Votazione al Parlamento europeo
Discarico 2024: bilancio generale dell'UE – Agenzie
Risultato complessivo
Approvata- 475 A favore
- 107 Contro
- 71 Astensione
- 66 Non ha votato
Come contiamo
- I voti Favorevoli, Contrari e Astensione provengono dal verbale di votazione nominale del Parlamento europeo.
- «Non ha votato» è derivato: deputati con mandato nel giorno della votazione per i quali non è stato registrato alcun voto. Le astensioni non contano per questo.
- Le successive correzioni di voto vengono mostrate ma non modificano il risultato ufficiale.
- Ogni votazione (votazione globale, emendamento, votazione parziale) conta separatamente. Per questo i totali possono differire da pagine che contano in modo diverso.
Stato e procedura
Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.
- Votazione del
- Ultima fase documentata
- Gazzetta ufficiale · (64 giorni fa)
- Prossima fase prevista
- Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.
- Pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale documentata
Svolgimento della procedura
2025/2156(DEC) · DEC
Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.
- Documentato: Deferimento
- Documentato: Esame in commissione
- Documentato: Plenaria
- Documentato: Altre attività
- Ultimo documentato: Gazzetta ufficiale
Attività documentate (26)
- Deferimento alla commissione
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Relazione della commissione presentata
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Emendamenti presentati in commissione
- Relazione della commissione approvata
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Discussione in plenaria
- Altra attività documentata
- Votazione in plenaria
- Risultati della votazione in plenaria
- Pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:
Fonti
Dati: EP Open Data API
Di cosa si tratta?
- Discharge granted for 2024 budget execution by EU Parliament.
- Approval of seven EU agencies’ accounts .
- Consideration of Court of Auditors’ reports and Council opinions.
Cronologia degli emendamenti (16)
Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.
Paragraph 11
Presentato da Virginie Joron · PfE
… consultations or opacity remain; highlights that transparent procedures, public disclosure of meetings, Aggiunto: justified, balanced and transparent expert selection, and continuous conflict-of-interest screening Aggiunto: management, decision-makers and entities linked to these agencies, are indispensable to ensure that agency decisions are based solely on objective …
Paragraph 12
Presentato da Virginie Joron · PfE
… in order to avoid creating unnecessary and/or additional administrative burden for agencies; Aggiunto: Calls for full transparency regarding agencies’ interactions with NGOs and interest groups; invites the agencies to systematically publish the list of their meetings with stakeholders not belonging to the Union institutions or the Member States, as well as the contributions received;
Paragraph 19
Presentato da Virginie Joron · PfE
… a reasonable timeframe be terminated, with funds reallocated to more effective measures; Aggiunto: notes, in general, weaknesses in the internal controls and procedures of the agencies, with certain shortcomings leading to avoidable expenditure; calls urgently for a public external audit aimed at proposing strengthened, effective and harmonised internal control rules for the agencies, in order to address deficiencies in internal control systems, conflict-of-interest management, public procurement, HR processes and other areas repeatedly identified by the European Court of Auditors, with the objective of enhancing their professionalism and preventing the recurrence of costly errors, thereby safeguarding the Union’s financial interests;
Paragraph 22
Presentato da Virginie Joron · PfE
… had to pay rent in both London and Amsterdam as a result; Aggiunto: expresses concern that the EMA may be liable for EUR 543 million in respect of the lease of its former premises in London, running until 2039, despite the subletting of those premises to a company that has recently renegotiated the contract downwards; regrets therefore that, at the end of 2024, a provision for an onerous contract of EUR 122.1 million was recognised by the EMA, partially reimbursed by the European Commission; acknowledges that since 2019 several agencies have introduced break-out clauses, but regrets … agencies have done so, including cases where new or renewed leases were
Rimosso: signed;Aggiunto: signed, reflecting a naivete regarding the use of taxpayers’ money from the Member States of the Union; notes that the former EMA building belongs to a property complex partly controlled by a Qatari fund (QIA); regrets the significant legal fees paid by the EMA on this matter when the agency has a legal department; urges agencies and the Commission to systematically introduce break-out clauses when negotiating … lessons learned from past experience, in order to limit financial exposure andRimosso: ensure greater budgetary flexibility;Aggiunto: to prevent any further misuse of taxpayers’ money from the citizens of the Member States of the Union;Paragraph 43 b (new)
