Votazione al Parlamento europeo
Un rinnovato bilancio a lungo termine per l'Unione in un mondo che cambia
Risultato complessivo
Approvata- 317 A favore
- 206 Contro
- 123 Astensione
- 73 Non ha votato
Come contiamo
- I voti Favorevoli, Contrari e Astensione provengono dal verbale di votazione nominale del Parlamento europeo.
- «Non ha votato» è derivato: deputati con mandato nel giorno della votazione per i quali non è stato registrato alcun voto. Le astensioni non contano per questo.
- Le successive correzioni di voto vengono mostrate ma non modificano il risultato ufficiale.
- Ogni votazione (votazione globale, emendamento, votazione parziale) conta separatamente. Per questo i totali possono differire da pagine che contano in modo diverso.
Stato e procedura
Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.
- Votazione del
- Ultima fase documentata
- Plenaria · (567 giorni fa)
- Prossima fase prevista
- Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.
Svolgimento della procedura
2024/2051(INI) · INI
Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.
- Documentato: Deferimento
- Documentato: Esame in commissione
- Ultimo documentato: Plenaria
Attività documentate (45)
- Deferimento alla commissione
- Relazione della commissione presentata
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Emendamenti presentati in commissione
- Emendamenti presentati in commissione
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Relazione della commissione approvata
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
- Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:
Fonti
Dati: EP Open Data API
Di cosa si tratta?
- Il prossimo bilancio pluriennale deve rispecchiare la realtà geopolitica, economica e ambientale ed essere flessibile
- La spesa dei Paesi UE non può basarsi sul del “piano nazionale unico”
- I mega-fondi che accorpano i programmi esistenti sono inadeguati
Cronologia degli emendamenti (12)
Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.
- Emendamento 7Respinta
Paragraph 37 a (new)
Presentato da Kris Van Dijck, Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans +104 · Members
Aggiunto: 37a. Believes that the continued presence of nuclear technology in the Union and the continued interest in the use of nuclear power as part of the national energy mix in some Member States, which currently means that about 22.8% of electricity generation in the Union stems from nuclear production, requires that the Union be a world leader with regard to knowledge of, R&D into and expertise on these technologies, including on their safety, through the Euratom Research and Training Programme and the continued involvement of the Union in the ITER project; stresses that the budgets for these programmes should reflect the new realities of the significant development towards the commercialisation of fusion technology;
- Emendamento 8Respinta
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Presentato da Julien Sanchez, Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans +79 · Members
Aggiunto: 11a. Opposes the adoption of new own resources, given that the purchasing power of Union citizens is already in a critical situation; calls for better management of EU funds and genuine budgetary control in order to create substantial fiscal room for manoeuvre, including through the implementation of the numerous recommendations made by the European Court of Auditors;
- Emendamento 9Respinta
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Presentato da Tamás Deutsch, Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans +79 · Members
Aggiunto: 28a. Emphasises that food security and food sovereignty are vital components of strategic autonomy and that the next MFF must continue to support the Union’s farming and fisheries sectors, including small and young farmers and fishers, and help the sectors produce food in an effective, competitive and sustainable way; highlights the crucial role of the common agricultural policy (CAP) in increasing productivity through technical progress, ensuring a fair standard of living for farmers and guaranteeing food security; calls for the maintenance of the two pillar structure of the CAP and for independent and adequate funding for the CAP in the next MFF;
- Emendamento 10Respinta
Paragraph 51 a (new)
Presentato da Julien Sanchez, Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans +79 · Members
Aggiunto: 51a. Recalls that, in accordance with Article 168 TFEU, health policy falls within the competence of the Member States, particularly with regard to the organisation and delivery of health services; considers that the next MFF should not serve as a pretext for a recentralisation of competences in the area of health; considers that the Union’s role must be limited to coordination, support and complementarity, and that any EU funding in this field must strictly respect the division of competences laid down in the Treaties;
- Emendamento 11Respinta
Paragraph 54 a (new)
Presentato da Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans, Jordan Bardella +79 · Members
Aggiunto: 54a. Stresses the failure of European policies to prevent migratory flows and human trafficking; reiterates its concerns regarding the role played by instruments such as the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund in managing the effects of the refugee and migrant crisis; underlines that appropriations should be reallocated to repatriation and border security;
