Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Aplicación de la Recomendación del Consejo, de 30 de octubre de 2020, relativa a un puente hacia el empleo: refuerzo de la Garantía Juvenil que sustituye la Recomendación del Consejo, de 22 de abril de 2013, sobre el establecimiento de la Garantía Juvenil

Hristo Petrov - Propuesta de Resolución (conjunto del texto)
Fecha: 15.09.2026·Referencia: A10-0218/2026
Ponente: Hristo Petrov

Resultado general

Aprobada
  • 530 A favor
  • 77 En contra
  • 61 Abstención
  • 49 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Pleno · (hace 78 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2025/2184(INI) · INI

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Remisión140 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Examen en comisión182 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Último documentado: Pleno78 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (13)
  1. Remisión a comisión
  2. Presentación del informe en comisión
  3. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  4. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  5. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  6. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  7. Presentación al pleno
  8. Presentación al pleno
  9. Presentación al pleno
  10. Presentación al pleno
  11. Presentación al pleno
  12. Votación en el pleno
  13. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

Historial de enmiendas (10)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 2Aprobada

    Paragraph 75

    Presentada por Hristo Petrov · Renew

    75. Recommends the promotion of volunteering opportunities Eliminado: within RYG schemes Añadido: for RYG beneficiaries and the creation of a European quality framework for volunteering; emphasises that … vulnerable young people in a supportive and solidarity-focused environment; considers that the Eliminado: integration Añadido: promotion of volunteering opportunities Eliminado: into RYG schemes could be achieved by creating synergies with Erasmus+ Añadido: for RYG beneficiaries should occur as part of the Erasmus+ programme and its European Solidarity Corps volunteering strand and Eliminado: by ensuring that young people engaged with, or seeking to engage with, RYG schemes Eliminado: are also Añadido: should also be made aware of available Añadido: quality volunteering opportunities funded under different schemes; takes the view that Eliminado: RYG providers from the volunteering sector Añadido: civil society organisations should be supported by adequate resources for the delivery of Añadido: quality volunteering opportunities and Eliminado: other RYG offers, ensuring that existing funds for employment and training opportunities are not Eliminado: reallocated; Añadido: reallocated and avoiding the replacement of potential quality jobs and traineeships with unpaid volunteering;

  2. Enmienda 3Aprobada

    Paragraph 55

    Presentada por Niels Geuking · PPE

    … to urgently increase the funding of the European Child Guarantee, which should Eliminado: have a dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion; Añadido: benefit from a substantial dedicated budget; insists that this dedicated budget be anchored in the next MFF and …

  3. Enmienda 4Rechazada

    Paragraph 6

    Presentada por Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski · ESN

    … footing with the support provided to NEETs who are registered as unemployed; Añadido: stresses that third-country nationals must not receive more favourable treatment under RYG schemes than citizens of the Member State financing and implementing the scheme; rejects quotas, positive discrimination and preferential treatment based on sex, race or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age, sexual orientation or migrant background; stresses that support must be allocated on the basis of objective socio-economic need and willingness to enter employment, education or training;

  4. Enmienda 5Rechazada

    Paragraph 52 a (new)

    Presentada por Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík, Marcin Sypniewski +2 · ESN

    Añadido: 52a. Calls on the Member States to reduce the fiscal, regulatory and administrative barriers that hinder young people in establishing businesses;

  5. Enmienda 6Rechazada

    Paragraph 54

    Presentada por Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski · ESN

    … support all children, parents, families and carers, which should lead to stronger Eliminado: families of all kinds; Añadido: families; recognises that the family founded on marriage between a woman and a man is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the state; stresses that this integrated approach must aim to prevent the ‘care cliff’ …

  6. Enmienda 7Rechazada

    Paragraph 57 a (new)

    Presentada por Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík, Marcin Sypniewski +2 · ESN

    Añadido: 57a. Stresses, however, that the establishment of a European label or degree must neither lead to the harmonisation of curricula, degree-awarding requirements or the governance of higher education institutions, nor result in a reduction in the autonomy of those institutions; recalls that the organisation of education systems and decisions on teaching content fall within the competence of the Member States;

  7. Enmienda 8Rechazada

    Paragraph 59

    Presentada por Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski · ESN

    … their communities; notes that for young people in vulnerable situations, the approach Eliminado: must be low threshold, without the need for registration or documentation; Añadido: should be low threshold and avoid excessive administrative burdens, while requiring verification of identity, eligibility and lawful residence, in accordance with national law; stresses that persons illegally staying in the territory of a Member State must not be eligible for publicly funded RYG schemes;

  8. Enmienda 9Rechazada

    Paragraph 87

    Presentada por Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski +1 · ESN

    … to expand the use and reach of EU funds across all territories; Añadido: calls on the Member States to exclude from EU and national funding under RYG schemes any NGO or other organisation that facilitates illegal entry or illegal stay in the EU;

  9. Enmienda 10Rechazada

    Paragraph 88

    Presentada por Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski · ESN

    … status, and socio-economic background, as well as the impact of interventions on Eliminado: gender, Añadido: sex, disability and disadvantaged areas; Añadido: stresses that, for the purposes of data collection and evaluation under RYG schemes, sex means the biological sex of a person, female or male, and must not be replaced by categories based solely on self-declared gender identity; calls on the Commission to provide technical assistance to Member States with …

  10. Enmienda 11Aprobada

    Paragraph 12 a (new)

    Presentada por Aodhán Ó Ríordáin, Estelle Ceulemans, Gabriele Bischoff · S&D

    Añadido: 12a. Recalls Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s commitment in 2019 to ensuring that every child in the EU at risk of poverty or social exclusion has access to the most basic of rights like healthcare and education, which was followed by the adoption of a Council Recommendation establishing a European Child Guarantee in 2021; stresses that the objectives of the European Child Guarantee cannot be achieved without an ambitious dedicated budget at both EU and national level; reiterates in this context its call for a substantial dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion for the European Child Guarantee; underlines the urgent need for this dedicated budget to be allocated in the next multiannual financial framework in order to respond to the growing challenge of child poverty and social exclusion;

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 717

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
BélgicaRenew
A favor
EspañaS&D
A favor
CroaciaEPP
A favor
ItaliaS&D
A favor
AustriaEPP
A favor
EspañaS&D
A favor
EslovaquiaRenew
A favor
BulgariaRenew
A favor
GreciaGUE/NGL
A favor
PortugalS&D
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en