Speeches

Madam President, I'm sorry. Commissioner, I'm sorry. After ploughing up European agriculture, which was the illegal signing of an agreement by the European Commission with the Mercosur countries, today we are debating another proposal for a new agreement, this time with India. Today, thousands of farmers, including farmers from my country, Poland, are protesting in front of our headquarters in Strasbourg. There are questions: What kind of Armageddon is the European Commission preparing for the people of Europe today? We know for sure that under this agreement India has unequivocally announced the protection of its agriculture and there is not the slightest chance that the Indian market will open up to agricultural products from the European Union. In the light of the foregoing, the following questions arise. Have the risks arising from India's close cooperation with Russia in the defence sector been taken into account? Has the risk of indirect transfer of security technology been taken into account? Has the need for data protection and cybersecurity been taken into account? Have the risks of infiltration of critical and digital infrastructure been taken into account? How is the risk of price pressure on European small and medium-sized enterprises and industry estimated? How was the risk of regulatory dumping, lower labour and environmental standards estimated? How was the risk of trade imbalances finally investigated? The European Union is opening up the market. India protects agriculture.

Mr President, thank you very much. The 2024 report approved in July this year again highlights significant problems in the form of errors in the management and spending of EU funds. Persistently high error rates, European Union debt, specificities of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We recognise that for RRF expenditure, our audit is limited as payments are made on the basis of the fulfilment of milestones and targets and not directly on the basis of the compliance of spending with EU and national rules. This means that it is not possible to fully confirm the regularity of the final beneficiaries’ expenditure. The best confirmation of the validity of the Court's observations may be the POLITICAL unblocking of funds from the RRP for Poland together with recent reports on the allocation of these funds to dubiously selected beneficiaries. Example: The Swinger Club. It's not a joke. Club for swingers, yachts intended for investments with a non-promising purpose and economic unprofitability. Problems with monitoring expenditure on the climate transition, irregularities in the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines create the risk of further abuses, inefficient spending of public funds and confirm the double standards of the European Commission, which does not adhere to the principle of transparency of public finances, which is elementary in the states of law, which it wants to control itself. The European Court of Auditors’ 2024 report shows that serious challenges remain in relation to the financial management of the European Union.

Mr President, thank you very much. Mr. Commissioner, I'm sorry. The strategy we are discussing here focuses on EU level and cooperation between countries, but less attention is paid to the integration and support of local and national police services, which are often on the frontline. Particular attention should be paid to the role of the police in countering the unrest and dangers exacerbated by mass illegal immigration, which has already been mentioned, caused by people who do not respect public order and social standards in our countries. It should be noted that Member States should have full autonomy in how their services operate. As a former Minister of the Interior of the Republic of Poland, I am proud to have been able to cooperate with fully professional police officers. But I am appalled by the idea of this argument, which is also being made here in this House, that the police in my country should behave as we have seen in the UK, that they should kneel before criminals, that they should tangle in pink skirts on equality marches, that maybe they should start to deal not with catching bandits and criminals, but with putting people in prison who pray under abortion clinics. More common sense and more trust for the Polish police...

Madam President, I'm sorry. On 12 August 2008, on the fifth day of the Russian-Georgian war, the then President of Poland, the late Professor Lech Kaczyński, stood at a rally in Tbilisi to support and show the fighting Georgians that they were not alone. He spoke prophetic words, stressing that it is the duty of the international community to stand in solidarity against Russia's imperial aspirations. He said: "We know very well that today Georgia, tomorrow Ukraine, the day after tomorrow the Baltic States, and then maybe it's time for my country", Poland. Putin never forgot those words. Two years later, the Smolensk massacre took place, in which the President of the Republic of Poland and the 95 most prominent representatives of the Polish nation accompanying him were killed. Today, these words come back to us in a situation where Russian drones appeared over the Polish sky. It is up to the international community, including the European Parliament, to decide whether our response to the Moscow criminal will be the one Lech Kaczyński spoke about, whether we will follow the path of round words, dirty words, such as Ursula von der Leyen's yesterday's words on the green deal, Merkosur or climate madness. We can't stop Putin. It is only a matter of time before Russian drones appear over Berlin, Paris, perhaps Strasbourg. And the fact that Putin's useful idiots are not lacking in this chamber, we have witnessed over the past decades. These empty benches on the left are also proof of this during this debate. Putin's useful idiots are not lacking in this chamber.

