4
Oct
2023
Watch
The proposed extension of glyphosate in the EU (debate)
Mr President-in-Office! Dear Commissioner, Colleagues! The glyphosate controversy spiral is deepening. In a study recently published by the European Food Safety Authority on effects on human, animal and environmental health, there are simply too many data gaps regarding the toxicity of this herbicide. Why is it important to talk about glyphosate? Firstly, because it is one of the most commonly used herbicides in the European Union. Secondly, because of the frequency of its use, there is a wide exposure of the general population, including children. And third, because a large number of independent studies have shown negative health effects of glyphosate. So mainly hormone-related cancers, obesity, diabetes and infertility. In addition to all of the above, glyphosate contamination poses a serious risk to aquatic ecosystems in the European Union. Therefore, as rapporteur for water protection, I welcome the European Parliament's recent broad support for the proposal to amend the Water Directive, which sets higher standards for the control of permitted concentrations of glyphosate in the European Union's rivers, lakes and groundwaters. In the circumstances, I believe that there are too many red warnings about the use of glyphosate. For this reason, too, I intend to closely monitor further parliamentary scrutiny of the Commission’s procedures for its potential approval.