Votazione al Parlamento europeo

Discarico 2024: bilancio generale dell'UE – Commissione

Daniel Freund – Dopo il § 7 – Emendamento 10
Data: 29.04.2026·Riferimento: A10-0085/2026
Relatore: Daniel Freund

Risultato complessivo

Respinta
  • 200 A favore
  • 433 Contro
  • 16 Astensione
  • 70 Non ha votato
Emendamento— Stai visualizzando una votazione secondaria (emendamento) della votazione principale.Emendamento 10 · Proposta di risoluzione · Presentato da PfEVedi l'emendamento al PE ↗
Testo dell’emendamento

Presentato da Virginie Joron, Julien Sanchez

Aggiunto: 7 a. Deplores the scandal of the President of the Commission purchasing 4.6 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines for EUR 71 billion and ordering an additional 146 million doses in 2024 for an unknown amount, while according to Politico, European countries had already admitted in 2024 that they had discarded 215 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines; - Recalls that the European Commissioner for Health testified before the COVI Special Committee on 27 March 2023 that President Von der Leyen was not involved in any negotiation of a contract for COVID-19 vaccines, contrary to the information published by the New York Times (28 April 2021) and the findings of the European Court of Auditors in its Special Report on the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines; - Recalls that the Commission required certain Members of Parliament, members of the COVI Committee, to sign a confidentiality undertaking on 30 May 2023 without specifying the end date of this confidentiality obligation concerning an allowance paid per dose by Europeans to Pfizer in exchange for the non-delivery of certain doses still to be delivered; - Deplores the persistent lack of transparency on the part of the Commission regarding the agreements it has concluded with the pharmaceutical companies responsible for the production of COVID-19 vaccines or Remdesivir, as well as the SMS communications between the President of the Commission and the CEO of a pharmaceutical company to the point that legal action has damaged the reputation of the Commission, when the President could easily have explained herself before Parliament; - Regrets the Commission’s failure to address the serious side effects of COVID vaccines on victims, particularly concerning medical research and compensation; - Notes that in the Pfizer case, the Court of the European Union (CJEU) ruled on 17 July 2024 that the Commission did not give the public sufficiently broad access to contracts for the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines; - Notes that in the SMS exchanged with Pfizer case, the Court of the European Union (CJEU) ruled on 14 May 2025 that Commission von der Leyen did not provide a plausible explanation to justify the non-possession of the requested documents or why it considered that the text messages exchanged in the context of the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines did not contain substantial information7a; - Is surprised that the Commission’s major financial errors in recent years (COVID vaccine contracts, Remdesivir, variable interest rates for the RFF, carbon tax fraud, etc.) have not been proactively investigated either ex ante or ex post to detect possible complicity or negligence; - Regrets that the Commission keeps prices and contracts secret (even for 2024 contracts) preventing parliamentary scrutiny of contracts; - Notes the extreme slowness of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office in the investigation into the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines and the EPPO’s persistent refusal to answer Members’ questions on the resources dedicated to the investigation or on the timetable or operations carried out complicating Members’ scrutiny of the Commission; - Regrets that the Commission chose to defend Pfizer rather than the Member States (Hungary, Poland, Romania) in the legal dispute between them over the refusal to order vaccine doses that became unnecessary after the end of the pandemic; - Notes that in 2026 Pfizer sought and obtained a judgment on a total of approximately EUR 2 billion from those States; Regrets that the Commission paid EUR 53 million7b to Pfizer in 2024; Regrets that the Commission compensated Pfizer for undelivered and possibly unproduced doses; Regrets that the Commission did not carry out any planned audits within 5 years of the signature of the contracts as long as the documents are available on the quality of the lots, the documentation provided by the manufacturers or other elements; - Requests a follow-up by the Commission in the form of a working group dedicated to the EUR 2 billion penalty imposed by Pfizer on Member States, as well as a final European Court of Auditors (ECA) special report to formally inform Parliament; 7a https://curia.europa.eu/site/upload/docs/application/pdf/2025-05/cp250060fr.pdf 7b https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/belgian-court-orders-poland-romania-buy-22-billion-pfizer-covid-vaccines-2026-04-01/; https://www.euractiv.com/news/hungary-poland-romania-to-face-pfizer-in-brussels-over-covid-vaccine-contracts/

Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese. PE783.213

← Torna alla votazione principale
Stato e procedura

Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.

Votazione del
Ultima fase documentata
Gazzetta ufficiale · (64 giorni fa)
Prossima fase prevista
Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.
Pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale documentata

Svolgimento della procedura

2025/2145(DEC) · DEC

Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.

  1. Documentato: Deferimento85 giorni alla fase successiva
  2. Documentato: Esame in commissione128 giorni alla fase successiva
  3. Documentato: Plenaria19 giorni alla fase successiva
  4. Documentato: Altre attività134 giorni alla fase successiva
  5. Ultimo documentato: Gazzetta ufficiale
Attività documentate (33)
  1. Deferimento alla commissione
  2. Parere della commissione approvato
  3. Parere della commissione approvato
  4. Parere della commissione approvato
  5. Relazione della commissione presentata
  6. Parere della commissione approvato
  7. Parere della commissione approvato
  8. Parere della commissione approvato
  9. Parere della commissione approvato
  10. Parere della commissione approvato
  11. Parere della commissione approvato
  12. Parere della commissione approvato
  13. Parere della commissione approvato
  14. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  15. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  16. Relazione della commissione approvata
  17. Presentazione in plenaria
  18. Presentazione in plenaria
  19. Presentazione in plenaria
  20. Presentazione in plenaria
  21. Presentazione in plenaria
  22. Presentazione in plenaria
  23. Presentazione in plenaria
  24. Presentazione in plenaria
  25. Presentazione in plenaria
  26. Presentazione in plenaria
  27. Presentazione in plenaria
  28. Presentazione in plenaria
  29. Discussione in plenaria
  30. Altra attività documentata
  31. Votazione in plenaria
  32. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
  33. Pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
  1. Discussione in plenaria
  2. Votazione in plenaria

Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:

Fonti

Dati: EP Open Data API

Di cosa si tratta?

  • Discharge granted for EU 2024 budget .
  • Executive agencies and development funds included.
  • Publication in the Official Journal planned.
Fonte: riassunto generato da IA con Mistral

Voto per gruppo politico

Come hanno votato i gruppi politici

Membri

Visualizzati 10 di 719

Posizione di voto
NomePaeseGruppoPosizione di voto
UngheriaPfE
A favore
FranciaPfE
A favore
FranciaPfE
A favore
PoloniaPfE
A favore
PoloniaECR
A favore
FranciaPfE
A favore
ItaliaECR
A favore
Paesi BassiPfE
A favore
SpagnaECR
A favore
ItaliaPfE
A favore
Mostra altro
Seguici su Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en