| Rank | Name | Country | Group | Speeches | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Lukas Sieper | Germany DEU | Non-attached Members (NI) | 390 |
| 2 |
|
Juan Fernando López Aguilar | Spain ESP | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 354 |
| 3 |
|
Sebastian Tynkkynen | Finland FIN | European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) | 331 |
| 4 |
|
João Oliveira | Portugal PRT | The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL) | 232 |
| 5 |
|
Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis | Lithuania LTU | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 227 |
All Contributions (129)
Global threats to abortion rights: the possible overturn of abortion rights in the US by the Supreme Court (debate)
You use a language that is unacceptable to cultural people. I do not wish you to insult Poland and the Polish government. You have incomplete knowledge, because abortion is not 100% prohibited in Poland. If you want to speak about Poland first, please gain honest knowledge about it. Comparing people to cattle is, I understand, in communist culture on the ground, in my culture not.
Global threats to abortion rights: the possible overturn of abortion rights in the US by the Supreme Court (debate)
Madam President, I'm sorry. Ladies and Gentlemen, The global threat to the right to abortion – the very title of this debate is absurd, because abortion is not a universal human right and is not covered by any international legislation, on the contrary. The Convention on the Rights of the Child stresses that a child due to immaturity requires special care and care both before and after birth. The child before birth has the right to treatment, to inheritance, and you believe that he has no right to life. As for the Charter of Fundamental Rights, Article 2 states that everyone has the right to life, because this right to life is the fundamental right from which all other rights derive. The Charter of Fundamental Rights, Madam Minister, does not require renewal, as President Macron says, but fulfilment of its provisions, because this right to life is a fundamental value on which the moral and social order is based. Madam President, I would like to draw your attention to the fact that you did not react to the behaviour that took place in the room. You have allowed the insolent use of prohibited symbols. You did not take the floor. I therefore believe that a Member who has not complied with the Rules of Procedure should be punished and that it is absolutely inappropriate to attack, approach and yell at Margarita. It is simply a dictatorship of the mad scattered left. (The speaker agreed to respond to the speech signalled by the blue card)
Binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States (Effort Sharing Regulation) - Land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) - CO2 emission standards for cars and vans (joint debate – Fit for 55 (part 2))
Mr President, thank you very much. Mr. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Mr. Secretary of State! A Europe steeped in economic crisis, rising inflation, the war in Ukraine and all the geopolitical problems we face are certainly affecting the level and potential of the European economy. Therefore, one must ask oneself: whether the Fit for 55 package is capable of addressing all these challenges. Well, the assumptions of this package were created before the war in Ukraine broke out, before Russia attacked Ukraine. Today, Europeans are hit hardest by inflation. Are the restrictive climate policy objectives of the Fit for 55 package therefore able to mitigate and mitigate this situation? Definitely not. Will the left side of the Chamber take responsibility for the deepening energy poverty that will affect Europeans as a result of the solutions introduced? Why do you, who talk so much about social sensitivity, not notice the problems of the poorest people, especially those who use district heating, which these solutions absolutely do not notice.
Ongoing hearings under Article 7(1) TEU regarding Poland and Hungary (debate)
Madam President, I'm sorry. Commissioner, thank you very much. Once again, my homeland, Poland, is under attack in the European Parliament. This time it comes at a particular moment – the Russian aggression against Ukraine. It is Poland, which has welcomed two and a half million refugees, that is most committed to helping the citizens of Ukraine. And even these circumstances did not stop you from conducting another session of hatred and unlawful attack on Poland, which today defends the honor of Europe. You are repeating slogans taken alive from Putin's propaganda. Check your eyes before it's too late! The former US ambassador to Poland had the courage to admit that the West had succumbed to Russian disinformation. Poland has already participated in five Article 7 hearings in the Council. All issues have been clarified. It's time to finish this procedure! In turn, when it comes to blocking funds from the RRP for Poland, it is not only illegal, but in the face of the war in Ukraine and the costs that Poland incurs, keeping the citizens of Ukraine, simply immoral.
