Votazione al Parlamento europeo

Strategia europea sulla resilienza idrica

Thomas Bajada – Proposta di risoluzione (insieme del testo)
Data: 07.05.2025·Riferimento: A10-0073/2025
Relatore: Thomas Bajada

Risultato complessivo

Approvata
  • 470 A favore
  • 81 Contro
  • 92 Astensione
  • 76 Non ha votato
Stato e procedura

Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.

Votazione del
Ultima fase documentata
Plenaria · (576 giorni fa)
Prossima fase prevista
Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.

Svolgimento della procedura

2024/2104(INI) · INI

Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.

  1. Documentato: Deferimento62 giorni alla fase successiva
  2. Documentato: Esame in commissione77 giorni alla fase successiva
  3. Ultimo documentato: Plenaria576 giorni dall’inizio di questa fase
Attività documentate (17)
  1. Deferimento alla commissione
  2. Relazione della commissione presentata
  3. Parere della commissione presentato
  4. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  5. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  6. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  7. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  8. Parere della commissione approvato
  9. Relazione della commissione approvata
  10. Presentazione in plenaria
  11. Presentazione in plenaria
  12. Presentazione in plenaria
  13. Presentazione in plenaria
  14. Presentazione in plenaria
  15. Discussione in plenaria
  16. Votazione in plenaria
  17. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
  1. Discussione in plenaria
  2. Votazione in plenaria

Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:

Fonti

Dati: EP Open Data API

Di cosa si tratta?

  • È necessario introdurre obiettivi di efficienza idrica e rafforzare l’adattamento climatico
  • Garantire investimenti mirati verso misure essenziali di resilienza idrica
  • Promuovere la digitalizzazione e innovazione del settore
Fonte: EP Press Room — 7 maggio 2025

Cronologia degli emendamenti (12)

Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.

  1. Emendamento 2Approvata

    Paragraph 10 a (new)

    Presentato da Thomas Bajada, Tiemo Wölken, Javi López +104 · Members

    Aggiunto: 10a. Stresses that no one, whether in public places or private establishments, should be denied access to water supplied from a distribution network intended for human consumption, where available;

  2. Emendamento 4Approvata

    Paragraph 42

    Presentato da Thomas Bajada, Peter Liese, Tiemo Wölken +101 · Members

    42. Insists that essential uses of Rimosso: PFAS, for example for Aggiunto: PFAS in critical sectors, such as medical devices, pharmaceuticals and products necessary for the Rimosso: transition to climate neutrality, are not endangered; Aggiunto: twin transition to a climate neutral and digital economy, are not endangered in the context of upcoming legislative and non-legislative proposals; calls on the Commission to propose to phase out forever chemicals (PFAS) Rimosso: in consumer goods with proven concerns for Aggiunto: – starting with consumer goods – linked to harmful effects on human health and the environment, Rimosso: and only Aggiunto: based on scientific evidence, allowing their use where there are Rimosso: safe alternatives; Aggiunto: no safe alternatives; underlines the need to scale up investments and accelerate the research and development of equivalent and safe alternatives;

  3. Emendamento 4Approvata

    Paragraph 42

    Presentato da Thomas Bajada, Peter Liese, Tiemo Wölken +101 · Members

    42. Insists that essential uses of Rimosso: PFAS, for example for Aggiunto: PFAS in critical sectors, such as medical devices, pharmaceuticals and products necessary for the Rimosso: transition to climate neutrality, are not endangered; Aggiunto: twin transition to a climate neutral and digital economy, are not endangered in the context of upcoming legislative and non-legislative proposals; calls on the Commission to propose to phase out forever chemicals (PFAS) Rimosso: in consumer goods with proven concerns for Aggiunto: – starting with consumer goods – linked to harmful effects on human health and the environment, Rimosso: and only Aggiunto: based on scientific evidence, allowing their use where there are Rimosso: safe alternatives; Aggiunto: no safe alternatives; underlines the need to scale up investments and accelerate the research and development of equivalent and safe alternatives;

  4. Emendamento 5Respinta

    Recital R a (new)

    Presentato da Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    Aggiunto: Ra. whereas agriculture is an essential sector in protecting the environment and ensuring the sustainability of ecosystems; whereas farmers play a fundamental role in sustainable water management by maintaining agricultural landscapes, preserving groundwater and actively helping to combat erosion and desertification; whereas farmers need to be supported in the transition to more resilient and water-efficient practices;

