Votación en el Parlamento Europeo
Aplicación de la Recomendación del Consejo, de 30 de octubre de 2020, relativa a un puente hacia el empleo: refuerzo de la Garantía Juvenil que sustituye la Recomendación del Consejo, de 22 de abril de 2013, sobre el establecimiento de la Garantía Juvenil
Resultado general
Aprobada- 530 A favor
- 77 En contra
- 61 Abstención
- 49 No votó
Cómo contamos
- Los votos A favor, En contra y Abstención provienen del acta de votación nominal del Parlamento Europeo.
- «No ha votado» se deriva: eurodiputados con mandato el día de la votación para los que no se registró ningún voto. Las abstenciones no cuentan para esto.
- Las correcciones de voto posteriores se muestran pero no cambian el resultado oficial.
- Cada votación (votación global, enmienda, votación parcial) cuenta por separado. Por eso los totales pueden diferir de páginas que cuentan de forma distinta.
Estado y procedimiento
Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.
- Votación celebrada el
- Último paso documentado
- Pleno · (hace 78 días)
- Próximo paso previsto
- La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.
Desarrollo del procedimiento
2025/2184(INI) · INI
Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.
- Documentado: Remisión
- Documentado: Examen en comisión
- Último documentado: Pleno
Actividades documentadas (13)
- Remisión a comisión
- Presentación del informe en comisión
- Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
- Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
- Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
- Aprobación del informe en comisión
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Votación en el pleno
- Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
- Votación en el pleno
Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:
Fuentes
Datos: EP Open Data API
Historial de enmiendas (10)
Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.
- Enmienda 2Aprobada
Paragraph 75
Presentada por Hristo Petrov · Renew
75. Recommends the promotion of volunteering opportunities
Eliminado: within RYG schemesAñadido: for RYG beneficiaries and the creation of a European quality framework for volunteering; emphasises that … vulnerable young people in a supportive and solidarity-focused environment; considers that theEliminado: integrationAñadido: promotion of volunteering opportunitiesEliminado: into RYG schemes could be achieved by creating synergies with Erasmus+Añadido: for RYG beneficiaries should occur as part of the Erasmus+ programme and its European Solidarity Corps volunteering strand andEliminado: by ensuringthat young people engaged with, or seeking to engage with, RYG schemesEliminado: are alsoAñadido: should also be made aware of available Añadido: quality volunteering opportunities funded under different schemes; takes the view thatEliminado: RYG providers from the volunteering sectorAñadido: civil society organisations should be supported by adequate resources for the delivery of Añadido: quality volunteering opportunities andEliminado: otherRYG offers, ensuring that existing funds for employment and training opportunities are notEliminado: reallocated;Añadido: reallocated and avoiding the replacement of potential quality jobs and traineeships with unpaid volunteering; - Enmienda 3Aprobada
Paragraph 55
Presentada por Niels Geuking · PPE
… to urgently increase the funding of the European Child Guarantee, which should
Eliminado: have a dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion;Añadido: benefit from a substantial dedicated budget; insists that this dedicated budget be anchored in the next MFF and … - Enmienda 4Rechazada
Paragraph 6
Presentada por Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski · ESN
… footing with the support provided to NEETs who are registered as unemployed; Añadido: stresses that third-country nationals must not receive more favourable treatment under RYG schemes than citizens of the Member State financing and implementing the scheme; rejects quotas, positive discrimination and preferential treatment based on sex, race or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age, sexual orientation or migrant background; stresses that support must be allocated on the basis of objective socio-economic need and willingness to enter employment, education or training;
- Enmienda 5Rechazada
Paragraph 52 a (new)
Presentada por Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík, Marcin Sypniewski +2 · ESN
Añadido: 52a. Calls on the Member States to reduce the fiscal, regulatory and administrative barriers that hinder young people in establishing businesses;
- Enmienda 6Rechazada
Paragraph 54
Presentada por Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski · ESN
… support all children, parents, families and carers, which should lead to stronger
Eliminado: families of all kinds;Añadido: families; recognises that the family founded on marriage between a woman and a man is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the state; stresses that this integrated approach must aim to prevent the ‘care cliff’ … - Enmienda 7Rechazada
Paragraph 57 a (new)
Presentada por Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík, Marcin Sypniewski +2 · ESN
Añadido: 57a. Stresses, however, that the establishment of a European label or degree must neither lead to the harmonisation of curricula, degree-awarding requirements or the governance of higher education institutions, nor result in a reduction in the autonomy of those institutions; recalls that the organisation of education systems and decisions on teaching content fall within the competence of the Member States;
- Enmienda 8Rechazada
Paragraph 59
Presentada por Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski · ESN
… their communities; notes that for young people in vulnerable situations, the approach
Eliminado: must be low threshold, without the need for registration or documentation;Añadido: should be low threshold and avoid excessive administrative burdens, while requiring verification of identity, eligibility and lawful residence, in accordance with national law; stresses that persons illegally staying in the territory of a Member State must not be eligible for publicly funded RYG schemes; - Enmienda 9Rechazada
Paragraph 87
Presentada por Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski +1 · ESN
… to expand the use and reach of EU funds across all territories; Añadido: calls on the Member States to exclude from EU and national funding under RYG schemes any NGO or other organisation that facilitates illegal entry or illegal stay in the EU;
- Enmienda 10Rechazada
Paragraph 88
Presentada por Stanisław Tyszka, Petr Bystron, Marcin Sypniewski · ESN
… status, and socio-economic background, as well as the impact of interventions on
Eliminado: gender,Añadido: sex, disability and disadvantaged areas; Añadido: stresses that, for the purposes of data collection and evaluation under RYG schemes, sex means the biological sex of a person, female or male, and must not be replaced by categories based solely on self-declared gender identity; calls on the Commission to provide technical assistance to Member States with … - Enmienda 11Aprobada
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Presentada por Aodhán Ó Ríordáin, Estelle Ceulemans, Gabriele Bischoff · S&D
Añadido: 12a. Recalls Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s commitment in 2019 to ensuring that every child in the EU at risk of poverty or social exclusion has access to the most basic of rights like healthcare and education, which was followed by the adoption of a Council Recommendation establishing a European Child Guarantee in 2021; stresses that the objectives of the European Child Guarantee cannot be achieved without an ambitious dedicated budget at both EU and national level; reiterates in this context its call for a substantial dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion for the European Child Guarantee; underlines the urgent need for this dedicated budget to be allocated in the next multiannual financial framework in order to respond to the growing challenge of child poverty and social exclusion;
Voto por grupo político
Cómo votaron los grupos políticos
- 59A favor
- 11En contra
- 5Abstención
- 3No votó
- 125A favor
- 1En contra
- 0Abstención
- 9No votó
- 166A favor
- 7En contra
- 0Abstención
- 11No votó
- 37A favor
- 1En contra
- 2Abstención
- 4No votó
- 46A favor
- 12En contra
- 18Abstención
- 8No votó
- 48A favor
- 21En contra
- 6Abstención
- 9No votó
- 16A favor
- 4En contra
- 6Abstención
- 2No votó
- 3A favor
- 20En contra
- 4Abstención
- 0No votó
- 30A favor
- 0En contra
- 20Abstención
- 3No votó
Miembros
Mostrando 10 de 717
| Nombre | País | Grupo | Posición de voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor |