Votazione al Parlamento europeo

Attuazione della raccomandazione del Consiglio del 30 ottobre 2020 relativa a un ponte verso il lavoro, che rafforza la garanzia per i giovani e sostituisce la raccomandazione del Consiglio del 22 aprile 2013 sull’istituzione di una garanzia per i giovani

Hristo Petrov – Proposta di risoluzione (insieme del testo)
Data: 15.09.2026·Riferimento: A10-0218/2026
Relatore: Hristo Petrov

Risultato complessivo

Approvata
  • 530 A favore
  • 77 Contro
  • 61 Astensione
  • 49 Non ha votato
Stato e procedura

Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.

Votazione del
Ultima fase documentata
Plenaria · (78 giorni fa)
Prossima fase prevista
Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.

Svolgimento della procedura

2025/2184(INI) · INI

Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.

  1. Documentato: Deferimento140 giorni alla fase successiva
  2. Documentato: Esame in commissione182 giorni alla fase successiva
  3. Ultimo documentato: Plenaria78 giorni dall’inizio di questa fase
Attività documentate (13)
  1. Deferimento alla commissione
  2. Relazione della commissione presentata
  3. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  4. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  5. Parere della commissione approvato
  6. Relazione della commissione approvata
  7. Presentazione in plenaria
  8. Presentazione in plenaria
  9. Presentazione in plenaria
  10. Presentazione in plenaria
  11. Presentazione in plenaria
  12. Votazione in plenaria
  13. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
  1. Votazione in plenaria

Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:

Fonti

Dati: EP Open Data API

Cronologia degli emendamenti (10)

Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.

  1. Emendamento 2Approvata

    Paragraph 75

    Presentato da Hristo Petrov · Renew

    75. Recommends the promotion of volunteering opportunities Rimosso: within RYG schemes Aggiunto: for RYG beneficiaries and the creation of a European quality framework for volunteering; emphasises that … vulnerable young people in a supportive and solidarity-focused environment; considers that the Rimosso: integration Aggiunto: promotion of volunteering opportunities Rimosso: into RYG schemes could be achieved by creating synergies with Erasmus+ Aggiunto: for RYG beneficiaries should occur as part of the Erasmus+ programme and its European Solidarity Corps volunteering strand and Rimosso: by ensuring that young people engaged with, or seeking to engage with, RYG schemes Rimosso: are also Aggiunto: should also be made aware of available Aggiunto: quality volunteering opportunities funded under different schemes; takes the view that Rimosso: RYG providers from the volunteering sector Aggiunto: civil society organisations should be supported by adequate resources for the delivery of Aggiunto: quality volunteering opportunities and Rimosso: other RYG offers, ensuring that existing funds for employment and training opportunities are not Rimosso: reallocated; Aggiunto: reallocated and avoiding the replacement of potential quality jobs and traineeships with unpaid volunteering;

  2. Emendamento 3Approvata

    Paragraph 55

    Presentato da Niels Geuking · PPE

    … to urgently increase the funding of the European Child Guarantee, which should Rimosso: have a dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion; Aggiunto: benefit from a substantial dedicated budget; insists that this dedicated budget be anchored in the next MFF and …

  3. Emendamento 4Respinta

    Paragraph 6

    Presentato da Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski · ESN

    … footing with the support provided to NEETs who are registered as unemployed; Aggiunto: stresses that third-country nationals must not receive more favourable treatment under RYG schemes than citizens of the Member State financing and implementing the scheme; rejects quotas, positive discrimination and preferential treatment based on sex, race or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age, sexual orientation or migrant background; stresses that support must be allocated on the basis of objective socio-economic need and willingness to enter employment, education or training;

  4. Emendamento 5Respinta

    Paragraph 52 a (new)

    Presentato da Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík, Marcin Sypniewski +2 · ESN

    Aggiunto: 52a. Calls on the Member States to reduce the fiscal, regulatory and administrative barriers that hinder young people in establishing businesses;

  5. Emendamento 6Respinta

    Paragraph 54

    Presentato da Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski · ESN

    … support all children, parents, families and carers, which should lead to stronger Rimosso: families of all kinds; Aggiunto: families; recognises that the family founded on marriage between a woman and a man is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the state; stresses that this integrated approach must aim to prevent the ‘care cliff’ …

  6. Emendamento 7Respinta

    Paragraph 57 a (new)

    Presentato da Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík, Marcin Sypniewski +2 · ESN

    Aggiunto: 57a. Stresses, however, that the establishment of a European label or degree must neither lead to the harmonisation of curricula, degree-awarding requirements or the governance of higher education institutions, nor result in a reduction in the autonomy of those institutions; recalls that the organisation of education systems and decisions on teaching content fall within the competence of the Member States;

  7. Emendamento 8Respinta

    Paragraph 59

    Presentato da Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski · ESN

    … their communities; notes that for young people in vulnerable situations, the approach Rimosso: must be low threshold, without the need for registration or documentation; Aggiunto: should be low threshold and avoid excessive administrative burdens, while requiring verification of identity, eligibility and lawful residence, in accordance with national law; stresses that persons illegally staying in the territory of a Member State must not be eligible for publicly funded RYG schemes;

  8. Emendamento 9Respinta

    Paragraph 87

    Presentato da Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski +1 · ESN

    … to expand the use and reach of EU funds across all territories; Aggiunto: calls on the Member States to exclude from EU and national funding under RYG schemes any NGO or other organisation that facilitates illegal entry or illegal stay in the EU;

  9. Emendamento 10Respinta

    Paragraph 88

    Presentato da Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski · ESN

    … status, and socio-economic background, as well as the impact of interventions on Rimosso: gender, Aggiunto: sex, disability and disadvantaged areas; Aggiunto: stresses that, for the purposes of data collection and evaluation under RYG schemes, sex means the biological sex of a person, female or male, and must not be replaced by categories based solely on self-declared gender identity; calls on the Commission to provide technical assistance to Member States with …

  10. Emendamento 11Approvata

    Paragraph 12 a (new)

    Presentato da Aodhán Ó Ríordáin, Estelle Ceulemans, Gabriele Bischoff · S&D

    Aggiunto: 12a. Recalls Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s commitment in 2019 to ensuring that every child in the EU at risk of poverty or social exclusion has access to the most basic of rights like healthcare and education, which was followed by the adoption of a Council Recommendation establishing a European Child Guarantee in 2021; stresses that the objectives of the European Child Guarantee cannot be achieved without an ambitious dedicated budget at both EU and national level; reiterates in this context its call for a substantial dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion for the European Child Guarantee; underlines the urgent need for this dedicated budget to be allocated in the next multiannual financial framework in order to respond to the growing challenge of child poverty and social exclusion;

Voto per gruppo politico

Come hanno votato i gruppi politici

Membri

Visualizzati 10 di 717

Posizione di voto
NomePaeseGruppoPosizione di voto
BelgioRenew
A favore
SpagnaS&D
A favore
CroaziaEPP
A favore
ItaliaS&D
A favore
AustriaEPP
A favore
SpagnaS&D
A favore
SlovacchiaRenew
A favore
BulgariaRenew
A favore
GreciaGUE/NGL
A favore
PortogalloS&D
A favore
Mostra altro
Seguici su Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en