  5. Emendamento 6Respinta

    Recital AL a (new)

    Presentato da Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    Aggiunto: ALa. whereas building dams and dykes and cleaning riverbeds are critical interventions in flood risk mitigation;

  6. Emendamento 7Respinta

    Paragraph 14

    Presentato da Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    … covering all water uses, including industry, energy, agriculture, public institutions and households; Aggiunto: calls for further red tape and excessive regulatory burdens to be avoided; underlines the fact that these targets should be ambitious yet adaptable, taking …

  7. Emendamento 8Respinta

    Paragraph 21

    Presentato da Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    … fertilisers efficiently, improve the hydrological cycle, enhance groundwater recharge and adapt to Rimosso: lower water use; considers that technological solutions can also include measures that can increase water absorption, infiltration and retention in agricultural systems, which are important amid increasing occurrences of both drought and heavy rains; Aggiunto: efficient water use; recalls that the average share of water use for irrigation presents significant differences across Member States; stresses that a ‘one size fits all’ approach is not appropriate and would create unnecessary and unjustifiable bureaucratic constraints and red tape in certain regions;

  8. Emendamento 9Respinta

    Paragraph 25 a (new)

    Presentato da Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    Aggiunto: 25a. Underlines that the role of farmers in Europe as the main environmental protectors and guarantors of food sovereignty must be respected, and calls for the elimination of all restrictions on access to water resources that prevent them from carrying out their activities properly; deplores the fact that farmers are often accused of being the main cause of water management problems, whereas, in reality, they are the ones most affected by droughts and other extreme weather events; stresses that farmers should be considered not as consumers but as users of water that is displaced within the hydrological cycle; calls for a balanced approach, based on consultation between agricultural stakeholders, public authorities and civil society, to address water challenges in a fair and pragmatic manner;

  9. Emendamento 10Respinta

    Paragraph 27 a (new)

    Presentato da Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    Aggiunto: 27a. Calls for an increase in water availability in water-stressed areas for all sectors at the local and regional level, ensuring that water basins are interconnected where possible and minimum river flows are respected;

  10. Emendamento 11Respinta

    Paragraph 55 a (new)

    Presentato da Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    Aggiunto: 55a. Requests specific exemptions from the WFD and its ‘daughter’ directives (the Groundwater Directive and the Environmental Quality Standards Directive), as well as the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and the EU Nature Restoration Law1a, in order to allow, among other things, the construction of infrastructure, including that necessary to prevent floods, or the development of large housing projects to address the current housing crisis; stresses that the construction of this infrastructure would have prevented the disaster that occurred in Valencia in October 2024; _______________________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2024 on nature restoration and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/869, OJ L, 2024/1991, 29.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1991/oj.

  11. Emendamento 12Respinta

    Paragraph 55 b (new)

    Presentato da Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    Aggiunto: 55b. Is concerned about the fact that the outermost regions of the European Union face specific challenges in terms of water management, particularly due to the scarcity of water resources, the dilapidation of infrastructure and increased vulnerability to the effects of extreme weather events; urges the Commission and the Member States concerned to prioritise the funding of specific programmes for the renovation of the water infrastructure of the outermost regions, the creation of suitable water reserves, including desalination units, the reuse of treated wastewater, and the collection and storage of rainwater to guarantee equitable access to water;

  12. Emendamento 13Respinta

    Paragraph 62 a (new)

    Presentato da Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    Aggiunto: 62a. Emphasises that controlling the flow of water and water storage for irrigation are the basis of all human activity as they play an essential role in ensuring access to water for people, meeting agricultural needs, and supporting electricity production; underlines that delays to and blocking of water irrigation and retention projects pose serious threats to food security and are detrimental to the general interest;

Voto per gruppo politico

Come hanno votato i gruppi politici

Membri

Visualizzati 10 di 719

Posizione di voto
NomePaeseGruppoPosizione di voto
GermaniaGUE/NGL
A favore
MaltaS&D
A favore
SloveniaEPP
A favore
SpagnaEPP
A favore
BelgioRenew
A favore
GreciaEPP
A favore
LettoniaEPP
A favore
SpagnaEPP
A favore
BelgioS&D
A favore
SpagnaS&D
A favore
Mostra altro
Seguici su Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en