Presentato da Virginie Joron · PfE
Aggiunto: 43 b. Recalls that agencies must focus on their core tasks; denounces the intrusion of an ideology promoted by politically left-wing NGOs, supported by the European Commission and increasingly present in recent years; regrets the increase in staff and budget allocated to fundamental rights monitoring at the expense of officers of the standing corps of European Border and Coast Guard Agency, as recalled by its Executive Director in 20242a, thereby at times hindering the Agency in the fulfilment of its core mission; stresses that all Frontex activities and resources must remain focused on border protection, the fight against cross-border crime, the prevention of irregular migration and the effective return of persons not legally entitled to stay; calls for the redeployment of resources to ensure that means are concentrated on essential border management tasks, the continued recruitment of operational frontline staff at the Union's external borders, and the rationalisation of administrative posts; 2a https://fr.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/03/05/nous-ne-sommes-pas-lagence-europeenne-de-sauvetage-souligne-le-directeur-de-frontex
Paragraph 48
Presentato da Virginie Joron · PfE
… invites the internal audit services of the agencies to prioritise procurement reviews; Aggiunto: recalls that, in the context of any public procurement procedure, it is essential to comply with all applicable principles, including transparency, proportionality, equal treatment, non-discrimination and fair competition between tenderers, as well as supply requirements, while prioritising European companies and products and services of European origin over non-European companies (IT softwares, cloud, cyber, open source solutions);
Paragraph 110 a (new)
Presentato da Virginie Joron · PfE
Aggiunto: 110 a. Notes that on March 19, 2026, Dr. Helmut Sterz, former chief toxicologist at Pfizer Europe, testified before the German Parliament's COVID-19 inquiry committee that the carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity of the vaccine had not been properly studied and that, two months after approval, Pfizer had already observed 1,200 suspected deaths in a post-marketing report; he estimates that 60,000 people may have died from the COVID vaccine in Germany; calls on the health agencies EMA, ECDC, and HERA to monitor social media posts and, if they have more compelling arguments, to comment on viral posts so that citizens can form their own opinions;
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Presentato da Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN
Aggiunto: 2 a. Public funding must be strictly linked to measurable outcomes and concrete policy delivery; financing advocacy activities risks blurring the line between policy implementation and political influence, which is not compatible with sound financial management; strongly opposes the creation of new EU agencies, and calls for a review of existing ones;
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Presentato da Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN
Aggiunto: 13 a. notes with concern the steady increase in the staffing levels of the Union’s agencies; points out that any increase in staffing levels must be justified by a clearly demonstrated operational need and by measurable results in order to avoid any budgetary overspending;
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Presentato da Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN
Aggiunto: 19 a. points out that the lack of clear and harmonised performance indicators can mask inefficiencies in the use of public funds;
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Presentato da Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN
Aggiunto: 19 b. considers that continuing with activities that have not proven their effectiveness constitutes an inefficient use of public resources;
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Presentato da Dick Erixon, Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza, Cristian Terheş · ECR
Aggiunto: 1 a. Considers that the current practice of adopting a single discharge resolution covering almost all decentralised agencies and other bodies, whose combined budget exceeds EUR 4,1 billion and whose staff exceeds 11 491 persons, structurally limits Parliament's ability to exercise meaningful scrutiny over individual agencies; stresses that each agency and body has a distinct mandate, budget and performance record that warrants a dedicated political assessment; calls, therefore, for future discharge procedures to provide for individual resolutions per agency, enabling targeted political accountability and more informed budgetary decisions;
Paragraph 24
