the present"; and one more: Openings to the inclusion of Muslims in democracies. A real priority for Europe, isn't it? No, because the European institutions use public funds very casually for questionable projects. Moreover, I find this obsession with the Muslim world, which so much resembles shameful propaganda, disconcerting. Why is Europe not defending our values, our culture and our traditions?