Madam President, I'm sorry. Commissioner, I'm sorry. In the shadow of this immense drama of Israel's war against Hamas, in the shadow of the unimaginable suffering of millions of civilians suffering, death, displacement, famine, the lack of access to basic livelihoods for the people of Gaza, the announcements by the Israeli authorities of the opening of the gates of hell show what hatred and unwillingness for reconciliation on the part of those who appeal to the same father, biblical Abraham, leads to. In this tragedy, which is the war between the followers of Judaism and Islam, there continues the immense suffering of Christians who have lived in Israel and Palestine for centuries. Today, their number is rapidly decreasing. The barbaric bombing of the Holy Family Catholic Church in central Gaza by the Israeli army in July this year, as well as attacks by Islamic extremists against Christians, are not only part of the long history of suffering of Christians in the Holy Land, but show that Israel's multi-faith heritage inevitably goes down in history. It is worth recalling here the words of the Christian Patriarchs of Jerusalem, who point out that there will be no peace without a true reference to the sources of Judeo-Christian civilization.

Mr President, thank you very much. Syria has one of the oldest Christian communities in the world, dating back to the first century AD. It is described as the cradle of Christianity. Before the start of the civil war in 2011, Christians made up about 10% of the population. For centuries, they have been a bridge in the Middle East between fighting Muslims and Shia and Sunni factions. They now account for less than 2% and have fallen from one and a half million in 2011 to just 300,000 in 2020, mainly due to war, ongoing persecution, displacement and emigration. Today we are talking about the next installment of Islamic madness, Islamic terrorism. A suicide bomber opened fire at a church mass that housed 350 Christians. I consider it an unimaginable scandal that once again, here in the European Parliament, we are talking about this issue at an hour. 22.00. When we talked about persecuted Christians in Nigeria, the European Parliament also designated the debate as the last one at night, as if we were ashamed to claim Christian brothers here. If it were an imaginary persecution of the LGBT community, it would be a priority debate at nine o'clock in the morning.

Mr President, thank you very much. Perhaps, at the beginning, I can answer my enthusiastic previous speaker from Poland with a Polish proverb: ‘The devil in the chasuble is dressed and the tail rings for the mass.’ The accusations against Poland were a political creation from the very beginning. The actions that were taken by the Polish services were always taken under the supervision of the courts and were directed against people who actually posed a threat to the security of the state, or against people who were suspected of criminal activities. The best example is the Russian GRU spy Pavel Rubtsov, who acted under the cover of a Spanish journalist, and his arrest even caused hysteria, also in this House, and was presented by the left-wing establishment as an example of the PiS government's repression of journalists. This journalist turned out to be a very dangerous spy, and those who defended him once again proved to be useful idiots of Putin. But, ladies and gentlemen, hypocrisy and double standards are evidenced by the fact that the European Union institutions are not responding today to the violation of fundamental rights in Poland by the current Tusk government for violating fundamental elements of democracy, for example for the illegal seizure of public media and the financing of the election campaign in Poland by political centres outside the European Union, the criminal suspension of funding for the largest opposition party. You are hypocrites.

Madam President, I'm sorry. At the end of this debate, I would like to thank you very much for all your comments on my reports in particular. I would also like to thank you very much for the extremely fruitful and substantive cooperation in our committee, CONT, but I would also like to highlight some of the concerns that have arisen here after our debate. Firstly, I would like to note the worrying but growing tendency of the European Commission to encroach on the competences of the Member States. The responsibility for managing national budgets and economic policies lies with individual countries, not with the central EU institutions. The Commission should have an advisory and control role and not a decision-making role on matters that require taking into account the specificities of national interests. Secondly, I would also like to note these worrying situations with regard to the Council of the European Union, which shows a lack of commitment to the budgetary discharge procedure. Finally, I would like to draw attention to the functioning of the European Public Prosecutor's Office, which often raises doubts as to its effectiveness and compliance with the principle of subsidiarity. The European Public Prosecutor’s Office enters into areas that fall within the remit of national legal systems, which can lead to conflicts of competence and unnecessary bureaucracy. Ladies and Gentlemen, at the very end, I would like to thank in a special way my closest collaborators, who are extremely involved in the work preparing my reports. I mean here invaluable Mrs. Kamilla Wrzesiński and Mr. Piotr Zielinski.

Mr President, thank you very much. Mr. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Ladies and Gentlemen, In my discharge reports for the financial year 2023 for institutions such as the European Ombudsman, the Committee of the Regions, the European Data Protection Supervisor, the Economic and Social Committee and the European External Action Service, I highlight some shortcomings related to transparency, employment policy, internal procedures and cybersecurity. However, the most important issue is still the issue of the Council. The topic that I am addressing today is the lack of cooperation, and this has been for many years, on the part of the European Council and the Council in the discharge procedure for the implementation of the budget of the European Union. Here we are confronted with an important issue of transparency, democratic accountability and sound management of public finances. In accordance with Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the European Parliament has full power to grant discharge in respect of the implementation of the Union budget, which is an essential element of democratic scrutiny of the European Union's finances. No matter how different political interests may be, the principle of transparency and accountability should be at the core of every EU institution. Unfortunately, for more than a decade, I have been underlining for more than a decade that we have witnessed a situation in which the European Council and the Council have systematically refused to cooperate with Parliament in this procedure. This is not only a serious procedural problem, but also a lack of respect for the principles of democratic accountability. In order to systematically scrutinise the use of appropriations, Parliament has the right to ask questions, request answers and participate in the discharge procedure. Unfortunately, despite numerous attempts on our part, the Council does not fulfil its transparency obligations, which somehow forces Parliament to postpone and then reject discharge in October. When the Council refused to cooperate in the discharge process for the first time in 2009, this caused serious controversy. Since then, the situation has not improved and the Council has avoided answering fundamental questions related to budget expenditure. In 2024, despite Parliament providing a questionnaire with as many as 90 questions on the implementation of the Council’s budget, the Council again refused to answer. Moreover, it refuses to participate in the hearing, which is a key element of the discharge procedure. We have also not received any responses until now. It is worth noting that for more than 20 years, the European Parliament has consistently granted discharge to all Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies. Today, after many years of cooperation, we are able to see clear differences in the approach to the procedure, especially in the context of the Council's lack of cooperation. This cooperation, which aims to ensure financial accountability, is essential for the effective management of the Union budget. Unfortunately, the Council's unwillingness to cooperate leads to a situation where Parliament does not have full knowledge of budgetary expenditure. I therefore call on the European Council and the Council of the European Union to resume their cooperation with Parliament immediately. This stalemate should be resolved and Parliament should be able to exercise its supervisory role effectively. In this context, I call on the Council to publish a full statement of its expenditure, in particular on travel and representation, in a format accessible to the public, so that every citizen of the Union can have full and transparent access to information on expenditure financed by his or her taxes.

Madam President, I'm sorry. On February 12, at about four o'clock in the morning, the terrorists arrived in the village of Maika, lying on Lake Edward in the northeast of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. First, they pulled 20 people out of the house. When the villagers, awakened by the noise, began to gather in the square, they kidnapped another 50 men, women and children. They tied their hands and took them out of the village. After two days in the nearby Evangelical Baptist Church in Kasanga, 70 restrained bodies were found devoid of heads. These were people who died simply because they believed in Jesus Christ. They did not die, as we have heard from the torn representatives of the left, because the shepherds fought with the farmers for pastures or as a result of the fight for minerals. These people died because they were Christians. And we in Christian France today are debating this subject again under the cover of the night. It's as if we're ashamed to call a thing by its name, and your political correctness doesn't matter. These people died because they were Christians. If we remain silent, the stones will cry out.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, The internal security of the Member States should mean first and foremost the security of the citizens of our countries. What does it look like in practice? I will use the example of my country - Poland. Well, Donald Tusk, delegated by Ursula von der Leyen to the Prime Minister of the Polish Government in order to supposedly restore the rule of law threatened by the governments of Law and Justice, introduced it in a truly spectacular way, for example, today a collaborator of the previous Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki is being held in a mining detention facility, who is being held in handcuffs for interrogations like a very dangerous criminal. The mother of a seriously ill child is being blackmailed - you testify against the previous prime minister, you will be fired. Another example is women, whose crime was that they cooperated with previous ministers or the prime minister, are held in detention without basic hygiene measures. Their physiological needs must be met in the presence of men. They also try to force compromising testimonies on their predecessors. And most interestingly, in recent days, an exceptionally bestial murderer is released from prison, who, trying to kill Jarosław Kaczyński, when he failed to do so, murdered God the spirit of a guilty employee of the parliamentary office, slit the throat of the other and is released three days after the long-time director of Jarosław Kaczyński's office, who was denied a lawyer during interrogations, is apprehended. This is Donald Tusk's rule of law.

