Vote au Parlement européen

Modifications au règlement intérieur du Parlement mettant en œuvre la réforme parlementaire "Parlement 2024"

Salvatore De Meo - Après le § 56 - Am 120
Date: 10.04.2024·Référence: A9-0158/2024
Rapporteur: Salvatore De Meo

Résultat global

Rejeté
  • 155 Pour
  • 419 Contre
  • 38 Abstention
  • 93 N'a pas voté
Amendement— Vous consultez un sous-vote (amendement) du vote principal.Amendement 120 · Déposé par Verts/ALEVoir l'amendement au PE ↗
Texte de l’amendement

Déposé par Damian Boeselager

Ajouté: Rule 56a Budgetary assessment on proposals for legally binding acts with budgetary implications 1. Without prejudice to the application of Rule 48, where a proposal for a legally binding act has implications for the Union budget, that proposal shall be referred by the President to the committee responsible for budgetary issues. That committee shall then issue a budgetary assessment of the proposal if it deems it appropriate or if so requested by the committee responsible for the subject-matter. This paragraph is without prejudice to the possibility for the committee responsible for budgetary issues to be authorised to submit opinions pursuant to Rule 56 or to act jointly with one or more committees pursuant to Rule 58. 2. The committee responsible for the subject-matter shall set a deadline within which the budgetary assessment is to be provided. Any changes to the announced timetable shall be immediately communicated to the committee responsible for budgetary issues. The committee responsible for the subject-matter shall not adopt its report before that deadline has expired. 3. In the budgetary assessment, the committee responsible for budgetary issues shall examine whether the proposal for a legally binding act provides for sufficient financial and human resources, and evaluate the potential impact of the financing proposed on other Union programmes or policies. It shall also determine whether the proposal is compatible with the multiannual financial framework, the system of own resources and the corresponding interinstitutional agreement, as well as the budgetary principles as laid down in the Financial Regulation. Where applicable, the committee responsible for budgetary issues shall also determine whether the proposal is compatible with Parliament’s position on any proposal to amend or replace that framework, that system, that agreement or those principles. 4. The budgetary assessment shall consist of an evaluation of the aspects of the proposal for a legally-binding act referred to in paragraph 3. The budgetary assessment may, where appropriate, also contain amendments to that proposal covering exclusively those aspects referred to in paragraph 3. Amendments on those aspects by the committee responsible for the subject-matter shall be inadmissible. The budgetary assessment, including the amendments, shall be integrated into the report as such. 5. Where a budgetary assessment is provided, the committee responsible for the subject-matter and the committee responsible for budgetary issues shall cooperate throughout the procedure to ensure full consistency between policy and budgetary objectives. To this end, they shall invite each other’s rapporteurs to their discussions within Parliament relating to the proposal for a legally binding act, including to the meetings between the rapporteurs and shadow rapporteurs. 6. Where a budgetary assessment is provided, the negotiating team referred to in Rule 74(1) shall include the rapporteur from the committee responsible for budgetary issues who shall lead the negotiations on the issues referred to in paragraph 3. Where a budgetary assessment is not provided, the committee responsible for the subject-matter may ask the committee responsible for budgetary issues to provide assistance to the negotiating team referred to in Rule 74(1) in relation to the aspects referred to in paragraph 3 at any stage of the interinstitutional negotiations.

Texte tel que publié par le PE, en anglais. PE760.542

← Retour au vote principal
Statut et procédure

Résultat tel qu'enregistré par le Parlement européen.

Vote du
Dernière étape documentée
Plénière · (il y a 963 jours)
Prochaine étape prévue
Aucune autre étape n'est prévue dans la source.

Déroulement de la procédure

2024/2000(REG) · REG

Activités documentées de la procédure. Elles ne prouvent pas qu’une loi est entrée en vigueur.

  1. Documenté: Examen en commission3 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  2. Documenté: Renvoi44 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  3. Documenté: Examen en commission5 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  4. Dernier documenté: Plénière963 jours depuis le début de cette étape
Activités documentées (6)
  1. Dépôt du rapport en commission
  2. Renvoi en commission
  3. Adoption du rapport en commission
  4. Dépôt en séance plénière
  5. Vote en séance plénière
  6. Résultats du vote en séance plénière
Activités prévues (réalisation non confirmée)
  1. Vote en séance plénière

Fiche de procédure (OEIL) · Données du Parlement européen
Consulté le:

Sources

Données : EP Open Data API

Vote par groupe politique

Comment les groupes politiques ont voté

Les membres

Montrer 10 de 705

Position de vote
NomPaysGroupePosition de vote
SuèdeGreens/EFA
Pour
AllemagneGreens/EFA
Pour
AllemagneNI
Pour
AllemagneRenew
Pour
PologneEPP
Pour
FranceGreens/EFA
Pour
FranceEPP
Vote prévuContreVote émis : Pour
BelgiqueNI
Pour
LituanieEPP
Pour
AllemagneGreens/EFA
Pour
Afficher plus
Suivez-nous sur Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en