Situation in Afghanistan, in particular the situation of women’s rights (debate)
Madam President, I'm sorry. Commissioner, I'm sorry. The Taliban takeover has revoked women's rights in Afghanistan by 20 years. Girls and women cannot participate in social and economic life, they do not have access to education. Girls over the age of 11 are forced into forced marriage, forced labor and sexual abuse. Unfortunately, they also have limited access to health care. In public spaces, they can only move with a male relative. The rigors of clothing are imposed on them. And all this contributes to plunging women into poverty. Afghanistan is currently facing hunger. This hunger particularly affects women. The situation resulting from the war in Ukraine will further aggravate this hunger. Dedicated assistance programs are needed. Women in Afghanistan need to know that the European Union will not leave them. We need to revise our policies and think about how we can help in a real way.
EU Protection of children and young people fleeing the war against Ukraine (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Mothers raped in front of their children, children raped in front of their parents. Mothers taking their children and fleeing from bombed Ukraine to the nearest safe country. This country turned out to be Poland, to which over two and a half million people fled during those days. It was in Poland that they found refuge, in hospitable Polish homes. It was Poland that hugged the war refugees. 160,000 children are already included in the Polish education system. It was Poland that prepared a special law giving entitlement to health, social and educational care. We call, Commissioner, for the creation of a fund that would allow for simplified financing of the costs associated with the reception of war refugees. Let me remind you: We have taken in two and a half million war refugees. What funds have been channelled from the European Union? You are so touched, you say: How terrible it is. Let's get started! It's time to put an end to the politics of appearances. Hard sanctions are needed. There is genocide in Ukraine. Putin's army of barbarians is trampling on basic human rights, while the EU is imposing tough sanctions. But against whom? Against Russia? No, against Poland, which has accepted two and a half million refugees. It is Poland that is illegally blocking funds from the NRRP. We are bent over the fate of the bleeding Ukraine, but nothing happens, ladies and gentlemen, for no reason. Do you remember the annexation of Crimea by the Putin regime in 2014 and the embargo on arms exports to Russia introduced at that time? How many Member States of the European Union have broken them? 10. And the current sanctions are as porous as a sieve, there are none. So Putin's barbarism looks like this: raped women are then ripped apart by Russian barbarians, by Putin's army of barbarians. Ukrainians are dying before our eyes. And this, ladies and gentlemen, is not only Putin's war on Ukraine, but it is a war on the West. This is a war against the whole world. You're talking about human rights. They are violated because the sanctions are, unfortunately, apparent.
The deterioration of the situation of refugees as a consequence of the Russian aggression against Ukraine (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. Commissioner, I'm sorry. I listened attentively to what the Commissioner said, because I know that you were in Poland. You were on the Polish border and you know very well that in just a few days it was Poland that received 1.2 million war refugees. It was Poland that provided them with shelter, and it is primarily to Poland that these war refugees are fleeing. And the involvement of Polish government services, local government, Polish citizens is huge. I am proud to be Polish. It is a pity that you did not have the courage to emphasize this strongly and clearly. But let's look at the European Commission's commitment to helping countries that are helping and welcoming refugees. Well, ladies and gentlemen, this is a help that is really illusory, small, one could say even minimal, not to say none, in the face of a war catastrophe. Concrete help is needed. The funds owed to Poland from the National Recovery Fund, which are unlawfully blocked by the European Commission, should be immediately unblocked. In the face of war and this tragedy that is unfolding before our eyes, it is time to start acting in solidarity. And I am sending this call to the European Commission and to Parliament, which tomorrow wants to vote on a resolution on blocking funds for Poland. Your hypocrisy is enormous.
Citizenship and residence by investment schemes (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. Commissioner, I'm sorry. First of all, I would like to thank the rapporteur for taking up this very important, much-awaited topic. I would like to talk about this issue in the context of the situation outside Poland's eastern border, in the context of the Russian aggression against Ukraine. Every day 100,000 war refugees enter Poland. These are most often women with children who left their homes in a hurry, taking only the necessary things into a handy suitcase. In Poland, they are received hospitably, warmly, they are not held in refugee camps, they benefit from our Polish hospitality. If we told those women who had to flee their homes before the war with their children that there are golden passports in the European Union, golden passports used by Putin's oligarchs to ensure a prosperous, comfortable life, they would certainly be surprised and would probably not believe that this is happening in a free European Union, in which the President tells the European Commission very clearly that EU values are not for sale. Well, they are for sale and have a measurable price. It's time to end this dirty practice and it's time to review which Putin's oligarchs got their passports, got their golden passports, got their golden visas, and it's just high time we did something about it.
Political crisis in Burkina Faso
Madam President, I'm sorry. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Ladies and Gentlemen, The situation in Burkina Faso is dramatic. There is a military junta in power, there is an escalation of violence. Thousands of deaths have been recorded. Last year alone, one and a half million people were internally displaced – they had to leave all their belongings behind. Among internally displaced people, children and women are particularly vulnerable to violence and sexual exploitation. Please note that there is an increase in the criminal practice of trafficking in human beings. This is all happening in Burkina Faso in the 21st century. Women are at risk of extreme poverty. What should I do? In particular, increase financial support and humanitarian aid to address immediate needs. But it is time for the Union to act, to learn from its commitments when it comes to the application of the arms export control and tracing system. This junta has a weapon to which it unfortunately has unlimited access, and hence this escalation of violence.
The EU priorities for the 66th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (continuation of debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Well, climate change is one of the biggest challenges of our time and global warming is causing world hunger, malnutrition, exposure to disease and lack of access to water. What should be our priorities for the session in New York? When we look at these climate changes, we could say that in the European Union they affect women less than on other continents, but in the European Union women also face very serious problems. I will come back to this issue because I think there is a great deal of indifference to this issue in this House. In the European Union, young girls are still at risk of forced marriages with adult men. Focus, ladies, on real problems and let us support women regardless of their age, their status, their social position, their religious denomination. Let's not forget the little girls who are brutally raped.
The Rule of Law and the consequences of the ECJ ruling (debate)
Madam President, I'm sorry. Mr. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Ladies and Gentlemen, So many untruths, and frankly speaking, lies have fallen here, that I will refer only to one, to this legal lie. I would like to inform you that Article 7 has not been activated in relation to Poland and no risk of a breach of this Article by Poland has even been identified. Therefore, the rule of law mechanism was invented because there was no consensus and agreement in the Council, because such premises do not exist in relation to Poland. And it's not right to lie like that. When it comes to the conditionality mechanism and understanding it as an instrument to respect sound spending of public funds – as it was designed and agreed by prime ministers at the July 2020 summit – we are of course in favour of not embezzling EU funds. And Poland is an example of how to spend EU funds decently, solidly, conscientiously. You want the conditionality mechanism to be a political instrument and put undue pressure on the European Commission to make the conditionality mechanism a de facto caricature of the rule of law.
Protection of animals during transport - Protection of animals during transport (Recommendation) (debate)
Madam President, I'm sorry. Ladies and Gentlemen, The EU has one of the highest animal welfare standards in the world. We have regulations, unfortunately there is a lack of effective implementation and enforcement. Therefore, there are many problems. When it comes to the transport of animals, I would like to draw attention to the transport of animals that are unable to be transported – because this is also the case – to overloaded trucks, to the lack of space over the heads of animals, to the lack of water and food, to adequate ventilation, to the beating of animals with sticks and electric rods, to hours of suffering and stress. Millions of animals make their last journey every day in absolutely horrific conditions. This can be remedied. That is why I believe, firstly, that there should be a clear definition of the capacity of animals to be transported, that there should be more control in the area of existing legislation, that transport geolocation systems should be used so that the duration of the journey can actually be determined, that appropriate sweating systems are in place, that the chambers, interiors of vehicles for transporting animals are adapted to those animals, that vehicles are equipped with cameras, that ammonia levels, air access and access to water are measured. Temperature sensors are also necessary. Indeed, there is much we can do if we want to apply the Farm to Fork Strategy in practice. We should do everything to ensure that the slaughter of animals takes place as close as possible to their breeding. Then we will not pollute the air with unnecessary emissions, we will shorten the chains and thus eliminate unnecessary suffering of animals. And the quality of meat from unstressed animals, as we all know, is much better and greater.
Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in the European Union (topical debate)
Madam President, I'm sorry. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Ladies and Gentlemen, The first country in the world to introduce abortion on demand in 1920 was the Soviet Union. In 1933, eugenic abortion became a law in Nazi Germany. After World War II, the communists introduced abortion on demand in all countries of the Eastern Bloc. Today, the left is trying to convince us that access to abortion is a human right. Abortion is not a universal human right and is not covered by any international law. On the contrary. The Convention on the Rights of the Child emphasizes that a child due to immaturity requires special care and care, both before and after birth. Article 2 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights states that ‘everyone has the right to life’. Because this right to life is the fundamental right from which all other rights derive. The Charter of Fundamental Rights does not require a ‘renewal’, as Macron said, but the fulfilment of its provisions. The right to life is a fundamental value on which the moral and social order is based. Today, left-liberal circles are wreaking ideological turmoil. You want abortion on demand, euthanasia, considering it irrelevant that every person has the right to life from conception to natural death. You disregard the fundamental principle that my freedom ends where the other person's freedom begins. The other person in this case is the most vulnerable – the unborn child, who has the right to medical treatment, the right to inherit, but in your opinion does not have the right to life.
Digital Services Act (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Ladies and Gentlemen, First of all, I would like to thank the shadow rapporteurs. Thanks to the good cooperation with the political groups, we have created a draft opinion that improves the situation of women by obliging internet service providers to counter discrimination, combat violence and respond to user signals. We have also highlighted the specific situation of children, who are often victims of abuse online. We have required ISPs to create codes of conduct and take remedial action. Some of our demands were included in the final IMCO report. We have a long way to go, but we have made progress towards protecting children from inappropriate content and women from cyberbullying.
An EU ban on the use of wild animals in circuses (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. Commissioner, thank you very much. More than one million citizens have signed a ban on the use of wild animals in circuses. Wild animals in circuses are forced to perform various so-called circus tricks, the training of which is very painful for them, and the ways in which this is done absolutely do not justify the fact that wild animals are used in circuses. Certainly, the welfare of wild animals is not preserved in circuses. It should definitely be stressed that the use of wild animals in circuses has no value: Neither educational nor cultural. Treating animals in the 21st century so that elephants, zebras, tigers perform some tricks is simply unethical. Enforcing behaviors unnatural to these animals is simply barbaric.
Plans to undermine further fundamental rights in Poland, in particular regarding the standards of the European Convention of Human Rights and Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (debate)
Madam President, I'm sorry. Commissioner, it is with sadness that I have listened to your speech, full of half-truths, lies and manipulation, and I want to protest vigorously. I have no words when the Commissioner, a representative of the European Commission, repeats fake news and untruths. You said that three provinces have created LGBT-free zones in Poland. I ask you to indicate at what address there are zones in Poland where LGBT people are not allowed to enter. Apologize to the local authorities you mentioned. It's far from right. The European Commission should be the guardian of the Treaties, i.e. ensure that competences are not exceeded. And this country goes beyond the competences that are conferred and defined in the Treaties. Health policy, as well as justice, you should know, is an exclusive competence of a Member State. And it is the European Commission, which should be the guardian of the Treaties, that brazenly disregards itself. Let the European Commission deal with Commissioner Dalli, Commissioner for Inequality and Exclusion. There are so many real problems in the European Union. Please stop humiliating Poland and Poles and deal with matters that fall within your competence, such as, for example, speculative trading of emissions. And I'm asking you not to disturb me.
The European Commission Guidelines on inclusive language (topical debate)
Madam President, I'm sorry. Ladies and Gentlemen, Commissioner Dalli has prepared a handbook that provides guidance on how to communicate so that no one feels excluded, while excluding Europe's Christian heritage from communication. It's getting in the way of Christmas. Jesus is disturbing. It disturbs Mary. In the name of equality, Christianity is being destroyed. Commissioner Dalli should therefore be the Commissioner responsible for creating inequality and exclusion. In fact, she became a representative of the ideology of invalidation. It is a devastation of humanism. This is what the European left is doing. This is their dream and this is their goal. And we must be fully aware that the Commission was aware that such a handbook was being created. By cutting yourself off from the Christian roots of Europe, you are denying not only our common European past, but you are also questioning the future. A Europe without Christian values will simply cease to exist. I wish you all a healthy, blessed Christmas.
Combating gender-based violence: cyberviolence (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Ladies and Gentlemen, Now that the world is moving online, especially during the pandemic, it is being followed by various forms of violence: hate speech, trolling, stalking or blackmailing using pornographic content. Cyberbullying can start online, but often ends offline with devastating consequences for victims and their families. Anything that is banned offline should also be banned online. Once again, I stress that I am firmly opposed to violence, but in accordance with the competences conferred by the Treaties and in an ideologically neutral manner. First of all, the report does not talk about violence against women and girls, but uses the non-Treaty concept of gender. For this reason, there may be many inaccuracies in the application of criminal law, which requires far-reaching guarantees from all sides. One of them is the principle of legal certainty. It cannot be achieved by introducing new, blurred concepts. Since Article 83 of the Treaty already mentions computer crime in the catalogue of eurocrimes, the mention of gender-based cyberviolence in the report should be considered as an example of a broad interpretation that constitutes manifest abuse and must be treated only in terms of instrumentalisation of EU criminal law for strictly political purposes. For me personally, it is sad that once again such an important topic as violence against women and girls has been spoiled by unnecessary ideological intrusions.
The International Day of Elimination of Violence Against Women and the State of play on the ratification of the Istanbul Convention (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Ladies and Gentlemen, We need to talk about violence and help break the silence of its victims. One in three women in the world has experienced physical, psychological, economic or sexual abuse. Unfortunately, women and girls in Europe also continue to experience the very specific and cruel violence of genital mutilation, and marriages between underage girls and adult men are also taking place in the European Union. I regret that this issue was not raised either in the Commissioner's speech or in the position of the European Commission. Do you pretend that these cruel crimes do not exist? Cyberviolence is also an increasingly common form of violence, including stalking, hate speech, and the dissemination of pornographic material. Anything that is illegal offline should also be illegal online. According to the data, domestic violence intensified during the pandemic, as victims were forced to remain locked up with their perpetrators. Last year, in my country, Poland, which you are so interested in, an anti-violence law was passed. The new rapid response procedure against perpetrators of domestic violence is to quickly isolate the victim from the perpetrator and order them to leave their home immediately. Take an example from us, let's exchange good practices. Let us have a common cause, and unfortunately we are divided by ideology.
State of the Energy Union (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. Commissioner, thank you very much. The current energy crisis requires us to redefine our energy policy. And the state is this: EU solidarity has been buried along with Nord Stream at the bottom of the Baltic Sea, the rising prices of allowances and their speculative nature – in terms of CO2 allowances – are reducing the competitiveness of European industry. As far as the energy perspective proposed in the "fit for 55" package is concerned, 80 million people are expected to be affected soon by deepened energy poverty, which is already very high. Winter is approaching, we have empty gas storage facilities, which are the result of gas blackmail, which is not mentioned in this House. Finally, a just transition. The biggest costs of the transformation will be borne by countries such as Poland. Is it as part of this just transition that the European Commission unlawfully blocks funds under the RRP?
The first anniversary of the de facto abortion ban in Poland (debate)
Madam President, I'm sorry. Abortion is not, has not been and will never be OK. It is necessary to be aware that those who perform abortions then experience very great suffering, sometimes they are unable to recover from this trauma throughout their lives. Commissioner Dali expressed her concern about the availability of abortion in Poland. Commissioner, what about abortion in Malta? Isn't it the case that Malta is the most restrictive law on this issue in the European Union? Is this why this issue of Malta is not raised in the European Parliament, because there is a left-wing government in Malta and that is why the left-wing majority in the European Parliament is blind not to one but to both eyes? This shows how full you are of hypocrisy. With this debate, you are witnessing the degradation of the essence of the rule of law in the European Union. You think abortion is OK, that's the law? Absolutely not! Please note that abortion is not and has not been a universal human right and is not covered by any legally binding international treaty. You have recently discussed abortion in Texas, so I think that soon it will not only be the parliament of the European Union, but of the whole world. No, you are wrong. How is abortion regulated in international law? The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child states that a child, due to his or her mental and physical immaturity, requires special safeguards and care, including adequate legal protection both before and after birth. Did you know that a child who has not yet been born has the right to inherit? But you think he has no right to life. The Constitutional Tribunal in Poland, acting legally and lawfully, ruled that one of the three grounds for termination of pregnancy was illegal and therefore annulled it. The other two are still functioning. Discuss facts based on truth, not on imaginations, falsehoods, and lies.
The state of play on the submitted RRF recovery plans awaiting approval (debate)
Madam President, I'm sorry. Mr. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Ladies and Gentlemen, Poland submitted and was due to receive an opinion from the European Commission on the National Reconstruction Programme. The European Commission had a certain amount of time to do so. Unfortunately, this commitment has not been fulfilled. The Commissioner speaks of principles: the principles of transparency, fairness and the rule of law. I am sure the Commissioner knows that the rule of law must be in line with the spirit and the letter of the Treaty. I am sure the Commissioner knows that justice is an exclusive competence of the Member States. So why is the European Commission failing to fulfil its responsibilities? Why is the European Commission trying to link the RRP to the conditionality mechanism and force concessions on non-fund related issues? I do not see a link between the approval of the RRP and the judgment of the CJEU in the case of the Disciplinary Chamber. You know that the administration of justice is a competence of a Member State. By its laziness, the Commission is not only violating European law, Commissioner, but is actually showing that it is not about the economy, but about politics, about ideology. You are not a super-government, you are transgressing the law and breaking European law.
The impact of intimate partner violence and custody rights on women and children (debate)
Commissioner, I'm sorry. Mr President, thank you very much. Domestic violence, psychological violence, physical violence, sexual violence is an absolute evil. Last year, an anti-violence law was passed in Poland to quickly isolate the perpetrator of violence from the victim and order the perpetrator to leave the apartment immediately. I think it's important that we exchange good practices. I think it is very important that we respect the law and take into account the competences of the Member States and those of the EU institutions. If we want to talk about violence, and so often the need to protect children from violence is emphasized here, I once again appeal to you: Stop practicing hypocrisy, pay attention to the great problem that still exists in the European Union, which is adult marriage with children. It is time to stop this barbarism in the 21st century. It's time to put an end to this. I call on the Commissioner to address this issue.
Identifying gender-based violence as a new area of crime listed in Article 83(1) TFEU (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Ladies and Gentlemen, At the beginning I want to say very clearly: I am against violence, violence of any kind and in any form, whether mental, physical, economic, sexual, harassment, solicitation both online and offline. I am particularly sensitive to the harm done to women and girls in the European Union. I am thinking of forced marriages and the circumcision of girls. Unfortunately, this practice continues in the European Union. But I also want to make it clear that I am against an instrumental approach to such a serious problem. The fight against violence against women cannot become an instrument of ideological struggle, and this is unfortunately an ideological project. Please note that the notion of gender is not a treaty notion, as are notions such as patriarchy or LGBT. Therefore, there may be many inaccuracies in the application of the law and the lack of clarity in criminal law creates uncertainty and potential abuses. The need for protection from violence. This is a very important challenge. Too serious to impose an ideology under his pretext. The implementation of such concepts is not only not conducive to the prevention of violence, but may even constitute an obstacle to the implementation of effective solutions. Thus, it will have the opposite effect to the declared.
Media freedom and further deterioration of the Rule of law in Poland (debate)
Madam President, I'm sorry. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Once again, there is a debate about Poland – never ending story. The same allegations of the alleged violation of the rule of law continue to be made. How would you not know that only the legal Article 7 Treaty procedure did not even identify a risk of a breach of the rule of law. This resolution is unfair and dishonest towards Poland. You talk so much about the rule of law and democracy, and you exclude our advisor from the resolution. But if you want to discuss it, please. The media in Poland is free and there is no problem with freedom of speech. It is outrageous to call for the suspension of funds from the RRP, making their disbursement conditional on the Prime Minister withdrawing his application to the Constitutional Tribunal. This is undue political pressure. I have no words to condemn further attempts to encroach on the competences of the Member States in the areas of the judiciary, health policy, family protection or education. The reforms we have introduced are based on similar solutions as in other Member States. Unfortunately, the European Parliament, which talks so much about fighting disinformation, creates this disinformation itself – even through this debate – because there are no LGBT-free zones in Poland. And since Mrs. Jourova was in Poland, she should tell us today in which city, on which street there are zones that LGBT people are not allowed to enter. You know this is a lie. Stop teaching Poles how to live, how to vote, whom to choose. It was the Poles who elected the parliamentary majority that formed the government in free democratic elections. It is time for you to finally respect that. Stop unlawfully insulting Poland and Poles.