Madam President, I'm sorry. Mr. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Let's start with some statistics and numbers. According to Eurostat data, only about one third of those who were ordered to leave the European Union were effectively deported to a third country. Between 2014 and 2023, EU countries issued 4.5 million return orders, of which only 1 million 300 000 led to effective returns. Or perhaps we should now ask ourselves why there are millions of illegal – I stress illegal – immigrants in our European home. Is it not by chance, as has already been said, a policy, an idiotic policy of countries such as Germany – such as Herzlich willkommen Angela Merkel has led to this. Maybe it's time to say apologies to the officers of the Polish Police, the Border Guard for the fact that when they defended our European home against this flood of illegal immigrants, there were also idiotic words from this room: ‘Let them in and you will see who they are.’ Who they are turned out on the streets of Munich and other European cities. Stop this idiotic open-door policy of our European home.

Madam President, thank you very much. Of course, we as the European Union should follow the situation in the Middle East on an ongoing basis, but it is not the Union that should be the author of a long-term agreement, because this is the task of the parties to the conflict. It would be a truism to refer here to the biblical conflict between Isaac and Ismail, sons of one father, Abraham. Today, before our eyes, we see another version of this biblical conflict. Today between Palestinians and Jews. As a Union, we should diplomatically support Israel and the Palestinians in developing the most stable option that respects the rights of both peoples. But above all, we are committed to ensuring the security of our own citizens in our own countries. And the ongoing destabilisation in the Middle East, as always, may result in another influx of illegal immigrants to Europe. Therefore, the task of EU diplomacy should be, first of all, to ensure that aid for the victims of the huge tragedy, it must be admitted, the Palestinians first come from the rich countries of the Gulf region. And for us Europeans, as a sacred principle ordo caritatis first of all, there should be help for Christians who have lived in these countries for thousands of years, but not by bringing them to Europe, but by helping them there on the spot.

Ladies and Gentlemen, When, in 2015, Angela Merkel turned on the fifth gear as part of the implementation of this idiotic multi-cult policy, announcing Herzlich Willkommen and broadly opening the European borders, the then leader of the opposition in Poland, the head of my party Jarosław Kaczyński, warned Europe, referring to examples just in Stockholm, when he said about more than 50 Sharia zones, to which the Swedish police and Swedish law do not enter, there was a scream from Stockholm, because the then Swedish ambassador to Poland intervened, through Strasbourg to Brussels. And Angela Merkel's disciple, Donald Tusk, the then head of the European Council, threatened those who would not accept illegal immigrants with punishments. Ladies and gentlemen, today we are all with the victims of these crimes, we are with the citizens of Sweden. We want our children to return safely from school to their homes. But we cannot defeat this crime if we continue to be paralyzed by political correctness and the fear of naming things. Even in what the Commissioner said, it is impossible to disagree with her, yes, let us strengthen the law. But what have we done with the police? Do you remember the pictures of British policemen kneeling in front of the oppressors who devastated the streets of London? You fired the head of Frontex for supporting the Polish government against admitting illegal immigrants to Poland. Hypocrites say little about you.

Mr President, thank you very much. Ladies and Gentlemen, since June 2021, Poland, Latvia and Lithuania have been experiencing a crisis on their border with Belarus, where tens of thousands of migrants and asylum seekers, mainly from Africa and the Middle East, have tried to enter and are trying to enter the European Union with the support of the Belarusian authorities. Since 2023, Finland has also joined here. Russia is already directly trying to push illegal immigrants into the territory of the European Union without the help of its assistant, Lukashenko. Meanwhile, the new crisis regulation, which is part of the Asylum and Migration Pact, addresses the problem of instrumentalisation of migration only from the perspective of asylum law and only by providing a very limited catalogue of derogations from the existing rules to be applied by Member States attacked in this hybrid way. However, as Europeans, we expect more assertive solutions from the European Union, focusing primarily on the safety of the citizens of the European Union. Such arrangements should include strengthening border infrastructure, building physical barriers and modernising the border system, law enforcement cooperation and adequate support to Europol and Frontex, also using international cooperation tools, including effective cooperation with third countries on return and readmission agreements. Ladies and Gentlemen, I would also like to remind you of the situation that took place when this hybrid war of Putin began. We have witnessed a festival of hypocrisy and cabaret performances in this Chamber. Representatives of not only the left, but also the EPP attacked in a rude and extremely unwise way the then Polish government, the Law and Justice government for building a wall on the Polish-Belarusian border and for protecting the external border of the European Union. Indeed, even the then head of Frontex was dismissed, only because he supported the actions of the Polish government at that time. No one else, like the then leader of the EPP, Donald Tusk himself, thundered that the migrants brought by Lukashenko were poor people who should be allowed in, because they came here in search of a better life. The members of the Civic Platform MEPs, who are sitting in this Chamber today, were mad at the border, verbally attacking officers of the Polish Border Guard, police or army. Today we are witnessing a miracle. No one else, and the same Donald Tusk yesterday from this place says that security is the most important thing and calls for the protection of external borders. Ladies and Gentlemen, his colleague Max Weber from this place congratulates Tusk on the removal of Law and Justice from power and sends Prime Minister Jarosław Kaczyński to retire. Mr. Weber, if it had not been for Prime Minister Jarosław Kaczyński, whose strength and political will stopped this illegal practice, you would have had these hundreds of thousands of migrants today in Berlin, Munich and other German cities. If someone is to retire, you, Ursula von der Leyen, and take Tusk away, thanks to you he already has a high European pension.

Mr President, thank you very much. Ladies and Gentlemen, It is clear that it is the duty of all Member States and the services of the European Union to combat all forms of embezzlement or irregularities related to the spending of EU funds. For me, today an MEP, once a minister in the Law and Justice government, in a government that has spent EU funds in a very transparent and very transparent way, and at the same time has been the subject of constant attacks, just as the Orbán government is being attacked in this House today. I fully agree with the Commissioner when he gives his due recognition here to OLAF officials, I was the head of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, it is obvious that the manifestation of fraud must be combated. But for God's sake, esteemed left-hand side, settle your accounts at least once. The Katargate affair, the affair of former Commissioner Reinders. There has never been a debate in this House about these irregularities, which are attributed to the governments of the so-called European left. However, if the prime minister is Beata Szydło, Mateusz Morawiecki or Victor Orbán, as during today's debate, then there are such charges as if the world was collapsing. I don't know if the Hungarians were eavesdropping on the services here in the European Parliament, I know one thing: there is no balance, there is no decency in this House.

Mr President, thank you very much. At the beginning, of course, full agreement with my honourable previous speaker. What more can I add? Therefore, I would like to draw attention to a completely different element, namely the dangers associated with acts of sabotage against critical infrastructure in the Baltic Sea, as well as those associated with the circumvention of sanctions against Russia by the so-called shadow fleet. I am referring here to these dangers associated mainly with a catastrophe, a potential ecological catastrophe. They concern two marine areas: Baltic and Black Sea. Both of these areas are characterized by the fact that they are closed seas, so if there was a full will to eliminate this fleet of shadows, then control at two sensitive points would be enough. As far as the Baltic Sea is concerned, it is the Danish Straits. The Black Sea is Dardanelles. Ladies and Gentlemen, I am a sailor, not more than a few days ago I spoke with my friend, the captain, who runs one of the largest tankers in the world. Among the officers and captains of the fleet, which is checked several times a day, there is widespread knowledge of the so-called shadow fleet, that they could be eliminated in this way if there was a will. They serve not only Putin and Putin's regime, but also the big oil companies, which circumvent sanctions in this way. So our talk here makes sense as long as it translates.

Mr President, thank you very much. Because I am a Pole, and therefore a European, because I have at heart the fate of my homeland, and thus also the fate of the project of united, sovereign and independent Member States of the European Union. That is why I welcome Donald Trump's words yesterday about the need to restore common sense in both the internal and external politics of the United States. I hope that this common sense policy in the US will also restore common sense in European Union policy, that we will move away as soon as possible from ideological idiocies in areas such as migration, energy security, technological competitiveness, CO2 emissions, and finally from devastating European families of idiotic social engineering and attempts to build a new man and new societies detached from those values that were once the same for both the United States and Europe; values based on Aristotelian logic, natural law, and not the neo-Marxist gibberish financed by Soros.