Presentato da Dick Erixon, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Cristian Terheş · ECR
… controls, staffing and absorption planning to avoid irregularities, carryovers, and ineffective spending; Aggiunto: stresses that any additional resources for agencies must be accompanied by measurable performance targets and regular reporting on the concrete outcomes achieved, so that the discharge authority can assess value for money; insists that before additional funding is approved, agencies must first demonstrate that existing resources are being deployed efficiently;
Paragraph 33
Presentato da Dick Erixon, Kristoffer Storm, Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza +4 · ECR
33. Notes the progressive expansion of
Rimosso: Europol’sAggiunto: Europol's mandate, including recently adopted and proposed measures conferring enhanced capacities to combat … the effective implementation of those additional tasks requires a corresponding increase inRimosso: Europol’sAggiunto: Europol's human resources, but also robust internal safeguards, sufficient compliance capacity and strengthened supervisory mechanisms; observes, thatRimosso: Europol’sAggiunto: Europol's budget increased by 5,78 % in 2024 compared to 2023; urges thatRimosso: Europol’sAggiunto: Europol's budget be further reinforced in order to address persistent staffing shortages and … ensure that its financial resources are commensurate with its expanding responsibilities; stressesRimosso: Europol’sAggiunto: that Europol's key role in combating migrant smuggling, traffickingRimosso: in human beings,Aggiunto: cross-border organised crime and terrorism is of the highest priority and these core tasks should take precedence over less urgent priorities elsewhere; underlines that Frontex must concentrate its resources on its core operational tasks, namely supporting Member States in protecting the external border of the Schengen area, combating cross-border crime and terrorism; underlines that Frontex should focus onRimosso: core operations; and welcomes Frontex’s ongoing efforts to strengthen its Fundamental Rights Officer;Aggiunto: its core tasks;Paragraph 33 a (new)
Presentato da Dick Erixon, Kristoffer Storm, Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza +4 · ECR
Aggiunto: 33 a. Stresses that the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) must concentrate its resources on its core operational tasks, namely border surveillance of the Schengen area, combating cross-border crime and supporting effective return operations, which are essential to maintaining a credible migration management framework for the Union; calls for the continued prioritisation of frontline recruitment at the Union's external borders and for a corresponding streamlining of administrative posts; notes that the overall Union return rate remains insufficient in relation to the scale of illegal migration flows; urges Frontex to further strengthen its return operations and to intensify cooperation with Member States and third countries to improve the effectiveness of return programmes;
Paragraph 33 b (new)
Presentato da Dick Erixon, Nicolas Bay, Charlie Weimers +2 · ECR
Aggiunto: 33 b. Notes with grave concern the public statement by the Executive Director of Frontex Hans Leijtens that 'To put it bluntly, nothing can stop people from crossing a border, no wall, no fence, no sea, no river'1a; expresses grave concern that these types of statements dilute Frontex's core mandate, which is to protect the Union's external borders and to prevent illegal border crossings; recalls that, under the former Executive Director, Frontex adopted a more operationally assertive approach to border protection, which was systematically undermined by institutional pressure from the Commission and NGO-driven advocacy; stresses that Frontex's budget, financed by Union taxpayers, must be directed towards effective border protection, combating migrant smuggling and supporting return operations, not towards an expanded mandate in migration management or fundamental rights that blurs the line between border protection and facilitation of illegal entries; 1a https://brusselssignal.eu/2024/01/head-of-frontex-nothing-can-stop-people-from-crossing-a-border/
Voto per gruppo politico
Come hanno votato i gruppi politici
- 66A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 11Non ha votato
- 123A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 12Non ha votato
- 162A favore
- 0Contro
- 3Astensione
- 20Non ha votato
- 45A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 8Non ha votato
- 41A favore
- 1Contro
- 2Astensione
- 2Non ha votato
- 6A favore
- 63Contro
- 6Astensione
- 10Non ha votato
- 10A favore
- 5Contro
- 12Astensione
- 3Non ha votato
- 22A favore
- 11Contro
- 48Astensione
- 0Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 27Contro
- 0Astensione
- 0Non ha votato
Membri
Visualizzati 10 di 719
| Nome | Paese | Gruppo | Posizione di voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore |