Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Informe de 2025 de la Comisión sobre Macedonia del Norte

Thomas Waitz - Propuesta de Resolución (conjunto del texto)
Fecha: 17.06.2026·Referencia: A10-0162/2026
Ponente: Thomas Waitz

Resultado general

Aprobada
  • 411 A favor
  • 120 En contra
  • 120 Abstención
  • 68 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Pleno · (hace 157 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2025/2254(INI) · INI

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Remisión56 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Examen en comisión117 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Último documentado: Pleno157 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (11)
  1. Remisión a comisión
  2. Presentación del informe en comisión
  3. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  4. Presentación al pleno
  5. Presentación al pleno
  6. Presentación al pleno
  7. Presentación al pleno
  8. Presentación al pleno
  9. Debate en el pleno
  10. Votación en el pleno
  11. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Debate en el pleno
  2. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

¿De qué se trata?

  • Macedonia del Norte candidata a la UE desde 2005 con 71 % de apoyo ciudadano.
  • Exigencia de reformas constitucionales para abrir negociaciones de adhesión.
  • Crítica a los déficits del Estado de derecho y los esfuerzos anticorrupción en Macedonia del Norte.
Fuente: Resumen generado por IA con Mistral

Historial de enmiendas (8)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 3Rechazada

    Paragraph 73

    Presentada por Thomas Waitz · Verts/ALE

    Eliminado: 73. Strongly urges the Joint Multidisciplinary Expert Commission on Historical and Educational Issues of Bulgaria and North Macedonia, established as a result of the Treaty of Friendship, Good-neighbourliness and Cooperation with Bulgaria, to achieve clear and tangible results; underlines that the texts should reflect the interpretation of historical facts and figures from the common history of both peoples based on objective, authentic and evidence-based historical sources and documents, scientific interpretation and historical events, as stipulated in the second protocol to the Treaty with Bulgaria; Añadido: deleted

  2. Enmienda 5Rechazada

    Citation 4

    Presentada por Stanislav Stoyanov · ESN

    – having regard Añadido: to the negotiating framework for North Macedonia approved by the Council on 18 July 2022 and to the Council conclusions of 18 July 2022 on Enlargement – North …

  3. Enmienda 6Aprobada

    Recital J a (new)

    Presentada por Ivaylo Valchev · ECR

    Añadido: Ja. whereas finding a common approach to communicating and engaging with the past and establishing a culture of remembrance in a mutually respectful way is the foundation on which Bulgaria and North Macedonia should build their future relationship; whereas the relationship between the future generations of North Macedonia and Bulgaria will be a reflection of the education processes in the two countries;

  4. Enmienda 7Rechazada

    Paragraph 2

    Presentada por Ivaylo Valchev · ECR

    … essential when aligning national legislation with the EU acquis throughout the negotiations; Añadido: notes with regret that North Macedonia has lost precious time and momentum in its EU accession process, while some other candidate countries have made significant progress towards EU accession;

  5. Enmienda 8Rechazada

    Paragraph 7

    Presentada por Ivaylo Valchev · ECR

    … closing of accession negotiations as major political milestones in the enlargement process; Eliminado: reiterates its call to enhance the EU’s capacity to act through simplified processes, such as the use of qualified majority voting in the intermediate steps in the enlargement process, fully in line with the Treaties;

  6. Enmienda 9Aprobada

    Paragraph 38 a (new)

    Presentada por Ivaylo Valchev · ECR

    Añadido: 38a. Commends the Government of North Macedonia for its rapid response to the antisemitic arson attack targeting a Jewish community building in Skopje on 12 April 2026; recalls that this is not the first arson attack against an ethnic community in the country, as in June 2022 the Bulgarian Cultural Club in Bitola was subjected to arson; calls for any future hate-motivated crimes to be met with the same level of swift and determined action to hold the perpetrators accountable;

  7. Enmienda 9Rechazada

    Paragraph 38 a (new)

    Presentada por Ivaylo Valchev · ECR

    Añadido: 38a. Commends the Government of North Macedonia for its rapid response to the antisemitic arson attack targeting a Jewish community building in Skopje on 12 April 2026; recalls that this is not the first arson attack against an ethnic community in the country, as in June 2022 the Bulgarian Cultural Club in Bitola was subjected to arson; calls for any future hate-motivated crimes to be met with the same level of swift and determined action to hold the perpetrators accountable;

  8. Enmienda 10Rechazada

    Paragraph 76 a (new)

    Presentada por Ivaylo Valchev · ECR

    Añadido: 76a. Expresses serious concern about the refusal by the authorities of North Macedonia to accept the offer of emergency energy assistance from Bulgaria at a time of declared energy crisis in the region; underlines that energy security in the Western Balkans is of strategic importance for regional stability, economic resilience and the well-being of citizens, and stresses that it must not be used as a tool in political disputes or be held hostage to short-term political considerations; calls for constructive, pragmatic and depoliticised cooperation in the field of energy, in line with the principles of solidarity and good neighbourly relations underpinning the EU accession process;

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 719

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
FranciaRenew
A favor
RumaníaEPP
A favor
Países BajosS&D
A favor
ItaliaS&D
A favor
EspañaS&D
A favor
EslovaquiaEPP
A favor
ItaliaS&D
A favor
PoloniaS&D
A favor
EspañaS&D
A favor
AlemaniaEPP
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en