Commissioner, I'm sorry. Ladies and Gentlemen, The vast majority of my previous speakers expressed their satisfaction and joy at the fall of the Assad regime in Syria. Of course, any fall of a bloody dictator should bring relief and joy. But in this case, what we are seeing today in Damascus, in Aleppo, in other cities and regions of Syria, should the Syrians and we in Europe really feel relief and joy? I will use the words of one of the priests of the Christian churches, a Melkite priest, who said that the feelings accompanying Christians in Syria today are joy and fear. Glad that something new is coming. Fear of chaos. Before the war, Christians, who have been there since the time of Saint Paul, accounted for 7% of the total population. In total, there were about one and a half million of them. Today there are only 300,000 of them left. May the fall of Assad not be the beginning of the end of Christianity in Syria. And may this naivety, which also resounds here in the speeches of the representatives of the left, the naivety that accompanied all this, when the Arab spring was, that democracy will come to the countries of the Middle East and North Africa, not result in the fact that Christianity will disappear from Syria, and we will have Islamists who march at Christmas markets and shout about the right to sharia here in Europe.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Mr. Commissioner, I would like to thank you. It's been talked about here before. We talk a lot, and rightly so, about the anti-Semitism of Islamophobia, but, ladies and gentlemen, we live in a Christian Europe. Today, crime against Christians has increased by more than 44%. In 2023 alone, there were more than a thousand such manifestations of aggression against Christians and religious objects in France. Ladies and Gentlemen, what are we dealing with in this House whenever we talk about the persecution of Christians? I remember the debate, even in the previous legislature, at 10 a.m. 23, about the madmen of Boko Haram who murdered Christians. When I used the term ‘Boko Haram madmen’, the speaker interrupted my speech and said that ‘this is hate speech, you must not call it that’. The darkest under the lighthouse. Today, in Poland ruled by your colleagues, colleagues from the EPP, a Catholic priest without a court sentence has been in prison for six months. His life is in danger. The constitutional minister of this government speaks about the necessity of sawing Catholics. Prosecution proceedings are underway against a charismatic father who runs a Catholic radio station for the sole reason that the station is Catholic. Ladies and Gentlemen, Commissioner, I would like to recall the words of Schuman: "Europe will either be Christian or it will not be at all".

Madam President, thank you very much. Mr. Commissioner, I would like to thank you. Organised crime groups operate across borders. The vast majority of criminal groups in the European Union are composed of members of different nationalities. Organised crime highlights the links between external and internal security. The ECR Group supports the fight against organised crime. The security of the citizens of the European Union is one of our main priorities. For years, we have been working intensively to strengthen border protection, equip law enforcement authorities with the necessary tools, and promote cross-border cooperation. That is why we also support an increase in Frontex's budget, which helps Member States protect the external borders and fight cross-border crime, and thus also supports the fight against organised crime. Frontex should have access to Interpol databases and Eurojust should be able to exchange operational information with Interpol. In addition, the Commission should examine the possibility of excluding the Russian Federation from the Interpol systems. Trafficking in human beings and smuggling of irregular migrants remains a lucrative business for criminal organisations in Europe, in some cases even with the support of third countries. We need to use access to development funds as a means to encourage genuine cooperation in managing migration flows, including facilitating returns and fighting criminal networks. In order to ensure security and prevent abuse of the asylum system, international protection should be granted only to those who are genuinely fleeing persecution and whose lives are at risk. We are in favour of an application for international protection being examined in countries with which applicants have close cultural, religious or geographical ties. In these countries, asylum seekers would await a decision on the possibility of entering Europe after undergoing a thorough security check. Ladies and Gentlemen, as on the occasion of this debate preceding our votes, i.e. the flood situation in countries such as the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Austria, it can be seen that where mad, ideological policies enter areas of common sense, such as the mad climate policy, resulting in the fact that various types of eco-terrorists often prevent investments such as the construction of retention reservoirs or even river regulation with the cooperation of governments. This happened in Poland, for example when it comes to the Oder River, which today floods cities such as Wrocław. And, ladies and gentlemen, the same is true of the mad ideology of illegal immigration. Politics first Herzlich Willkommen, Come on, we're opening up the borders. And if the situation is getting out of control, then we are closing the internal borders against the treaties, what Germany has done now and we are trying to shift this hot potato to countries such as Poland, which was also criticised in this House when we protected the external Polish-Belarusian border from Putin pushing illegal immigrants here. How many voices were voiced here precisely in the name of such an ideological, mad policy attacking my country. If we do not stop this ideological common sense policy, tragedies will continue.