- Emendamento 12Respinta
Paragraph 64 a (new)
Presentato da Tamás Deutsch, Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans +79 · Members
Aggiunto: 64a. Stresses that the next MFF should not provide any financial support to organisations promoting radical Islam in Europe;
- Emendamento 13Respinta
Paragraph 70 a (new)
Presentato da Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans, Jordan Bardella +79 · Members
Aggiunto: 70a. Draws attention to the fact that, in recent years, the Commission has been funding an increasing number of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) that are engaged in political activities, as the European Court of Auditors’ report has also highlighted, while the funding of NGOs has been carried out in a non-transparent manner; highlights the fact that this practice strongly contradicts the values of a genuine civil society; considers, therefore, that it is important for the requirements of transparency to be fully applied to contracts concluded by the Commission and all other EU institutions; demands that the funding of organisations that engage in political activities should be carefully scrutinised to avoid distorting European democracy and thus undermining voters’ faith in democratic values;
- Emendamento 14Respinta
Paragraph 72 a (new)
Presentato da Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans, Jordan Bardella +79 · Members
Aggiunto: 72a. Demands that securing the EU’s external borders must be a top priority in the post-2027 budget, with a focus on preventing illegal migration, stopping the activities of human trafficking networks and putting in place an effective return policy; calls for stronger financial and operational support for frontline Member States’ border protection efforts, particularly those most affected by migratory pressures, while ensuring that border security remains the sovereign responsibility of national authorities;
- Emendamento 15Respinta
Paragraph 72 b (new)
Presentato da Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans, Jordan Bardella +79 · Members
Aggiunto: 72b. Calls for the mobilisation of substantial Union funds and means to support Member States in reinforcing external border protection capabilities and infrastructure such as walls, means of surveillance, including aerial surveillance, and equipment; proposes that costs be covered to build and maintain physical border barriers that are an essential part of a comprehensive migration policy, which should aim at detaining asylum seekers at the external borders, preventing illegal entry and stopping human smuggling and hybrid attacks;
- Emendamento 16Respinta
Paragraph 76 a (new)
Presentato da Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans, Jordan Bardella +79 · Members
Aggiunto: 76a. Recalls with grave concern that the former Commissioner entrusted with negotiating the anti-corruption framework and the rule of law with Member States over the preceding five years is currently the subject of a criminal investigation for alleged money laundering and other corruption-related offences; condemns in the strongest terms the instrumentalisation of rule of law conditionality for politically motivated ideological assaults on Member States; emphasises that in these assaults, the Commission has demonstrably utilised and financed NGOs and left-leaning media outlets through Union funds; consequently demands an immediate cessation of these attacks against national sovereignty, which are perpetrated through the misuse of the rule of law conditionality;
- Emendamento 17Respinta
Paragraph 76 b (new)
Presentato da Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans, Jordan Bardella +79 · Members
Aggiunto: 76b. Expresses its firm opposition to the perpetuation of the current ‘rule of law conditionality system’ and, furthermore, to any proposals aimed at its reinforcement or expansion; recalls that any initiative seeking to strengthen or extend such conditionalities undermines the crucial objectives of simplification and enhanced competitiveness by imposing greater complexities and protracted delays on Member States seeking access to vital funding;
- Emendamento 18Respinta
Paragraph 125 a (new)
Presentato da Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans, Jordan Bardella +79 · Members
Aggiunto: 125a. Recalls that there is no need to introduce new own resources, since the current own resources system is completely capable of delivering the amounts needed;
Voto per gruppo politico
Come hanno votato i gruppi politici
- 5A favore
- 18Contro
- 0Astensione
- 7Non ha votato
- 139A favore
- 13Contro
- 16Astensione
- 20Non ha votato
- 112A favore
- 0Contro
- 7Astensione
- 17Non ha votato
- 54A favore
- 3Contro
- 12Astensione
- 6Non ha votato
- 6A favore
- 7Contro
- 34Astensione
- 6Non ha votato
- 1A favore
- 32Contro
- 7Astensione
- 6Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 21Contro
- 0Astensione
- 5Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 75Contro
- 8Astensione
- 2Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 37Contro
- 39Astensione
- 4Non ha votato
Membri
Visualizzati 10 di 719
| Nome | Paese | Gruppo | Posizione di voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore |